Rep denies Brown leaked Rihanna’s nude pics

RihannaA representative for Chris Brown denies that his client is the one who leaked nude photos of Rihanna on to the Internet this past weekend. The photographs appear to have been taken in the bathroom of a hotel by the singer herself. Although her face is not visible in any of the nude shots, the most incriminating shot appears to feature the singer partially clad, taking a photograph of herself in a bathroom mirror. Written on the mirror are the messages “I Love You” and “I Miss You.” Though most of the photos show Rihanna, Brown appears in one photo with pink thong panties on his head. All of the photos have been branded “Young Turk,” supposedly the name of the person who put them online. Rihanna is reportedly devastated about the photos and is in Hawaii to escape the public eye. “She is freaking out. She was on the road to recovery after a terrible few months,” a friend of the singer told Britain’s News of the World. “She has no idea how these pictures have been leaked but she’s determined to find out. She’s rushed off to Hawaii to escape the scrutiny. She’s recording her new album and wants to shut herself in the studio away from the world for a few days.”

Share this article:

Comments & Discussion

  1. Edith • May 11, 2009 @ 11:17 AM

    i think celebrities who have things like this happen to them are stupid the have to think ” do i want photos like this to end up online?” they have to relise that they are always being wached and if you are stupid enough to take pic like this then you should be man or woman enough to take responsibility for it

  2. Nancy • May 11, 2009 @ 12:15 PM

    Ditto, Edith. Especially when you can see her name ‘Robyn’ written right there on the mirror, too. I wonder who’s head that is in the smaller mirror that is on the vanity..?

  3. Jo-Anne • May 11, 2009 @ 1:53 PM

    rushed off to Hawaii to escape the scrutiny??? like she never in her wildest dreams ever imagined these photos could one day surface…yeah, right…agree

  4. Jim • May 11, 2009 @ 2:53 PM

    This article states:

    the most incriminating shot appears to feature the singer partially clad, taking a photograph of herself in a bathroom mirror.

    Is the picture accompanying the article the most incriminating shot? If it is, I don’t see what the fuss is about. Does she not look exactly like this in all of her music videos and during most of her live performances? I seem to remember something about a performance of her song Distrubia and the outfit, or lack thereof an outfit, that she sported in that.

  5. Alexandra • May 11, 2009 @ 3:20 PM

    It’s the most incriminating because it’s the only one in which her face is shown. The other photos are just of her body. This photo pieces together those other photos with this one, and make it likely that it’s her in those photos as well. It’s not the most revealing, it’s the one that shows that the nude photos (and they are pretty nasty, they can’t be shown on this site) are probably her as well.

  6. Nancy • May 11, 2009 @ 3:40 PM

    Wow! They would have to be pretty nasty then to not be shown on Tribute…here it comes…..wait for it…..Jo-Anne is “pretty nasty” and she’s on here! HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!

  7. tributegirl • May 13, 2009 @ 10:43 AM

    Agreed, Edith, these are the days of the world wide web, anything we do has a chance of ending up online.

  8. mandee • May 17, 2009 @ 10:49 PM

    i dont understand why someone should be worried about taking pictures and giving them to their boyfriend. clearly, it was chris brown that put them on the internet, just like it was chris brown that beat her up. he will continue to deny both regardless of any evidence pointing to him. like, for instance, if they were pictures she took for brown…who else would have had them? only whoever SHE sent them to or whoever HE sent them to. i really do not believe SHE would have sent them to anyone else. i can see why she would want to get away, its pretty embarrassing because now he didnt only abuse her, hes also trying to humiliate her and trying to make her look bad to her fans. shes just young which is what makes this situation so disgusting. who would want to post an 18 (or is she 19??) year olds naked pictures online for the whole world to see? imagine if her dad had of been the one to find them?

Join The Conversation:

Similar Articles

Trending Articles

Current Poll

  • Harvey Weinstein was stripped of his Academy membership. Who should be next?

    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...

You Might Also Like


Close Menu