Anderson wants to retire

By Alexandra Heilbron on November 29, 2007 | 24 Comments


Pamela AndersonPamela Anderson wants to retire within the next five years—and settle down in Canada. Newly married to Rick Salomon, the ex-Baywatch babe tells USA Today, “I get offers to do movies and TV all the time. I say no to everything. Drives my agent crazy.” She’s currently sharing a Las Vegas stage with magician Hans Klok in The Beauty of Magic, but complains, “I’m lazy. I don’t want to work. I want to be with my kids. So I just fly in from L.A., do a few days of shows and go back home. Five more years of [T&A] and I’ll go back to Canada. I’ve got some land. It’ll be time.”



Comments & Discussion

  1. Bob • November 29, 2007 @ 4:11 PM

    You can take the girl out of the country….
    Pam…you never really left. Van Isle would be happy to see you come back full time.

  2. Nancy • November 29, 2007 @ 4:46 PM

    I, I, I……you are married now..again….shouldn’t it be we, we, we? What does your husband think of moving here to Canada or are you going to divorce him too? Your kids should be pretty much grown up in 5 years.

  3. Anonymous • November 29, 2007 @ 7:26 PM

    Pam wants to retire? Don’t you have to actually have had to work to retire? Nothing she has ever done even resembled work.

  4. Arnold • November 29, 2007 @ 9:49 PM

    She could just stand there in her bikini and that would be fine with most of us.

  5. Fart NOW • November 30, 2007 @ 8:10 AM

    Retiring will give her more time to get married…and married…and married…and married…

  6. Nancy • November 30, 2007 @ 9:13 AM

    What YOU talkin’ bout Arnold?? LOL.

  7. theresa • November 30, 2007 @ 12:25 PM

    Pam is getting up there and the blond bimbo roles dont keep roling in for women after 40, her face is starting to look like Joan Rivers, so its best to retire, and keep a quite life.

    PS Didnt she just complete a movie? Of course she did and you will see her promoting it I am sure from wherever she resides.

    People who love the spotlight and cheers wont retire forever as their ego wont allow it too.

    This is a temporary move to later than promote the upcoming action film she has coming out,..

    Unless of course it was released already and nobody saw her “great”acting,…

    Direct to DVD?

  8. Nancy • November 30, 2007 @ 12:43 PM

    Like musicians and the rest of Hollywood….you don’t retire…….you fade away!!!

  9. Tawny • November 30, 2007 @ 4:42 PM

    Pamela is a lovely woman and has done as much for the world as most of you. Get real! A vegetarian with a fabulous sense of humour. I wish her the best and always enjoy her efforts in anything she does.

  10. You Can Fart If You Want To • November 30, 2007 @ 4:59 PM

    “Pamela Anderson come on down! You’re the next contestant on Dancing with the Stars!!!”

  11. Gina • November 30, 2007 @ 7:48 PM

    Better yet, The Surreal Life. haha

  12. Gina • November 30, 2007 @ 9:22 PM

    More like a vegetable with a sense of humor. Keep her in the USA, don’t need any brain dead here in Canada.

  13. Anonymous • November 30, 2007 @ 11:58 PM

    When she left Canada she certainly was not part of that brain drain we hear about!

  14. Hairy Kim • December 1, 2007 @ 2:27 AM

    “Keep her in the USA, don��t need any brain dead here in Canada.”

    Last I checked, Stephen Harper is still PM…

  15. Gina • December 1, 2007 @ 2:36 AM

    “Last I checked, Stephen Harper is still PM��”

    LOL!

  16. Anonymous • December 1, 2007 @ 3:31 PM

    Yeah, Stephen is still the PM but nobody ever said you had to be intelligent to be a politician. That’s why they do it – their skill is knowing how to manipulate the system and have everyone do their work for them.

    Pam, on the other hand, has a whole contingent (like Arnold) who salivate over any morsel they can get from her.

    Both brainless wonders, but its the way they work it that makes the difference.

  17. me • December 3, 2007 @ 2:11 PM

    “Five more years of T&A & I’ll go back to Canada”??? What’s she mean by “T&A”??? And as for her hubby coming to Canada with her, do you really believe they’ll still be together by then? Not a chance. Better chance of Harper getting re-elected!!!

  18. Nancy • December 3, 2007 @ 8:00 PM

    I know. That’s why I said – or are you going to divorce him too? Also, it does not matter who gets elected……they are all full of sh*t!!!

  19. Anonymous • December 4, 2007 @ 1:10 AM

    So true, so true. And they wonder why there’s such a thing as voter apathy!

  20. Nancy • December 4, 2007 @ 10:40 AM

    I don’t even WASTE my time going to vote anymore. I mean, it is just a wate of time, gas, wear and tear on my vehicle….and for what? A bag of sh*t!!!!

  21. Anonymous • December 4, 2007 @ 1:04 PM

    You’re not alone in that sentiment. Between all of the politicians (federal, provincial and municipal) they may share a single brain cell.
    Not much of a think tank going on there.

    I guess we have to give Pamela credit for something. At least she doesn’t share her single brain cell with anyone else. (Her body, on the other hand, is another matter!)

  22. me • December 4, 2007 @ 3:04 PM

    I still vote, every time. Not sure why though, it is a waste of time. I like to vote for the “regular guys” whenever I have a chance, I hate voting for so called professionals! They were born with a silver spoon in their mouths, and don’t have any idea what it’s like to be a “regular joe”. I just wonder what’s going to happen to our country.
    Oh yeah, Pamela Anderson…I almost forgot.

  23. Anonymous • December 4, 2007 @ 10:12 PM

    You vote because of Pamela Anderson? I’ve never seen her name on a ballot. What party does she run to? Sorry, that’s for, what party does she run for?

    HAHAHAHA!

  24. me • December 5, 2007 @ 10:00 PM

    Yeah, if she was on a ballot, I’d tear it up. Remember when she wanted to have a serious talk with the PM about the seal hunt? HE wouldn’t even waste his time on her!


Join The Conversation:


 Change Location