Angelina Jolie doesn’t believe in fidelity

Angelina Jolie believes an open relationship can work equally as well as a monogamous union. According to FemaleFirst, the actress doesn’t think loyalty is an essential part of a harmonious relationship. Brad Pitt‘s partner and the mother of their six children believes an open relationship can be successful if both parties agree to the circumstances. “I doubt that fidelity is absolutely essential for a relationship. It’s worse to leave your partner and talk badly about him afterwards. Neither Brad nor I have ever claimed that living together means to be chained together. We make sure that we never restrict each other,” confessed the actress. Jolie, 34, met Pitt in 2005 on the set of their film, Mr. and Mrs. Smith, when he was still married to Jennifer Aniston. ~Patricia Gougeon

Share this article:

Comments & Discussion

  1. Nancy • December 30, 2009 @ 1:32 PM

    As long as “both parties agree to the circumstances” then it is their business. I, personally, am not like that and couldn’t live like that but, I also wouldn’t stand for someone to cheat on me either.

  2. ugh • December 30, 2009 @ 4:16 PM

    LOL… so both Brad and Angelina are dipping/being dipped in the ocean.

  3. Johnny • December 30, 2009 @ 5:13 PM

    Judging on Angelina’s comments she is bascially admitting to being one of the unknown women who has slept with Tiger. Love it!

  4. mandee • December 30, 2009 @ 5:32 PM

    lmfao hahaha youre hilarious johnny.

    actually, i have kind of thought that way as well though. its hard to be with the same person for the rest of your life, sometimes it gets boring, causes you to fight etc. as long as i could be certain they would come back to me at the end of the night and were safe, i would probably agree to this.

  5. ugh • December 30, 2009 @ 5:37 PM

    and you’d catch some STI’s and give it to your loved one for sure

  6. mandee • December 30, 2009 @ 6:26 PM

    thats not true. if you practice safe sex and dont just sleep with everyone then you could manage to do it without stds/stis

  7. demigod • December 30, 2009 @ 6:50 PM

    Wow..a woman I can relate to 🙂 I can see why Brad loves her.

  8. tributegirl • December 30, 2009 @ 6:55 PM

    I wonder if Brad is in agreement to this?

  9. puttputt • December 30, 2009 @ 7:38 PM

    plow as much as you can, long as they know about it, the world will be a better place and there will be less domestic violence cough cough woods/brown

  10. Rita • December 31, 2009 @ 4:18 AM

    “actually, i have kind of thought that way as well though. its hard to be with the same person for the rest of your life, sometimes it gets boring, causes you to fight etc. as long as i could be certain they would come back to me at the end of the night and were safe, i would probably agree to this.”

    Yes, it would be hard to stay with one person all of your adult life once married, but nowadays there is TONS and TONS of things to do. There is So Much variety in inventions that there is not enough time in each day, to do everything you Want to do. I find when I have extra time on my hands and I start something usually I can’t finish what I’m doing. Too much to do that comes up that you need to do! I’ve thought of the “bored of your partner” part…but its what you make it. There is So Much to do and see, so why would you get bored to much? Well, if get bored both people could always go away somewhere for a break or just go out at night an extra night away from their partner and go somewhere with their friends.

    Well, everyone on this Planet has arguments or lively discussions but thats because its the lack of respect/can’t understand each other unintentionally/don’t want to listen to the other partner because one person thinks they know better or more than the other person/or they were abused emotionally/they were brought up different b/c they had different parents who may or may not have taught them right from wrong.

    Theres varying degrees of right and wrong that children are taught. I was taught about telling the truth All the time. Also morals I was taught. Did my Family live up to those morals. Some did and some didn’t. That Doesn’t mean I am going to copy them . No, because I know whats right and wrong. I copied the good, Not the bad they did, if I wanted to do the good they did.

    I just heard a star saying: Now I have found that my motivation is to be Good.

    Yes, they sure would come back to you alright. Yes, some may come back but there is No Hope in heaven or “hell”(as the saying goes), that Anyone can say for Asolute Certainty that their partner will come back… just look around the world and you’ll see the consequences of having an “open” relationship…. at anytime he could find someone that might convince him to leave you. There are too many problems that are caused by Not making a Relationship Sacred. Just go on the internet and search and look around at all the Women that have been cheated on and then there are all the messy divorces, EVEN THAT INVOLVE CHILDREN. Plus he may start spending less and less time with you and you Wouldn’t deserve that.

  11. Thibz • December 31, 2009 @ 7:15 AM

    Simple solution here is….If you want to experiment be single and do it without the strain of having another companion to complicate relations your having with multiple women/men.
    If you truely love someone(if theres such a thing) then commit to that person only when you know that this is the one and your not having thoughts of others. Looking at someone and finding them attractive is normal and in the human nature, but going out and having relations with another while with someone is 9 times out of 10 bound to backfire in your face! even if its an open relationship because again its human nature to get jelous when one spends more time with someone else or commits more to another. Eventually you loose sight of who you really care about and this creates fights which creates break ups or divorce which will happen with Brad and Angelina eventually.

  12. David • December 31, 2009 @ 11:15 AM

    “mother of their six children”
    … “met Pitt in 2005 ”

    I am still stuck on the math here…

    But “open relationship”… OK – who is Brad gonna
    find that is better looking? Hotter? Yeah Ok.

    That is a stacked deck.
    Angelina know the odds on that one.
    She is a smart cookie.


  13. ugh • December 31, 2009 @ 3:06 PM

    I think Mandee needs to attend a sex-ed class again… she obviously missed the part that said condoms were not 100% effective all of the time.

    and I guess the only thing touching must be the genitals, because anything from scratching and biting (people dig that, you know) to kissing can get you something unexpected.

  14. susan • December 31, 2009 @ 7:59 PM

    I would be surprised if Brad is in agreement with this. He seems more grounded and traditional than this way of thinking….of course after seeing him in various interview I have come to the conclusion that he does not have much of a personality or much subtance to him, i think he is maulable…he is also not good looking….how he came to be such a sex symbol is a mystery to me. I don’t always get white beauty right away…sometimes its acquired over time, but I have never been able to acquire a taste for brad and angies so called good lucks and I have put on my glasses and squinted my eyes really hard trying to see the physical beauty in these two, but to no avail…I do see that angie, weird as she is, has an inner glow/beauty, but the physical eludes me…that is why their natural children are plain looking..anyway, i strayed from the point here…angie is a weird one….brad not so weird and i would be surprised if he is in agreement on this ,but i believe angie is the leader and he the follower..somehow i am not sure if he is going to follow her down this road….if angie did say this, i give their relationship about 3 more years…but angie does love him though….

  15. mandee • January 1, 2010 @ 12:22 AM

    rita – someone elses “right” may not be YOUR “right” but that doesnt make it “wrong”. i have morals, i do good things not bad and i still see nothing wrong with an open relationship as long as both partners are ready and willing.

    Thibz – i like your comment a lot. and i agree to a point, although i still see nothing wrong if both participants are willing.

    ugh – no need to be so rude about my opinion. i am very well aware that condoms dont work 100% of the time thanks. doesnt change my opinion. what about the single people or the unmarried people of the world? do you believe they should never meet anyone or ever have sex because its POSSIBLE they COULD get an STD/STI/pregnant? or do you think its only married men and women this applies to?

    susuan – no children are ever plain looking. they are always all cute and adorable. also, im not sure what their childrens looks have to do with the article?

  16. Alexander • January 1, 2010 @ 10:05 AM

    The problem is when people are unfaithful, that means they are not loyal. Who wants to be with someone who is not loyal to you, who is sharing intimate parts of their life with someone else. If you think that’s okay for you, then you must not hold yourself in high esteem. Or you don’t really care about the other person, you think more highly of pleasing yourself.

    As for morals, mandee, where did you get your morals from? Who decides what’s immoral and what is not? You? Because your statement (“I see nothing wrong with an open relationship”) makes you, in my eyes, immoral. Things are most definitely right and wrong but if you have no moral background or guidance on which to base that, then everything could possibly be right or wrong, depending on your situation in life at the time and your emotions. That’s a dangerous way to live. For the people around you and your own emotional health. As a man, if I met a woman whose morals were so flimsy, I would steer clear of her.

  17. Non monogamy works • January 1, 2010 @ 12:32 PM

    I am non monogamous and I see there are a lot of close minded people replying to this obviously without proper information. There are people out that actually give in to their true animal nature, yes even though we are human we are still animals and animals are non monogamous we are just conditioned by society to be monogamous with someone that we love, get married and have kids. I do not wish to have a part of that lifestyle and before anyone says anything about that I was raised correctly this is just how I feel. I have always been this way and can commit to one person emotionally and I do, I am in love but I have the need to be with other people. I do not find this unsettling I find it natural and I know many other people like me and I know some poly people as well. We are all comfortable, most but not all are safe. Let me define safe for you, safe means questioning a potential sexual partner on their current and past partners, making sure they got tested recently and using protection. Well I’m sure people will say I have no “moral fiber” but I have tons. I am extremely traditional in many ways and I behave like a normal 22 year old. I say to those who want to try it, try it! If you are thinking about it most likely you can do it. I don’t see why Angelina and Brad can’t be in an open relationship as long as they are safe and committed to each other emotionally. I would just hope that they would not bring partners or potential partners around their children as that can be a bit much for kids to understand. Thankfully someone like Angelia Jolie can bring this to light as it is rarely talked about. First the gay marriage issue than non monogamy! She’s more than just an awesome actress!

  18. Jo-Anne • January 1, 2010 @ 3:00 PM

    well, brad maybe it’s time you picked up the phone…call Jen up….looks like Ang is in complete harmony with that….yeah, right…

    what an impeccable “mom” role model…

  19. mandee • January 1, 2010 @ 4:09 PM

    Alexander on January 1, 2010 10:05 AM what may be immoral to you, doesnt make it immoral to everyone. thats why everyone is different. everyone has their own mind and their own thoughts, morals, right & wrong etc. i dont personally care what you think of me, ive never met you nor will i ever. youre asking me where i got my morals, well…i chose them. my mom has been with the same man since she was 18 years old, they broke up a few times in between, but they have been married forever. what is good for her doesnt HAVE to be whats good for ME. this is basically the same as people thinking homosexuals/bisexuals are immoral. no one can choose what YOU think, say, do, believe…so how can anything that doesnt hurt someone else be immoral? just because you want someone that wants to stay with you for the rest of your life and never be with anyone else doesnt mean its for everyone. it also doesnt mean your life/marriage will be a happy one. based on the divorce rate, abuse rate, cheating rate etc, do you also agree that marriage is immoral? if not, how come? why is it your belief/opinion that marriage is the moral/only way to go? you need to have more of an open mind on this type of topic. whats your stand on threesomes then? should no one ever participate in them even if they think its fun or they all want to do it? you could never expect everyone on the planet to agree with your thoughts about everything. so, lets just disagree but how about next time you leave the insults about me out?

  20. demigod • January 1, 2010 @ 6:50 PM

    Judging by most comments, I can see feminist values are alive and well. Ange’s realistic and liberal views on relationships has stepped out of the mainstream ideal of what a relationship is. No one owns anyone else. You’d think people would clue in by now that monogamy doesn’t work for most, and is too confining. People need to get over themselves and come to realize people have more needs/desires than what can be had in an exclusive coupling.
    Alexander – YOU are the one dictating what’s moral. And don’t confuse ‘high esteem’ with ego. You shouldn’t need anyone to validate your own worth.
    Jo – being in an open relationship doesn’t equate to being a bad mom. As in most cases, discretion is often needed.

  21. tributegirl • January 1, 2010 @ 9:02 PM

    “white beauty”?????

  22. Alexander • January 1, 2010 @ 11:30 PM

    Not at all, demigod. And mandee, let me explain further. I’m saying that “good” can’t be defined by what any one person thinks. Some people think it’s good and moral to have sex with children. So is that okay? Do you think that it’s “good” or “moral” or “okay”? How about beating women. Some men think that’s perfectly okay and it’s within their moral code, especially if it’s their girlfriend or wife. Or their children. Or to gamble away all their money when they have families to support. Or to drink and drive. Should I continue? Just like you, mandee, they “choose” their morals. So just because a person thinks something is okay to do, does it mean it’s okay for them? Anything goes as long as YOU feel it’s right? If we choose our own morals, why should we have any at all? It’s a nuisance to be moral. It’s hard work to be faithful. Why work at a relationship when you can just screw around? Right?

  23. gypsy • January 2, 2010 @ 1:23 AM

    Alexander..I believe the article is speaking about two consenting adults.NOT for 1 second would I believe Mandee or anyone for that matter would agree on your theory of a grown man taking a child,which is disgusting! Nor do I believe,they would condone the beating of a woman or man.As to the drunk driving and gambling I feel you are way off topic on all your above comments from the original topic!! That being said,my opinion on the article for adults is to EACH HIS OWN!!!!Its not my cuppa tea, personally speaking,nor am I the ONE to judge others actions!!!

  24. Lloyd • January 2, 2010 @ 5:22 AM

    I personally think that there’s no point in “committing” yourself to someone and then having several sexual partners. What is the point of a relationship if you’re going to screw everything that you’re attracted to? What exactly is the commitment part? I understand that they have commitment to their CHILDREN and that they need to be around together to raise them, but what of the commitment to EACH OTHER? There is none in a relationship like this.

    If you’re going to be in a relationship, be in a relationship. If you want to have multiple sexual partners be single.

    Now I’m not judging anyone, but this is just what I believe (don’t read it if you’re going to get offended). Men are men, animals are animals. I understand that man has an animalistic side, but what makes us different from an animal is discipline and self control. If you’re proud of being an animal then I think there’s something seriously wrong. Why not apply this “animal” attitude to the rest of life i.e. hygiene and habitat?

    I think people are in love with the IDEA of being in love. The idea is that you’re going to feel amazing all the time and everything’s going to be new and exciting. This is not the case however, and in reality settling down with someone is work and compromise. If you really care for that person and want to be with them, then you want to work and make compromises because you want that person to be happy. In a “healthy” relationship this goes both ways and the other person wants to make you equally as happy and doesn’t want to abuse the fact that you’re willing to meet their reasonable needs. Like if you have a mother or father who you love. You’re not going to like everything that they expect of you, but you try to meet those expectations (if they’re reasonable) because you love them. Now most people won’t agree with this because they’re your parents and it’s different, but I think it’s very similar and the importance of a partner has been lost in recent years because it’s just easier to get a divorce or to separate when you get “tired” of someone.

    Just my “two cents”…

    p.s. Don’t call me “closed-minded”. My mind is not closed because I’ve weighed both views and just found this one to be better. I’m willing to listen to someone who makes sense, but again I already gave both sides a chance. Just sharing my thoughts…

  25. mandee • January 2, 2010 @ 5:49 AM

    Non monogamy works on January 1, 2010 12:32 PM sorry, your comment wasnt there when i made mine. i really enjoyed reading your comment and i agree. everyone has their right to their own opinions on what is best for them and their family. if its right for the person thats doing it, awesome. if its not right for people that arent doing it, awesome. just dont shove your morals down my throat if you disagree with me. (im not saying that to you i mean in general!) 😀

    Alexander on January 1, 2010 11:30 PM having sex with children and abusing women HURT OTHER PEOPLE. so YES it IS immoral. if me and my husband (or wife) when i get one decide hmm lets have an open relationship (we both agree to it as adults remember) does this make the 2 of us immoral just because you (or society) doesnt understand or agree with what we are doing? we are not physically or emotionally HURTING anyone. its OUR CHOICE as a couple whether or not we pursue different roads when it comes to our sexuality/intimacy. drinking and driving also causes harm to others when you are incapable of not running someone over because you are impaired. gambling is also up to the person. if they want to gamble thats their choice, who are they hurting? if they gamble away MY money they are out the door. i understand that its addicting but there is a line.

    gypsy on January 2, 2010 1:23 AM loved your comment hon!

    Lloyd on January 2, 2010 5:22 AM you dont need to be so quick to defend your opinion! as long as you arent insulting us or acting like what we think is immoral or wrong then everyone will be ok with a differing opinion. you do make some very good points in your comment, but i still disagree. having sex with the same person can become very boring and can seem like more of a chore than something you both enjoy. especially when you see the person day in, day out, good, bad etc. i dont see anything wrong with spicing up your life by adding a third person and having a threesome, trying some new things in the bedroom or (when all else fails) having an open relationship. if you KNOW you love the person you are with and they know they love you then why does it matter who you have sex with? sex doesnt HAVE to be about love and feelings/emotions/romance. it can just be for fun too. having sex with someone that isnt your partner isnt the same as making love with your partner. thats where the appeal lies. its fun, exciting, new. eventually after being with someone for soo long the spark is gone. why should people be limited to one partner if the excitement is gone and both partners are ready and willing to try an open relationship? perhaps being with others will also bring on a new found appreciation for the one you love and are with once youve dipped into the ocean around you.

  26. puttputt • January 2, 2010 @ 6:14 AM

    If society said it was ok to have more than one lover and we wouldn’t have a problem with it. The problem here is conditioning and following the norm what has been set prior. To each their own, some folks like to commit to one person forever, others follow their biological instinct and mate with as many as possible.

    How many happily married men go to strip joints and get their rocks off? How many married woman fantasize about plowing that stud, everyone has felt this way, it’s only human and natural.

    If you look at the rich and powerful, all have cheated, some people are smart and figured that if they set the rules up prior, nobody gets hurt or has to hide anything. Compare Tiger Woods and Will Smith, both love woman, except one had to hide it from their partner because he did not discuss that option, instead lied and hurt his wife. Whereas Will Smith agreed with his wife that they can do what they want as long as they come home safe and they don’t talk about it.

    If you were in love with someone, and you had the chance to sleep with that one celebrity or whomever, you would and we all would and if you say no, you are lying.

  27. dave • January 2, 2010 @ 6:30 AM

    Some people can separate sex and love and some people can’t. Some countries allow 10 wives, some countries do not allow same sex to marry, some countries treat it still as a business transaction, some countries allow their kids to get drunk and knocked up at a bar – foster child, dead beat dad/mom/marry young, some countries people get married, cheat, divorce and repeat the cycle, some countries like to share husbands and wives, everyone’s different, different strokes for different folks. Who are you to say or judge what you do is right or moral? There is no absolute truth in knowledge except in mathematics.

  28. demigod • January 2, 2010 @ 8:26 AM

    Lloyd, that’s your feminine side talking. Quite sad actually. The point of a relationship is what it means to YOU. People should feel free to ‘commit’ what they can, and not be bound by someone else’s ideal or society’s rule. One can still ‘love’ someone and be attracted to others. And if they choose to follow their desires, it doesn’t make them ‘animals’, it’s simply human nature. That human nature is being suppressed by religion and the feminized society that upholds these values. The concept of marriage and monogamy is designed to fail. This is more than a male’s perspective, but an enlightened view.
    ‘In love’ – a temporary illusion.
    ‘Faith’ – a lunatic’s expression of hope.

  29. Nonmonogamy works • January 2, 2010 @ 10:37 AM

    Gyspy, demigod (love your idea of faith!) and puttputt, right on! It’s great to see people with such realistic views of the world and to stand up for those who never get to stand. I am often considered a “monster” because of my lifestyle but I don’t hurt anyone and I make sure never to do that. It sucks to see that there are people like Alexander in the world that have such negative and ignorant views on these topics. It is so true that if in society that theses types of relations were expected than no one would have written anything here at all and it would have been just celebrity gossip to read. It would not have been a debate at all. Also for Lloyd who made a comment in regards to the animal side of things. We are and always will be considered “animals” scientifically, some more than others but it is also refered to as “human nature”. Have you ever cheated? Have you ever thought about it? If you did than that’s your human nature speaking subconsciously to you. Also, I am proud of being human, human is animal. We have self disicipline and control in our personal surroundings it’s just that each person is different in how they execute those actions. I have great hygiene and personal attributes (behaviors and otherwise) that I do not attribute to “animal nature” but not everyone does. Are you always going to ignore your biological/hormonal impulses for the rest of your life? That’s your choice.

  30. Lloyd • January 2, 2010 @ 11:38 AM

    demigod, in what way is it my feminine side talking? Just because more men think believe in multiple sexual partners? This is just my personal view.

    Would you call that love then? I’d say you’re affectionate towards that person, but at the end of the day you’re prioritizing your own physical needs selfishly in front of them. Love’s a really strong word and saying that that is love really starts to deteriorate the meaning of the word. I’d refer to it as more of a sexual/physical connection which you’ll move on from once you get bored, rather than the emotion. You basically keep describing a single life, and calling it a relationship so again, I ask “what’s the point”? Just stay single…

    And it’s not a concept designed to fail. It’s just that most people think it’s easier to separate than to deal with a problem. I would say that’s rather weak-willed more than anything. And your view isn’t enlightened just because it’s not the norm. Like I said I weighed both options logically in my own mind, so I’m not “in the dark” because I believe what I believe.

    Nonmonogamy, you can attribute many things to the nature of humans, and monogamy is one as well. You cannot define human nature.

    The only thing I have in common with an animal is that I am made of flesh and blood, so at the end of the day I hope to consider myself more than just a common animal. If you’re proud of sharing the comparison, then more power to you…

    The purpose of the hygiene comment was to point out that there are several attributes of an animal, and why would you just choose the indulgence of sexual desire, but not anything else? For instance, have you ever wanted to hurt someone because they committed a transgression against you? Perhaps in that moment you even felt like you could KILL them. An animal would have, and if we’re meant to embrace our animal side, should it not be right to hurt or kill those if they give a reason to?

    No I don’t ignore my biological or hormonal impulses. On a hormonal or biological level, we desire sex. It just reflects upon our current society that we need to indulge in sex with whatever we are attracted to in front of us.

    My point after all this is if you want multiple sexual partners, go for it, live the SINGLE LIFE. If you grow tired of it or want something deeper at the end of the day, get in a relationship. Don’t make a foolish hybrid of the two, it just doesn’t make sense.

  31. Nonmonogamy works • January 2, 2010 @ 12:50 PM

    Hopefull this is the last thing I am going to say as this is getting rather tedious for me as you are not comprehending the facts here. I am not saying that human nature is concrete but there are a lot of scientific facts to prove that all people have certain sexual needs built into their biological system that is out of their control. Males require more sexual partners, this is built into their system. I am female but I feel that need as well and I’m not ashamed of it. I don’t get attracted to everything that is in front of me as well. The whole animal thing is getting way out of proportion on your side. We are intelligent but we are animals nonetheless, we are still classified as a type of species in the animal realm. I am not saying that we are like blood thirsty animals at all I’m just saying that we are classified as animals and we are not monkeys or anything in that definition but my belief is that we certainly came from there we are just superior and advanced on most skills and complexity. Our emotional intelligence is much higher. Not all animals are nonmonogamous either, there are many “animals” and by this I mean the amphibian/hairy variety that are monogamous creatures and stay with their “partner” for life. I never said I didn’t believe in monogamy, I’m just not and don’t judge anyone who is, that’s quite the contrary. I think there way of life is quaint, simple and nice. I disagree with the idea that it is put into our head that we should sleep with whatever that is attractive. Sure, if you read into that media crap than sure but religion is still very strong in the world and forced down people’s throats. Some children do not get to think for themselves when it comes to what they think about relationships and marriage but are forced to believe in “god’s will” whereas when it comes to media that promotes promiscuity, you have a choice whether or not you look at it, you don’t have to! Change the channel, don’t read magazines! I truly know that I get a lot of slack from people like you over the lifestyle so I’m trying to figure out what people are in this “society” that you speak of because they don’t seem to be in Halifax. I have found a very small group of people who actually think the way I do but they are afraid to actually be honest about it due to backlash. There are people who live this way and I’m not talking about guys/girls who pick up sexual partners from the bar and brag about it. I have never done this. I actually go on dates with potentials and so do my other nonmonogamous friends. The only reason I replied to this article was to show that there are people like that out there and even though you say you are not judging, you certainly are. As a gay female and non monogamous I have been judged a lot in my life and have gone through a lot of things it was just nice to see people understand me in the least and the last thing I wanted was a a** like you telling me how to live my life aka stay single! You don’t know me so stop trying to act like Doctor Phil. I am in an open relationship with my girlfriend, I am in love with her and I’m probably going to marry her if I decide I want to do marriage. If I had the choice I would be monogamous. I do not have a choice in this, believe me I tried. I heard that whole BS line “well if you meet the person you are in love with than you will be monogamous”. I have and nothing has changed for me, I will always be this way. So think about it differently because you obviously know nothing about it. All my non monogamous and poly friends say the same thing, we were born this way and there is nothing we can do to change it. I would in a heart beat, I do not desire to live this way but if I must than I will and I will enjoy it. I am also not a selfish person either, I will put my self in harms way to help the people that I love. You know nothing about me you are just making assumptions. I am not attacking you in the least but just trying to defend myself. I have better things to do than that, I am just trying to educate people who obviously don’t know what they are talking about. If you lived this way for a peirod of time and it didn’t work for you, you weren’t that way you just tried something. If I were to do what you say and “find something deeper at the end of the day” I already have but if I didn’t have an amazing, loving and accepting girlfriend and found someone I could fall in love with I’m sure I would cheat on her anyways because that is the way that I am. Again this doesn’t always mean that I am sleeping with people I think you have many wrong ideas about nonmonogamy. Hopefully, even if you don’t understand it, you have learned something today. I must ask however if you are Christian because that would make a lot of sense.

  32. demigod • January 2, 2010 @ 2:49 PM

    Lloyd, the argument is not about the choices (in which there really isn’t any, but more of that another time). It’s about the human condition (not society’s),the conflicting desires/feelings that everyone has, regardless of their relationship status. You need to realize there are problems which cannot be overcome no matter how hard we try, differences that cannot be bridged, and compromises that we can’t come to terms with. ‘Love’ is suppose to be unconditional, but it isn’t (especially in a monogamous relationship) It’s transient. An enlightened view has no conditions.
    Monogamy is actually unnatural. Organized religion introduced marriage/monogamy to CONTROL people and set the groundwork/standard to encourage the family unit/life.
    Ask Hugh Hefner if he ‘grew tired’ of his single life. Though he did grow tired of a wife. Here’s a guy who was in a position to pick and choose from the cream of the crop, but came to realize the single life is more fulfilling and ‘something deeper’. Any guy with a pulse who had his choice would opt for the same.

  33. mandee • January 2, 2010 @ 2:51 PM

    mandee on January 2, 2010 5:49 AM i commented up there and it has everything i think and feel about this conversation, but its awaiting moderation. i dont want my comment to go unread 🙁

    Nonmonogamy works on January 2, 2010 12:50 PM you never have to defend yourself against anyone. your life is your decision. i can understand why people feel like they need to defend themselves or explain, but no one matters. what these people think about you and your lifestyle doesnt matter, what the people in halifax think about or say about you and your lifestyle, doesnt matter. if it works FOR YOU and your girlfriend then thats all that matters. i completely agree with everything youve said. i think youre a very brave woman and im glad you found someone that makes you happy and allows you to be who you are. if you dont comment again, i wish you the best of luck in the new year ! 😀

  34. tributegirl • January 2, 2010 @ 3:25 PM

    I don’t think it’s all that complicated. If you are into monogamy and want to be in a monogamous relationship, find a like minded partner. If you are not into monogamy, either find a like minded partner, or stay single. Either way, nobody gets hurt, and you have what you want. But if you end up in a relationship with a person who feels differently than you about this very important issue, then you’re screwed. Or maybe not.

  35. lotus1975 • January 2, 2010 @ 4:26 PM

    I think that she has an open mind about things. And though it may not work for some people, it probably does work for others. She isn’t saying you should cheat on your partner, but if you and your partner have an understanding on the relationship then that is all that matters. I don’t think we should judge people unless you know them personally. All the magazines like to paint a negative picture of famous people and the public lap it up like thirsty dogs. She does good work and makes movies, as well as being a parent and loving parnter. Why make her into some evil woman only out for herself? Reguardless whether her being famous helps people or not, at least it goes to a worthy cause. I don’t think you or I could stand up in public and be heard as well as she can. And she seems to truly care about the causes she is involed with and that is all that matters. Lots of actors/actress are involved in chartiy work and they are exactly as vocal as she is, and there is nothing wrong with that. Let her live her life and you do the same with yours.

  36. mandee • January 2, 2010 @ 5:45 PM

    lotus, i agree. tribute didnt let my full comment go through earlier 🙁 so i tried to repost it after my last comment. sure hope they let it through this time. im not even being rude to anyone in it 🙁

  37. natsnice2 • January 2, 2010 @ 6:05 PM

    Yeah, yeah. Sure, sure. What hogwash!

  38. Nancy • January 2, 2010 @ 8:42 PM

    Tributegirl, Jan. 02, 2010, 3:25 PM – I totally agree. I also understand and agree with what Lloyd is saying. I believe that while you are in the single stage, you can do whatever and whomever you like. Once you get to the living together stage, you’re a little more committed…things like this would need to be discussed and agreed upon by both parties BUT once you are married (unless both parties agree), you are now supposed to be 100% committed and faithful and like Lloyd said, divorce comes too easily nowadays to those who can’t control their urges and have strayed outside of the commitment they have made.

  39. tributegirl • January 2, 2010 @ 9:49 PM

    True, I agree, but, once you are in the more committed stage, if BOTH people agree to live in an open relationship, than it should be ok. I have a friend who is in a very committed relationship, I really think this is “the one” for her, and they are VERY open, and it has actually made their relationship stronger, because it’s something they both believe in and have both agreed to. Personally, I would be a bit jealous, so I don’t think it would work for me. To each his own.

  40. mandee • January 2, 2010 @ 10:22 PM

    mandee on January 2, 2010 5:49 AM my comment finally went through 😀

  41. Nancy • January 3, 2010 @ 2:15 AM

    Exactly, Tributegirl. I said that as well “(unless both parties agree)”. Also, I couldn’t live like that either. I’d never agree to any such thing. I’ve never done anything like that nor cheated and it hasn’t been done to me either (as far as I know anyways, hahaha). Even dating, for me, it’s one at a time, and I take commitment VERY seriously. As long as they agree to it though, best of luck. I guess we now know WHY Brad and Angie haven’t taken their vows….and most likely never will.

  42. Insane theories • January 4, 2010 @ 4:11 AM

    I am really surprised at how little people actually honor marriage anymore these days. Its pretty sad saying that you can be in love an still want to be with other people. Anyone who says that obviously hasn’t really loved someone before. I have been in all the different types of relationships. I think that if you have to have three-somes and multiple partners to keep your marriage going then that marriage wasn’t supposed to be. My husband and I have three kids and have been married for quite awhile. Neither one of us are bored with our sex life or want other partners.

    I have seen too many relationships fall apart from having multiple partners. In the end it never works out.
    To say that we are like animals and that we are not meant to have one partner is stupid. Lots of animals mate for life. Sadly animals are actually more loyal and protecting then most people.
    Obviously there are a lot of men making comments. As most men’s dream world is not having to commit and have as many sex partners as they can.
    What a life!

  43. Moviefan • January 4, 2010 @ 1:38 PM

    I’m with you, Insane theories. It never works out and your mate wanting to be with someone else is not a sign of love. But they’ll find that out for themselves, the painful way. Unless they don’t have feelings for anyone that they’re with. Sleeping around is for shallow people who are in love only with themselves.

  44. demigod • January 4, 2010 @ 2:28 PM

    I.T., you’re not a man, so you’ll never understand. You’re equating sex to love, and can’t separate the two as easily as men. And who says anyone can only love one person? Oh right, a woman.
    Relationships fall apart well on their own without a third party. Having multiple partners is not common, and usually short-lived.
    Animals are not egotistical..they live instinctively. And no, they’re not more loyal, protective, and few mate for life.
    Men marry for lack of choice.

  45. demigod • January 4, 2010 @ 2:29 PM

    Moviefan, go bake a cake.

  46. Moviefan • January 4, 2010 @ 3:06 PM

    Dummigod, you self-admitted woman-hater, you’re giving gay men (yes, it’s clear you’re gay to anyone on here) a bad name. Some gays do seem to be monogamous, otherwise why would they want marriage to be legal? And please do some research into animals, since you have no knowledge about that. Many are extremely loyal, protective and do mate for life. I have researched it and witnessed it myself.

  47. demigod • January 4, 2010 @ 5:21 PM

    Fanny, its too late to be calling me any of that, youve been around long enough and youre just sore.
    A very very small percentage of gays (mostly men) care to get married. First and foremost, they want to be acknowledged, given equal rights, and not be discriminated against by society.
    Youve mated with animals in the name of research?

  48. Nancy • January 4, 2010 @ 5:46 PM

    WOW! You sure do make friends wherever you go, don’t you demigod? Hahahaha. I knew that others saw and took your sexist remarks the same as I and were just staying on the sidelines! I also knew that it was only a matter of time before you started to p!ss them off too and engage them into it…hahahahahahahaha. Bravo! Bravo! Ahh, my sides are sore from laughing so much and my arm is really sore from patting my own back! ROFLMFAO!

    Moviefan Jan. 04, 2010 3:06 PM – YUP! Couldn’t agree more. Sorry to interrupt you two but, I just couldn’t believe my eyes. I didn’t think someone would come out so soon.

  49. tributegirl • January 4, 2010 @ 6:40 PM

    LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!!!!!!!!!!! Oh, this is too funny!
    There are some things demigod said that I totally agree with. First that women can’t separate love and sex as easily as men (not all women, but I think most can’t), and that relationships do fall apart without a third party, that happens every day.

  50. demigod • January 4, 2010 @ 8:01 PM

    And out pops the troll rearing it’s ugly head.
    Unlike you, I’m here giving strong opinions, and not seeking friends. Did you think you’re the only ditz who’s anti sex? You still hold the crown though -no worries.
    ‘Staying on the sidelines’? Maybe some see merit, and are tollerant of other’s opinions.

  51. demigod • January 4, 2010 @ 8:17 PM

    Thx tg, more importantly people can love more than one person at any time (not talking just sexually), but we know society deems it unacceptable.
    I think anyone who opposes open relationships generally have/show insecurities (of all kinds).

  52. Nancy • January 4, 2010 @ 9:29 PM

    Hahaha…”Unlike you, I’m here giving strong opinions, and not seeking friends.” – I have given my “strong opinions” as well, not only on this article but many, many others as you have. I gotta tell you though, being sexist is not what one would just call an “opinion”…it is a hate which you have towards females in general, and you constantly give sexist comments. Here’s one for example: “Moviefan, go bake a cake.” Yeah, I guess I should be more “tollerant” (sic) of your “opinions”. Pfft, BAHAHAHAHAHAHA!! You just can’t stand the fact that not only 1 woman is standing up to you…and if you keep up this facade, many more will come!

  53. Nancy • January 4, 2010 @ 9:30 PM

    Btw, not one of WE women, have said or given any kind of impression, that we are “anti-sex”. LOL.

  54. demigod • January 4, 2010 @ 11:08 PM

    It never gets old for you does it, nutty Nance? Still waging your one troll crusade. The only female (for lack of..)I hate is YOU. So much for your ‘accusation’.

    Some comments like ie. ‘Sleeping with themselves’ are dumb, and I’ll con’t to call them out on it.

    Now why don’t you go don an apron, bake yourself brownies and have a square for catching that (sic). You’ve earned it.

  55. Nancy • January 5, 2010 @ 12:53 AM

    “hate”…such a strong word isn’t it? Do I really get under your skin enough for you to “hate” me? Hmmm, obviously so. Btw, I have BACKED UP any and all “accusations” I have made about you…which is, in fact, most likely why you “hate” me.

    “Some comments like ie. ‘Sleeping with themselves’ are dumb, and I’ll con’t to call them out on it.” – Jeeze, maybe you should try to be more “tollerant (sic) of others opinions”, after all, we are all “entitled to our opinions” right, even if others consider them “dumb”? Now why don’t YOU go find your d!ldo and stick it where the sun don’t shine?

  56. tributegirl • January 5, 2010 @ 4:15 PM

    demigod on January 4, 2010 8:17 PM

    I mostly agree with your comment, although I don’t think everyone that opposes these relationships necessarily is insecure, some no doubt are, but I don’t think all are. I think with a lot of people, it’s just their personal moral standards. I just think that whatever a persons personal moral standards are, if they want a relationship with someone, they really should try to find a like minded partner, otherwise it’s guaranteed to fail.

  57. Nancy • January 5, 2010 @ 5:27 PM

    Well then, good luck to demigod in finding a “like minded” woman hater, hahahaha.

    Tributegirl: I’m no psychic but….I can sure picture you LYAO at the last line of my previous comment. haha.

  58. tributegirl • January 5, 2010 @ 6:31 PM

    hahahahahhahaha, well actually…..yeah!!! I think you are psychic!

  59. Nancy • January 5, 2010 @ 6:57 PM

    I better go choose my lottery #’s then!

  60. mandee • January 6, 2010 @ 10:22 PM

    i found this comment to be sexist

    “Obviously there are a lot of men making comments. As most mens dream world is not having to commit and have as many sex partners as they can.
    What a life!”

    there are also women commenting and there have been at least 2 (myself included) that have stated they have no problem with an open relationship. also this comment :

    “Sleeping around is for shallow people who are in love only with themselves.”

    is ridiculous! i do not understand why someone would come on here and insult the people that are willing to admit they are ok with open relationships. there is NOTHING WRONG with having sex with more than one person. it is everyones right as human beings to decide who they have sex with, when they have sex with these people and how many people they have sex with. what people decide to do behind closed doors shouldnt be anyones business in the first place, but since its out in the open it most definitely shouldnt be criticized.

    tributegirl on January 5, 2010 4:15 PM this was a great comment.

  61. Nancy • January 6, 2010 @ 10:53 PM

    Mandee: “It is everyones right as human beings to decide who they have sex with, when they have sex with these people and how many people they have sex with.”

    When they are single, yes…or in a relationship where their partner agrees with it. Once they ‘commit’ themselves to someone, that all ends, unless the agreement still stands. That is what ‘marriage’ defines.

    Also, you haven’t said one word to demigod about his CONSTANT sexist comments. Why is that?

  62. mandee • January 7, 2010 @ 12:12 AM

    nancy, yes thats what i meant (as long as both people agree, cheating is not included in what i meant) sorry i left that out! demigods “sexist” remarks usually dont seem “sexist” to me. i just thought since everyone was talking about sexist remarks, i would include one i found to be sexist. i actually have no problem with anyone as long as they arent insulting me, but i dont think its right to act as if the only people that could ever possibly consider an open relationship are MEN. especially when this article is about a woman saying thats what she wants, and other women have commented saying the same thing. i dont come online to cause fights with people or to get caught up in the drama (i already have quite enough of my own!) i come on here to voice my opinions and i dont see why that should make me “shallow” or “in love with only myself” if i am willing to agree that an open relationship IS ok if both participants are ready and willing.

  63. demigod • January 7, 2010 @ 12:46 AM

    Nice try ‘recruiting’ there Nance hehe. Mandee ‘gets me’, with you it’s just personal.

  64. Nancy • January 7, 2010 @ 9:58 AM

    Actually, it’s not “personal” at all, and I wasn’t “recruiting” either. I know where Mandee stands but I gotta say, she would have to be blind and stupid to not see that a lot of your remarks are sexist…but yet, picks right up on it on another persons comment..?? Doesn’t make sense because I know she is not blind and stupid so, why is she covering up for you? I’m not saying for her to fight with you or to get caught up in the middle but, when she’s pointing fingers at others for only 1 comment but just totally disregards you doing the same thing on SEVERAL occasions here, it doesn’t add up. Now, I know that I never said anything to the other person but, I never did with demigod right away either. It was comment after comment after comment of it, over and over. How can so many others see it but yet you don’t, Mandee? I think friendship is clouding your judgement.

  65. Jo-Anne • January 7, 2010 @ 12:16 PM

    calling someone out to back you up in a trivial matter like a celebrity website?


  66. mandee • January 7, 2010 @ 3:57 PM

    nancy, i rarely pay attention to (or remember) what others have said in their posts unless it is directed AT ME. thats why i dont jump all over what demigod says, he never says anything that is directed my way. the reason i said i thought the other person was sexist is because (like i said) everyone else was saying that demigod was sexist. i didnt find anything wrong with demigods comments, i didnt see any part of it to be sexist. but to state matter of factly that men are the only ones that would consider having sex with others doesnt make any sense. really? out of the billions of people on the planet theres NO CHANCE that ANY WOMAN could ever possibly think that having an open relationship would be fun or right for them? i know you werent trying to “recruit” me. i have been avoiding all the fighting (for the most part) i rarely even come on here, so why would i judge demigods comments and refer to him as sexist just because he may say a few remarks here or there against women? i agree with most of his remarks because a lot of women really ARE everything he says they are. just like a lot of men really are what you (and others) say they are. the world is a bad place with bad people in it. you cant say something about only ONE gender without it being true about BOTH genders. i actually dont really find any comments to be “sexist” because with the billions of people out there it is possible that the comments are right. theres no way demigod (or anyone else that comments about men or women) honestly mean the billions of (whatever gender they are bashing) are the ONLY ones that do it. and i know that if they actually took time to think about what they were saying theyd realize they dont mean EVERY woman/man in the WORLD. they are probably just basing(not sure if this is the right spelling?) their opinions on personal experiences…and who, out of all of us, can honestly say they arent guilty of the same thing? i hated ALL men for a long long time because of things other men had done to me. sure, i got over it, but for a long time i didnt and i HATED the entire gender. either way, im really not looking for a fight with anyone, i have way too much going on in my own life right now to worry about pettiness online (im not saying youre fighting with me, i mean thats why im not in here fighting with anyone, picking on most peoples comments etc) it has nothing to do with “friendship” because last time i checked, me and demigod werent friends. its a computer, im not “friends” with any one of you, i dont know you or your life or situation i only know what youre willing to let me know. we arent friends we are just names on a screen.

    also, i hope this made sense bc i dont feel like rereading it right now 😛

  67. Nancy • January 7, 2010 @ 5:15 PM

    Jo-WAnne: As if! I’ve never needed anyone to back me up.

    Mandee: “just like a lot of men really are what you (and others) say they are.” – What have I said about men? What ‘are they’? I haven’t said anything against men.

    “i didn’t find anything wrong with demigods comments, i didn’t see any part of it to be sexist.” – So, you missed 2 of his comments then? The one directed at Moviefan (who is a woman) to “go bake a cake” or how about the one to me, “go don an apron, bake yourself brownies”. Those are just the ones on THIS article. There are, in fact, many, many, many, many others…you can’t possibly say that you haven’t read any sexist remarks from him, EVERYONE has! I completely understand if you want to stay out of the sexist argument but, if you are going to do that, then you shouldn’t call someone else out for making a sexist comment.

  68. Moviefan • January 7, 2010 @ 5:39 PM

    You’re right Nancy, and dummigod, I don’t believe Nancy is the only woman you hate. From what I’ve seen, there have been many posts where it’s clear you hate women. You blamed Rihanna for causing Chris Brown to beat her. You called Elin Woods “a lying b!itch” and said she never loved Tiger Woods, just married him for his money. Yeah, is that why she had two kids with him? She’s stuck to him for life with visitation etc. Ick. If I were her, I would never want to see his cheating face again. I don’t think all gay men hate women (I could be wrong), but you are one sad individual. You should try therapy, it must be awful to be as twisted and angry inside as you seem to be. And the way you’re headed, you’ll be alone when you die. None of your pathetic sex partners are going to give a damn.

  69. Angela • January 7, 2010 @ 5:47 PM

    For those of you who think no one gets hurt when the adults are consenting, what about their kids? Do you think when the kids find out their parents were sleeping around it’s not going to affect the way they view life? Kids always seem to find out these things, and in Jolie’s case, the fat mouth can’t even shut up to the press about it. Her numerous children will read this very available information at some point in their lives and it will hurt them that they didn’t have quite the solid family unit that they thought they had. You all must know someone who was extremly hurt to find out one or both of their parents were messing around. It can be devastating and can potentially also change your relationship with them.

  70. mandee • January 7, 2010 @ 7:05 PM

    Nancy on January 7, 2010 5:15 PM i just told you, i dont remember anything anyone says because to me its not of any importance what was said on a separate article. the comments demigod makes i always take as joking, i have never taken them seriously, which is why i dont find them sexist. im actually surprised that anyone takes something like “go bake a cake” seriously or as sexist. it sounds like more of a joke to me. also, i believe that demigod knows there are just as many men bakers and cooks in the world as there are women. turn your tv on, youll see tons of them. i actually watch more men cooking shows than woman cooking shows! also, the things these other people are saying to demigod, if all he does is say “go bake a cake” then good for him. to accuse someone of being “gay” because he doesnt like certain women is ridiculous. i dont think that when demigod said “go don an apron, bake yourself brownies” should actually be considered sexist just because the 2 of you are always fighting. he KNOWS what to say to get you going and so he says it. when people on here are fighting they dont play fair and they say dirty/low things to one another, look at moviefans comment right under yours for a great example of that. just because demigod says it to you when you 2 arent getting along doesnt mean he believes it or would say it to someone hes not fighting with or would think it any other time except during the fighting.

    Angela on January 7, 2010 5:47 PM the kids shouldnt know about what their parents do in their sex life. (i mean any kids). why would they be hurt or affected when they found out later in life that their consenting adult parents chose to have an open relationship? its still a stable household for the children, its still a strong family. everyone just has different morals and feelings on this. as long as they dont bring it into the house where the kids will know when they are still young, i doubt it would affect them at all. how can you choose what life is right for your parents? as long as they arent cheating or causing the other one pain and both people are happy and its what they both want, i believe any children would grow up and at least respect that their parents found a way to be happy and stay with each other. i dont think it would break their heart etc. i know my parents went through a lot of stuff when i was young and it hasnt affected me or made me think anything less about my home life or them.

  71. demigod • January 7, 2010 @ 7:36 PM

    Fanny, dont rehash the past..too late.
    Wow another twister. I never said ANY such things in those articles. If you think Im going to explain myself all over again think again.

    On the contrary, I lead a fulfilling life. Sorry to disappoint you. Youre just sore and mean-spirited.

  72. Nancy • January 7, 2010 @ 7:48 PM

    Hahahaha….I’ve been “toning it down” since YOU “busted me”? Hahahahaha. Have you been drinking? Had your nose in the bag? You have been accusing me for months now and I have asked you several times to back it up, to prove it, to bring SOMETHING….ANYTHING, to the table here but you can’t…because you have absolutely nothing. Bring it. Show what you are accusing that I have said. I sure as heck proved you to be a sexist…but not after your first or second sexist comment, it was after several. I had to be sure you really were sexist before I accused you, of course because, as mandee said, lots of people say something that comes off as sexist at least once in their lives. You knew as well as anyone else that Moviefan was female…why in the hell would you call a guy “Fanny”? DUH! And yes, you called her “Fanny” on other articles before this, and yes, she made comments on other articles which insinuated that she was indeed a ‘she’. So come on, really?

    Btw, “every other article on this site” is NOT “about relationships” and the ones which are yes, are expected to have lots of sex/gender related comments but, comments about women deserving to be beaten; only getting pregnant to trap men into supporting them; Mel and Robyn Gibson being married for almost 30 years – her raising their 7 kids while he made movies and you say she doesn’t deserve anything in their divorce because she didn’t work to make the money…??? Those are sexist comments. Maybe you should pull out that dictionary that Jo-WAnne always tells others to get and look up the definition of ‘sexist’.

  73. demigod • January 8, 2010 @ 12:25 AM

    Once again ditz, I had no idea Fanny was female and I don’t give a s–t, this site is not my life.
    I won’t have another stupid, mindless exchange with you over the same crap.
    You’re a certified N U T C A S E , and everyone knows it.
    Why don’t you get YOUR dictionary and look up ‘opinion’ ‘freedom of speech’ ‘perpective’. But then again there is no learning curve with you.

  74. Nancy • January 8, 2010 @ 1:55 AM

    You have a “perpective”, do you? 😛

    FYI, ‘opinion’, ‘freedom of speech’, ‘perspective’ are totally different and acceptable as compared to SEXIST. You constantly call me “ditz”, “nutcase”, “dense”, etc., etc., proclaiming how you are so much more intelligent than I am….and yet, you expect me and others to believe that you “had no idea Fanny was female”? What a crock of “s-t”! You are a very poor excuse of a man. Why? Because I have proved over and over, time and again with your very own comments that you are indeed sexist. You do nothing but deny it and say “you just don’t ‘get’ me” and then degrade women (like myself) by calling names when you know you are backed in your little corner. Over and over again with your “ditz”; “N U T C A S E”, etc. Oh yeah, what a man! Pft!

    Btw, I already asked you but, once again, you avoided giving an answer, who ever calls a guy “Fanny”? I think YOU are “a certified N U T C A S E , and everyone knows it.” LMAO.

  75. Nancy • January 8, 2010 @ 2:07 AM

    Mandee: I read your latest ‘awaiting’ comment and all it is is excuses. You can’t honestly be serious! As for the importance of what was said on a separate article, I meant WHEN we were commenting on those articles, not to go back. I stand by what I said, that if you want to stay out of the argument, you shouldn’t call others out for making a sexist comment. I mean, I have seen you totally flip out and jump down someone’s throat for making a bad comment about Angelina Jolie, also, for making a comment you didn’t approve of towards gays but yet, you TOTALLY disregard sexist comments made by demigod. Are you even a woman?

  76. Thibz • January 8, 2010 @ 7:37 AM

    I Think you all just wrote a mini sicom series lol, 81 comments that are the length of a small novel!!! Lets make it a drama show im sure it make a ton of money 😛

  77. mandee • January 8, 2010 @ 8:17 AM

    im in!

  78. Jo-Anne • January 8, 2010 @ 10:40 AM

    January 7, 7:23PM….first five words suffice, d.g.
    wraps it up….completely…..

  79. Moviefan • January 8, 2010 @ 11:06 AM

    Excuse me Dummi, but you most certainly say “such things in those articles.” Here’s one example – you wrote this about Elin Woods: “What a lying b!tch.” November 28 at 7:09pm. Rihanna: “She got what she deserved because shes no better.” November 7 at 2:22am. You wrote this directed at Nancy November 7 at 11:28pm: “Apparently you werent beaten hard enough by the ex. I think another round is richly deserved.” About Tiger Woods: “Just another rich/famous tool getting screwed over by women. And not in the way hed like.” So everything that happened to Tiger is the fault of women, according to you? Please don’t lie when it’s all there in black and white, makes you look kind of like an ass.

  80. Nancy • January 8, 2010 @ 2:06 PM

    Mandee: Actually “spelling and grammar” doesn’t bother me…it bothers you FRIEND (which you said you have none on here) and email buddy, Jo-WAnne…remember? Or, are you going to deny and make excuses for that too? I wouldn’t doubt one bit but what you are friends and email buddies with d.g as well, hahaha. Must be why you stick up for him instead of being a WOMAN and standing up and saying you don’t like how he talks about women. It doesn’t have to be mean or rude to get your point across…mine weren’t…at first, until he wanted to get personal. Anyways, you’re a coward Mandee.

    Moviefan: I like you! We don’t always agree in our opinions but, you bring it to the table. You brought the proof and you’re right, he is “an a$$”…always lying and denying. Hmmmm…he must be a coward too.

  81. Nancy • January 8, 2010 @ 2:07 PM

    OMG! I better put the ‘R’ on the end of “youR”!!!!!!!!

  82. Nancy • January 8, 2010 @ 4:10 PM

    Mandee: I didn’t “side with someone who is being sexist towards the male gender”. I also already told you why I never said anything to that person and, I guess now would be the perfect time to use your words, “who, out of all of us, can honestly say they arent guilty of the same thing?” I never said a word in agreement with ‘Insane Theories’, did I? I never said I did/did not agree. As for Moviefan’s comments which you keep putting down certain things she has said to demigod, such as “being gay”…did you read the things he said to her? Such as “You’ve mated with animals in the name of research?” Oh, let me guess…you thought it was a joke? Maybe you agree “because most of what demigod says about women is true”. Let me tell you something, SEXIST COMMENTS ARE NOT “OPINIONS”. So, go ahead mandee, borrow Jo-WAnne’s dictionary and go through it and find your “few nice words” to describe me because if you want to play that game, I could go on for days about your whiny life! I could care less what a bimbo like you thinks anyways. I never said you have to have the same opinions as me or anyone else, did I? But, when you call one or two people out for ONE comment they made that you feel is sexist but let the many sexist comments of your buddy just fly by, then I’ll surely be the first to tell you. Not standing up is being a COWARD and that is the only reason why I called you that, and it is true. You’ve done it on several occasions on these articles. With comments from all of us ‘regulars’. Disregard some of the things we say and then call a ‘stranger’ out on something similar. You have even told people that they have no right to say certain things because they are not ‘regulars’ on this site. Go ahead, I dare you to deny it! I wouldn’t have said anything to you here except for the fact that you called someone else out for a sexist comment, meanwhile so many more from demigod were previously put forth before you and you chose to ignore them. Part of the reason why you are so defensive here is because Moviefan said demigod must be gay…and you ALWAYS freak out when someone says anything bad about gays…or Angelina Jolie! LMFAO!

  83. Nancy • January 8, 2010 @ 4:14 PM

    Oh, and there are a few things in this world that I am definAtely not…a liar, a cheater, a thief nor a COWARD. Bet quite a few here wish they could say the same about themselves!

  84. Nancy • January 9, 2010 @ 2:56 AM

    Hahaha, Demigod, Mandee always takes sides…and she absolutely makes NO sense at all…she usually doesn’t…even on one of her good days!

    Mandee: – You won’t stoop to calling names because that’s “grade 8 name calling” and you “have better things to do” and you “HAVE a life”…but yet, hypocrite, you are calling names..??

    – Moviefan calling Demigod “gay”…”WAS a joke. haha. anyone that would take that seriously definitely needs to lighten up !”

    -“Sexist comments ARE opinions. if someone thinks them then they are THEIR opinions.” – So is RACISM…still isn’t right though, is it?

    -You are definitely NOT “mature”!

    -I don’t expect you to call someone sexist because I did…I expect you to call ‘a spade a spade’…you certainly didn’t mind calling someone else sexist over ONE single comment! Also, If you “don’t care why” I didn’t say something, then why did you mention me taking sides with that person?

    -This “miss priss” hasn’t “lied” about anything I have said. Bring some proof.

    -“I have no problems with HIM.” – I never said you did or that you should have a problem with Demigod. As a woman, or even as a human, you should have a problem with SEXISM.

    -“i do, however have problems with you every time i disagree or have a thought of my own because you cant stand that someone else may be open minded about things.” – Hahahahaha, “every time i disagree or have a thought of my own”..?? A little far fetched wouldn’t you say? Don’t f-ing flatter yourself!

    – “so perhaps you should have considered minding your own business?” – public forum, “honey”! Besides, your big nose is constantly stuck in everything as well.

    -“or at least you could have considered not causing a big scene over something that wasn’t even about you in any way, shape or form.” – Uh, I am a woman…and unlike you “COWARD”, I stand up to sexism!

    -“im glad SOMEONE on here (me) is willing to defend the gay community when someone randomly starts calling others gay because they dont agree with or like their opinion.” – Well, I’m glad a few on here (me included) are willing to defend women when someone randomly starts calling them names, etc. because they don’t agree with or like their opinions…being ‘sexism’.

    -You are CONSTANTLY defending miss lips, Angelina! You defend her being a homewrecker, etc., etc., etc…even your buddy Jo-WAnne likes to make reference to this fact!

    -I don’t “accuse” you of being friends with someone only when I am fighting with them and you…it is the only time I SAY it in my comment but, I’ve known as others have, that you email Jo-WAnne (previously…you say). I mentioned you emailing Demigod because it’s just weird that you wouldn’t say anything about his many many sexist comments but yet, jump all over someone else for only ONE comment..??

    -“yet as soon as im in a fight with jo all of a sudden we are cool again. any idea why that is?” – Well, that’s because as soon as you get in a “fight with jo”, you start kissing Tributegirl and my @$$es again! As usual! Then, when you are arguing with me, you go running to a front page article (which you just did today) and start kissing Jo-WAnne and Demigod’s @$$es. Hahaha…”As usual!”

    -“i wonder if its possible for you to actually post a comment nancy that doesnt include an insult?” – Hmmmmmm…I post lots of comments that don’t include insults. How about you, “miss priss”?

  85. Nancy • January 9, 2010 @ 3:07 AM

    Mandee: PROOF: ‘Miley Cyrus says she’s not your kids parent’ article, Mandee’s comment, Jan. 08, 2010 @ 5:18 PM: “demigod, since we are friends these days ha ha, hope youre having a great day 😀 you too joanne!”

    Demigod, Jan 09, 2010 @ 3:01 AM: LEECH, just waiting to pounce and suck blood, huh? Well, at least you did wait 5 whole long gruelling minutes after my comment. Must have been really hard for you to keep your mouth shut that long.

  86. demigod • January 9, 2010 @ 3:30 AM

    Oh, btw..Mandee, I’ve had a gr8 day and a gr8 night! Thx 🙂

  87. Nancy • January 9, 2010 @ 3:34 AM

    Yeah, he’s had a “gr8” time annoying all the women he meets with his sexist comments.

  88. Jo-Anne • January 9, 2010 @ 4:48 PM

    forgiving is never a bad thing…the first time…

  89. Jo-Anne • January 10, 2010 @ 8:23 AM

    nothing wrong with being forgiving, mandee, I think it’s commendable, but think of yourself too, your own personal worth and know that you don’t deserve this…

    it just happens way too often…

  90. moondog • January 10, 2010 @ 11:29 AM

    slick move

  91. mandee • January 10, 2010 @ 2:09 PM

    thanks, i agree completely. so, how have you been anyways? sorry we havent been talking, ive just had way too much stuff going on lately. i have a dentist appointment monday to see about getting my wisdom teeth out 😀 and i have a dr appointment monday afternoon, meetings with people to set up volunteer work for me, a career horizon 4 day class that ill be doing aptitude tests etc to find out which career best suits my personality, a meeting with the school so i can get the other credits i need to go do the psw class for september. all kinds of fun stuff this month. hows everything with you? hows your kids and hubby? hope all is well.

  92. Nancy • January 10, 2010 @ 11:49 PM

    Mandee: I didn’t “shove” any of my opinions down your throat. I don’t care if you agree with my opinions or not. BUT, Demigod has made several sexist comments…MANY people have commented about it, not just me. Why would you call out a person for ONE sexist comment when several have been put forth in front of you by the other person? That is ALL I asked you. But, I know the answer, like I said earlier, Demigod is a regular poster on here whereas ‘Insane theories’ isn’t. So, as you have told many before him/her, he/she has no right to say certain things on here but us “regulars” do. Not only that but, Demigod considers you to be “cute” and “too forgiving” so, why get on that persons bad side, right? Oh, and did you happen to see what your newest buddy that you are agreeing with, said about “homosexual males” being “damn faries”? Or, is that me shoving my ridiculous opinions down your throat?

  93. Muhammad McBride • January 11, 2010 @ 12:32 AM

    LMFAO Nancy… here r a few things you eiter don’t know or r wrong about

    I don’t know Demigod from ahole in the ground, btw y is it when some1 agrees with some1 else or mentions them do u always think they r friends? Am i mandee’s best friend & e-mail buddy next lol the only 2 people i know here i work with and thats nonmanogomy & thibz
    ihave checked about 5 stories and comments here total and u fight in all 5 and this is the 2nd story where u accuse friendship on ppl, hell u did twice in this 1 lol Is that because you have no friends?

    As for your pitiful attempt at mouthing off please try using your own material and not saying to yourself i’ll repeat what he said and use him in it….it may burn out a few brain cells but i’m sure you can think of something.

    Lastly thank you for making my belief concrete i now more than ever believe that you are the sad little woman i thought you were that gets no sex….y u ask….BECAUSE IT OBVIOUSLY STRUCK A NERVE!!!

  94. Thibz • January 11, 2010 @ 1:19 AM

    I have another idea! If you are with someone and want to commit to one person DO IT! If you are with someone and have an open relationship DO IT! If your are gay or lesbian and want to commit to one person DO IT! If you are gay or Lesbian and want to have an open relationship DO IT! If you are single and want multiple people DO IT!

    Now….how can you go wrong with that…YOU CANT because there is no wrong or right! Everyone has different beliefs, morals, religions, opinions & sexual preferences. Thats what makes the world turn and makes things interesting conversations such as this. If we were all the same things would be shallow and boring.

  95. tributegirl • January 11, 2010 @ 10:39 AM

    You say that to Nancy and no one else (yet, I’m sure). So does that mean you think

    “the bi***es can shut there mouths when told!”
    “give them some poor 3rd world country to take over and live in so we never have to see the damn faries ever again.”
    “the couples can each join a harem and have fun with all the wives that are in it while the man watches and joins in.”
    “I have nothing against women. In fact I THINK EVERY MAN SHOULD OWN AT LEAST 10!!!”

    are ok? And that’s only from MMc’s FIRST comment. If you are ok with those comments, and not others in retaliation, then there is something seriously wrong with you.

  96. Nancy • January 11, 2010 @ 12:27 PM

    There always was something seriously wrong with her. LOL. She’s been agreeing with others “pig” comments for a very long time on here. Her co-leeches are all “pigs” as well. She sure didn’t like me calling her a “mutt” and telling her to “go fetch” a comment that she lied about and told everyone I said, did she? Yet, here she is, spewing the caca herself! She’s just mad because I told everyone what her very nice sister, Vicki, thought of her. Sad but true. Vicki was here for a short time but she was actually very well liked…guess she just didn’t like this side of Jo-WAnne and what it brought out in others. Can’t say I blame her either.

  97. tributegirl • January 11, 2010 @ 12:31 PM

    Actually, Vicki said herself what she thought of Jo-WAnne’s behaviour on this site, that’s why I cracked up when Jo said that Vicki was her sister! And yes, Vicki was very well liked, she got along with everybody. That’s why I said I thought the wrong sister left.

  98. mandee • January 11, 2010 @ 2:22 PM

    Nancy on January 10, 2010 11:49 PM if i wanted to disagree with demigod, i would have. i did on the miley article and we got along just fine. i dont HAVE to insult people or fight with them in order to disagree with them. i also dont have to spend every minute of my day dissecting EVERY comment posted by EVERYONE that ever comes on here to feel fulfilled or to cause fights for people based on what they think or say to other people. thats why i didnt feel the need to start a fight with demigod. why do i care if he thinks im “cute” or “too forgiving” (which i actually only learned yesterday) you have at times said nice things about me too, but im not in here trying to be your “friend”.

  99. Nancy • January 11, 2010 @ 3:48 PM

    Exactly. I’m not here to be your friend either, or anyone’s. I also don’t dissect “EVERY comment posted by EVERYONE” but, when they post BS, I will surely point it out, and I think you calling that one person out and not saying a word to demigod is just that, BS. I also commented way up further, that you don’t need to argue with him to get the point across. I also didn’t insult you or fight with you to get my point across when I asked you that question…not until you didn’t give a straight answer and accused me of not letting you have your own opinions. Anyways, as far as that goes, now I’m wondering WHY you jumped on Moviefan for calling demigod “gay”…but have not yet said a word to Muhammad McDingDong about his “damn faries” comment? Aren’t you usually the one who swarms people for making anti-gay comments? Just sayin…

    Anyways, anyone who thinks that my reply to Muhammad on Jan. 10 @ 11:39 PM is “inappropriate”, should have seen the comment he wrote to me after his first comment about a bunch of sexual stuff, which Tribute rightfully deleted.

  100. mandee • January 11, 2010 @ 4:24 PM

    Nancy on January 11, 2010 3:48 PM i dont care. insulting someone because you dont like their opinions or thoughts is petty. im not going to sit here and fight with you and fight with you. im apparently the more mature one on here. type til your fingers fall off, i have no problems with that. i wont be reading your rants until you start acting normal again, nor will i reply to any more of your attempts to fight with me. also, i didnt say anything to muhammad because i also assumed he was joking. you were the one that took it personally and freaked out, and he even later admitted he was just joking around. no one seriously thinks that way. anyhow, take care! when youre back to being “nancy” we will probably chat again.

  101. Nancy • January 11, 2010 @ 6:41 PM

    I DID NOT insult you because I don’t like your opinions and thoughts. Muhammad also DID NOT admit later that he was joking! What have you been smoking anyways? Lots of people think that way, that gays should be sent somewhere else…where the hell have you been for the past 10 years? You think all these things are jokes? Seriously? Whenever anyone else disses gays, you’re all over them like white on rice! How do you know moviefan wasn’t “joking” when she said demigod was “gay”? I mean, “you were the one who took it personally and freaked out”. Oh right…she’s not on your ‘buddy list’!! YOU… “apparently the more mature one on here”? BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! Now THAT is the “joke”!! Don’t read my comments then…because I don’t wanna be on your buddy list, you’re too, uh, how do you say…uh…”needy”. Don’t hold your breath on us ever chatting again. You’re fake.

  102. mandee • January 11, 2010 @ 8:13 PM

    thanks hon. guess this means WE are friends now too? lol. hope you have an amazing year! mines actually getting reallllly good already!! thanks for the kind words !

  103. mandee • January 11, 2010 @ 8:27 PM

    oops, by the way you were RIGHT for once nancy. he didnt say he was joking, i misread his comment. so sorry about that, and YES i DO personally believe the first comment was sexist and uncalled for, but i dont actually care enough about what is said on a gossip website to let it disrupt my entire being and cause world war 3 over.

  104. Nancy • January 11, 2010 @ 8:49 PM

    Nonmonogamy works: Of course you would think that way…after all, I agreed with Lloyd’s comments above and you didn’t like that at all. But, who cares! On the other hand, Mandee on Jan 02 @ 5:49 AM & @ 2:51 PM and demigod on Jan 02 @ 2:49 PM totally agreed with your comments. MWAH MWAH MWAH! So, in your very own words that you said on Jan 02 @ 12:50 PM to Lloyd: “You know nothing about me you are just making assumptions. I am not attacking you in the least but just trying to defend myself. I have better things to do than that, I am just trying to educate people who obviously don’t know what they are talking about.”

    Mandee: you can stop kissing @$$ anytime now “hon”. That shade doesn’t look good on you at all, hahahaha.

  105. Nancy • January 11, 2010 @ 8:51 PM

    Btw, I was right more than once, Mandee. And WWIII…don’t flatter yourself, “hon”, you certainly don’t “disrupt my entire being”. LOL.

  106. mandee • January 12, 2010 @ 1:12 PM

    clearly i do or else you wouldnt still be replying and youre right, im not an @$$ kisser, i just thought it would be funny to try to mimic what youre calling me ha ha. i especially love when i agree with someones comments im an @$$ kisser but when you agree with someones comments yourewhat? intellectual? haha

  107. Nancy • January 12, 2010 @ 5:53 PM

    You just don’t get it do ya? Just flies right over your head, doesn’t it? Or maybe through it…. I didn’t call you an @$$ kisser because you “agree with someones comments”. It’s your “hon”; “hope you have an amazing year!”; “thanks for the kind words”; “how have you been lately?”; “hope youre having a great day”, etc., etc., blah, blah, blah, that I consider “@$$ kissing”. And yes, I’m very “intellectual”.

    So, if you think that you “disrupt my entire being” because I still reply to you…then why is it that you keep replying to me? Especially since you claimed not so long ago that you “HAVE a life” and I don’t. Especially since you’ve claimed how many times now that you are not going to respond to me anymore until I can have an “ADULT” conversation. But yet, here you are…still replying, hahahaha.

    Are ya gettin any of this yet? YOU are doing ALL the things you accuse me of. Hey, I could swear that I told you that before!

  108. mandee • January 12, 2010 @ 8:16 PM

    i agree “hon” is way over the top, but the rest? seriously? you dont honestly believe someone can genuinely care enough to say things like “hope you have an amazing year” or “how are you” to another person? im not bitter like you, i do genuinely hope these people are doing ok and they have an amazing year. unlike you, i dont wish harm or bad things on others. and you are also doing all the things i accuse you of, so why is it ok for you but not ok for me? thats the point im trying to get across to you now. if its ALRIGHT for you, its ALRIGHT for me.

  109. Nancy • January 12, 2010 @ 9:16 PM

    “unlike you, i dont wish harm or bad things on others”

    Oh, do I now? News to me. I can’t recall wishing “harm or bad things on others”..?? Why do you need to lie, Mandee?

    “you don’t honestly believe someone can genuinely care enough to say things like “hope you have an amazing year” or “how are you” to another person?”

    Yeah, but only after they praise you, right? Hahaha.

    “you are also doing all the things i accuse you of, so why is it ok for you but not ok for me?”

    I never said it wasn’t okay for you…I just pointed out that you’re doing those things as well…and then insisting that “I” am the childish one. Well, the saying goes ‘What’s good for the goose, is good for the gander’

    Btw, did you notice that you’re still replying to me when you said you wouldn’t? LMAO.

  110. mandee • January 12, 2010 @ 11:05 PM

    meh, im bored today is a slow day for me. also, thats the first time whoever it was commented here and they wished us all a good year, so clearly the only way to go would be to also wish them AT LEAST a good year. so no, it had nothing to do with her “praising” me. and i generally ask how people are, so what if for a little while i didnt? doesnt mean im “@$$ kissing” when i finally DO ask them, it just means i was busy and being selfish and worrying about myself for a while rather than everyone around me. and im not lying, you wish bad things on joanne all the time. the one time you said you hoped she got the swine flu because she deserved it. so clearly, me saying you “wish harm” to others wasnt a lie. even if YOU dont want to believe it, joanne is a person and has feelings just like the rest of us. perhaps if you chilled out and spent some time TALKING with her instead of constantly fighting youd understand that.

  111. Nancy • January 13, 2010 @ 9:55 AM

    Hahaha, if I had to “talk” to Jo-WAnne, I’d wish swine flu on myself!!! Hahaha. She’s like you. She NEEDS that “nest”. There is no reasoning with her if your not a member of the “nest”. I despise her and that will never change so don’t try play medium. I have only once said that with any luck, the queen of the leeches may have contracted h1n1 because, for once, it was soooooooo nice, peaceful, quiet and civilized on here. I’m pretty sure I’m not the only one who thunk it, LOL. Anyways, I don’t wish any harm to “others” and, in fact, I wished EVERYONE on this site (old and new) a very Merry Christmas…and I even specified “ALL the regulars” as well as the newcomers…and guess who the comment was to? It was to Demigod…because he was starting to argue again so I said “bah-humbug, suck it up for a day and have a Merry Christmas!”, there were a handful who could put their differences aside and say the same thing. Demigod and Jo-WAnne were not amongst them, were they? So, who did you say should “chill out instead of constantly fighting”?

    Btw, it’s not “selfish” to put yourself first once in a while.

    Oh, and that IS NOT the first time that person has commented here. nomonogamy works DID comment before and only praises you and demigod because you both tripped over your own feet to agree with her. Comments proving such are above ▲ Nonmonogamy works Jan 02, 2010 @ 12:50 PM.

  112. Jo-Anne • January 13, 2010 @ 10:42 AM

    to actually wish swine flu on me, Nance? W O W
    now, that’s evil…

  113. mandee • January 13, 2010 @ 1:09 PM

    Nancy on January 13, 2010 9:55 AM ok, so then i was right. im NOT a liar because you hoped jo had swine flu. i have never hoped anyone has ever had anything bad. also, good for you. you said merry christmas once. when do you show compassion/empathy towards others on here? when do you try to show understanding? you dont. thats what the problem is. thats why you see my “have an amazing year” “how are you” comments to be something they arent. also, i never noticed nonmonogamy posting before, i obviously wasnt paying attention to the name because i thought it was a different name that commented when i wished them an amazing new year. also, me and nonmonogamy had agreed with each other on this article, but he/she never wished me a happy new year until just now, which would explain why i never thought to say it first. anyways, i dont care. like i said, i have a few days where im doing nothing and thats the only reason im even in here. i dont care that you dont like me, demigod, joanne, and everyone else on the planet. it really doesnt hurt my feelings.

  114. mandee • January 13, 2010 @ 1:12 PM

    by the way, i meant before this article i never noticed him/her commenting. i see how that next sentence makes it contradictory.

  115. Jo-Anne • January 13, 2010 @ 1:31 PM

    hello mandee, just wondering something. Maybe you can clear it up for me…

    why do you try so hard with her? I see nothing but insults after insults directed at you, some of them very cruel and all of them unnecessary. Do you not think you are turning the other cheek far too often with this person? I am not advocating “fighting” with her but believing in yourself as having true worth and refusing to accept this kind of behaviour can never be viewed as a poor choice.

    You know I think very poorly of her and also the other 3 who do nothing original but mimic the bad taste remarks, but I get the strong sense here you are trying to patch up a “relationship” that can only work should you be the perpetual underdog (like the other 3, that’s why her acceptance for them has always been there)

    I have corresponded with you in the past, and believe you to have true compassion and a good heart and know you’ll carry that with you into the future, whatever you choose to do. I know you’ve had a lot of hardship throughout your life and few breaks, but you’ve got to believe in yourself and make good decisions.

    Don’t be intimidated by bullies here or anywhere and demand respect from everyone you connect with, if it’s not there, they don’t deserve any part of you…

  116. Muhammad McBride • January 13, 2010 @ 1:43 PM

    Nancy I just read some more of the comments, cause i needed a laugh. Thanks btw I do think you’re funny. You are wrong on 1 thing though I did state I was joking when I posted 1 about you and demigod in which I said I think he does the same thing I had done which was post something to get idiots riled up. That was an admission that it was me joking. I was being an azz to get a laugh out of some pals and you freaking out just made it all the more fun (I mean come on MUHAMMAD just screams joke)

    Tribute girl of course my comments were inappropriate, that was the point of it, if I had come on here saying I think monogamy is the right good christian thing to do I don’t think I’d have gotten any laughs.

    As for my real opinions who someone sleeps with is their own business as long as it works for them, a realationship is a realationship no matter what form like some saying To-MAY-to and some To-MA-to, either way it’s the same thing

  117. mandee • January 13, 2010 @ 4:17 PM

    jo, hi there. how are you doing? thanks for the comment and the concern! im glad to know theres still some people around here that care about others! its not that im trying to “fix” anything with nancy, i just want her to talk like a person again. i have never been one to hold grudges, i get over things extremely quickly (im not exactly sure why that is?). i dont believe that its because im “needy” or “clingy” i believe its because im a people person. i enjoy the company of others, i dont mind the fighting when its in good taste, but i think youre right a lot of the time its unnecessary and unwarranted and simply just petty. im the same way in real life, it doesnt matter what you say or do to me, within a few mins (or perhaps a few days depending how bad it is!) i have already forgiven and let it go and everythings back to normal again. i dont understand the people that can (and do!) hold on to the past and grudges and bad feelings just to be miserable or fight. (i dont mean just one specific person here, i mean anyone!) i cant seem to figure it out. why would anyone want to stay miserable rather than just get over it all and be happy and friendly with everyone? you can dislike someone but still be friendly and nice with them. i have never hated another person, hate is too strong of a word and even the ones that have done terrible things to me, i cant bring myself to hate. i may have used the word a few times about celebs i dislike, but i dont actually hate anyone or anything. i guess im just not vengeful? hope that explains why im still talking to nancy. im not sure if i made much sense (as i, and others have pointed out, i rarely do!) hope youre having a nice day (everyone on here!) take care.

    Muhammad McBride on January 13, 2010 1:43 PM i thought you had said you were joking! i think maybe they deleted the comment when i went back to check? i knew you werent being serious 😛

  118. Nancy • January 13, 2010 @ 6:06 PM

    Mandee: You say “i have never hoped anyone has ever had anything bad”…I beg to differ, because you directly told me before that I deserved to be assaulted and that my kids should be taken away and that my children would never amount to anything in life. Remember? Now if that doesn’t say “compassion/empathy”, I don’t know what does! Hahaha. I’ve showed compassion/empathy quite often on here (even to you, demigod and apologized to Jo-WAnne) but even more so in my day to day life. Actually, when it comes to the 3 above mentioned, I’ve showed more compassion to the 3 of you than any of you showed me. All 3 of you have laughed and joked that my children should be taken away, so…I wouldn’t be talking if I were you…you neither, Jo-WAnne.

  119. Nancy • January 13, 2010 @ 6:10 PM

    Jo-WAnne: As for what was said about you having the swine flu, I was joking because it was so quiet and peaceful on here. Seems funny everyone takes others comments as jokes and condemn me for taking things too seriously but yet, I make a comment and everyone is all GASP!!

  120. Nancy • January 13, 2010 @ 6:39 PM

    And Mandee, you knew it was a joke! After all we WERE joking around about you calling me the devil (in Jo-WAnne’s eyes) and I was asking where my pitchfork was and followed up the “Well I do!” comment with my “Hahahahaha”. You consider everything else to be a joke but took THAT comment seriously? LOL.

    Check it out at the end (Nov 23 comments from Tributegirl, Mandee and me) of the Nov 20,2009 ‘Claire Danes Forgets Important Clothing Item’ article.

  121. mandee • January 13, 2010 @ 10:17 PM

    Nancy on January 13, 2010 6:06 PM HAHAHAHAHA ! i only said those things because the direct insults/rude comments you threw my way. about my home life, my family, whats happened with and to me in my past etc. i never actually WISHED them on you, i only said them to p*iss you off. clearly it worked. also, when did you show me ANYTHING other than attitude? sure you pretended to be nice for a while, off and on here and there, but when did you ACTUALLY mean any of it? guess im not the only “fake” one on here?

    Nancy on January 13, 2010 6:39 PM no i didnt find it a joke when we were messing around and you decided to talk about someones health. if you were joking you could have told us. when its light hearted i find it to be joking. anyways, youve always been hateful towards joanne so why would i have assumed you werent being serious? are you just joking with all the other comments you say about her too? or will you wait til our next fight and then try to say it was all in pure, good fun?

  122. Nancy • January 13, 2010 @ 10:37 PM

    Whether you meant them or not, Mandee, you still said them and it was AFTER you said those things that I freaked on you and called you a “schizo”, etc….AFTER. Also, when I was nice to you, I “ACTUALLY” did mean it. Then you say I take everything the wrong way! Maybe you should go on back to the Nov. 20 Claire Danes article and re-read the last comments before you ACCUSE me of things that aren’t true. It is very obvious that I was joking. I shouldn’t have had to say it! No one else says they are joking but yet, that’s how you seem to take all their “sexist” and “anti-gay” comments. Hahaha. “if you were joking you could have told us”, pfft! Now, no, I can’t say I’m just joking about all the other things I say to/about Jo-WAnne…nor she to me, I bet, but, that’s really none of your beeswax now, is it? You just proved by your comment above that YOU are TOTALLY whacked! Seriously. You and everyone else can cry “it was a joke” when confronted, meanwhile, there was nothing funny about it/them, but yet, when I say something jokingly (including my “hahaha”‘s and “where’s my pitchfork? 😀 “), you run around boo-hooing and whining about what I’ve said. Also, I notice on that article, that you never said anything about it then…so why now? “or will you wait til our next fight and then try to say it ‘WASN’T’ all in pure, good fun?” Hypocrite…once again.

  123. Nancy • January 13, 2010 @ 10:40 PM

    Oh, and two can play that game…

    If you were just trying to piss me off, you could have told us.

    Sound familiar? I mean, if I have to tell when I’m joking, I guess everyone should have to tell what point they are getting at, right?

  124. Jo-Anne • January 13, 2010 @ 11:08 PM

    how can you actually stomach this, mandee….complete crap

    sad this IS her life….

    yes, you are way more forgiving than I am, but I only forgive those that deserve to be forgiven….

  125. mandee • January 14, 2010 @ 1:20 AM

    Nancy on January 13, 2010 10:37 PM im sure you actually meant it when you were nice to me, haha what a laugh. especially considering your entire rant about how “fake” i am and how you dont wanna be friends with someone like me etc etc. and its funny this whole fight is based on something that was “none of your beeswax”. when you start minding your own business, ill start minding my own business. the rest of the stuff you b*itched about, i dont even care enough to answer to. you are the reason we are fighting nancy, not me. because you didnt mind your own “beeswax” and because you are “whacked”. none of it is because of me.

    i agree completely with your entire comment jo. im glad that theres a few of us on here that can still get along.

  126. tributegirl • January 14, 2010 @ 10:42 AM

    I have a feeling that if mandee and Nancy were left alone to sort this out, it would all work out fine, like it always has. But people who try to sway one person against the other, like the person who commented on Jan 13, at 11:08 pm, are the reason these things drag on so long. Too bad she can’t keep her big nose out of it, but she never has, can’t expect her to now.
    mandee, Nancy, I don’t think either of you are “fake”, I think you both say exactly what is on your minds, always have, always will, which is one thing I really like about both of you. It’s probably also part of the reason you butt heads sometimes, and part of the reason you both get along sometimes.
    I think sometimes things are taken out of context, maybe one person is serious about something, or just joking around, and the other person takes it the wrong way. It’s happened before, I think it was mandee that said once that it is hard sometimes to tell, because it is all text, not face to face conversation.
    Now, I’m not sure exactly how this most recent fight got started, but is it possible that there was a misunderstanding? Or even if there wasn’t, is it worth all this?

  127. Nancy • January 14, 2010 @ 10:45 AM

    You know what, Mandee? I really don’t care what either of you think so there’s no reason for me to lie about it. I was sincere in being nice to you but, you just keep whining and whining about your life…your wisdom teeth for example, you whine and whine about them and getting welfare to pay for them because you can’t afford to but yet, you say you buy a ton of stuff for your niece all the time…whose mother is on a disability pension and has all her dental stuff covered! It doesn’t add up and it gets very tiring after awhile. Like I commented on the Charlie Sheen article, there is only so long that a person can continue riding the rollercoaster…and there is only so much BS one can endure listening to. So go run back into your nest and snuggle up to your coddlers. LOL.

    This “fight”, Mandee, is because you can’t give the same opinion to a friend that you give to a stranger. So yes, it’s on you.

    “i agree completely with your entire comment jo. im glad theres a few of us on here that can still get along.”

    – Hahaha, tick tock, tick tock…

  128. tributegirl • January 14, 2010 @ 10:48 AM

    Muhammad McBride on January 13, 2010 1:43 PM

    I figured you were joking around, not too many people would come onto a public forum like this and say those things. My point was, your comment was full of vulgar comments, then Nancy’s reply was full of vulgar comments back to you, why does this one person who claims to be all innocent and NOT an instigator, slam Nancy’s reply to you, yet not your original comments? Because she IS an instigator!

    Btw, yes, Muhammad does “scream joke” these days, and I actually did laugh at the name, I haven’t met too many Irish “Muhammad”‘s!

  129. mandee • January 14, 2010 @ 2:58 PM

    Nancy on January 14, 2010 10:45 AM i havent bought my niece a thing since i got on ei, i had all of her christmas shopping done with money i saved up (which wasnt much let me tell you!) i spent maybe 100 on her this year. also, for my wisdom teeth because they are impacted they said it would cost me 400 PER tooth, i need all 4, plus 200 for xrays, 400 to be put out. how can i afford that on 460 a month when i pay 400 rent? also, i wasnt whining about getting them out at all, im HAPPY im finally getting them out. have you been through the pain and suffering of impacted wisdom teeth? they should have been out when i was 16 but i ended up getting cut off my parents dental plan because i started working in a donut shop, i have put it off for 9 years and they are excruciating. excuse me for being excited to be relieved from severe headaches, jaw pain, gum pain etc etc.

    “This fight, Mandee, is because you cant give the same opinion to a friend that you give to a stranger. So yes, its on you.” thats hilarious considering the fact its pretty often im referred to being YOUR friend by others and i have no problems calling you on YOUR “BS”. clearly id have WAY more friends if i was “nesting” or if i didnt stand up to them, and there would be much less fighting if i was as “fake” as you seem to think. the reason you accuse me of “siding” is because theres only ever 2 possible ways to go, either you agree with what is being said or you disagree. you ONLY accuse me of “siding” with others or “nesting” when i dont agree with YOU. im allowed to have differing opinions than you.

    tg, i really like you and i dont mind your comment at all, but it was nancy who started this fight.

  130. Nancy • January 14, 2010 @ 5:20 PM

    Jeeze, I never said you had to have the same damn opinion as me! What part of that don’t you understand? For the millionth time…you called a stranger out for ONE sexist comment but you never said one word over the months and months and months of sexist comments from one other person. Plain and simple. Your excuses were:

    (1) I thought he was joking
    (2) I agree with most of the things he says about females

    “but it was nancy who started this fight” – Noooooo, it was Nancy who had the guts to call you out for being biased. Actually, it just started with me asking you a simple question as to why you questioned one and not the other but you turned around and lied about your motives.

    As for your wisdom teeth, I’m tempted to drive to Oshawa, pliers in hand, and pull the damn things for you so we don’t have to hear about it anymore! LOL.

  131. mandee • January 14, 2010 @ 7:42 PM

    id gladly let you take them out! ive been thinking about buying a bottle of JD and removing them myself! not even sure now if ill be covered for them since for some reason they just cut me off welfare (interesting because i JUST went on :S )

  132. tributegirl • January 14, 2010 @ 9:57 PM

    Aren’t you due for another hand job?

    mandee, you really should look into that, they don’t normally just cut people off, find out why they did that, this isn’t good! And it doesn’t make any sense. When did your EI run out? I wonder if that has anything to do with it? And I REALLY wouldn’t recommend pulling your own teeth, I know someone who had to do that, and I can’t imagine the pain!

  133. mandee • January 14, 2010 @ 10:46 PM

    tg, i tried for hours today calling non stop, they put me through to a supervisor, none of them EVER answer the phones over there except the receptionist! also, i dropped off papers i copied proving i was doing what they told me to (the letter mentioned something about participation? i assumed it meant the info session, but i went etc) and they called here while i was out after that i washed my truck and came back and they were closed but they told my mom to tell me no it wasnt about any of that it was something else. its driving me nuts, gotta wait til they call me tomorrow morning when he gets in to find out why. yeah, i know i probably wouldnt pull them myself lmao i just wish i could sometimes! 😀

  134. Nancy • January 14, 2010 @ 11:57 PM

    Well, Jo-WAnne…maybe you should take your own advice. Take a little break. “have mercy on us”…instead, you FORCE this site to delete your comments. Oh, maybe that partly has to do with YOU not getting the order right…YOU usually start it and keep it going! INSTIGATOR!

  135. Nancy • January 15, 2010 @ 12:00 AM

    It’s pretty funny you know. At least I know WHY my comments get deleted. So I’m a little vulgar every now and then, hahaha. But you, miss goody-goody instigator who likes to laugh at my vulgar comments getting deleted yet, here you are…wondering…asking…”Tribute oh Tribute, why must you delete my comments?” Freaking hilarious! “P

  136. Nancy • January 15, 2010 @ 12:02 AM

    Ooops, that should be 😛

    I sure do wonder why Demigod hasn’t been commenting lately…??? Maybe he should get a real cottage instead of having to be sent to the ‘Tribute cabin’, hahahaha.

  137. Thibz • January 15, 2010 @ 7:43 AM

    How long can you guys go at this….seriously how long….And im also curious what do you “Nancy” do day to day? Whats a day in the Life Of Nancy like? Id love to hear about your daily activities.
    This site should be called “These are the Tributes of our Lives”.

  138. tributegirl • January 15, 2010 @ 10:10 AM

    Sure I’ve used that line before, and I’ll use it again, just like you do with all your lame-o crap. OH, and by the way, it looks like several of your comments were deleted BEFORE I got to read them, so no, I don’t live on here, but it would appear that you do. And no, your “message” didn’t get across, what is it you’re trying to say? And be nice, now, you don’t want another one deleted!

  139. tributegirl • January 15, 2010 @ 10:13 AM

    Mandee, good luck, they owe you an answer, they can’t just cut you off and not tell you why. They have to tell you why, and give you a chance to argue it, or to correct whatever it is you might have done that got it cut off in the first place. Let us know what you find out!
    And I’m glad you won’t pull out your own teeth, that would be unbearable, plus there’s always the chance of complications. And I hate to say it, but with the way your luck runs, that’s exactly what would happen.

  140. Nancy • January 15, 2010 @ 11:20 AM

    Tributegirl Jan.15, 2010 @ 10:10 AM – Hilarious!

    Thibz: Why would I tell you anything personal about my life? Trust me, I know what you’re getting at and you can relax because yes, I do have a job and I do have a life and I spend plenty of time with my kids. Hey, even have friends…and get this…a couple of them are, GASP!..male. LOL.

  141. Thibz • January 15, 2010 @ 12:57 PM

    No seriously im not getting at anything, my comments on here mostly always about the article at hand. I almost never really “attack” other comments on here.
    I not sure what your comments about males is about but anyway i was just curious.
    Tributegirl just curious if that comment was directed to me?tributegirl on January 15, 2010 10:13 AM

  142. Nancy • January 15, 2010 @ 1:20 PM

    Uh, yeah, sure..?? Then why on earth would you like to hear about my (specifically “Nancy’s”) daily activities? I already have a boyfriend. Seriously, you ARE trying to get at something so, just admit it and come clean. What’s it to ya? I will tell you something…just a little tidbit…It’s 12:20 my time right now (Tribute doesn’t do daylight savings time changes, LOL), and I am on my lunch break.

  143. Nancy • January 15, 2010 @ 1:22 PM

    Btw, hahahaha, I think you must mean Tributegirl’s 10:10 AM comment…unless your name is Mandee, LMFAO!

  144. tributegirl • January 15, 2010 @ 1:48 PM

    Thibz, I’m also assuming you mean my 10:10 comment. It actually wasn’t to either of you, it was a reply to Jo-WAnne’s comment which got deleted, AGAIN! She was just doing her usual pi$$ing and moaning, so that was for her. Sorry for the confusion, sometimes when they delete one comment, the replies look kind of out of place, don’t they!

  145. Thibz • January 15, 2010 @ 2:49 PM

    Ok Nancy you got me :P, i was just wondering if you could talk about other things besides what you normally talk about, ie; Trash talk, finger pointing, Detective work, know the usual. Most all these topics spurt off into completely different things then what the initail article was about to begin with.
    And i am not a drama person lol so dont think about dragging me in on your little games haha.
    Take care

  146. mandee • January 15, 2010 @ 3:48 PM

    tributegirl on January 15, 2010 10:13 AM LMFAO youre right. with the way my luck goes there would have to be SOMETHING ! he didnt call me today, so i called and called, no answer so i talked to the receptionist she says she has no idea whats going on, put me on hold, came back and told me im no longer suspended? so i have no idea whats going on! glad they fixed it though.

  147. Nancy • January 15, 2010 @ 5:11 PM

    Thibz: “And i am not a drama person lol so dont think about dragging me in on your little games haha.”

    Drag you in? You walked in on your own, hahaha.

    Btw, maybe you should address your “off topic” comment to all who do it instead of just one person. Also, to be coming this far back into the archives, reading the comments and involving yourself by commenting…you so obviously ARE a “drama person”!! You love it and you know it otherwise you would avoid it like the plague.

  148. tributegirl • January 15, 2010 @ 6:32 PM

    mandee, I’m really glad they fixed it, but I find it really weird that they did this in the first place. I still think they should tell you why they did it. But anyway, you’ll be able to get your dental work done! 🙂
    Thibz, how come you want to know what Nancy does everyday? I’m guessing she does what the rest of us do, work, eat, sleep, stuff with the kids, housework, computer….I’m also guessing that like everybody else on here, she’s probably not too interested in giving out too much personal info on herself!

  149. Thibz • January 16, 2010 @ 6:56 AM

    Meh i dont care. Yes, it is enjoyable to read a few of all of your comments from time to time. And i couldnt care less about personal information, that was said to simply change the topic just like MM. It was directed to Nancy because shes the most frequent gossiper on here. Anyhow im retireing from this article lol:P
    Thanks for the laughs

  150. Nancy • January 16, 2010 @ 7:41 PM

    I’m only the “most frequent gossiper on here” because the members of the “nest” can’t go it alone, they have to attack in packs, whereas I CAN go it alone. So, it’s me going back and forth between the members of the nest. LOL.

  151. Jo-Anne • January 16, 2010 @ 9:30 PM

    you’ve NEVER gone it alone….who ya kiddin’….bet even as I type this the foursome are warming up their typin’ fingers…hahahahahaha

  152. gypsy • January 17, 2010 @ 12:26 AM

    Nice Try!!!

  153. Jo-Anne • January 17, 2010 @ 12:32 AM

    there’s one down…hahahahahahaha!!!!

  154. gypsy • January 17, 2010 @ 12:40 AM

    Nancy..Keep on trucking girl,their DEFINATEY at the starting line choking on YOUR DUST!!!

  155. gypsy • January 17, 2010 @ 12:45 AM


  156. Jo-Anne • January 17, 2010 @ 2:30 AM

    you say “their DEFINATEY”…

    W O W

    chokeworthy for sure, gyp….

  157. Nancy • January 17, 2010 @ 2:36 AM

    See what I mean? Then when the old hag is down for the count, she starts picking on the spelling errors…makes her feel superior, I guess…”chokeworthy for sure”. Wonder why her comments are getting deleted in between though, hahaha. Must be full of “vulgarity”. LMFAO!

  158. Nancy • January 17, 2010 @ 2:37 AM

    She’s just gotta keep it goin though!

  159. Jo-Anne • January 17, 2010 @ 3:02 AM

    yup….definAtely…hmmmmm….wasn’t it you who pointed that out?
    guess you’re the old hag down for the count….

    hahaha !!!

  160. Nancy • January 17, 2010 @ 3:18 AM

    Read it, hag: Jo-WAnne, Jan. 17 @ 2:30 AM. Yup…definAtely is you who pointed out the spelling. You know though, as long as the first and last letters of a word are in the correct place, the brain can still decipher what the word is…makes sense as to why you keep picking on spelling..must be hard for you to figure out. Hey, I thought elderly people went to bed earlier than 3 AM…?? LMAO!

  161. Jo-Anne • January 17, 2010 @ 3:28 AM

    so did I….why you up?

    besides the obvious reason……anxiously awaiting my response


  162. Nancy • January 17, 2010 @ 3:39 AM

    Bet you have waaayyy more wrinkles than me, hahaha.

    “awaiting my response”…hippocrite, LMAO!

  163. mandee • January 17, 2010 @ 5:19 AM

    Nancy on January 16, 2010 7:41 PM is this you trying to drag me back into your drama? i havent commented to you in a while, isnt it about time you give it a rest? talking about someone picking on someone elses spelling is petty, especially when you started off by talking about multiple people who werent even speaking to you or doing anything wrong.

  164. mandee • January 17, 2010 @ 5:25 AM

    theres usually only ever 2 sides to an opinion. yours, gypsys and tributegirls (im not trying to start a fight with you 2!) and joannes and demigods. if i agree with you and tributegirl im all of a sudden an “@$$ kisser” if i agree with demigod or joanne im “nesting” and an “@$$ kisser”. so, going by your definitions, are you a “nester” or an “@$$ kisser”? because you always side with the same people? when i agree with someone or im friendly with someone you have nothing but terrible names to call me, meanwhile you spend all of your time “on the same team”, so clearly whatever category you are accusing me of being you also fit into.

  165. Jo-Anne • January 17, 2010 @ 7:23 AM

    wow, mandee, so well put…I’m not wrong about you, your maturity comes through time and time again, you nailed it…

    truthfully, I couldn’t care less about spelling errors, but when the entire “style” of writing screams of lewd vulgarities strewn together with inappropriate in your face trash talk….yeah, it’s time to respond and question the necessity of such comments…

    sure, I make a point of it…with certain people…but only those people who should practice better manners whilst showering criticism at others…

  166. Nancy • January 17, 2010 @ 2:25 PM

    Mandee: DUH! I was not trying to “drag” you back into anything! I was replying to Thibz. So “isn’t it about time” you shut up and quit trying to tell me what to do? If me telling Jo-WAnne that picking on someone elses spelling is petty, then how low is she for picking on it to start with? Btw, YOU are calling yourself “petty” then because above on Jan. 8th, I laughed at a word demigod misspelled (laughed at the word…not the spelling) “perpective” and you started in with the “spelling and grammar” crap, hypocrite. Another hypocritical moment of yours is in your last comment…DRAGging Gypsy, Tributegirl and demigod in through your comment. I mean, I didn’t even say any names in my comment and you flew onto me about it! You are such a follower and you just proved what I said about attacking in a pack. I have my own opinions, Mandee. I speak my own opinion no matter WHO it is in agreement with (check out the Libby and Michael Return to Lost article…I even AGREED with JO_WANNE!!!!). I am closest to the people who think and have opinions similar to mine on here, even though at times, we DO disagree. That is understandable in ANY situation. I don’t turn on them for petty stuff and then run with another pack..and then turn on them and go back to the other pack. That’s what I mean, you flip flop back and forth to what and who suits you best for the time being. It’s only a matter of time before you’re kissing the @$$ of another. Now, I’ll tell you one more time, Mandee…it is not your opinions and whether you agree with me or not, I could really care less, and we always have differing opinions but I don’t say anything to you so, there goes your theory of me trying to “shove” my opinions down your throat. The problem I have with you is that you are biased towards your ‘friend of the day’, hahaha. Don’t even try to deny it. Everyone knows it’s true.

  167. mandee • January 17, 2010 @ 3:23 PM

    interesting youre still dragging up THE PAST instead of staying with only the current conversation we are having. the reason i asked you if you were dragging me back into your drama was your “nesting” comment. its funny the people you accuse of nesting are only me, joanne and demigod, and instead of only referring to a single person in your comment, you referred to multiple people (meaning me, demigod and joanne) how did you of all people miss that? also, “friend of the day” ahaha. so im not allowed to agree with joanne and demigod say, today and then agree with you and tributegirl tomorrow or else im an “@$$ kisser” and picking a “friend of the day”? this is getting old. i am one of the few left on here that actually CAN have discussions with others without fighting, also disagree with others without fighting (until someone goes out of their way to pick a fight with me, that being you!). im not going to go and check “other articles” for anything because even on the days you DO agree with joanne youre still rude to her about it. i wasnt dragging anyone into our fight, i even said i wasnt trying to fight with them i was just proving my point. nice try though 🙂

  168. Nancy • January 17, 2010 @ 3:40 PM

    Actually, I didn’t say anything rude to Jo-WAnne on the Lost article at all and you don’t want to go see that I DID actually agree with her because then that would PROVE YOU WRONG, once again! Now, my “nesting” comment (which shouldn’t need to be explained AGAIN) was saying that – the reason WHY I am the “most frequent gossiper” on here is because it is me going back and forth between you, Jo-WAnne, demigod, and sometimes other members of the nest….”how did you of all people miss that?” DUH! Also, AGAIN…I don’t really care WHO you “agree with”. What I am saying is that when you are fighting with one of the two groups you distinguished between above, you get all smoochie smoochie with the other group, hahaha. Proven fact. In black and white on sooooooooo many articles here. So what if you said to Gypsy and Tributegirl that you weren’t “trying to fight with them”, you still dragged their names in which I didn’t do in my comment about the “nest”. I also, was just proving my point…”nice try though” HYPOCRITE. 😉

  169. mandee • January 17, 2010 @ 5:34 PM

    “Now, my nesting comment (which shouldnt need to be explained AGAIN) was saying that the reason WHY I am the most frequent gossiper on here is because it is me going back and forth between you, Jo-WAnne, demigod, and sometimes other members of the nest.”

    EXACTLY! that was YOU trying to drag ME back into your fight by talking trash about me once again! (calling me a “nester” in case you need me to explain to you how its talking trash about me) so, once again you are guilty of starting another fight between us. glad to see you can let bygones be bygones. also, im ALWAYS friendly with gypsy, tributegirl and demigod, the only 2 i seem to have issues with from time to time are you and joanne. clearly i only have issues with you because you act like a child. me and joanne also act like children with each other sometimes but then the mature adult in us comes out and we can go back to being civil. still waiting for that side to come out in you. and WOW you picked ONE whole article EVER to be NICE when you agreed with joanne? thats a big step for you! usually you go on and on about “i cant believe im actually going to say this but i agree with joanne” or whatnot. just because you agree with someone doesnt keep you (personally) from being a b*itch to everyone every chance you get. perhaps you should consider seeing someone about your rage issues? its really starting to interfere with your life.

  170. Nancy • January 17, 2010 @ 5:46 PM

    Perhaps YOU should see someone about still being a schizo! This is not “another fight”. Where have you been? You know where I stand already. I’ve already gone through this “nest” thing with you before. So, what part of it did you not understand from before? I have no “rage issues” and you nor anyone else nor this site, interferes with my life, LMAO. Get a grip, schizo. You’re just love to bring out the “b*tch” in me, hahaha. When are you gonna realize “hon” that I don’t give a BEEP what you think…that is, when you actually do THINK! LMAO.

  171. Nancy • January 17, 2010 @ 5:48 PM

    I even left the spelling error in there for your “buddy”, hahaha.

  172. mandee • January 17, 2010 @ 9:51 PM

    “schizo” ?? haha. im not the one on here displaying 2 personalities nancy. “schizo” seems to fit your profile a hell of a lot better than it fits mine. give it a day or so, youll prove it by trying to pretend youre being nice to me again. the difference is, i AM a nice person, im just willing to defend myself. i dont start unnecessary fights the way you do.

  173. Nancy • January 17, 2010 @ 10:34 PM

    Well, there is where you are definitely wrong, Mandee. I most certainly am a nice person, of course, you don’t know me so you wouldn’t know.

    “give it a day or so, youll prove it by trying to pretend youre being nice to me again” – hahahaha. I’ve NEVER pretended to be nice to you. Also, we’ve been at each others throats for what, about a week now? So, I think you’re off by about a “day or so”, LMAO!

    Btw, I’m very far from being schizo…unlike you, I don’t have to hide out and be afraid of things, hahaha.

Sorry, comments on this story are closed.

Similar Articles

Trending Articles

Current Poll

  • Which Denzel Washington movie is your favorite?

    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...

You Might Also Like

Close Menu