Jennifer Aniston’s beauty routine $141,000 a year

How much does it cost to be named “Hottest Woman of All Time” by Men’s Health magazine? The title was given to Jennifer Aniston, whose beauty routine reportedly costs upwards of $141,000 a year. Based on products and treatments Aniston has recently complimented, “The chicks at beauty.com” estimate the 43-year-old actress spends about $400 a day to maintain her glowing skin, trendy hairstyle and toned body. A variety of skin care products and facials are estimated to cost almost $1,200 a month. A salon day, apparently every six weeks, is an easy $900 thanks to her celebrity hairstylist, Chris McMillan, and hair colorist, Michael Canale. Then there are the make-up fees, a celebrity trainer, a dietician and more. Too much? ~Renita Naraine

Share this article:

Comments & Discussion

  1. Vayne • March 16, 2012 @ 9:32 AM

    Too much? – It’s all perspective…

    Aniston’s earning potential is obviously in the multiple of millions a year. Period.
    IF that $141,000 figure a year is true, that’s pretty much a business as maintaining her looks directly contributes to her constantly getting movie roles.

    At 43 yrs old – she looks as natural and young as ever… so it’s obviously a great investment.

  2. SS • March 16, 2012 @ 3:35 PM

    That explains why she looks like she hasn’t aged since the first season of Friends.

    Although I bet there are other celebs who spend way mroe than that on their “beauty” routine!

  3. Tam • March 16, 2012 @ 3:36 PM

    Who cares if she’s making millions?! That’s a ridiculous amount of money to be spending on stuff like that. She could be putting that money to much better use!!

  4. Chris • March 16, 2012 @ 4:25 PM

    I agree with Vayne 100%

  5. Nobody Important • March 16, 2012 @ 7:54 PM

    It’s the cost of doing business in Hollywood.

  6. allee • March 16, 2012 @ 9:54 PM

    Iv’e always liked her, she’s beautiful and deserves to be named sexiest woman of all time. Angelina Jolie ain’t got nothing on Jen, lol

  7. Mike • March 16, 2012 @ 11:54 PM

    “She could be putting that money to much better use”

    I cant stand when people use that line. Look, the honest truth is if you were in their shoes….oh wait, thats right….you never will be! Speaking hypothetically about you would or wouldn’t do, or what is right or wrong and what you would do if you had the choice doesnt actually hold any water!!!

    And yes, her estimated earnings in 2010 were $25M. The beauty treatments of $141k works out to 0.564% of her earnings. Say you make $50k a year, 0.564% works out to $282.00 per year. Yea I guess you should drop your beauty treaments entirely – you could be putting that money to much better use!

  8. C-Dub • March 17, 2012 @ 10:16 AM

    43yrs old and looks like that! Who cares. She has natural beauty. I don’t think it’s the greatest of all time, but I do think that Brad Pitt should have never let her go. She is a stone cold fox and always will be.

  9. b • March 17, 2012 @ 3:12 PM

    why not, as i am sure it’s all a tax write-off for her

  10. jjjones • March 19, 2012 @ 7:53 AM

    I think the main thing that bugs me is that the products she’s able to buy cost so much and I blame the manufacturers for that. Do some of these products really cost so much to make that they have to charge an insane amount to make them?

    I’m glad to see a 43 year old woman looking so fantastic and hopefully this means she won’t feel the need to do plastic surgery and ruin her looks like so many other women in Hollywood. They should age naturally, it is much more beautiful than the nip tuck.

  11. vision of the eye • October 17, 2013 @ 1:57 PM

    All this approaches are proved efficient, what you want
    to do is holding on faithfully.

Join The Conversation:

Similar Articles

Trending Articles

Current Poll

  • Harvey Weinstein was stripped of his Academy membership. Who should be next?

    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...

You Might Also Like


Close Menu