Spears not allowed to drive with kids

Britney in the carBritney Spears is no longer allowed to drive with her children in the car, as per a sealed order during an emergency custody hearing held last Friday. The order came after the judge viewed a video showing her running a red light and making an illegal left turn against oncoming traffic, with the two boys in the back seat on TMZ.com. She’s also run over paparazzi photographers’ feet on three separate occasions. A source close to the case confirmed the ruling to Us Magazine on their website, saying, “It was a long time coming.”

Share this article:

Comments & Discussion

  1. Jack Prescott • November 19, 2007 @ 12:07 PM

    That’s ridiculous! What if she wants to take them out for ice cream???

  2. Dear Anon... • November 19, 2007 @ 1:08 PM

    Good, shes an idiot. Let her die on her own in a fiery wreck

  3. Nancy • November 19, 2007 @ 3:17 PM

    I agree because of the red light incident, but not because of the paparazzi feet incidents. The paparazzi should not be in the way of moving vehicles, dumb*sses!!!

    The children will be MUCH more safe this way, as will Britney and the greater L.A. area. (Now the L.A. population will want her to have her kids, just to keep her from driving the streets!!) She can afford to pay for a driver during the time she is with her children.

  4. Anonymous • November 19, 2007 @ 4:56 PM

    The continued persecution of Britney has got to STOP! Hasn’t she given the world enough already???

  5. Cactus Man • November 19, 2007 @ 5:00 PM

    This stinks! If you don’t want to take your chances with Britney behind the wheel, stay off the road!

  6. Debra Barone • November 19, 2007 @ 9:59 PM

    Those people have a lot of nerve telling a mother she can’t take her children anywhere! And people rant that celebs get special treatment…

  7. Nancy • November 19, 2007 @ 10:41 PM

    They didn’t say that she can’t take her kids anywhere. They just don’t think that she should endanger them anymore with her wonderful driving skills!! Don’t ask me why they just don’t pull her damn license. That would be best for all God’s children!!! LOL.

  8. Arnold • November 20, 2007 @ 1:25 AM

    Britney or Toronto cab driver. erh I will take Britney as the safer bet. There are worse drivers than Britney around… Unfortuanately they are all in Toronto!

  9. Anonymous • November 20, 2007 @ 10:23 AM

    I say the court has WAY TOO MUCH POWER!!!

    Britney needs to GET ANOTHER LAWYER and take back her rights……..they’re being violated WAY TOO MUCH!!!! WTH??? Seems the system is stacked against women these days. You women better start takin’ action………or you’re gonna lose all those rights you’ve worked so hard for.

  10. Joshua • November 20, 2007 @ 11:17 AM

    After Britney’s action. She shouldnt even have her kids anymore.

  11. Nancy • November 20, 2007 @ 3:48 PM

    I agree with Anonymous, 2 comments above. As women, we really do need to start taking action….immediately, or we are going to lose all of the rights we and women before us have worked so hard for!! Thank you for pointing that out Anonymous! Take a GOOD look ladies…things are changing quite quickly, and pretty soon it may be too late to grab it all and take it back!!

  12. Nancy • November 20, 2007 @ 3:52 PM

    Britney also has the cash…she can afford a lawyer that will crush that spineless little whimp, wanna-be-gangsta once and for all!! She just needs to DO IT!!!!!

  13. Carolyn • November 20, 2007 @ 4:59 PM

    All you hear about is how bad Britney is at driving…I would like to know who passed her to give her a licences in the first place. She’s better off having someone else drive her, that way we can all feel safe on the road.
    Sorry Britney, but you stink at driving.

  14. Anonymous • November 20, 2007 @ 5:35 PM

    Britney needs to get a CHANGE OF VENUE!!!!!

    She’ll NEVER GET A FAIR TRIAL THERE!!!!!!!!

    Get the judge RECUSED OR SOMETHING!!!!!!!!!

  15. Ed Davis • November 21, 2007 @ 3:11 AM

    These legal wieners are preventing Britney and her children from doing things as a family — and that’s a violation of EVERYTHING The Constitution stands for.

  16. Fannie Mann • November 21, 2007 @ 3:16 AM

    I couldn’t agree more, Ed! The President should really intervene on Britney’s behalf; he knows what a drag these drunk driving violations can be.

  17. The Golden Martian • November 21, 2007 @ 3:35 AM

    It would also give Bush the opportunity to salvage something of his presidency.

  18. Anonymous • November 21, 2007 @ 10:28 AM

    It’s a sad day in this so called “FREE COUNTRY” of ours when a mother can’t even drive with her kids in the car due to some STALKER following her around. Geez, I should have followed my ex around with a camera stalking her cause she can’t drive worth a crap. These family courts are outta control.

  19. Nancy • November 21, 2007 @ 7:53 PM

    Like I said earlier…she’s got the cash….crush him like the slimy maggot that he is! You would absolutely be amazed what money can buy, and she has more cash than he ever will!!!!!!!!

  20. Nancy • November 21, 2007 @ 7:56 PM

    Speaking of which…..wouldn’t it be something if the police had an anonymous tip..raided Federline’s house…..and maybe found a big bag of Coke in his cupboard???? Amazing what money can buy!!!!

  21. Anonymous • November 22, 2007 @ 12:11 AM

    Shouldn’t the Coke be in the fridge?

  22. Nancy • November 22, 2007 @ 12:57 AM

    LMFAO!!! As long as it is on the premises it is in his possession, that’s all that matters. But yes, it would stay nice and cold in the fridge! It would get quite damp and lumpy though wouldn’t it??? LOL

  23. Nancy • November 22, 2007 @ 12:58 AM

    Smart *ss!!! LOL

  24. Anonymous • November 26, 2007 @ 12:41 AM

    Britney, kick some ARSE!!!!!!!

Join The Conversation:

Trending Articles

Current Poll

  • Harvey Weinstein was stripped of his Academy membership. Who should be next?

    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...

You Might Also Like


Close Menu