Joe Jackson loses bid for son Michael’s will

joejacksonEven though the late Michael Jackson‘s father was omitted from his son’s will, Joe Jackson put in a claim for financial assistance stating that his son was supporting him. But according to the latest hearing, Joe Jackson does not stand to inherit anything.
A Los Angeles judge hearing Joe’s claim to his son’s multi-million dollar estate ruled that Joe has no grounds to prolong the legal battle and would gain nothing from doing so. “I don’t think he gets to step into this and create further litigation,” the judge declared. “Joe Jackson takes none of this estate. This is a decision his son made.”

Share this article:

Comments & Discussion

  1. Holly • November 11, 2009 @ 1:31 PM

    Can this guy just give it up already. What makes him think after his sons death things would change? He hated him when he was alive! STOP, JOE!

  2. mandee • November 11, 2009 @ 3:04 PM

    im glad they finally told him he is going to get nothing. IF michael jackson WAS supporting him, why should he continue to do so after his untimely death? yeah, lets take money away from his children, good thinking, grandpa!

  3. Nancy • November 11, 2009 @ 5:28 PM

    I thought it was just reported a couple weeks or so ago that this guy owns his own recording company or whatever and he was talking about signing at least one of Michael’s children to a record deal..?

  4. moondog • November 11, 2009 @ 5:52 PM

    give him some dough he made those kids what they are

  5. gypsy • November 11, 2009 @ 10:50 PM

    KARMA!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  6. demigod • November 12, 2009 @ 4:47 AM

    He’s been sponging off him long enough.

  7. Michael • November 12, 2009 @ 1:56 PM

    moondog – you are an idiot.

    He made them who they are through years of abuse! Now he deserves their money? Are you crazy?!?

    It does NOT mean that he deserves money just because he is their father! That would be like Walter Gretzky demanding money from Wayne for “making him the hockey player he was”.

    Are you another one of those people that live through their children?…that might explain your logic….

  8. tributegirl • November 12, 2009 @ 5:04 PM

    No, Michael, he’s an “idjit”! hahahhahahahaha!!!!!!!

    Joe deserves NOTHING from Michaels estate!

  9. 4thjet • November 14, 2009 @ 4:23 PM

    GOOD!
    This poor excuse for a father doesn’t deserve a dime. Sure he got his son’s to make a band and become famous, but he got enough of their money then. Micheal HATED him and didn’t leave him anything and that’s the way it should stay.
    He’s just pissed that his wife has total control and obviously that’s leaving him out!

  10. moondog • November 15, 2009 @ 7:40 PM

    fu mike these ppl r rich & famous and lovin their lifes and hes the reason
    but he is one ugly f**k isnt he

Join The Conversation:

Similar Articles

Trending Articles

Current Poll

  • Which TIFF film are you most looking forward to this fall?

    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...

You Might Also Like


Close Menu