Jude Law’s baby lucrative for waitress
By Alexandra Heilbron on September 18, 2009 | 65 Comments
Samantha Burke, the 24-year-old cocktail waitress who is eight-months pregnant with Jude Law‘s child has come to the conclusion he’s not that dependable, so she’s decided to make a little cash on the result of their union for herself. “Samantha is getting offers ranging up to $200,000” for an interview and first photos of the baby, a source close to Burke told the New York Post. “She will talk openly about her relationship with Jude — and he’s not getting rave reviews” for his behavior. The source continues, “While Jude has promised to provide for Sophia, Samantha doesn’t feel like his behavior towards her was entirely chivalrous.” Burke, who currently lives in Florida, is reportedly going to tell how Law disappeared and switched off his phone after their week-long affair. Law’s Broadway opening as Hamlet on October 6 coincides with the baby’s due date. The interview and photos are expected to appear shortly afterwards, much to the displeasure of Hamlet producers who are trying to keep a lid on Law’s love life, to not pull attention from the show. They’ve even ordered reporters to refrain from asking questions about his reputation as a love rat.
Comments & Discussion
Similar Articles
Hit movie Crazy Rich Asians to become Broadway stage musical
April 17, 2024 | Leave a Comment
The box office hit movie Crazy Rich Asians is now being developed into a musical stage show, which will be aiming to open on Broadway after a trial run.
Steve Carell to make Broadway debut in Uncle Vanya
November 15, 2023 | 2 Comments
Steve Carell is headed to Broadway to make his debut in a new adaptation of Anton Chekov’s play Uncle Vanya at the Vivian Beaumont Theater in April 2024.
New movies in theaters – Jordan Peele’s Nope and more
July 21, 2022 | Leave a Comment
Jordan Peele’s newest horror Nope hits theaters this weekend. Other films opening this weekend include documentaries Fire of Love and Come Back Anytime.
What a cad! But given his track record, she shouldn’t be surprised…
WELL HE ALWAYS COULD STICK AROUND AND RAISE THE CHILD, BUT AS I RECALL SOME YEARS AGO HIS BABY HAD AN OVER DOSE FROM A PILL OF EXTACSY THAT HAD FELL ON THE FLOOR FROM ONE OF HIS PARTYS. SAMANTHA JUST THINK … YOU HAD A GREAT WEEK WITH HIM …YOUR KID WILL HAVE TALENTED AND GOOD LOOKS IN THERE GEANS … HE MOVED ON. WEAR A CONDOM NEXT TIME …
I thought she was a model, not a waitress…this is the first I’ve heard that she was a waitress.
She;s an opportunist.
when can anyone ever depend on a man? 😛 sorry, feeling a bit sexist today !
LMAO mandee!!
I wonder Why I Haven’t supported him by going to see any of his movies after I heard of his affair!! If anyone thinks this is ok, maybe they can go talk to the Woman that was married to him 1st and also his Children and see How They Feel about what their “father” did to them. Their Feelings Matter! If I had a father like him, I would have disowned him! There are daughters and sons in this world that do not have any communication with their parents because of abuse issues of all different sorts. They feel — “much to the displeasure of Hamlet producers who are trying to keep a lid on Law��s love life”. They Don’t have to hire him, you know!
Very cute, Mandee 😉 Not to mention witty.
Yea, that Jude Law..what a creep. Going around ‘poking’ unsuspecting women, getting into their ‘personal space’..the nerve. Thinking he can have some fun without paying for the consequences. He should own up to his responsibilities and do the honourable, chivalrous thing, and pay her what she deserves..that free meal ticket for the rest of her life (and the child’s)..and he will.
I’m often surprised at the gullibility of women who don’t realize what other women are like. Many models take part-time jobs such as cocktail waitressing for the sole purpose of snaring rich celebs. This one sure hit paydirt.
Hey everyone knows that Jude Law is a creep when it comes to women, so I think this Samantha woman knew what she was getting into. Anytime you have unprotected sex you run the chance of getting pregnant. Which is what she probably wanted to happen. Now she will be taken care of financially for at least 18 or 21 years due to his substantial child support he’ll be paying. After a one week fling what the heck did she expect, “wedding bells”? She knew what she was doing! I agree with demigod, she a total opportunist.
rita seriously? you think that no one in the world should ever see a movie because jude is in it, and his children should hate him for his entire life just because he was no longer in love with his wife?? are you crazy? why do you think that just because hes a man he should have to suffer through a marriage (FOR LIFE) that makes him unhappy? what (or who for that matter) jude does in his spare time is NOBODIES business but his. how can you even begin to compare this to “abuse”? do you even understand the definition of the word? sooo he got someone pregnant, whats the big deal? he wasnt even WITH his EXWIFE when this “affair” happened. he had already been engaged with someone else, cheated on her and it ended and THEN he slept with the waitress. did you seriously expect him to spend the rest of his entire life being unhappy and never meeting women?
demigod and leigh, great posts! 😀
PS !!! rita, i just read your comment on the bruce willis article, how can you support someone that lashed out at a fan, scared her half to death, was completely rude and say something like “No one reacts 100% good all the time.” BUT condemn someone for having unprotected sex with a waitress that he met, accidentally getting her pregnant and then not being with her because it was a one night stand?
Leigh, I was being sarcastic calling him a ‘creep’. What guy in his shoes could resist the bevy of beauties wanting to get with him?
Demigod & Leigh: She’s an “opportunist”? Maybe she is but like you said Leigh, “Anytime you have unprotected sex you run the chance of getting pregnant”. I’d like to add to that…anytime you have unprotected sex, you run the chance of getting someone pregnant and having to pay support for at least 18 years. It takes two to tango you know. He’s just as much to blame for this situation as she is. So, I guess he has to lay in this bed he has made now, doesn’t he? It is not the child’s fault. I believe he should have to pay to support the child but not to support her.
Get real Nance. Child support payments are based on gross income. Seeing as he makes millions a year, she’ll be getting 10Ks+ per month. Is this not supporting her??
i see this from both points of view. he should be required to pay child support, but they shouldnt base it on his income, they should base it on how much it costs to raise a child in this day and age. like anyone would really spend 10ks on the baby alone?
Demigod: He has other children, doesn’t he? He knew the situation when he walked into it. He’s just as much to blame as she is. This child should not have to live in poverty while daddy sits high on the hog, that is why they base child support on income. Her world changes now too you know. Everything from completely raising and taking care of a child to homework assignments/school projects, losing all the freedom she had before and I am not saying that is his fault…it took two to tango. She knew what she was getting into as well as he did too but the child shouldn’t be the one to suffer. When the courts decide child support, they should make sure that SHE stays employed as well.
It’s just easier to tell you to shut @p. Take your head from your a$$ and recognize: He made a MISTAKE, and she’s taking ADVANTAGE.
Yeah, you keep telling yourself that, you sexist PIG. So, “shut @p” yourself. Then you wonder why women get to choose between having the child, abortion, etc….well, we’re the masterminds, aren’t we? According to you we are. And men are just the mistakes, hahahahaha!!
She may be taking advantage, I don’t doubt that one bit, but he didn’t make a mistake, he knew exactly what he was doing and what the consequences could be.
I’m not wondering why. I KNOW why.
Like she’d abort! Too profitable. This girl is no VICTIM. She’s just a diff. class of whore. Ask yourself..is she better off now, or b4 hooking up with him? She’s been rewarded enough right Nance? ‘Life’s greatest gift’ haha. I can’t decide whether you’re a cow,pig, or a horse’s a$$. Guess you’re all. Aside from your reptilian qualities hehe
tributegirl: Is that why he’s on the run? He’s regretting it!
Who knows..maybe she lied about being on the pill.
Jeeze demigod, open your eyes! I never said she was innocent, did I? I said they are BOTH to blame. What part don’t you get of that? You are the one saying that Jude is innocent, that he made a “MISTAKE”. Well, we all have to pay for our mistakes! I never said this lady would abort, but you were going on on another article about men not having a choice in whether a woman has an abortion or not (which I agreed with you about, in case you get that short-term memory again), and now on this article, you are going on about how women are sneaky and this woman totally set this up (maybe she did…wouldn’t surprise me) but that Jude made a “MISTAKE”…GIVE IT UP!! He knew exactly what he was doing and if she lied about being on the pill, too bad…he is the one who should be responsible to protect himself. He should be wearing a raincoat anyways…too much disease out there. You’re making it sound like he is totally dumb and she just took him for everything.
What next…Oh, let me guess…he met her in a lounge where she was a waitress so, he must have been drunk. How dare she! LOL.
We all have to pay for our mistakes?? There can be a lesson to learn..but SHE will make him pay for his mistake!!! She doesn’t have to demand so much $$$ to raise a child! She can be reasonable. She has a CHOICE. SHE can settle based on FAIRNESS not GREED. But you can be sure this leech will take him for all she can! The courts are on her side. Open YOUR eyes!
Now we all no what you’re made of Nance..you’re no diff. than this ‘opportunist’.
Demigod…you said you don’t have kids, so how the hell would you know how FAMILY COURT works? They will do what is best FOR THE CHILD and as I said earlier, THE CHILD should not have to live in poverty while his/her very rich daddy sits high on the hog. That’s just the way it works. Just like people who only have little income make little support payments and people who have no income make no support payments. Same goes for federal taxes…the higher your income, the higher your tax bracket, it’s a no-brainer. Just like it’s a no-brainer that people have to pay for their mistakes whether they like it or not. Do I think that it takes 10’s of thousands per month to raise a child? Hell no! But child support is based on income for EVERYONE…male or female, rich or poor, celebrity or average Joe. If people don’t like it, they should be more careful not to make “MISTAKES”, huh?
Mandee: Hahaha, demigod has it in for EVERYTHING I say…especially when it comes to topics of discussion about man vs woman, LMAO!
You are just the most impossible, infuriating, hard-headed stubborn mule to get thru to. YOU are a no-brainer! Ya windbag. Why go thru the courts???Because she’s greedy!!! Yea, millions of $$$ is best for the child!!! Who’s talking about poverty??? Rich daddy EARNED his millions!!!
Mistakes can still happen with condoms, dummy.
Another thing..to state that if she lied about being on the pill as ‘too bad for him’ and that she’s still entitiled to it all, shows what little regard you have in the treatment, and lack of respect you have towards the opposite sex. That is truly contemptible and reprehensible. You clearly have man-hating issues. You need to take a long hard look in the mirror to see that multi-headed farm animal.
WOW! Demigod, can you say “My mommy really screwed my head up!”? You seriously need to work on your communication skills and get some anger management.
“Why go thru the courts?” – Because that is what people do when a parent will not pay TO SUPPORT THEIR CHILD.
“Because she’s greedy!!!” – Obviously is…if she’s selling info. to the tabloids…another “no-brainer”.
“Yea, millions of dollars is best for the child!!!” – Who said anything about millions of $$$ for the child?
“Who’s talking about poverty?” – Well, most single parents don’t live above the poverty line now, do they?
“Rich daddy EARNED his millions!!!” – Yes, he did…he also helped to conceive children, which he must now monetarily (and hopefully physically, mentally and emotionally) support.
“Another thing..to state that if she lied about being on the pill as ‘too bad for him’ and that she’s entitled to it all, shows what little regard you have in the treatment, and lack of respect you have towards the opposite sex.” – If he’s gullible enough to believe one of the oldest tricks in the book (“I’m on the pill, so it’s okay”) it’s not my problem. I never said SHE was “entitled” to ANY of his money let alone “it all”, so stop saying that I “stated” things that I never did. His child however, IS entitled. So, that just goes to show that YOU are projecting your idiocy onto me by saying that I have “man-hating issues” and “little regard in the treatment, and lack of respect towards the opposite sex”, when YOU are the woman-hater who shows such little regard for children and their “treatment” and the respect that they deserve. The CHILD is not to blame because mommy is perhaps a golddigger or because daddy possibly made a “MISTAKE”.
So, it would seem that YOU are the one who needs “to take a long hard look in the mirror”…Lord only knows just WHAT you’ll see but, it can’t possibly be human. 😛
“Mistakes can still happen with condoms, dummy” – Really? You don’t say, “dummy”!!
Come on people…I know loads of women who say they got pregnant despite using protection. The only safe sex is no sex…So calling him stupid because she got preggers is a tad judgemental. Even if she said it was unprotected it doesn’t make it true. Even if it was unprotected…how many of you can say you’ve never made a similar mistake. A week is hardly a one night stand. You wouldn’t, however, want to be obligated to marry everyone you dated for a day, a week, a month or even a year. If you’re not in love…it is not caddish to break up. A baby is not a reason to get married if nothing else is working in the relationship. So…they date, it doesn’t work out…she finds out she’s preggers…he’s agreed to take financial responsiblity. At what point is he stupider than the rest of us? He is not acting like a cad because he doesn’t wish to be involved with her romantically anymore…he is owning up to his responsibility and offering child support. The rest is speculation on everyone’s part.
why do you always call names?
Shauna: His immaturity really shows when he doesn’t get his own way, doesn’t it? That is why my last comment said that he needs to work on his communication skills and get some anger management.
Demigod: In my last comment, half of what you are calling “psycho-babble” are direct quotes from your comments…hypocrite. All you think about is the man in situations like this…how he will have to pay; how she’s taking everything that is his; him; him; him. Which is why I call you SEXIST. And then you have the nerve to call me a “man-hater”..? I’m not on her side at all but that is what you seem to be seeing in my comments. I don’t know how many times I have said that YES, SHE PROBABLY WILL TAKE HIM FOR MORE…DID YOU GET THAT? My outlook on this is for the child because I’ve REPEATEDLY said it is not the childs fault what his/her parents do/have done…but you keep going on and on as though I’m taking this womans side in all this. LEARN HOW TO FREAKING READ, “you ditz”!!!
Btw, regarding Rihanna…that’s your opinion. It is her choice and if she so chooses to stay with Chris then I’m sure she will pay greatly for her “MISTAKES”.
“Little regard/respect for children? You make this sh!t up as you go along? This coming from an abusive mom.” – Jeeze, now you think you know me? I don’t abuse my kids @$$ hole…just because your mommy took out her frustrations on you, don’t go projecting that onto me. You’re a freaking psycho! Seriously. You need help…severely!
“You? On the pill? Why? Being so anti-men/anti-sex and always sounding menopausal.” – Again, there you go thinking you know me or anything about me. Think maybe you could point out where I said anything about me and “on the pill”??? I’ve never been “anti-men/anti-sex”…where did you get that from? Just because someone CHOOSES to be ‘single’ doesn’t mean they are “anti-men/anti-sex”. As for sounding menopausal…it will be a few years yet before I get there, LMAO! I think you beat me to it!! PSYCHO!
The quote “I’m on the pill, so it’s okay”…..wasn’t me saying I’m on the pill, “dummy”! It was in reference to “one of the oldest tricks in the book”. Like I said, “LEARN HOW TO FREAKING READ!” As if I would come out and say “Hey everyone, I’m on the pill, so it’s okay”. DUH!!! Then you rave about yourself being soooooooooooooooooooooooo intelligent! Hahahahahaha.
Nancy, you are magnetizing like crazy lately, where is Arnold when you need him?
I’m smarter than you will EVER be, dummigod so, if you’re talking about a “ret@rd”, you must be speaking of yourself, LMAO. And “gibberish” is all you speak. Yes, my cottage does await (jealousy will get you nowhere btw. All bought and paid for by a woman…must burn your britches, eh? LOL), no ‘time-outs’ here, I’ve had a few comments await moderation but that’s the extent of it…no time-outs. What crawled up your @$$ anyways? You think you are so great but really you’re nothing but a piece of sh!t. Why don’t you go back and start at the top of this article and see what a f-ing d!ck you are?
You’re always being moderated, and your posts deleted. Take the hint. What do you expect with that foul mouth?
Asking me to re-read my posts again? lol
Let’s cut the crap..
Fact: She wanted his baby and his ‘support'(she had a week- her version of ‘planned parenthood’ lol). Nance, you can whine all you want about the burden of parenthood, and all it entails in raising ‘life’s greatest gift’. Nevertheless, she wanted this.
Fact:He didn’t want a child (with her anyways), and doesn’t want to pay support. Nance, you conceded that it’s unfair that men don’t have a say/choice in (un)wanted pregnancies, yet you say he is obligated to pay support. Contradictory, no? If not hypocritical. She chose to have the child despite his wishes.
Btw, I don’t know how this all got to be termed as a ‘mistake’. It implies wrongdoing. It was an ACCIDENT. On HIS part. But this changes nothing in your world eh, Nance? He must pay.
You’re basing your whole argument on what’s best for the child. Fine. Is spoiling the child best? Because that’s what all that money offers. I’m just saying.
What’s best is having two loving supportive parents. But that ain’t gonna happen, so the child will have to depend on one. As so many others do. It won’t be easy, but I know money helps lol. She wanted this, with or without his help.
And I can’t forget your ‘too bad for him’ comment re being maliciously lied to with such repercussions. That example of callousness is going to come back and haunt you!
First of all, I didn’t say “too bad for him”..you need to start getting your facts straight and maybe try using direct quotes (like I do…why do you think I do it? DUH!) I SAID…and I quote, “He knew exactly what he was doing and if she lied about being on the pill, too bad…he is the one who should be responsible to protect himself.” DID YOU GET THAT? I never said I agree IF, and that’s a big “IF”, she lied about being on the pill. I also said that that is “one of the oldest tricks in the book” and that he is “gullible” if he believes it…IF it was even said. It is up to each and every individual to protect themselves and IF he didn’t want kids then he should have kept it in his pants then! YOU are the one who said he made a “MISTAKE”, not me…now you’ve decided to change your tune and call it an “ACCIDENT”. As for you saying that “But this changes nothing in your world eh, Nance? He must pay.” Well, that’s how it is here in the REAL world, dummigod, we all pay for our “MISTAKES” and our “ACCIDENTS”, whatever you want to call it…you seem to have a new excuse everyday as to why men shouldn’t have to own up to their responsibilities.
I agreed with you on the fact that it is not completely fair that the father of an UNBORN child has no say in whether the mother HAS AN ABORTION…I never said anything about a guy “not having a say/choice in (un)wanted pregnancies” (comment on Sept. 20 @ 7:38 PM), so no, my comments are NOT “contradictory” or “hypocritical”…stop and READ the comments, “ditz”, “dummy”, “farm animal”, instead of just lying through your teeth about what people say. You need to start learning how to back up that big mouth of yours if you plan on opening it. I agree that “What’s best is having two loving supportive parents” and there is NO REASON why any child cannot have that as long as both parents are alive, it doesn’t mean the parents have to love each other and live together, they can be separate and still love their “MISTAKE” or their “ACCIDENT”, can’t they?
As for my comments always being moderated and my posts deleted because “what do you expect with that foul mouth?” – It may be foul at times but ALWAYS speaks the truth and I’ve had you pegged for a long time, sexist. Comment after comment of proof right here. Also, I never asked you to re-read your posts again, “lol”….I SAID, and I quote (again) “Why don’t you go back and start at the top of this article and see what a f-ing d!ck you are?” But, being a d!ck as you so obviously are, I should have expected your d!ck head reply, “lol” so, “Let’s cut the crap..”, whether he made a “MISTAKE” or an “ACCIDENT”; whether she’s a conniving beyotch is all irrelevant. The only thing that matters now is that they grow up and do what is best for this child, PERIOD!
So, no….no “example of callousness” and nothing to come back and “haunt” me…hahahahaha.
why doesnt he just take her to court for custody? because a) the baby will get all the perks of being a celebs kid, b) SHE will have to pay HIM child support, c it would probably cost him less in the long run and d)its not like hed lose, he can afford the best lawyers out there…and if that doesnt work, he could always bribe the judge !
I won’t be able to watch him in any movies now. Sad that a little girl won’t be able to see daddy.
You can sugar-coat it all you want..that was a very callous statement, and your contempt is obvious. But nice try.
‘If he didn’t want kids, he should have kept it in his pants then!’ lol wow if this doesn’t scream anti-men/anti-sex, I don’t know what does! What a prude. Life would sure s@ck in your world! People can take every precaution, but accidents can still happen! Nothing is foolproof. Nancy’s solution: Have sex only to procreate! lol. This is the reason I’m pro-choice. Abortion is always an option, as are morning after pills.
I meant ‘(un)wanted pregnancies’ AS abortion. Same thing. You’re a hypocrite.
There is no law that says she HAS to get support from him. So no, he doesn’t HAVE TO PAY for his mistake/accident. It’s up to her if she wants to pursue, but we know that the courts are on her side. People don’t always have to be made to pay for their mistakes/accidents. It can depend on the other party. But knowing the callous, contemptible, opportunistic hag that you are Nance, it wouldn’t occur to you.
Stop playing the ‘baby card’. You just want to see this wh@re milk a man of his fortune because you’re a man-hater, and have contempt for guys just looking to get laid. This wh@re deserves nothing.
Ok, I think this is going a little too far.
But anyway, here’s what I read in the above article:
“While Jude has promised to provide for Sophia, Samantha doesn��t feel like his behavior towards her was entirely chivalrous”
Ok, so he’s going to provide for the child. Good. I personally feel that’s what a real man would do. Now as far as him being “chivalrous”, too bad for her, he wasn’t in it for anything but sex, and she should have known that. If she expected marriage, or a long term commitment, then she wasn’t very smart.
And this one:
“Burke, who currently lives in Florida, is reportedly going to tell how Law disappeared and switched off his phone after their week-long affair.”
Well, that’s a cowardly way to end a “relationship”, even if it was only a week long affair, but that’s what a lot of guys do, and it sucks, but it’s a fact of life. And it’s obvious she’s only telling these little details just to hurt him, and that’s stupid in my opinion.
Demigod, I didn’t “sugar-coat” anything. Can you read? Seriously! Because you keep saying things that I haven’t said at all. So, “nice try” yourself, I never said “too bad for him” and I certainly never insinuated it.
“If he didn’t want kids he should have kept it in his pants then!” – Actually, in front of that line, I said “It is up to each and every individual to protect themselves and…” so, no, I am not “anti-men/anti-sex” and I don’t think that people should only “have sex to procreate”. I DO however think (and have already said…but as usual, you DON’T read!) that people need to use their own protection, not rely on the other person. If they want 100 % protection, then they shouldn’t be having sex but, as long as they ARE having sex, if they are conceiving children, then they must support them.
“I meant ‘(un)wanted pregnancies’ AS abortion. Same thing. You’re a hypocrite.” – Actually, no, I’m not. “I” meant a situation in which the mother wants to abort…I think the father should have the choice for the fetus to live if he wants to raise it or put it up for adoption. I don’t think he should have the choice to abort if she wants the child either. It is her body. I do not agree with abortion unless the woman has been raped. So, according to you, if the woman wants to keep the child and the man doesn’t want anything to do with his “ACCIDENT”, then he should be able to make the decision for her to have an abortion…and if she refuses, then he shouldn’t have to support the child? It’s a good thing you’re too stupid to make the laws in this country!
“There is no law that says she HAS to get support from him. So no, he doesn’t HAVE TO PAY for his mistake/accident. It’s up to her if she wants to pursue, but we know that the courts are on her side.” – The courts are there for the child…and children have necessities, which BOTH parents need to chip in for WHETHER THEY LIKE THEIR “ACCIDENT” OR NOT!
“Stop playing the ‘baby card’. You just want to see this wh@re milk a man of his fortune because you’re a man-hater, and have contempt for guys just looking to get laid. This wh@re deserves nothing.” – I’m not playing a ‘baby-card’ at all. People need to own up to their responsibilities…male OR female. Too many irresponsible people in this world! I don’t want to see her milk Jude or anyone else “milk” anyone for their fortune. I am not a “man-hater”, hahahaha. People need to protect themselves, that’s all. You can’t count on others to “protect” you, especially when there are millions of $ at stake. He got himself into this jam. Blame her all you want but, it still takes two to tango.
“So I’ll take back SOME of what I said.” – Don’t bother. I don’t give a sh!t what you “said” anyways and it won’t change the fact that you are still a SEXIST PIG! 😛
Tributegirl: I agree and I hope that he stays true to his word and provides for that child. Seems funny doesn’t it, that demigod has more of a problem with Jude providing than Jude himself does?!!!! Hahahahahahahahaha. Ah, the life of a SEXIST!
The child is not in need of a huge cash flow. What the child really needs, the courts can’t provide.
Just the association will garner more offers of money than the child needs. So he shouldn’t need to pay support. He’s already given her ‘life’s greatest gift’ and the monetary means thru his association. So why should he pay support on top of that when the baby’s needs are already met?
Jude has NO CHOICE to provide! What’s he gonna say? No? DUH.
meant ‘child’s needs are already met’.
Yes demigod…my comment on Sept. 20 @ 7:38 PM…READ IT.
“He knew exactly what he was doing and if she lied about being on the pill, too bad…HE IS THE ONE WHO SHOULD BE RESPONSIBLE TO PROTECT HIMSELF”.
Did I say “too bad for him”? Insinuate it? Agree with her or anyone else doing that? NOPE! But, you just keep grasping at those straws to try to take the attention off of your SEXIST REMARKS, “LIAR”, LMAO!
“If he didn’t want kids he should have kept it in his pants then! – Who goes around saying this? Seriously. So S Q U A R E.” – Well, besides me, lots of people say it, hahaha. Go to Olive Oil’s comment on Sept. 22 @ 2:50 AM (I’ll quote it for you, LMFAO)…. “The only safe sex is no sex”.
I never said “the child is in need of a huge cash flow”…holy sh!t man! YOU ARE P S Y C H O ! ! ! Without a doubt! Your mommy obviously knocked something loose up there. “Oooooooh Low Blow? TOO BAD.”
“It’s just easier to tell you to shut @p. Take your head from your a$$ and recognize:” YOU ARE PSYCHO! LOL.
“That’s all besides the point! Her lying about something like that is very malicious, and YOU stated it as ‘too bad’ for him for believing her. That’s still callous! And you still think she’d deserve support using the ‘baby card’ to get it!” – You know what, “dummy”? Why don’t you direct me to the point in the article (not your f’ed up comments) where it says “she lied to him and said she was on the pill”? In fact, what’s good for the goose is good for the gander…maybe she WAS on the pill and this was an “ACCIDENT” or “MISTAKE” on HER part. Because the pill is not 100% either now, is it? I did not “state it as ‘too bad’ for him for believing her. I “stated” it as ‘too bad’ if she said that, it is up to each person to protect themselves!! I also “stated” that IF she did say something like that, that I don’t agree with it.
What Olive Oil said and what I said ARE the same thing! “DUH”!! How the hell do you know in what context Olive Oil or I said our comments?! In fact, you don’t even READ my comments, you just put whatever the hell you want in there, LMAO!
I did NOT say “men should keep it in their pants if they don’t want children”. Point out as well, where I said that because I see my comment on Sept. 24 @ 10:01 AM…it says, and I quote (AGAIN!) “It is up to each and every individual to protect themselves and IF he didn’t want kids then he should have kept it in his pants then!” Do you understand anything? I did not say “men”, did I? I said “he”…as in the guy in the article! I also never said anything about only having sex for “procreational reasons”. You are mental! “You just can’t stand the thought of a man having sex just for the pleasure of it lol and not have to pay for it!” – Never said that either, did I? But you seem to think that women only have sex to trap a man by getting pregnant and cleaning out his bank account…or by marrying him only to divorce later and GASP…clean out his bank account, and to “take part-time jobs such as cocktail waitressing for the sole purpose of snaring rich celebs”….and, clean out his bank account? You say women are “gullible” and “opportunistic”. YOU’RE A SEXIST PIG!
“but it wouldn’t matter as you’re so dense” – BAHAHAHAHAHA. Even JA is smarter than YOU, dummigod! 😀
They both created this child, so they should both financially support this child (and this childs needs are probably greater than the average childs, as she will probably need protection from the papparazzi, etc). Jude has agreed to financially support her, so what’s the problem? He hasn’t said that he will emotionally support her, and I hope he will, but that’s his business.
If a pregnancy has occurred in any relationship, and one person wants the child, and the other doesn’t, the one who doesn’t can always sign off all parental rights, and then I don’t think they have to pay anything. Doesn’t sound like that’s what Jude is looking for here.
What I’m getting from Nancy’s comments, she doesn’t sound anti-man/anti-sex to me at all, she sounds realistic, basically saying if two people engage in sex, pregnancy can occur. If one person does not want pregnancy to occur then it is that persons responsibility to protect themselves, and if they count on the other person to provide protection then they aren’t very smart.
EXACTLY!!! Someone FINALLY gets it! Hahahahaha. But, you know what, Tributegirl? It doesn’t matter to demigod. He has this sick fascination with me and my thoughts on the male population, LMAO. No matter what I say, he just plugs whatever he wants in there, “Nancy said this…”; “Nancy thinks that…”; “Nancy stated…”…meanwhile, he has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to back ANY of it up. Nothing.
omg more of this idiocy..do you even believe your own bs?? I know there was no mention of the pill! We were speaking hypothetically. That was understood! There you go ‘twisting’ again, and changing your story too.
I’m not even going to address the comparison to Olive Oil’s comment, but to say P R U D E.
Is Jude not a man? How/why would your comment be any different to any other? Those straws getting mighty short!
It must’ve been a gruelling 2 days for ya..mounting this ‘comeback’ haha. But you came back in classic form as the ditz that you are.
Tg pls. don’t encourage her, it doesn’t take much!
She’s said more than that. And not just in this article.
She sounds realistic? Like nothing is 100% guaranteed, so don’t do it? VERY realistic (no sarcasm). She sounds like a prude. Not anti-man/sex? She’s living it!
We’ve been over this, preggers can still occur using protection.
I don’t know if that’s true about the choice in ‘signing off’ parental rights, and not have to pay support. Obviously Nance hasn’t a clue.
So…lemme get this straight…because I choose to be single, YOU think I am “anti-man/sex”? BAHAHAHAHAHA! That is hilarious!!! I can have relationships with no strings attached, you know…DUH! ROFLMFAO.
Obviously…..you STILL have “ABSOLUTELY NOTHING” to back it up, hehehehehe (giggling my @$$ off).
I don’t believe you Nance. Not by a longshot. You’re just not the type. It’d be all or nothing for you.. with your views/attitudes about sex (can’t forget your take on a ‘John’ getting caught with his pants down, and stating he should pay a fine). No,you’re not anti-sex, not at all.
I ALWAYS back up what I say, and you know it.
Hahaha…so I “know it”, do I? You NEVER back it up…EVER! You just fill in what you want the comments to say, LMAO.
I really don’t care what YOU “believe”, dummigod. You have absolutely no clue as to who I am or what my “type” is/isn’t. Show some PROOF where I have given my “views/attitudes about sex”, proof of what I said AND WHERE. You NEVER show the proof….you just say things like I mentioned above, “Nancy said this…”; “Nancy stated that…”……..W H E R E ? ? ? Show the proof or are you just all mouth as usual? I believe the answer to that question is in all of your ‘proofless’ comments.
“Like nothing is 100% guaranteed, so don��t do it?”
Actually, demigod, hate to argue with you, but she did say nothing is 100% guaranteed (which is true), but I don’t see where she said anything like “so don’t do it”.
C’mon.. she said if guys don’t want children, to keep it in their pants! Since there’s always a risk (nothing guaranteed), then don’t have sex (don’t do it)! I couldn’t make this sh!t up. haha
I’m done with this article.
“but that��s what a lot of guys do, and it sucks, but it��s a fact of life”
t.g……really????
I would have assumed this “lot of guys” had willing partners….wow…your poor son, father, brother…what a sexist remark…
Welcome back, Joanne, I’m sure we’re all very excited to have you back.
Yes, a lot of guys had willing partners, Jude had a “willing partner”, but obviously she expected more than he planned on giving, so he did what a lot of guys do, he “disappeared and switched off his phone”. Did you not know that people do that sometimes when they want out of a “relationship” (fling) but the other person feels differently? Sometimes people do that when they just don’t want to hear from someone. Think back, I’m sure there were many times the people in your life didn’t answer the phone when you called, and I bet at least half the time they were there.
A lot of women do the same thing, so it was not a sexist comment here, it just so happened that we were talking about a MALE person disappearing and switching off their phone.
sexist
p.s. I’m willing to bet you’re drawing on
personal experience here….
Tributegirl: BAHAHAHAHAHAHA!! I don’t doubt but what her friends and family ALWAYS screen her calls! I definately don’t blame them one bit…I wish Tribute would screen her, too!!! She’s just a leech. What was it someone on here called people like her? A ‘TROLL’, hahaha. I noticed she never said a f-ing word to her buddy demigod over the last 6 months or so of his CONSTANT “sexist” remarks but yet, jumps all over you like the slimeball she is over your comment.
Jo-WAnne: “I’m willing to bet” Tributegirl is “drawing on personal experience here” too…..experience of knowing what YOU are like and that if you were in her life, she’d screen your call too! 😛
Demigod: How many times do I have to tell you? Over and over and over…worse than teaching 50 – 2 year olds at the same time! I did NOT say “If guys don’t want children, to keep it in their pants! Since there’s always a risk (nothing guaranteed), then don’t have sex (don’t do it)!”…Yeah, you did “make this sh!t up. haha” I said it is up to each person to protect themselves and that if he didn’t want kids he should have kept it in his pants. HIM. I never said “men” or “guys” I was speaking of Jude. And if a female was complaining about this, I would say the same about her, that it is up to everyone to protect themselves and if SHE didn’t want kids, then she should keep HERS in HER pants too…even if he fed her the “but I’ve had a vasectomy” line, LOL. “Too bad”…protect yourself…don’t be so gullible as to believe everything people tell you!
Nancy, you’re right, I would definitely screen her calls!
Joanne, personal experience, yes, I have ignored phone calls from certain people before. I’ve never been into talking on the phone much, so I don’t make many calls, so when I do people don’t bother to screen, they answer my calls.
You can call me sexist all you want, I definitely am not, so the more you call me that, the more childish you look. On the other hand, I can call you crazy, or insane, and anyone would be able to look at your comments and see why I would say something like that.
TRIBUTEGIRL FOR PRESIDENT!! LMFAO!