Johansson turns down porn role
By Alexandra Heilbron on August 1, 2007 | 11 Comments
Scarlett Johansson has turned down the role of porn queen Jenna Jameson in the film version of her autobiography. “Scarlett has never seen a script nor been approached about this project,” her rep told People magazine. “She has no interest in playing this role.” Jessica Simpson had also been approached for the role, but she and her manager/father passed on the project as well.
Too Bad on both accounts. They are both hot and would love to see then dig there teeth into a role like this.
Why doesn’t Jenna just play herself?
If Scarlett has never seen a script nor been approached for the role, how is it that she could have turned down the role?
GOOD FOR THEM BOTH! IT’S ABOUT TIME SOME PEOPLE HAVE SOME MORALS.
It’s called acting
What that they think?, They are? So prettyyyy…….
WHAT, DOES SHE THINK SHE’S ABOVE THIS KIND OF STUFF? WHEN YOU DO THIS TYPE OF STUFF AS AN ACTOR(OR ACTRESS) IT JUST SHOWS HOW DEDICATED YOU ARE TO YOUR CRAFT. ACTRESSES ARE PAID SO MUCH THESE DAYS THAT THEY ARE TOO FAR REMOVED FROM WHAT IT IS THAT MAKES THEM AN ARTIST. GIVING SOMEONE AN OSCAR AT SUCH A YOUNG AGE JUST SETS A BAD EXAMPLE FOR ALL. EVERYONE SCREAMING “INTEGRITY” ARE SO FULL OF SHIT THAT IT STINKS. THEY ARE IN AN INDUSTRY THAT PRETTY MUCH MAKES YOU A WHORE BEFORE YOU EVEN TAKE YOUR CLOTHES OFF, AND THEY ARE GOING TO TALK ABOUT “INTEGRITY?” GIVE ME A FREAKIN’ BREAK!!!
if they dont want to do the role its their freakin choice.
its their lives, their bodies and their careers
Agreed. If they don’t want to do it, they don’t need to.
Agreed. If they don’t want to do it, they don’t need to. (But Scarlett is so pretty.)
Ditto, and why do we even want a movie like this?