Restraining order for Lindsay Lohan

Lindsay LohanLindsay Lohan confirms she’s broken up with Samantha Ronson, saying they’re “taking a brief break so I can focus on myself.” But it looks like the breakup may not have been Lohan’s idea. Ronson’s mother, Ann Dexter-Jones, and her fashion designer sister Charlotte allegedly went to the Beverly Hills Police department to file a restraining order against Lohan. On Saturday, Lohan was said to have tried to gain entry to a party at Ronson’s house for Charlotte, but was refused by Samantha. “She does these things to get attention…We had to tell security to keep her out… She also followed our brother Mark around,” Charlotte reportedly told a police station source. Lohan had to be restrained by five bodyguards, according to OK! magazine. The locks of Ronson’s house were seen being changed just hours later. The Ronsons appear eager to get Lohan out of her life. A friend was quoted as saying that Samantha’s family has made her swear that the relationship is really over. “They are giving her all the support they can to keep her away from Lindsay.” ~Meryl H.

Share this article:

Comments & Discussion

  1. Nancy • April 7, 2009 @ 10:57 AM

    G A S P !!! I thought their love would last FOREVER!!!

    BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!

  2. tributegirl • April 7, 2009 @ 1:09 PM

    Man, Lindsay’s life is just in a steady decline.

  3. Jo-Anne • April 7, 2009 @ 3:27 PM

    so, what if Ronson caves and gets back together with Lohan, should a penalty be issued for her wasting time of the P.D.??

    hmmm….just wondering….

  4. tributegirl • April 7, 2009 @ 3:34 PM

    Sure, why not, maybe some penalties are just what Lindsay needs to clue in to the fact that the world doesn’t revolve around her.

  5. Nancy • April 7, 2009 @ 4:35 PM

    Sure Jo-Anne, why not? If they did that, there would actually be less physically and verbally abusive relationships. When people can’t get along they should be separated. As for “wasting the time of the PD”….yes, they could use the extra time…to eat more doughnuts!! 😉 Hahahaha!

  6. Anon • April 7, 2009 @ 6:22 PM

    Just when you think she can’t sink any lower, the ground gives a little.

    Jo-Anne on April 7, 2009 3:27 PM

    I bet she goes back for a few more rounds….police usually need to be called a numerous times before most people get their act together.

    Nancy on April 7, 2009 4:35 PM

    The donuts are reserved to our men in blue, then off to the school parking lots to munch them down. hahaha

    Now I’m just kidding! I have the utmost respect for these poor guys that not only keep us safe and sound, but risk their lives doing it while having to deal with stress that surely takes its toll not only on them, but their family and friends as well.

  7. Jo-Anne • April 7, 2009 @ 7:42 PM

    “If they did that, there would actually be less physically and verbally abusive relationships”…

    makes no sense whatsoever….

    ???

  8. Nancy • April 7, 2009 @ 8:07 PM

    “makes no sense whatsoever…”

    Which planet did you come from, Jo-Anne? Many people don’t like to get into trouble, with the law or otherwise, so therefore…they would not cave in and get back together with someone that they always argue and get physical with. If you think my answers “make no sense whatsoever”, maybe you shouldn’t ask senseless questions! 😛

    hmmm…just wondering…

  9. Nancy • April 7, 2009 @ 8:11 PM

    Well, I should say “physically abusive” with instead of just “physical”. LOL.

  10. Anon • April 7, 2009 @ 9:05 PM

    Nancy on April 7, 2009 8:07 PM

    People that are in emotionally charged relationships have very clouded judgement and are not afraid of the consequences. They dont think – they act. If that was the case, the unstable people that continue to stalk their victims or kill their spouses would think twice before their actions, but they dont. So your argument is an invalid one. Consequences dont come into the picture; they are only focused on the moment and regaining some sort of control over their victims since they have lost control of their own lives. If I recall correctly, you said yourself that your ex continued to harass you without any regard to the law.

    Personally, since this is the first of police involvement that weve heard about, I am sure that there will be many more. Based on the comments from other family members, Lindsay is out of control and will continue until Ronson goes back to her..then the real Lindsay “chronicles” will begin.

  11. Nancy • April 7, 2009 @ 10:12 PM

    Anon, when I referred to people not wanting to get into trouble, I was referring to the one who is NOT the abuser, in this case, Samantha Ronson. Didn’t you read Jo-Anne’s initial question @ 3:27 pm today? It referred to Ronson caving in and taking Lindsay back. If there were a penalty, would she take Lindsay (the psycho) back? I know that the aggressor has no regard for consequences, and if I recall correctly, I said so myself that in my situation, once I was informed that there would be a “consequence”, being that I wouldn’t have help, I got rid of the problem! And just so that everyone is on the same page here, Jo-Anne was just making another one of her “wise-cracks” without mentioning my name, referring to the comment I made on the latest Chris Brown article. So Anon, my argument is NOT an “invalid one”. Oh, and this is not the first that the police have been called into the Lindsay/Samantha chronicles.

  12. mandee • April 7, 2009 @ 11:40 PM

    well nancy, you are living proof that arrogant, self righteous, ignorant, insensitive, infantile, abusive people DONT change. they continue with the same rude, hurtful and obnoxious behaviour theyve always had. its safe to assume that joanne was NOT talking TO YOU. but once again, EVERYTHING is about nancy, is it not? and on the topic at hand, i highly doubt it would take 5 cops to restrain what looks to be an anorexic, or at least very skinny young woman. i dont see anything about abuse, can someone show me where it says she abused samantha?

  13. Anon • April 8, 2009 @ 12:25 AM

    Nancy on April 7, 2009 10:12 PM

    Yes you are right, I did mistake the point and realize now that you were speaking of the victim. But, I still think your argument isnt a valid one. There are penalties in place for women that take abusers back that are far worse than a fine or slap on the wrist from the judge. These are broken bones, abused children, verbal abuse, alienation from family and friends, daily fear, and a life robbed of dignity and self respect. This, to me would be a greater motivator than a consequence no different than a parking fine or time in lieu of one. I could go on forever with the list of penalties in place already for the victims. Regardless of our difference of opinion I still think shell take her back.

    As for Jos comments, I havent read the latest on Brown yet so I didnt read into the jab.

    mandee on April 7, 2009 11:40 PM

    Some would take stalking and intimidation as abuse if the attention isnt wanted and you have to resort to restraining orders for them to stop. I do agree that the 5 cops needed to restrain her. But, then again, the media has to feed our hungry minds with something hahha

  14. Anon • April 8, 2009 @ 12:30 AM

    mandee on April 7, 2009 11:40 PM

    Oooops, I meant that I don’t agree that it took 5 cops to restrain her

  15. mandee • April 8, 2009 @ 12:41 AM

    im glad someone sees it from my point of view. i believe that the media mainly just make up their stories (for the most part) or completely embellish the truth to sell magazines etc. and youre right about stalking and intimidation being forms of abuse, but i do not actually follow what goes on in the stars love lives unless its something with proof. (such as chris brown) so, i have no idea how things went, i dont know if she told lindsay she wanted to break up for good. maybe she said she just needed some space or something so lindsay thought she could talk to her to fix things?

  16. Anon • April 8, 2009 @ 12:50 AM

    If thats the case, you cant really blame her. We all make attempts to talk to our partners when things are falling apart. Ronson’s family could be over reacting or on the flip side, things don’t seem to be going to well for Lindsay and she could be a pest that is grasping at straws to get her back. Honestly, I really don’t believe or care for that matter about what they do in their personal lives….I’m more interested in everyone’s opinions here lol

  17. mandee • April 8, 2009 @ 1:03 AM

    thats true. i think that was my point (that she was grabbing at straws) because if you really believe you love someone, youre going to try as hard as you can to get them back. no matter what. i think she is misled and she needs to get her life in order before she tries to have a relationship. its hard for anyone to love you or take you seriously when youre a train wreck. i dont really care so much either about any of this, its just something to do when i can find the time and i enjoy the discussions when people dont always NEED to be trying to pick fights. im just tired of nancy acting like shes above everyone and like everything is about her. she spends all her time trying to cause problems, so when i stopped posting she kept picking on jo. and what fun is it to post when instead of having a normal DEBATE, youre insulted and treated like crap and made to seem like your opinion doesnt matter or is just a silent JAB at someone else? lol. read between the lines.

  18. Nancy • April 8, 2009 @ 8:32 AM

    Mandee, go to your Dr. and get some meds…seriously! Who even said ANYTHING to YOU? Go back to the top of the page and read the comments in order but be sure to read the comments on the Chris Brown article first, then come back and try to convince people that I am the one “picking fights” and “causing problems”…seems to me that you’re doing that now. I never said a word to or about you on here did I? You haven’t even been on here in a while and when you did comment just the other day on an article, I agreed with you. So mandee, maybe if YOU would keep your nose in your OWN business and stop insulting and treating others like crap and make them feel like their opinions don’t matter, maybe they would treat you with a little more respect! As for the “JAB” from Jo-Anne that you say does not pertain to me….it’s plain as day and you just might realize that if you could get over yourself long enough. Anyways, back to Lindsay and your question about their “abusive” situation…there have been several articles of loud hotel room arguments, breaking glass, throwing things, smashing windows, police being called, ie: archive March 16, 2009.

  19. tributegirl • April 8, 2009 @ 10:18 AM

    Actually, it WAS plain as day that the jab was directed to Nancy. It was in reference to earlier comments on the Chris Brown article.
    And really, I think if Lindsay had to face some sort of penalty for wasting the PD’s time, it might make her think twice about going uninvited to Samantha’s next party.

  20. Jo-Anne • April 8, 2009 @ 10:58 AM

    you two need to get over youreselves like yesterday…

    If I were to Archive Queen it and reference all your “jabs” to myself…well, suffice to say I haven’t got all year…

    hmmm…doughnuts, police…yesterday…anyone???

    dish it out, but can’t take it…

    mandee, thanks.

  21. tributegirl • April 8, 2009 @ 11:58 AM

    ditto.

  22. Nancy • April 8, 2009 @ 12:02 PM

    Haha…I’m not “Archive Queen”, Jo-Anne. And sure, I’ve jabbed BACK at you and yeah yeah, I know two wrongs don’t make a right but I won’t stand by and be accused by mandee of starting it when I didn’t…

    “im just tired of nancy acting like shes above everyone and like everything is about her. she spends all her time trying to cause problems, so when i stopped posting she kept picking on jo.”

    Seems to me Jo-Anne and mandee are causing the problems. At least I PROVE my claims, more than I can say for you two! What’s that? Scroll up and read the first 3 comments on this article…WHO started what now?

  23. Jo-Anne • April 8, 2009 @ 12:34 PM

    started what exactly, Nancy? You stated penalties should be issued for wasting court time, taxpayer’s money and I followed that line of thought and asked you if the same (penalty?) should apply to wasting police time (taxpayer’s money), if that were to be the case in this storyline here?

    yes? no? simple?
    or so I thought….

    and for the record, your above comment that if penalties were enforced, “there would actually be less physically and verbally abusive relationship” I find absurd.

    and for the record, the last time I checked I was from a planet called Earth…maybe you should have paid closer attention in Grade Three geography instead of poking the student in front of you and arguing with the teacher, telling the whole class they were wrong and you were right ha ha…

    just joking, couldn’t resist, my passive agressive side taking over…again

  24. mandee • April 8, 2009 @ 1:52 PM

    ok well, first of all. youre right i havent been on in a while. i havent found anything worth posting. second of all, i dont care if the 2 of you find it plain as day what she was saying, it is POSSIBLE that both of you mistook what she said. when the person who WROTE it tells you straight up that it wasnt a jab to you, perhaps you should believe her. after all, its HER words and thoughts, NOT YOURS. “its plain as day and you just might realize that if you could get over yourself long enough. ” nancy, clearly i am NOT the one that thinks EVERYTHING is about me. i was defending jo, so unless me and her are the same person, theres no way i could be only interested in myself. i remember a time i used to defend you, until you became an idiot. and about the stuff you said about the breaking glass etc, i was unaware of any of that. like i said, i do not really follow celebs lifes and if i do i dont remember anything that i read because its unimportant. tributegirl, you can disagree with me all you like. i read things different than everyone else. i get that you dont like me since me and nancy arent getting along and since i havent been posting on here (given the fact i havent heard from you since i said i wasnt coming on here anymore) and thats cool with me. and jo, no problem. ohh oops, forgot to include, nancy if the doctors would give me pills because they think theres something wrong with me, i would gladly take some, but the fact of the matter remains. its not ME theres something wrong with. 🙂

  25. tributegirl • April 8, 2009 @ 3:10 PM

    Ok, first of all mandee, my yahoo account isn’t working again, not unusual, I’ve found yahoo to be a poor account.
    Secondly, when I read the comments, I did find it very clear that certain comments were jabs at certain people, they weren’t jabs at me, so I didn’t bother with it until it started to become an issue, then I just simply stated that yes, I felt that it was very clearly a jab. Also, on that same note, no one actually said straight up that it wasn’t a jab, all that was said was some stuff to kind of skirt around the issue while trying to make it look like an answer was given, which it wasn’t.
    Thirdly, if you and Nancy aren’t getting along, that’s fine with me, remember when you first started coming on here? Nancy and I got along with each other, neither of us got along with Jo, you got along with Jo but not with Nancy, yet I still got along fine with you. I think sometimes some of the things you say are out of order, but I really don’t feel it’s my place to say anything unless it is directed at me, which you haven’t said anything out of order to me. Also remember when Vicki was on here? We all got along fine with her, even though the three of us weren’t getting along with Jo, Vicki still was fine with us, even though she’s Jo’s sister. So you can get along with whoever you want, and argue with whoever you want, that’s your business, I won’t dislike you because you aren’t getting along with Nancy. Just understand that I do get along great with Nancy, sometimes I even kind of get along with Jo (I know, that sounds weird, but sometimes we do actually have fairly decent conversations on here). You like and dislike who you want, I’ll like and dislike who I want, it shouldn’t have anything to do with how you and I get along.

  26. Nancy • April 8, 2009 @ 4:18 PM

    Everything needs to be explained to mandee like a 2 year old. This issue never even involved you at all but yet, you couldn’t keep your schizophrenic trap shut for 2 seconds, could you hypocrite mandee? Yeah, you’re going to really get the names now little miss “sponge”, I mean, you like name calling right? You are nothing but a sponge mandee…soaking up everything you can get from your parents. It’s one thing to have to use your parents as a crutch when times are hard…it’s another to make it a lifestyle! Up until 12:34 pm today, Jo-Anne never denied that she didn’t make a jab, so how was anyone supposed to believe “straight up that it wasn’t a jab”? And you think I have problems….you need a mirror…and a Dr. appt.

  27. Nancy • April 8, 2009 @ 4:20 PM

    Oh, and Tributegirl…I can’t believe you know this person outside of Tribute. Your choice though. Just wondering, is she like this in “real life”?

  28. tributegirl • April 8, 2009 @ 4:36 PM

    Actually, I don’t “know” her outside of tribute, she posted her e-mail address on here once, I think while Vicki was here, and I wrote to her, we’ve e-mailed a few times, mostly just shooting the breeze about our families & stuff.

  29. Jo-Anne • April 8, 2009 @ 4:55 PM

    why do you feel the need to answer a question like that, t.g., respond to her obvious annoyance with you for “taking it one step further” with Mandee and choosing outside contact apart from this site? You even feel the need to prove to her that your contact with Mandee was merely “shooting the breeze”, just small inconsequential stuff, like you have to assure her it was really unimportant chit chat…

    you go on about choice prior to this…shouldn’t you stand up for yourself, “Hey, I really like Mandee, I’ve enjoyed our contact, etc. etc.” – and not keep feeling the need to answer to this control freak?

    oh an aside – how was anyone supposed to believe it was not a jab? Laughable. Petty.

    Well, only a few short months ago you were sticking up for Mandee left, right and centre, Nancy, and now you’re pulling out ALL the stops, even “sinking so low” as to throw her living arrangements with her parents into the pot here, trying to degrade and humiliate her…

    No mirrors necessary here, just pure revelation on one person’s unfortunate fixation on themself…

  30. Nancy • April 8, 2009 @ 5:09 PM

    First of all Jo, I’m not “annoyed” with Tributegirl for corresponding with mandee. Like I said, it’s her choice and no matter what YOU think, I mean that.

    “control freak”…yeah, right!

    “sinking so low”, “trying to degrade and humiliate her”….why should I have ANY respect for someone who calls me an “idiot” time and time again? Not happening! I also won’t respect someone who calls me a “control freak” and has absolutely NO CLUE who I am. Why are you so angry Jo-Anne? Why can’t you just let things go? 😛

  31. ke • April 8, 2009 @ 5:16 PM

    what;s up with nancy and mandee? i thought they were ‘buddies’ here on tribute. did i miss something?

  32. tributegirl • April 8, 2009 @ 6:54 PM

    They were, ke, then things changed very suddenly, took a very nasty turn.
    Jo, I didn’t feel a “need” to answer, I just simply “felt like” answering. And I wasn’t trying to “assure” Nancy of anything, mine and mandee’s contact has been just normal chitchat between two people, not inconsequential at all really, we’ve mostly talked about our families. You want me to say I like mandee and enjoy my contact with her? Fine, I like mandee and enjoy my contact with her. I didn’t really feel it was necessary to say that, I would think that by stating the fact that mandee and I are “shooting the breeze” would kind of say all that, but whatever, there it is.
    I did not feel threatened at all, did not feel the need to “stand up for” myself. I think you may have taken my comment to Nancy out of context.

  33. Dave • April 8, 2009 @ 8:58 PM

    Maybe we should be looking into restraining orders for some Tributers here?

    Just kidding, of course. I’m a kidder.

  34. mandee • April 8, 2009 @ 10:18 PM

    ke, me and nancy got along just fine until she made a very insensitive “joke” about that actress that died after hitting her head. something along the lines of “oh i was beginning to think natasha wasnt the only one that hit her head” and i simply agreed with jos NICELY put comment that she shouldnt be talking about someone that died of a head injury like that, and nancy became a psychopathic freak. she started insulting me, dragging me and my living arrangements with my parents because i work PART TIME since no one in my city is hiring and it is completely impossible to live ANYWHERE making only 500$ per month. and now, here she is again, dragging in the fact that i have said that my sister is skitzofrenic (i really can not spell this word) and trying to accuse me of the same because i think the way she torments people is way out of line, childish and bordering on abusive herself. nancy, you can talk about my family all you like. do you notice how youre still the one dragging my family, living arrangements, financial situation, family illnesses into every fight? its clear to me that youre very insecure, frightened that you and your children will never succeed in this world, and youre pretty pitiful if you ask me. and tributegirl, ok thats fine. im glad that you cleared that up for me, because i thought it was strange no word from you since me and nancy started fighting. im also uncertain as to why you feel the need to point out you thought jos comment was a “jab” at nancy, but dont feel the need to defend me when nancy keeps bringing up things that are either out of my control, none of her business, or stuff to do with someone that isnt even me.

  35. mandee • April 8, 2009 @ 10:19 PM

    ps. sorry for the long long post, had a lot of things to say to people. one more thing, perhaps you should contact tribute joanne and tell them how nancy is always harassing you, show them the evidence and then wait for them to ban her. because i do believe she is bordering on harassment, and should get the same treatment she thinks lindsay deserves.

  36. Anon • April 8, 2009 @ 10:24 PM

    Dave on April 8, 2009 8:58 PM

    Yes I agree but everyone on this site would be slapped with one at some point! Its quite funny actually; there are more trolls and e-drama here than on any other site Ive frequented. Hahahaha It really is quite addicting.

    Just so I dont piss everyone off. A troll is someone who posts controversial, inflammatory, irrelevant or off-topic messages in an online community, such as an online discussion forum or chat room, with the primary intent of provoking other users into an emotional response or to generally disrupt normal on-topic discussion. Wiki

  37. Jo-Anne • April 8, 2009 @ 10:49 PM

    you know, I did find your comment quite funny Dave, and also your’s Anon. My issue is with Nancy’s apparent need, (a need which would appear to be fulfilling her perverse enjoyment at seeing another person down on their luck) to reiterate repeatedly to all here Mandee’s unfortunate circumstances and continue to kick her when she’s down…

    it’s shameful and even more so when said person is raising impressionable children who would have to be blind not to witness this distasteful trait their mom possesses.

    We all know you went through hell in the past Nancy, but isn’t it time you started putting that behind you and not blaming others for your choices?

    This is and should be a harmless website, have a little fun, be sarcastic, healthy debates, even heated debates on topics are interesting and healthy, throw a few jabs (why not?, I have been accused of such and lived to tell of it ha ha) and at the end of the day no one should feel this means anything more than a place to check in with familiar and unfamiliar names.

    When one person chooses to let others in on personal details, these details shouldn’t be used as ammo when difference of opinions arise and blasted all over the site with the sole purpose of one-upping the individual and embaressing them.

    Surely, at your age, you can see this is wrong and unnecessary…

  38. Anon • April 8, 2009 @ 10:55 PM

    mandee on April 8, 2009 10:19 PM

    I wouldnt worry too much about what is said about your living arrangements. I went through a divorce and took a major financial nosedive. Couldnt afford anything while in court waiting for division of assets and child support. I moved (with two kids) back into my parents home where we happily stayed for over 10 yrs. It was greatno childcare costs or running around trying to find someone that was suitable to watch the kids, no rent, suppers were cooked after work etc etc. But in return, no yard work, housework, laundry or any other physically demanding jobs for my aging parents as we took all those taks over. They enjoyed the company (at this point in life they really cant stand each others company anymore hahha) and help and we gained financially; it was a win win situation and everyone was happy. If your situation agrees with you, why do you care what others (especially here) think of it? Or your sister or anything personal for that matter?

    As for the rest of the Tributers that are spewing personal insults, a lesson can be learned from a wise saying: Never look down on anybody unless you’re helping him up. The drama here is getting to be too much and takes away from great discussion and personal connections.

  39. Nancy • April 8, 2009 @ 11:01 PM

    Ke: Refer to March 16 Lindsay Lohan article IF you would like to know EXACTLY what happened and judge for yourself, don’t go by the story mandee seems to be telling, read the proof for yourself, please. I made a comment to demigod BEFORE Ms. Richardson died, Jo-Anne didn’t like it (that’s fine), mandee agreed with her (that’s also fine). What mandee doesn’t seem to understand is that she had to add onto the end of her smart-@$$ comment, “Oh, and you can tell me to shut up all you want, nancy.” She then proceeded to accuse me of referring to her in a comment on the Julia Roberts article in which I was replying to Jim’s comment but yet, she accused me of it over and over…which is WHY I commented that “I think schizophrenia runs in your family”…she claims she knows the symptoms…one of them is accusing everyone of being out to get you. Anyways, she then told me that I deserved to be abused by my ex-husband and called me (and this one is real original) an “idiot”. Then she disappeared for a week or two and now, comes flying in here, where nothing was even said to or about her calling me “arrogant, self righteous, ignorant, insensitive, infantile, abusive, IDIOT, rude, hurtful, obnoxious, etc., etc., etc. and flips out because I said she needs meds because she obviously has mental problems. Now, she calls me “psychopathic freak” & “insecure and frightened that you and your children will never succeed in this world, and youre pretty pitiful if you ask me.” I “succeeded” many years ago, mandee and my children (who have done absolutely nothing to you) surpassed you by the time they were 5 years old.

    As for you Gina/Anon/Whatever other names you’ve used, what is the term for someone who goes on a website and comments under about 20 different names just to “provoke” people? Would that be a “troll” too? 😉

  40. Jo-Anne • April 8, 2009 @ 11:11 PM

    nancy, now more then ever, it’s clear you need help or at least a time consuming hobby…

  41. Anon • April 8, 2009 @ 11:11 PM

    Nancy on April 8, 2009 11:01 PM

    Definitely a troll!! But I stopped fishing when my ip address was banned for a couple of weeks. Now I am only Anon and say with complete sincerity that I enjoy talking with you all.

  42. mandee • April 8, 2009 @ 11:15 PM

    thanks for your comment anon. i agree with you that living at home is actually very helpful when you can not financially live on your own. and about the julia roberts article, and the you deserving to be abused comment nancy, i actually apologized to you for those, im sure. and if i didnt, i sure meant to. if you would stop picking on people, then perhaps people would stop picking on you? the more you insult my family and my situation, the worse you make yourself look to others. and im sure when your kids were 5 they were struggling with a part time job in a city that was very quickly becoming empty, with no jobs available, AND were paying you rent, doing your dishes and laundry, walking the dog, spending time with their autistic niece, paying rent AND being everyones taxi whenever anyone needed a ride. yeah because you dont sound like an “idiot”. 🙂 and the “you can tell me to shut up all you want nancy” comment was clearly a joke, hence the 🙂 at the end of it.

  43. mandee • April 8, 2009 @ 11:24 PM

    sorry put rent in there twice my bad

  44. Nancy • April 8, 2009 @ 11:28 PM

    “if you would stop picking on people, then perhaps people would stop picking on you?”

    AGAIN mandee, WHAT WAS SAID TO YOU ON THIS ARTICLE…BY ME…TO MAKE YOU ALL OF A SUDDEN COME ON HERE AND SAY…AND I QUOTE,

    “well nancy, you are living proof that arrogant, self righteous, ignorant, insensitive, infantile, abusive people DONT change.”

    You chose to join in and start with your name calling and now try to twist it that it’s MY fault..????

  45. mandee • April 8, 2009 @ 11:32 PM

    i never said you said anything to me to start it. i just figured since you felt soo quick to once again be rude to jo, that you should know how you make yourself look. so i was simply telling you. and when i said if you would stop picking on people, then perhaps people would stop picking on you what i meant was, if you werent soo quick to pass off judgment and angry demeaning words to people without asking them if they were even referring to you, you should expect at least some degree of insult or comments directed at you either by that specific person, or by one thats willing to defend them. you saw no problems with me defending you to jo when she was jumping down your throat without just cause, why is it any different when i defend jo when you jump down her throat? like i said, i did not see any “jabs” at you. ask her if that was her intention. if it was, i will gladly apologize and take back what i said to you. if it wasnt, well then, too bad for you.

  46. Nancy • April 8, 2009 @ 11:38 PM

    Nothing was said to you….should have kept quiet…”too bad for you.”!!! 😛

  47. mandee • April 8, 2009 @ 11:40 PM

    i didnt ask, or expect you to apologize or take back anything you said, so what exactly do you mean by “too bad for you” ? you said things you shouldnt have, so did i. i dont have any regrets, unless jo WAS picking on you. and you dont have any regrets. so why is it too bad for me? :S sorry, im “like a 2 year old” you gotta explain that better for me.

  48. Anon • April 8, 2009 @ 11:51 PM

    Okay, I am going to try posting this again….

    This has nothing to do with your arguement, but I wanted to share some feel good fun with you guys. I just read a hilarious story called the True life story of Ken doll. Click my name for a chuckle. The article is on cracked; scroll down to the story, pretty funny!

  49. ke • April 9, 2009 @ 2:03 AM

    i don’t know the story behind all this but i do know that whatever it is, (and i’m sure each person has a reason to be angry and defensive), maybe you should just let it go. i’m reading what you all are writing to each other and its just plain mean. its personal and cruel. i think that if you really dislike someone the worst thing (to them) and best thing (for yourself) you could do is ignore them and let it go. but hey i’m just speaking up.

    anon: i love what you said ‘never look down on anybody unless you’re helping him up’ if only people were more like. (NOT a jab on anyone!)

  50. ke • April 9, 2009 @ 2:04 AM

    and there is absolutely nothing wrong with mandee’s financial/life situation.

  51. mandee • April 9, 2009 @ 2:40 AM

    thanks. and youre right. about everything. you should check out the youtube video added to my name. i laughed soo hard when i saw it !

  52. Anon • April 9, 2009 @ 7:48 AM

    mandee on April 9, 2009 2:40 AM

    Very funny, nothing like a wtf on live tv hahaha.

Join The Conversation:

Trending Articles

Current Poll

  • Harvey Weinstein was stripped of his Academy membership. Who should be next?

    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...

You Might Also Like


Close Menu