| B.L. You star
in Willard as a man who connects with rats and you have actually
written a novel about rats. So what is it with you and rats?
C.G. I happen to have a copy of the book with me right here. It’s
a book called Rat Catching and it’s actually illustrated.
I published this in 1987 and I made it in 1984. It was an old text
that I found without any images in it but I put a whole bunch of
drawings and images in with it and rearranged and rewrote it into
something else. When I first made it, I didn’t actually plan
on publishing it, but it led me on to another career so to speak.
I have three more books in print that I am very proud of.
B.L. And all of these are
available at bookstores under Crispin Glover?
C.G. If people look up my name in the telephone book in Los Angeles
or call 411 there is a number that they can call to find out how
to get them. There are also various ways of finding out how to get
them through the Internet as well.
B.L. So back to the rat question.
Have you always been interested in them?
C.G. Well no, not really. It’s just a coincidence. My Rat
Catching book just happens to have been the first one I published,
but my other books have no rats in them. I have nothing against
rats. I have always thought that they were nice creatures.
B.L. So it didn’t creep
you out at all to be working with them for the film?
C.G. Oh no, not at all! They were really well trained and I was
glad of it because I had a lot of intense and sad, emotional things
I had to play and I had to concentrate a lot during those scenes.
In real life I’m not a very tearful person, but there was
a lot of emotion in this movie and I wanted to make sure that it
felt real and true. The fact that these rats were trained so well
was important because it required a lot of concentration. I was
amazed how well trained they were. They’d play on cue every
time!
B.L. That is absolutely wild!
C.G. Oh yeah, they were really good. Better than some actors I’ve
worked with. (laughs)
B.L There’s a lot of
talk that Willard is a bit of a mix between The Birds and
Psycho.
C.G. Yes, the director and writer Glenn Morgan showed us those films
and I had of course seen them before but it was nice that we got
to see them. I actually wasn’t thinking about that so much
while making it but I’m sure the director was thinking about
it a lot.
B.L. I really thought that
you were so perfect in this role. Was it something that you thought
about doing even before you were approached to do it?
C.G. No, not at all. I had never seen the original film. I was aware
of it, but initially when I heard about the idea it really appealed
to me. It sounded like a good role, I read it and it was really
well written with interesting psychology and I wanted to do it right
away. It’s actually one of my favorite parts that I have gotten
to do.
B.L. Is it? Because you have
had some really diverse roles.
C.G. Yah, you’re right but this one is definitely up there.
There are three or four roles that I really liked that I have played
but this is the best.
B.L. So, spill the beans.
What are the other ones that you really liked?
C.G. I liked one role that was in a very small film that hardly
anyone has seen called The Orkly Kid it’s only a
half hour long and I made it when I was 19. I liked The River’s
Edge quite a lot, I’m proud of that film. Those two films
I like a lot and then there are other characters that I have played
that I enjoyed. I always have to wait to comment about films like
Willard, I don’t know how I’ll feel about it,
say in a year or so. I do feel good about my performance and I think
that there are interesting things in the film and what I’m
getting from people that it’s a movie that makes you think
and talk about afterwards. I really like when there is some thought
involved and not to have to just think about what’s being
dictated to you on the screen.
|