Lindsay Lohan flour bombed for wearing fur

By Alexandra Heilbron on November 17, 2008 | 7 Comments


Samantha Ronson and Lindsay LohanLindsay Lohan was pelted with a flour bomb when she arrived at a Paris nightclub wearing a fur stole over a blue-sequined dress. An angry anti-fur activist yelled “Lindsay Lohan – fur hag!” before dumping an entire bag of flour on Lindsay’s head on Saturday night as she made her way into the VIP Room on the Champs-Elysees. Later, Lindsay’s gal pal, Samantha Ronson, later wrote on her blog: “”I think there are plenty of families that could have used that flour for a meal. Nice job, lady.” To see pictures of the attack, click here.



Comments & Discussion

  1. Kelly • November 17, 2008 @ 11:37 AM

    Sam’s worried about the ‘waste’ of one bag of flour? Isn’t that a little silly for two people in their position of privilege and gluttony?

  2. Stephen • November 17, 2008 @ 2:13 PM

    Does this mean that Lohan will eat humble pie (flour being one of the ingredients)?

    Or does Lindsay covered in flour mean a new pie is on the menu… Firecrotch Pie, anyone? Skank Pie?

  3. yuck • November 17, 2008 @ 5:38 PM

    God I hate PETA. Charge them with assult and sue them.

  4. Nancy • November 17, 2008 @ 6:43 PM

    As much as I don’t like either Lilo or Peta, it’s not against the law to wear fur. It IS however a crime to throw something on someone! I’m also curious as to how they know FOR SURE that she is not wearing fake fur? I mean, Kate Winslet is totally against killing animals and using real fur and even she couldn’t tell the difference at her latest photo shoot!!!

  5. Demigod • November 18, 2008 @ 4:40 AM

    Flour!? Oh no!lol What ever happened to using spray paint and tomato paste?
    Nancy, good point. Would be tough to tell the difference. But knowing Lilo..she’s too young to care.
    Ronson’s comment is so lame.

  6. mandee • November 18, 2008 @ 6:20 PM

    yep i completely agree with nancy 🙂 i think its ridiculous that anyone would get away with doing anything like that in this day and age! i heard of a 6 year old who was being charged with assault for HUGGING his teacher when she was bent down! so they should definitely be charged or sued with SOMETHING. either way its assault.

  7. tributegirl • November 19, 2008 @ 1:13 PM

    A 6 year old is being charged for hugging his teacher? That’s insane! If the teacher has pressed charges against a small child for something like that, the teacher is definitely in the wrong profession! Or maybe should teach teenagers or something!


Join The Conversation:


 Change Location