Britney Spears protected from parasite

Britney Spears and sons at DisneyworldA restraining order has been issued against Britney Spears‘ paparazzo ex-boyfriend (aka parasite), Adnan Ghalib. A court ruled yesterday that he is forbidden to have any contact with the pop star for three years. He cannot go within 250 yards of her or her family or have physical, email, or phone contact with any of them. He is also forbidden to speak or act on Spears’ behalf. The less-than-honorable Ghalib dated the pop star during her troubled period, during which he appeared on an nation-wide entertainment news program to talk about her personal life, including admitting that he had sex with her. He currently faces assault charges for allegedly hitting a process server (who was trying to notify him about the restraining order) with his car, but denies the charges. Spears’ father Jamie, co-manager of her personal and professional life, applied for the restraining order. In addition, he has tried to protect his daughter against her former business manager, Sam Lutfi, and lawyer Jon Eardley, for attempting to sabotage her management. A hearing is set for April 1.

Share this article:

Comments & Discussion

  1. Jo-Anne. • March 20, 2009 @ 8:41 AM

    on first view of the title, I thought Britney has digestive issues…ha ha parasite – good term for Ghalib…

  2. sim9999 • March 20, 2009 @ 8:14 PM

    Good riddance to bad rubbish!!!

    This guy enraged me the first time I saw him and his parasitic ways. He took advantage of someone that was in not in a proper state of mind.

    Loser!

  3. mandee • March 20, 2009 @ 9:28 PM

    i didnt hear anything about any of this until JUST now. i wonder if a restraining order will actually be able to help her in this situation? as if hitting a man with your car isnt proof youre a little nutty? and totally off topic, but does anyone actually AGREE with dressing your kids (that arent even twins) in the exact same clothing? that irritates me to no end lol. i hate it so much !

  4. Casey • March 20, 2009 @ 11:35 PM

    Britney IS a parasite >.

  5. Minerva • March 21, 2009 @ 2:38 AM

    My, my!! Doesn’t Brittany just look the part of the stable, doting mother in this photo!! Looks like she’s even been cashing in on the “two for one” sales for the kids too!! **gag** Poor dear lady, being bothered by a nutbar. Now I wonder what it is about Brittany that would’ve made him think they were compatible…hmmm…

  6. demigod • March 22, 2009 @ 9:06 PM

    She is the handful. Let’s throw some more kids in the mix, she’s a multi-tasker.

  7. Jo-Anne • March 22, 2009 @ 9:27 PM

    hear her 2 Toronto shows were a sellout…apparently was in top form for her appearance
    good for her

    nothing like getting back on track again…

  8. demigod • March 22, 2009 @ 10:38 PM

    Jo-Anne, we don’t need all your positivity on here, it’s like a poison 🙂
    She sold out a show in Montreal on the weekend, but i made the drive to catch the hockey game 😛

  9. tributegirl • March 23, 2009 @ 3:48 PM

    Probably the people who bought her tickets were hoping to witness another wardrobe malfunction!

  10. lily • March 23, 2009 @ 4:46 PM

    I like Mandee’s question. No, I’m not a big fan either of dressing kids the same. But here’s a better one. How about those COUPLES that wear the same clothes? LOL!!!!

    P.S. Jo-Anne, I’m all for your positivity and, judging from her smiley face, so is demigod. If only for the sake of her little boys, I’m happy Britney seems healthy again.

  11. demigod • March 24, 2009 @ 4:26 AM

    I’m a guy ,dude 🙂

  12. lily • March 24, 2009 @ 7:57 AM

    Sorry, demigod! Your responses are so thoughtful and witty, I assumed you must be female!
    lol just kidding! don’t hate me all you guys out there!

  13. Jo-Anne. • March 24, 2009 @ 9:26 AM

    and how about those people who dress their wee dogs in au couture and carry them around in Gucci purses – ha ha

    thanks demigod and lily…I look forward to your remarks

  14. lily • March 24, 2009 @ 5:23 PM

    OMG Jo-Anne, how did I forget the whole “pets in clothes” category?!! LOVE that comment! And thanks for the compliment, cause I look forward to your messages too!

  15. Nancy • March 24, 2009 @ 5:32 PM

    What a bunch of @$$ kissers! 😛

  16. lily • March 24, 2009 @ 7:21 PM

    Nancy, why does it enrage you to see people being nice to each other? Why does it provoke any response from you at all? Seriously, has someone been so cruel to you in the past that now you react bitterly to every show of human kindness? I am being dead serious here, and I don’t care how angry it makes you: I am genuinely sorry for whatever bad things you have suffered. If it makes you feel better dishing it back out to total strangers who are just enjoying a chat, then dish away.

  17. Nancy • March 24, 2009 @ 8:13 PM

    lily, didn’t you see the ‘ 😛 ‘??? Who’s “enraged”? I think it’s absolutely hilarious…and so is ‘moondog’, LMAO! So true, moondog. I guess you think lily is ‘vicki’ too, huh? (Refer to March 11 Michael J. Fox.)

  18. moondog • March 24, 2009 @ 8:28 PM

    no question

  19. lily • March 24, 2009 @ 8:49 PM

    Yes, I saw the smiley face. It didn’t change the intent of your words at all, Nancy. You get very upset every time someone agrees with Jo-Anne, no matter how much you protest your only kidding. Conversations that have nothing to do with you are jumped all over as soon as they involve Jo-Anne and anyone else being pleasant to each other. Now you can’t even believe I can like chatting with her on-line without my knowing her in real life? I like Nat and demigod and mandee too, so are they all my sisters too? (and brother, in demigod’s case!)
    I like this site. Its fun and its a good break. Why is it all so intense for you? Its like you’re obsessed or something, and again I’m telling you I am really sorry if something bad happened to you and thats why you’re like this. Truly.

  20. Nancy • March 24, 2009 @ 9:22 PM

    Nope lily, I only think Jo is your sis. Oh, and nat is a guy too, LOL. Please stop feeling sorry for me lily, there is nothing wrong with who I am. You don’t know me, I’m definately not upset, angry or “obsessed”, hahaha. Honestly, I was laughing when I commented about the @$$ kissing because you and Jo are so fake. “Truly”! So please, don’t pretend you know me just because you know each other.

  21. lily • March 24, 2009 @ 9:38 PM

    This is getting really wierd.
    PS Sorry Nat! I guess I’m not too good at important details!

  22. Jo-Anne. • March 24, 2009 @ 10:05 PM

    only a short time on here, lily and you’re already “getting it” – thanks for your kind words and what you’re trying to do, but it’s futile, believe me.

    but boy, do you get it!! dead bang on…

    p.s. Vicki would be amused

  23. demigod • March 25, 2009 @ 3:37 AM

    At times, Nancy will feel left out of any camaraderie that goes on 🙂

  24. lily • March 25, 2009 @ 9:39 PM

    I love that word, demigod! Camaraderie. I like being a part of that.
    And Jo-Anne, you COULD be my sister, as long as your willing to spoil me rotten! I’m used to getting babied by my beautiful sister (she kind of raised me)and I’m always ready for more! lol!

  25. tributegirl • March 26, 2009 @ 7:51 AM

    I agree with what lily said before, this is getting really weird.

  26. Nancy • March 26, 2009 @ 8:16 AM

    Agreed Tributegirl, very weird. Sounds like feeding time! 😛

  27. Jo-Anne • March 26, 2009 @ 10:11 AM

    Lily!
    count me in for both camaraderie and volunteering for sisterly duty – I have 2 sisters myself and a l’il bro and enjoy spoiling them all!

    p.s. you sound like a really nice person, glad to have you on board

  28. Nancy • March 27, 2009 @ 8:17 AM

    Oh Tributegirl, you sound like a really nice person…you know, a breath of fresh air. I’m really glad that you “get it” and so glad to have you on board. It is not my intention to to lick your boots or to attach myself to you and follow you, I just wanted to let you know how nice it is to talk to someone who finally gets it. Thanks for being there and making this site fun and interesting again. 😛

  29. lily • March 28, 2009 @ 4:28 PM

    Jo-Anne, thats such a nice thing to say! Thank you so much! I always laugh at your funny comments but I also like how nice you are.

  30. Jo-Anne. • March 29, 2009 @ 5:48 PM

    Thanks for the compliment, Lily…

  31. Nancy • March 29, 2009 @ 6:03 PM

    That sure is alot of @$$ kissing you two… I wonder which one will be the next to bend over and which one will be puckering up..? Hahahahaha!!

  32. Jo-Anne. • March 30, 2009 @ 8:40 AM

    well, now it makes sense….

    At Chapters the other day, on special, clearance bin (educated guess – zero public interest?)

    “All you ever wanted to know about A.K., Boot Licking and General Provocation” by Nancy…

    you’ve made it abundantly clear by your step by step “technique” flaunted repeatedly here, Nancy, you’re an expert in the A.K. field…you stand alone basking in your own isolated limelight…

  33. Nancy • March 30, 2009 @ 9:40 AM

    Whatever you have to tell yourself to make your @$$ kissing more acceptable, Jo-Anne. So will you be bending today or smooching…or both, perhaps? See unlike yourself, I don’t have to kiss anyone’s @$$…and I don’t. I also don’t like those who do…it leaves an awful looking brown spot on the end of their nose….disgusting! 😛 So, I’m ASSuming you didn’t purchase the book? No wonder it didn’t sell very well…too many @$$ kissers out there nowadays!

  34. Jo-Anne • March 30, 2009 @ 1:24 PM

    No, didn’t purchase the book…concluded, with such little interest in your book, your classes were sure to be nowhere near full, so thought I’d swing by and witness that brown spot on the end of your nose firsthand….

    as dear Gervais once said, and I quote, “Are we having a laugh”???

    undoubtedly, I am…

  35. Nancy • March 30, 2009 @ 4:03 PM

    Well, you must look pretty weird having your laugh because like I said, I don’t kiss @$$ so therefore, I would have no brown spot on the end of my nose…unlike yourself….or, maybe you’re laughing because you looked in the mirror…

  36. Nancy • March 30, 2009 @ 4:11 PM

    You also avoided my question…..bending, smooching…or both? 😛

  37. Nancy • March 30, 2009 @ 6:40 PM

    Oh, and Jo and lily should not be upset that I called you two “@$$ kissers”….I mean, you brought it up first a long, long time ago Jo-Anne, when you made a comment about Tributegirl “licking Nancy’s boots”. And now, lily is on another article saying “can I agree with other people without being called an @$$ kisser?” Well lily, according to the “licking Nancy’s boots” comment that Jo-Anne made to Tributegirl….her answer would be no, you cannot “agree” with others. But “agreeing” is NOT my definition of “@$$ kissing”. It’s all that ‘ewy gooey’ stuff up above that I call @$$ kissing. 😛

  38. Jo-Anne • March 30, 2009 @ 7:09 PM

    I guess all I can say is…

    this surpasses WAY WAY beyond flattery you remember my comments “a long, long time ago”….

    I always knew you hung on my every word…but to have you actually admit it…spell it people…say it, one, two, three, repeat after me…

    P – R – O – G – R – E – S – S

  39. Nancy • March 30, 2009 @ 8:20 PM

    Hahahaha…so because I have a brain and am very good at remembering things you think I hang “on your every word”….don’t go WAY WAY beyond flattering yourself! BUT…at least you acknowledge that you DID make the comment, that’s the main thing. So yeah, I guess you are making…

    P – R – O – G – R – E – S – S

    Good job! Keep up the good work! 😀

Join The Conversation:

Trending Articles

Current Poll

  • Which Canadian actress is your favorite?

    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...

You Might Also Like


Close Menu