The Twilight Saga: Breaking DawnHey Twilight fans, here’s a sneak peek of what you can expect to see in Breaking Dawn Part 1, due in theaters this November. Bella (Kristen Stewart) has decided to not to become a vampire just yet and so when she marries Edward (Robert Pattinson), she's able to still be a blushing bride. (For those of you new to Twilight, vampires aren't capable of blushing). Enjoy this quick clip from the wedding you've all been waiting for -- it looks like it's going to be quite the event!

Share this story:

You Might Also Like:

More news: , , ,


17 Comments so far

  1. Linda on June 3, 2011 10:24 AM

    That was just sad.....

  2. Christie on June 3, 2011 11:37 AM

    Beautiful. Can't wait to see it!

  3. Rose on June 3, 2011 12:52 PM

    cant wait! --

  4. ash on June 3, 2011 1:14 PM

    cannot wait!! so exciting

  5. Germain on June 3, 2011 2:11 PM

    Stop the madness, this movie does not make any sense. He's like 80 years old in love with a stupid teenager, where does this make any sense? Aside from her tight ass and cute smile, how would he be attracted to her? She can't act, the plot is stupid and the action is sporatic.

  6. kenny on June 3, 2011 2:35 PM

    lol someones pessimistic

  7. Jessica on June 3, 2011 3:01 PM

    LOL! I do kind of agree with Germain, though my opinion comes from the books and my distaste for the story line more so then the acting, ect.

  8. Christie on June 3, 2011 3:20 PM

    He's a 100+ year old who was frozen in time as a 17 year old. I was reading the Twilight guide by Stephenie Myer and vampires can get more educated and wiser, but they don't get older in the same way humans do. He's never had a girlfriend and he's a virgin. Bella is a wise-beyond-her-years teen (she's 19 when she marries) who basically raised her emotionally immature mother. In the books, she cooks for her father every night and when she's not home, makes sure there's something prepared for his dinner. She's an unselfish teen who gives more than she takes and that's why they fall in love; they're two souls on the same path who were meant to be together. He says in the first book that in the 80 years he's been a vampire, he was sure he'd never meet someone he would fall in love with and now he realizes that's because she wasn't born yet. He had to wait 80 years to find her. And besides, when she's been on the earth 300 years and him for 400+, no one will know the dif anyway. :)

  9. Chris on June 3, 2011 5:33 PM

    Fans of the book need to be honest with themselves and just admit that these films absolutely suck and don't capture any of the emotion that the book had.

    My girlfriends honest.

  10. Jo-Anne on June 4, 2011 12:19 PM

    she prob likes his tight ass and cute smile too....

  11. Germain on June 4, 2011 12:19 PM

    @Christie ARE YOU JOKING!!! You are actually trying to analyse a vampire's needs and state of mind? You know it's only a book/movie right and doesn't really exist? Rationalize it any way you want just for the movie to make sense does not make it seem more realistic in the least.

  12. Nessa on June 4, 2011 3:39 PM

    Honestly, I liked Breaking Dawn the most out of the four books because it actually had a plot and subplots and character developement. The book that sucked the most was New Moon. I've never read anything that sucked that much. Honestly, I've read better book series than this. A LOT better, even ones made for teenagers. (ie. The Nick Chronicles by Sherrilyn Kenyon) But the cheesiness of it all is what grabs teenage girls. That and the half naked guys all the time. Why do think there was so much skin in the New Moon movie? Because there was no story whatsoever and they had to make it better somehow.

  13. Chris on June 4, 2011 10:16 PM

    This will be perfect for hopeless romantics. Some of us still believe in true love and soul mates

  14. John on June 5, 2011 2:22 PM

    Greatest. Trailer. Ever. 16 seconds. Wow.

  15. Melody on June 5, 2011 4:42 PM

    the only reason he likes her is because he cant read her thats the only reason, ohh and her obession with him is pathetic.

  16. Christie on June 6, 2011 9:48 AM

    @Germain, no doofus, I'm not trying to analyse Edward, I'm explaining what the writer of the books says about him and what you would already know about him if you took the time to educate yourself by reading the books. But no, you want to give your uninformed opinion without having read them and criticize someone who has and is explaining what's in them. I don't really care if you think the movies or the books make sense - to me and millions of other fans, they not only make sense but are a top notch form of entertainment. If you don't like them, I doubt very much Stephenie Meyers gives a rat's ass about one close minded skeptic who's a guy -- and neither do I.

  17. Germain on June 7, 2011 2:09 PM

    Yeah OK, skeptical about what, vampires? yes I am.

Name (required)

Email (required)


Speak your mind

View all Celebrity News & Gossip

Search News Archive