Sheen loses right to keep his kids off TV

Charlie Sheen & Denise Richards head to court Jan 22/08 with their childrenCharlie Sheen has lost his bid to keep his young daughters from appearing on his ex-wife Denise Richards‘ new reality TV show. The two took their disagreement to court to determine whether Sam, 3, and Lola, 2, can participate. The show will revolve around Richards’ life as a working single mom in Hollywood. As their father, Sheen had the right to stop them appearing on the show. Richards wanted Sheen’s right as a father revoked, and a Los Angeles judge ruled in the actress’ favor.  

Share this article:

Comments & Discussion

  1. That Awful Smell is Cloverfield • January 23, 2008 @ 10:38 AM

    “Working single mom in Hollywood?” When was her last movie???

  2. Anonymous • January 23, 2008 @ 10:40 AM

    Out of fairness, the children should also be free to appear on “Two-and-a-Half Men.”

  3. Anonymous • January 23, 2008 @ 11:03 AM

    Stupid Judge!! Did he really think about the welfare of the kids???? I mean, reality show!!! Jeez…

  4. Joshua • January 23, 2008 @ 1:06 PM

    I would have to agree with Charlie on this one.

  5. Anonymous • January 23, 2008 @ 2:30 PM

    Talk about pathetic.

    What claim to fame does she have? I’m with Charlie on this one. With all the screwed up kids in Hollywood, why in God’s name would a judge okay this?

    Denise Richards is an opportunist of major proportions and definitely IS NOT thinking about her children’s welfare. She’s trying to revive the non-existent career she had before kids and that’s it.

    I hope there is a way for Charlie to appeal this inept judge’s decision. If not – boycott the show. No viewers; no advertising revenue, no show – easy as that!

  6. Anonymous • January 23, 2008 @ 8:07 PM

    enough with these so called reality shows, they’re all scripted

  7. Anonymous • January 24, 2008 @ 11:05 AM

    no there not, there really real

  8. Chris • January 24, 2008 @ 12:19 PM

    The only thing i ever remember about Denise Richards was her in wild things…..anything else is shit.

  9. Karen • January 24, 2008 @ 1:26 PM

    What she will do to make a buck! Those poor kids. Exploiting them like that. She should give it up and live off the royalities or whatever it is these actors make and really, give up acting because she can’t act. I am sure she swindled enough out of Charlie. Give up the dream already girl because it ain’t going to happen!

  10. Anonymous • January 24, 2008 @ 2:37 PM

    I cannot believe that a judge sided with denise on this one. If I were Charlie, I would appeal this decision. It is a mark of a good parent to try and prevent their kids from getting trapped in the downward sprial Hollywood seems to be.

  11. Anonymous • January 24, 2008 @ 3:08 PM

    I wouldn’t worry too much, I mean, seriously. How long can this “reality” show last? No one is interested in her, they will get pretty low ratings and that will be the end of that.

  12. Anonymous • January 24, 2008 @ 9:24 PM

    My question is “What producer is she sleeping with who thinks she can pull this show off?”

    Who’s going to watch a show about somebody nobody knows or cares about other than that producer?

  13. Fern • January 25, 2008 @ 10:05 AM

    She doesn’t work hard she’s a f***ing actress she doesn’t work she has tons of money all ready

  14. Anonymous • January 25, 2008 @ 6:27 PM

    What is wrong with the judges in Hollywood? They obviously don’t know anything about children. I think all family courts should have a very well trained, experienced child psychologist on staff. And the judge should HAVE to take that persons opinion into consideration.

  15. Poppa John • January 25, 2008 @ 8:50 PM

    Wow!!! She sure pulled one over on that judge! Charlie may not be an angel, but at least he’s not wanting to have his children all over the gossip pages and in the mayhem-like atmosphere that is reality television. She is just grasping at straws, as her career was over long ago. It’s evident when you take on a reality show(unless you’re Ozzy or Gene Simmons, big difference there!!)that your career is over!!! Just plain ridiculous!

  16. pm • January 26, 2008 @ 5:14 PM

    She’s a nut case. That’s all there is to it.
    One day she says that Charlie is a child molester and the next day she goes and gets pregnant by him for the second time.
    I mean nobody put a gun to her head and said go and have another kid. I’m sure she could afford birth control pills.

Join The Conversation:

Trending Articles

Current Poll

  • Harvey Weinstein was stripped of his Academy membership. Who should be next?

    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...

You Might Also Like


Close Menu