Hulk Hogan explains his O.J. empathy

Hulk HoganIn a recent Rolling Stone article, professional wrestler Hulk Hogan admitted to understanding O.J. Simpson’s pain. He was quoted saying, “I could have turned everything into a crime scene, like O.J., cutting everybody’s throat. You live half a mile from the 20,000-square-foot home you can’t go to anymore, you’re driving through downtown Clearwater and see a 19-year-old boy driving your Escalade, and you know that a 19-year-old boy is sleeping in your bed, with your wife. I totally understand O.J. I get it.” Hogan is currently in the middle of a hostile divorce from his wife of 23 years, Linda Bollea, who left him. Hogan said on the “Bubba the Love Sponge” radio show today that the quote was part of a larger conversation that was not printed. The Rolling Stone writer asked Hogan how he is handling the divorce, and he responded that he is feeling a wide range of emotions, from rage to depression to resignation, which led to the O.J. Simpson comments. “Twenty years ago, I would have thought about beating up my wife and her boyfriend,” he said on the show. “The way things are nowadays, you can’t do that. I don’t have a white Bronco, I’m not a killer.” He states that although he used Simpson as a metaphor for his emotions toward the divorce, he would never resort to violence. “I took the high road. I walk in the spirit of Christ.” ~Meryl H.

Share this article:

Comments & Discussion

  1. Jo-Anne • April 16, 2009 @ 11:48 AM

    so, 20 years ago beating up your wife and her boyfriend was acceptable? Wow.

  2. Stephen • April 16, 2009 @ 11:52 AM


    Maybe he meant that 20 years ago, the thought of beating up his wife and her boyfriend would have been acceptable to him because he was young and foolish.

    Or maybe I’m just hoping that that is what he meant. Otherwise, he and Sean Connery should talk.

  3. Jo-Anne • April 16, 2009 @ 11:59 AM

    Well, I am not sure, Stephen ’cause of the way he phrased it, “nowadays you can’t do that” almost like it could be done back then, but it’s unclear I guess. I hope you are right.

    ha ha Sean Connery comment….did you ever see the Saturday Night Live Jeopardy skit with Sean as a contestant? Riot!

  4. mandee • April 16, 2009 @ 12:23 PM

    whats the sean connery comment about? i dont have any idea lol. i dont really follow much about celebs. im glad he wouldnt kill his ex wife though. thats a plus.

  5. Jo-Anne • April 16, 2009 @ 12:41 PM

    Sean was “reputed” to have been a violent, abusive man towards his ex-wife…

  6. Stephen • April 16, 2009 @ 2:15 PM


    “Nowadays maybe you can’t do that” does sound like wishful thinking on his part now that I’ve read your comment.

    Oh, for ye olde days when a wee bit of a backhand would keep me wee lass in order (to be read with a Connery accent, of course).

    And no, I haven’t watch SNL since the Belushi days (and even then, rarely).

  7. Jo-Anne • April 16, 2009 @ 10:04 PM

    I like your version way better, Stephen! and I can so picture Connery on that one!

    I have a very old (VHS) Best of SNL with Belushi, Acroyd, Chase…etc and it still ranks up there with the best of the best. But I gotta say there have been many memorable hosts and moments since Belushi’s tragic demise…

  8. demigod • April 17, 2009 @ 3:25 AM

    I would find it so hypocritical if no women here start berating Mrs. Hogan for cheating. You’re all so quick to do so in Mel’s case.
    jo-Anne, he’s hurting. Can you understand? But who cares, he’s just a man..

  9. Nancy • April 17, 2009 @ 8:23 AM

    demigod, they are separated….who said “she cheated”?

  10. Jo-Anne • April 17, 2009 @ 11:07 AM

    demigod…I believe my ONLY comments on this page have been in reference to Hulk’s own comment re his applying some beatings…

    oh, I get it…you’re implying it’s okay for a hurtin’ man (as long as he’s hurtin’!!) to make such a comment (if indeed that’s what he meant – yes, I did state his meaning was “unclear” to me)

    and I gotta say it “he’s just a man” comment (clearly directed at me) was the reason for my “not understanding”….wow, you give grasping at straws a whole new meaning…

    to add substance to your peeves, maybe avoid injecting never-before-seen words into my posts and stick with what is written…

    if you’re clever enough that’s all you need

  11. Nancy • April 17, 2009 @ 12:28 PM

    Oh….I don’t see where demigod directed that statement at you, Jo-Anne. Jeeze, it would seem that ANYONE who disagrees with you is told that they are “grasping at straws”. 😛

  12. 4thjet • April 17, 2009 @ 12:46 PM

    Geeze I didn’t even know they were separated! They always looked so happy on tv. I guess things went to pot after Nick’s accident that killed his friend.

    As for his comments, I think he relates to the feelings he thinks OJ was feeling but does blow it with “you can’t do that now”.

    Couldn’t do it then either but the DA’s brought in so much scientific evidence the jury didn’t get it. (no CSI then) Nowadays the jury would get the evidence and OJ would have been long gone in jail for life.

  13. demigod • April 17, 2009 @ 3:08 PM

    There’s no mention of separation on this article, but there is mention of one in Mel’s marriage in 2006. So who’s cheating?
    Jo, Hogan was just expressing his painful divorce, and his range of emotions. I just find it predictable that most women show a total lack of sympathy because he’s a man. But I got your initial point. I was’t implying what he said is ok, but UNDERSTANDABLE.And my ‘he’s just a man’ comment was directed to ALL women. You’re grasping your own straws.

  14. Jo-Anne • April 17, 2009 @ 3:19 PM

    corection, d.g., I stopped grasping years ago…I am confident that what I say is really what I feel…

    For the record, I disagree with you on the “understandable” part as well, I fully recognize the tremendous hurt involved in relationship split, but no, I don’t understand a grown man threatening to beat anyone up, far less understand anyone saying they “get” what O.J. did, implying acceptable solution to the cheating problem…

    re the male bashers, I am happy to say I don’t count myself in with That Lot, and have expressed as much on earlier articles here, on more than one occasion. and you know what, I’d have to agree with you on the point that a good deal of women are “all over the man” when many a break-up surfaces, yet I feel every situation needs to be looked at separately and not that “all men are…” blah blah blah….has never worked for me…

  15. demigod • April 17, 2009 @ 3:41 PM

    Jo, his FEELINGS are understandable. He wasn’t ‘threatening’, because of related thoughts..doesn’t mean he would act on them.

  16. Nancy • April 17, 2009 @ 4:29 PM

    demigod, they were/are separated and are going through a divorce. In the article above, he says “You live half a mile from the 20,000-square-foot home you can’t go to anymore, you’re driving through downtown Clearwater and see a 19-year-old boy driving your Escalade, and you know that a 19-year-old boy is sleeping in your bed, with your wife.” Clearly they are separated so yeah, who’s cheating?

  17. demigod • April 17, 2009 @ 4:47 PM

    And Mel is after filing in 2006?

  18. Nancy • April 17, 2009 @ 4:50 PM

    It has been reported that Mel Gibson cheated with several women throughout his marriage. BEFORE 2 years ago. His wife supposedly separated from him in 2006 after he got nailed DUI and spewed racial slurs about Jewish people.

  19. demigod • April 17, 2009 @ 4:58 PM

    Until those women come forward, it’s all hearsay.

  20. Nancy • April 17, 2009 @ 5:10 PM

    Every article on here is “hearsay”.

  21. Jo-Anne • April 17, 2009 @ 7:15 PM

    I see where you are coming from d.g., I really do…The only point I’m trying to make is I feel, regardless of his actually having the urge to act on them or not, just SAYING it alone is enough to turn me off…options options

    I cannot fathom myself ever saying “I totally understand O.J. I get it”….

    we’ll just agree to disagee on this one…

  22. Jo-Anne • April 17, 2009 @ 7:17 PM

    and maybe when we finish “disageeing” we can move on to disagree!!! ha ha

  23. lily • April 17, 2009 @ 9:36 PM

    Nancy 4:50 and JoAnne 7:15 make the main points for this site AND the Gibson article : A)Mel’s racist and B)theres NOTHING about OJ that is understandable. Demigod, I get that Hulks in pain, and for the record his wifes a cow if she cheated on him just like any spouse who cheats. But ANY kind of sympathy for a psycho killer like OJ-and I do mean ANY-is clearly and completely sick.

  24. mandee • April 18, 2009 @ 12:53 AM

    “Every article on here is hearsay.” lmfao. good one nancy. its completely true. and youre right as well lily. actually, i agreed with just about everyone on this site. except demigod accusing all “women” of being hypocrites because we did not bash hulks wife. clearly, no one agrees with someone cheating, no matter what the sex. we do all feel the same amount of sympathy for good men that are cheated on as well as good women that are cheated on. but feeling sympathy for a man that would probably have beat/oj-ed his wife 20 years ago if she had hooked up with a 19 year old after they were separated is pretty friggen hard.

  25. demigod • April 18, 2009 @ 3:16 AM

    Ok Nancy, everything is hearsay and sure doesn’t stop you coming on here and comment on things you’re unsure about!! Like..oh I don’t know..Mel’s past affairs!!!
    At least with this russian girl we have her name, pics and confession from numerous sources.
    Mandee, you’re cute (pat on head)

  26. Nancy • April 18, 2009 @ 3:46 PM

    Exactly demigod. We all do…that’s gossip for ya! 😀 LOL.

  27. demigod • April 18, 2009 @ 4:22 PM

    Nancy on April 18, 2009 3:46 PM

    So you don’t see that as being hypocritical of you for disputing my comments?

  28. Nancy • April 18, 2009 @ 4:35 PM

    Well demigod, I’m just going by the articles that Tribute posts on here and Mel’s multiple affairs are mentioned in one particular article…not the most recent one but the one before that from this month. And yes, I know it says “rumored affairs”.

  29. demigod • April 18, 2009 @ 4:45 PM

    Then why are you going around stating it as fact of Mel cheating?

  30. Nancy • April 18, 2009 @ 6:09 PM

    Scroll up ▲ to my comment April 17 @ 4:50 pm….it starts off with “It has been reported”. So in all reality demigod, I am not “going around stating it as fact of Mel cheating”.

  31. demigod • April 18, 2009 @ 6:31 PM

    Nice try, but you stated it as fact NUMEROUS times on the other article ‘Mel Gibson’s New Squeeze..’ Busted.

  32. tributegirl • April 18, 2009 @ 6:51 PM

    Take it easy, guys, it’s not that big a deal, it’s just a bunch of articles on a web site that we all gossip & argue about.

  33. demigod • April 18, 2009 @ 7:32 PM

    She started it 🙂
    C’mon TG, playing it neutral is the best you can do when Nancy is proved wrong? 🙂

  34. Nancy • April 18, 2009 @ 8:06 PM

    “proved wrong”? “stated it as fact”? These are opinions here, in case you hadn’t noticed. Tributegirl noticed. I could go to that article and bring back some of your opinions that you “stated as fact”, if I really wanted to. I think you just pick on me because of the colour of my skin. 😀

    LMFAO! Come on….SMILE!

  35. demigod • April 18, 2009 @ 9:08 PM

    You’re running out of straws. If these are all opinions, why are you challenging mine? Are you trying to PROVE something?
    Your green skin is not the issue. 🙂

  36. tributegirl • April 19, 2009 @ 11:37 AM

    Actually demigod, I didn’t see that either of you were “proven” wrong, from my point of view, you both have very strong points on your side. And I’m actually enjoying reading the banter between the two of you, because you are both “playing fair”, no name calling, or crap like that, so it’s much more interesting. I think my comment last night was because I thought I could almost see it going the unfair way, if it wasn’t my place to step in, my apologies to both of you! 😉

  37. demigod • April 19, 2009 @ 2:34 PM

    Well yea, you would see that from a biased point of view 🙂 Fine,she’s not wrong, just unreasonable 🙂

  38. Nancy • April 19, 2009 @ 3:03 PM

    I think I’m being VERY “reasonable” here, demigod….considering the “fact” that you consider all of us women here “sexist”.

  39. Nancy • April 19, 2009 @ 3:20 PM

    Oh, and I guess I should ask you, “Why are you challenging my opinion, are YOU trying to PROVE something?”

    This feels like deja-vu…..have we had this conversation before? 😛

  40. demigod • April 19, 2009 @ 4:21 PM

    How ‘womanly’ of you to put words in my mouth 🙂
    You’re the one calling everything an ‘opinion’. I try to be factual.
    I’m always on the defensive in this matriarch 🙂

  41. Nancy • April 19, 2009 @ 5:04 PM

    What “words” have I put in your mouth. YOU said it!! And THAT is a “fact”!!

  42. Nancy • April 19, 2009 @ 5:05 PM


  43. Jo-Anne • April 19, 2009 @ 5:42 PM

    oh my God, when does “Nancy of the Open Mind” morph in here???

    ha ha

    d.g., “green skin” ha ha

    gotta laugh, this should be fun, no?

  44. Nancy • April 19, 2009 @ 5:50 PM



  45. demigod • April 19, 2009 @ 9:45 PM

    When did I call women here ‘sexist’? (words in mouth)

  46. Nancy • April 20, 2009 @ 12:22 AM

    Why do you have to do this to me, demigod? Now I have to go collect all your words. Feminist/sexist….same diff. except the word “sexist” is normally the discrimination against women…and that is what I believe YOU are, sexist…as you have shown us that you are on a few different articles on here. You, called us women on here “living in a feminized society”, “ungrateful b!tch” (if we agree that Mel Gibson’s wife deserves her share of the fortune). “I know you better than you know yourselves”; “She never had to work a day in her life other than raise kids. A woman’s ideal”; “jo-Anne, he’s hurting. Can you understand? But who cares, he’s just a man..”; “I just find it predictable that most women show a total lack of sympathy because he’s a man. And my ‘he’s just a man’ comment was directed to ALL women”

    Shall I go on?

  47. demigod • April 20, 2009 @ 4:08 AM

    Re all my comments..that’s just the kind of week it’s been!lol But nice editing job..taking one-liners right outta context- talk about propaganda. I stand by my every word with conviction. Most were generalities. MY opinions. What happened to accepting other’s opinions Nance? You’re trying to PROVE to everyone I’m ‘sexist’? I’m just a male who’s not ‘whipped’.
    I DO think some women have a very UNREASONABLE sense of fairness in what they think they’re entitled to in Mel’s case (even IF he cheated)
    Women DON’T want to be married w/kids?? (maybe 90%)
    ‘Living in a feminized society’–I can explain that perspective..but I don’t have the time of day!

    Any other personal attacks you have for me?

  48. Nancy • April 20, 2009 @ 8:34 AM

    Not trying to personally attack you, demigod…but you asked and I just delivered, that’s all. We ARE feminists. We want equal rights for women but that doesn’t mean that we as women, think any lesser of men. The majority of us women were all for Guy Richie getting half of Madonna’s fortune…we’re not all against men, you know. I just wanted to make you realize that. As for “nice editing job..taking one-liners right outta context-talk about propaganda”…I could write it paragraph for paragraph what you wrote…would be very time consuming, that’s why I just took a few of your lines. I’m pretty sure though that it wouldn’t change most women’s view but….if you want me to…I will. I’d prefer not to though, just for the record. 😀

  49. demigod • April 20, 2009 @ 2:25 PM

    Not a personal attack? I asked to be called ‘sexist’?
    The MAJORITY of women were for Guy Ritchie getting half? Why wouldn’t it be ALL women?!? Where’s the equal rights there? I remember a number of women saying Guy Ritchie didn’t deserve anything in madonna’s case, and there were no accusations of cheating on his part either. Ritchie went on record saying he doesn’t want ANY of madonna’s fortune. Refreshing huh!?
    I believe Mel’s ex is entitle to some, but not $450 mill. That’s gross. My opinion.

  50. Nancy • April 20, 2009 @ 4:02 PM

    No demigod, you didn’t “ask to be called sexist”!! You asked me, “When did I call women here ‘sexist’ (words in mouth)” and I told you. Some of your comments…even the one right above this, IS sexist and yet, you are blaming us women of being “sexist” against men. Here’s MY opinion…when two people get married they become one and when and if they divorce (if there was no pre-nup) they split everything 50/50…if they don’t like that then they should either have a pre-nup signed or NOT get married. There, nothing “sexist” about that!!

  51. Nancy • April 20, 2009 @ 4:06 PM

    Oh, and I said “we’re not ‘ALL’ against men, you know”. I can’t control ALL women just like you can’t control ALL men. There will always be some of each gender out there which are sexist but it’s up to you to choose which you want to be. And, if I “personally attacked” you by calling you “sexist”, then you personally attacked us women on here….so in a way, you did ask for it! 😉

  52. tributegirl • April 20, 2009 @ 4:53 PM

    Um, sorry demigod, but I do have to agree, some of your comments do sound very sexist.

  53. tributegirl • April 20, 2009 @ 4:53 PM

    Hopefully it has just been due to you having a bad week, and you will soon be back to your sharp, witty self! 🙂

  54. Nancy • April 20, 2009 @ 6:17 PM

    I also have to add that most of us are not rich, so when I gave my opinion of divorce as splitting everything 50/50….I didn’t just mean the assets, I also meant the liabilities. Which is only fair.

  55. demigod • April 21, 2009 @ 5:18 AM

    Wow Nancy, you really know how to twist/stretch my meaning. You’re misconstruing..I NEVER used the word sexist. That was YOUR word. I NEVER blamed women for being sexist-that may have been your interpretation. I’ve only offered diff. points of view, perspectives, opinions – no more no less. Being sexist is being descriminatory. Where am I descriminating?? Some comments may sound sexist- doesn’t mean it is. I won’t even ask how my last post is sexist, you’ll twist that too.
    I get it that you’re the most law-abiding/by-the-book person here. Some of us just think outside the box.
    You’re truly insufferable.

  56. Nancy • April 21, 2009 @ 8:26 AM

    Yes actually, you did use the word “sexist”, ie:

    “When did I call women here ‘sexist’? (words in mouth”. &

    “Not a personal attack? I asked to be called ‘sexist’?”

    So yes, you did “use” the word, you just never flat out called us sexist but YOUR statements are sexist and you’re saying things about us women making US sound sexist. So…you say “being sexist is being discriminatory. Where am I discriminating?” Hmmm…let’s start with yesterday’s comment from you:

    “The MAJORITY of women were for Guy Ritchie getting half? Why wouldn’t it be ALL women?!? Where’s the equal rights there? I remember a number of women saying Guy Ritchie didn’t deserve anything in madonna’s case, and there were no accusations of cheating on his part either. Ritchie went on record saying he doesn’t want ANY of madonna’s fortune. Refreshing huh!?”

    Yeah….real refreshing…a woman has never done that, right? Guy Ritchie was already filthy rich on his own as well. If he was flat broke I think his story would have quite a different ending and Madge’s bank account would be about half what it currently is! You’re being very unrealistic, demigod…expecting “ALL women” to be in unison. How would you like it if us women expected ALL men to act a certain way? There will always be some who do and some who don’t. Oh, if only ALL men would put the damn seat down…now THAT would be “refreshing”!! 😀

  57. demigod • April 22, 2009 @ 4:02 AM

    C’mon Nance, you’re losing it..the word was first used by YOU. That’s the word you put in my mouth. Obviously I said it 100 times’ve been accusing me of it in every post, but I haven’t used it.
    You’ve been reading way to much into things.
    About yesterday’s comment..yes, women know a divorce settlement is 50/50. Why wouldn’t all women expect Ritchie to get that? If you call that statement ‘sexist’, then your bar is pretty low.
    To turn the tables..

    Nancy on April 17, 2009 8:30 PM Its the men that do it to us, they make us old and expire sooner, LOL!

    I find that to be a sexist remark. And laughing about it doesn’t make it ok. If I said that about women, I’d be labelled a sexist according to you. Ridiculous- I know.

    Ritchie doesn’t have money to speak of. MAYBE he feels it wouldn’t be right or doesn’t deserve half her fortune because he didn’t earn it. MAYBE he has his own principles/values, and wants to make it on his own and remain independent. Very noble- a true gent.

    Is this argument still about expressing opinions or who’s right/wrong? You seem to keep changing the tone. If you feel you’re losing an argument it’s all just opinions lol, if you feel you’re winning it’s about right/wrong.
    Is it still your opinion Mel cheated before 2006? lol Silly goose.

  58. Nancy • April 22, 2009 @ 9:26 AM

    Hahaha…nice try, demigod! First of all, yes…it is still my opinion that Mel cheated BEFORE the 2006 split. Secondly, I’m not “changing the tone”. Sure, people have different opinions and I completely understand that. I don’t look at this as an argument and I’ve said before that it is not about winning or losing, not to me anyways…maybe to you..? I don’t believe I have been “reading way too much into things” here, demigod. Comment after comment from you on this article and both of the Mel Gibson articles is sexist. I’m sure I’m not the only woman to notice (stating this as a believed fact…not for others to jump in, in case anyone is wondering or waiting to accuse me of such). And yes, I did make the “joke” of it being men AND children who age us women (we all know that stress ages us, no matter the gender)…and it was CLEARLY a joke, and I will admit that it all reality, it WAS partially a sexist joke BUT, I also made a joke on the newest Madonna article about horses not liking her either, and I also made a joke on the new Angelina article about the dog attacking her. At least I’m not denying it or making sexist comments and then blaming your gender! Go back to the 3 articles and read your comments, demigod. You specifically made a comment to Jo-Anne saying “jo-Anne, he’s hurting. Can you understand? But who cares, he’s just a man”. AND, “The passion was gone years ago, she was just waiting (hoping?) for him to stray. Oh poor her..walking away with $450 mil. Judging by the majority of comments we sure live in a feminized society..” AND, “She hit the power-ball lottery marrying Mel”. I like this one… “Let’s assume she married him for the right reason. During her marriage she’s been given a fine home, unlimited credit, an extravagant lifestyle, showered with gifts, having children with a man voted sexiest many women do you suppose would be envious of THAT? NOT LUCKY?!? Now she wants to clean him out. You know what I call that? An ungrateful b!tch. That goes to all women here who think she deserves more, regardless of what the law says she’s entitled to. You’re just proving that you’re no better. Can’t you for once be the BIGGER person? Maybe shed that reputation? Think not..Hell hath not enough money for a woman scorned!” Oh, and for the record, those are YOUR quotes, demigod. I did not add or delete from them. I read your comments to be very sexist towards my gender…accusing us women of ONLY marrying for money and that ALL women getting divorced clean the men out from their hard earned cash, that we are all b!tches, your quote “I know you better than you know yourselves”, “She never had to work a day in her life other than raise kids. A woman’s ideal”. You don’t think raising 7 kids is work? You think only women stay at home raising the kids and then “undeservingly” take half of the MAN’S money during divorce? She never earned it right? Because she “never had to work a day in her life”, right? There are alot of men nowadays who are stay-at-home dads, demigod. Anyways, yes…you are very entitled to your opinion as everyone else is but, let it be known that your comments are VERY sexist comments. I already stated that you did NOT outright say that we are “sexist”…you just imply it in almost every comment you make.

  59. Nancy • April 22, 2009 @ 9:28 AM

    Now THAT’S a book!!!

  60. tributegirl • April 22, 2009 @ 2:58 PM

    That IS a book, non-fiction!

  61. lily • April 22, 2009 @ 6:07 PM

    Demigod your comments about women and divorce have been making me cringe for some time. You sound like you totaly dispise women for wanting there fair share (half). And Im not sure if Im reading it right but its like your particularly mad at Nancy. Sorry but I have to totaly agree with her last post (now that I finaly finished it LOL)

  62. Nancy • April 22, 2009 @ 7:03 PM

    I don’t know you, demigod and I’m not mad at you or against you in any way. I just get the impression that a woman hurt you pretty bad and that is your business but, your hurt or whatever it is really shows in your comments whenever the topic article centres on something of this nature, ie: Chris Brown & Rihanna; Mel Gibson, etc.

  63. demigod • April 23, 2009 @ 5:17 AM

    C’ reasonable. Look at your post. Where would you like me to begin? There’s a lot to address. You’re throwing too much at me at once. If you want some kind of an intellectual and healthy debate, you have to break it down. What kind of time do you think I have? You can stop quoting me too, I know what I said!
    I can have strong views/opinions. That’s just me. I don’t apologize for it. My aim sometimes is to make people take a harder look at themselves. You’ve all heard my views on black culture, abuse, drugs remember how controversial they were? Do you see the parallels?
    For the record I don’t hate/despise women either, and no women have ever hurt me, in fact they’ve been great to me. Sorry to disappoint you all.
    Honestly Nancy, what is this all about if not to PROVE something? You’ve already made up your mind. I’ve been tried and convicted.
    But I do think I was a little harsh with Jo-Anne..
    To be con’t ..if not on this article!

  64. Nancy • April 23, 2009 @ 10:38 AM

    I did break it down for you, demigod….you’re opinions are very sexist and your comments put most of the blame on women. Plain and simple. I’m not disappointed, I think it’s great that women have treated you well but I am not trying to “PROVE” anything. Why do you keep insisting that I am trying to “PROVE” something? Are you trying to “PROVE” something? And why do you keep spelling it in CAPITAL letters? As for your being “a little harsh with Jo-Anne..”, w/e….just wait until she doesn’t agree with you, either! Hahahaha.

  65. demigod • April 23, 2009 @ 10:45 AM

    You’re not trying to prove I’m sexist?? lol
    You’re going out of your way!

  66. Nancy • April 23, 2009 @ 11:10 AM

    I don’t have to “PROVE” you’re sexist….you did that just fine on your own, LMAO!

    Oh, and I quoted you because your quotes were from a few different articles. If you would stop denying that you are sexist, I wouldn’t have to quote you. You asked, and I specifically said, and I quote…”Why do you have to do this to me, demigod? Now I have to go collect all your words.” You should know by now that I back up my claims with proof!

  67. demigod • April 23, 2009 @ 3:17 PM

    YOUR opinion. Not fact, sorry. YOU are in denial. If I’ve proven I’m sexist, why keep arguing and quoting? Maybe to support a weak argument? Or maybe you have nothing better to do. GET A LIFE. You obsessive,unbearable,pathetic, nagging old battleaxe! It’s no wonder why you’re still single! What guy would put up with your sh!t? I feel sorry for your kids too!
    What was Jo-Anne’s line?..’My comments are known to be sliced/diced and served on a completely diff. platter’ lol How fitting! I totally understand where she’s coming from!
    It would seem ANY comment I make about the opposite sex constitutes sexism in Nancy’s book.
    And please, keep’em under 3 paragraphs. I DON’T HAVE ALL DAY. You think the longer your posts the more intelligent you look?

  68. demigod • April 23, 2009 @ 6:09 PM closing argument..
    If you came across one of my comments on ANY article that you take exception to or don’t agree with, why wouldn’t you question me about it THEN? Maybe ask me to articulate it, like a REASONABLE FAIR INTELLIGENT person would. You’d be surprised how well that approach would go. Instead of collecting all these random comments and slapping a big label on it! Like some nut CONSPIRACIST! That is a very IGNORANT, CLOSE-MINDED thing to do! Even MALICIOUS.
    You should be absolutely ASHAMED of yourself!
    I can’t help it feel your PERSONAL ATTACKS has to do with you having it in for me for some reason. Maybe I’ve embarrassed you in the past, and made you look foolish? Perhaps you’ve been biding your time for some kind of payback? Childish.

    In clicking your name, there should be a pic of a reptile w/green skin and a streak of yellow. Why don’t you go slither into some corner and keep it to yourself once in a while!

  69. Nancy • April 23, 2009 @ 6:26 PM

    WOW, looks like I hit the nail on the head, huh? So you want to call names now, do you @$$hole? Meanwhile, I was very nice to you. That big comment of mine that you’re f-ing whining about, was your comments…because you’re in denial! Oh, and FYI…I’m single and loving it because I CHOOSE to be. Been there, done all that “together” stuff, had my kids…my lucky, spoiled kids whom I love more than life itself. If I wanted to go back to that, I could, but I don’t, so I won’t. But your intelligence that you have that is soooo much greater than mine….it shines so bright in your last few comments. BAHAHAHAHAHA…NOT!!

    “Why don’t you go slither into some corner and keep it to yourself once in a while!”

    Why don’t you come make me…you “big, witty, intelligent man!!”

  70. demigod • April 24, 2009 @ 2:26 AM

    ??? You called me sexist. You attack my character and paint me out to be someone I’m not, and you don’t expect me to retaliate? What world is it you think you live in?

  71. Nancy • April 24, 2009 @ 6:37 PM

    I didn’t “paint you out” to be anything….they’re YOUR comments…don’t blame me because you are sexist! So, I live here in the real world…how about you?

  72. lily • April 25, 2009 @ 7:09 AM

    Nancy, April 22 9:26 a.m.
    Demigod instead of continuing to slam Nancy with increasingly furious insults, wouldn’t it make more sense to explain a few of your own quotes? She does make a hugely convincing arguement just by copying your own words so, if you insist you aren’t sexist, why not explain what you did mean by all those anti-women statements?
    I’m not stiring the pot (as if it NEEDS any stiring!!!) I really do want to know cause I used to like your comments alot but lately your sounding less witty and more wierd.

  73. Jo-Anne • April 25, 2009 @ 9:09 AM

    d.g., hitting all the right notes…for the record, thanks, but no offence taken with the “harsh” remark…

    that “platter” is overflowing now your words have been piled on top of mine…

    I hear Twisted Tortellini is being served today…enjoy

  74. Nancy • April 25, 2009 @ 12:38 PM

    Oh, the LEECH always comes out when she gets a smell of blood…….little does she know, it’s not my blood she’s smelling! LMAO.

  75. Jo-Anne • April 25, 2009 @ 1:44 PM

    Burp…excuse me, the tortellini was a little heavy on the stinky cheese today…

  76. Nancy • April 25, 2009 @ 4:27 PM

    From the sounds of you, it should have been “a little heavy” on the arsenic, hahahahahahahahahaha (extra ‘ha’).

  77. Jo-Anne • April 25, 2009 @ 5:27 PM

    I just love it when you use my funniest lines as your own!!!

    your adulation is not lost on me….

  78. Nancy • April 26, 2009 @ 6:44 PM

    So….”a little heavy” is your “funniest line”? Those 3 little words are yours? I think I’d like to see the copyright! Don’t get out much do ya, Jo? More rat poison at table 6!! 😀

  79. Jo-Anne • April 26, 2009 @ 9:07 PM

    I was referring to “extra ha”

    I’m sure you would be hard pressed to pick the funniest…but seeing as I am feeling particularly generous today after such a wonderful day with my entire family at home together, feel free to “copy and paste” the entire Jo Collection onto your screen…oh, I forgot, you’ve already done that…

  80. Nancy • April 26, 2009 @ 9:18 PM

    Oh, you mean…with your ‘make-believe-Carol Brady family’? Today was family visitation day in the psych. ward? I hope they tightened the straps on your straight jacket so you wouldn’t hurt anyone! LMAO! Who is Carol Brady anyways? She must be before my time…

Join The Conversation:

Trending Articles

Current Poll

  • Dwayne Johnson stars in Skyscraper. What's your favorite Dwayne Johnson movie?

    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...

You Might Also Like

Close Menu