Suri Cruise may get baby brother

suri_cruise.jpgSuri Cruise, who may well be the most adorable little celebrity munchkin in the world, might become a big sister, according to OK! magazine. “Katie and Tom very much want another baby,” a friend of the couple told the magazine. “There may be no better time than now for Katie to get pregnant again and absolutely nothing would make Tom happier.” Nicole Kidman appears to be thrilled with the news, because Conner, the son she adopted with Tom while they were married, would like a brother. “At 41, Nicole knows she’s not likely to have another baby,” a friend of the actress said. “It’s obviously up to the much younger Katie to give Connor that baby brother.”

Share this article:

Comments & Discussion

  1. Sam • November 7, 2008 @ 8:27 AM

    I don’t know but it seems that the world isn’t really ready for Cruise Jr. yet… lol

  2. Stephen • November 7, 2008 @ 9:17 AM

    Does the Gap sell baby-sized couches?

  3. dscott2 • November 7, 2008 @ 9:19 AM

    Am I the only person in the world that remembers Tom Cruise is supposed to be infertile? That was reportedly why his first wife left him, their inability to have children together, and why Nicole and Tom chose adoption together. Nicole can obviously have children of her own, so how did Katie get pregnant in the first place? I know, miracles happen. But I assume that if they want more children, they have to adopt. Does anyone else remember this, or is my imagination gone wild? I haven’t seen mention of it in the press since Katie’s had Suri.

  4. Sonny • November 7, 2008 @ 9:30 AM

    I saw a movie on TV the other week where Katie bears her breast. All I can say is “WOW – very nice”

  5. Nancy • November 7, 2008 @ 9:45 AM

    They are breeding their own little Scientology cult! 😀

  6. Judy • November 7, 2008 @ 10:08 AM

    I think Nicole should mind her own business!

  7. Nancy • November 7, 2008 @ 10:56 AM

    I think Nicole was asked her opinion and is very much entitled to it because it involves her other two children…which makes it her business, Judy! Nicole never said anything bad about them!

    I also think the clock has been wrong at Tribute since last Saturdays DST!

  8. Alison • November 7, 2008 @ 11:16 AM

    I remember that statement about Tom Cruise being infertile. I was wondering that myself.

  9. ke • November 7, 2008 @ 3:08 PM

    Judy – why would you say that about Nicole Kidman? It’s very much her business if her children are going to have other siblings. I agree she has no say when it comes to the marriage between Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes, but they are connected and so some decisions of the couple will obviously affect her and her family.

  10. Allison • November 7, 2008 @ 3:19 PM

    Unless they DO adopt again..what makes them so sure it will have another boy biologicaly.

  11. Tracy • November 7, 2008 @ 4:41 PM

    yep, infertile. but then again, i really don’t see much of Tom in Suri, she looks exactly like a clone of Kate! hmmm alien technology?

  12. tributegirl • November 7, 2008 @ 7:41 PM

    I’ve heard about the infertile issue too, but I’ve always thought Suri has Tom’s eyes. Maybe his little alien friends are helping increase his sperm count!

  13. Demigod • November 8, 2008 @ 1:13 AM

    Hmm..come to think of it, baby Suri seems to have more of L.Ron Hubbard’s eyes.. hehe

  14. Bond,James...Cosmos! • November 8, 2008 @ 12:08 PM

    »Interesting news.They are a very interesting family.

  15. Gary Burcher • November 8, 2008 @ 2:07 PM

    I don’t know, I still can’t watch Tom’s movies without thinking what a total wingnut the guy is.

  16. mandee • November 8, 2008 @ 9:32 PM

    yeah i really DO NOT agree with the statement about how nicole should have a say in weather or not tom and his NEW wife have babies. maybe the real reason all his wives left him was because hes a psycho, and they didnt want to be rude, or maybe give him a reason to chop them up lol, so they lied and said he was unable to have children. because quite clearly it IS getting out that hes a nutcase. i wonder what their son would look like, if hed look more like her than him the way suri does. i think suri is absolutely gorgeous, and i think katie and the baby need to get out NOW before adding to their family. tom is crazy.

  17. Demigod • November 8, 2008 @ 11:51 PM

    Yeah, but his movies are great 🙂

  18. Bond,James...Cosmos! • November 9, 2008 @ 11:16 AM

    »Tom Cruise´s next movie “Valkrye” is very intersting,very GOOD :They did some additional filming in North of Africa and now its ready to be a Oscar nominated film(December/08). “Valkrye” last trailer is GREAT.

  19. Bond,James...Cosmos! • November 9, 2008 @ 11:19 AM

    »”VALKYRIE”,of course. Looks very interesting,indeed.

  20. A Canadian • November 9, 2008 @ 2:37 PM

    OMG — Who in the world cares??!!!

  21. Nancy • November 9, 2008 @ 6:20 PM

    Mandee, no one said “Nicole should have a say in ‘WHETHER OR NOT’ Tom and his new wife have babies”….we simply stated that it is her business to tell the media her feelings of it, when asked, as she has children with Tom who will be affected by more siblings.

    Tribute: WORDPRESS is STILL happening….and my name is black!!!

  22. mandee • November 9, 2008 @ 10:50 PM

    ok first of all NANCY no one was referring to you. i was referring to this post :

    ke on November 7, 2008 3:08 pm

    Judy – why would you say that about Nicole Kidman? Its very much her business if her children are going to have other siblings. I agree she has no say when it comes to the marriage between Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes, but they are connected and so some decisions of the couple will obviously affect her and her family.

    maybe if you would ask people before getting snippy, there wouldnt be soo many that dislike you 🙂

  23. Nancy • November 10, 2008 @ 2:50 AM

    Mandee: “Soo many” do not dislike me and like I care what others think of me anyways! I did not get “snippy” with you in my comment I simply stated a fact to you that no one said the comment you suggested. You are the one is getting “snippy”. Anyways, I never said that you were referring to me but you should learn how to read because ke did not say that “Nicole should have a say in whether or not Tom and his NEW wife have babies” nor did he/she insinuate it!

  24. Jo-Anne. • November 10, 2008 @ 8:44 AM

    ha ha Mandee you are soo soo soo (DID I SAY SOO?????) right ha ha

    Suri is gorgeous

  25. Bond,James...Cosmos! • November 10, 2008 @ 11:19 AM

    »Indeed,Jo-Anne. The CRUISE Family also ROCK! Of course.

  26. mandee • November 10, 2008 @ 12:26 PM

    clearly you dont know how to read between the lines nancy. anyways 🙂 get over yourself, everyone knows you only come here to cause drama. but i dont really care that much, i DO have a job AND a life, unlike you it seems :)take care, and feel free not to comment on MY comments anymore unless theres actually a GOOD reason to do so. i dont usually comment on yours either because i dont see the point in causing a fight with someone so insignificant. have a good night kiddies, some of us GROWNUPS need to head off to work now

  27. tributegirl • November 10, 2008 @ 4:19 PM

    And as usual, the Queen herself (Jo-anne) has to stick her big nose where it doesn’t belong.

  28. Nancy • November 10, 2008 @ 5:41 PM

    Read between the lines? Ke said basically the same thing I said, which was that if it affects Nicole’s children it also affects her….which makes it her business. Ke never said or insinuated that Nicole has a say in whether or not Tom and Katie have more children. You know…insinuated? As in wrote it for us to “read between the lines”!! Don’t speak for EVERYONE mandee because you have no clue what EVERYONE knows or think they know about me! I come on Tribute to give my opinion, as others do, and I’ll damn well give it no matter whether you, Jo Jo or anyone else likes it! There was a very good reason why I commented to you in the first place mandee, because you accused someone of saying something they did not actually say, and if someone was accusing you of such I would be writing this to them. So yeah, have a nice day/night at work…I know I did! 😛

  29. Jo-Anne • November 10, 2008 @ 9:48 PM

    wow, t.g. stooping to suggest I can’t comment on a storyline.

    ballsy…big step for you
    what’s next? getting your posse to poke me in the eye – ha ha
    you toughie!!

  30. tributegirl • November 10, 2008 @ 11:11 PM

    Well, did you comment on the storyline? Nope, as usual you just stuck your big nose into someone else’s conversation, no mention of the story at all.
    Mmmm, yeah, ballsy, toughie, w/e. Poke you in the eye? wtf? As usual you don’t make any sense.

  31. mandee • November 11, 2008 @ 12:03 AM

    nancy, whatever. you dont need to always spend all your time commenting on EVERYONE ELSES posts just because you disagree with what they say. i was commenting on hers, while still commenting on the storyline. what i say to or about other people isnt any of your business, the last time i checked, ke has fingers and can type for him/her self. im sure if anyone needed or wanted your attitude or help, they would have asked you by now 🙂 like i said before feel free to stop commenting on EVERYTHING i say. at some point hun, you will have to grow up 🙂

  32. Nancy • November 11, 2008 @ 12:17 AM

    Mandee, you are the one who needs to grow up…you’re posting on a public forum…telling people to mind their own business and not comment when they disagree with YOUR LIES! I don’t like people who lie and I’ll definately tell you so…whether ke has fingers or not! I also notice that you didn’t tell Jo-Anne to keep her brown nose out of your business, that you have fingers and can type for yourself!

  33. Nancy • November 11, 2008 @ 10:00 AM

    Gee Jo-Anne, maybe you and Mandee can go take your reading lessons together…..Mandee told ME to mind my own business and not comment my differing opinion. GET A GRIP, FISH! I call you a brown nose because it doesn’t seem to matter to you what someone’s opinion is, as long as it is the total opposite of mine…and then you’re right in there…kissin @$$!!!

  34. Jo-Anne. • November 11, 2008 @ 1:05 PM

    get over it, Nance, truth of the matter is, as you no doubt realize, the way you present yourself is Attack Mode, Schoolyard Bully to whomever disagrees with you. You lack the maturity to accept difference of opinion in an adult fashion and further lack the eloquence to express yourself in adult fashion, thus shamelessly resorting to “LMAO”, “Fish”, etc., grade school insults coupled with “I’m tougher than you are” mentality.

    Debate like a grown up and you’ll be treated as one.

  35. tributegirl • November 11, 2008 @ 2:38 PM

    I think I’ve said this before, but I’ll say it again anyway, it’s like the pot calling the kettle black.

  36. Nancy • November 11, 2008 @ 5:33 PM

    Since when is “LMAO” a “grade school insult”? The way I present myself? Schoolyard bully to whomever disagrees with me? So because I don’t put up with your crap (calling me a 6 foot tall freak; idiot..real mature Jo Jo!)that makes me what you call “a schoolyard bully”? People disagree with me all the time and yet I am the FIRST one to have the parts to stand up and say that everyone deserves their own opinion, that it would be a really boring world if we all thought the same! You and your new bff Mandee do nothing but kiss @$$, lie and call people “idiots”….so take your crayons and go colour in the corner!

  37. tributegirl • November 11, 2008 @ 7:04 PM

    Well, we all know by now that Jo can dish it out, but she can’t take it. So that means, Nancy, that everything you or I say is going to be inappropriate to her, but she will be able to say whatever she wants, and it will be totally acceptable.
    AS IF!!!

  38. Nancy • November 11, 2008 @ 9:09 PM

    GASP! That would make her a hypocrite! GASP!

    (LMAO) Tee hee hee…

  39. Jo-Anne. • November 12, 2008 @ 10:22 AM

    if you got your facts straight Mandee, you’ll see once again T.G. felt the need to jump in after my comment and try her usual “Queen” stale comment, which is not only typical but indicative of the constant line of name calling they address me with after I have posted a comment.

    give it up on citing your friendship with her to me – I really don’t care who you befriend, it’s so Grade School. But it would be appreciated if you would stop telling me who I should and shouldn’t respond to. Please, enough.

    but hey, it’s outta my hands, so post away, all of you.

  40. Nancy • November 12, 2008 @ 10:27 AM

    There you go again, HYPOCRITE Jo-Anne!

    (spoken to Mandee, of course) “But it would be appreciated if you would stop telling me who I should and should not respond to”…….Hmmmm…..I could swear I heard that before!

  41. mandee • November 12, 2008 @ 4:09 PM

    first off nancy, whatever lol. youre an idiot and i dont care. and second off JO i dont care who you fight with, i dont care why you fight with them, but dont drag them into a fight that is with me and nancy. you should have never be in it, also, nancy should have never been in it in the first place either. anyways, the message i was referring to in the first place isnt here anymore *the one where you wrote that help dig me out BS that was signed tribute girl, with my name in it.* and ill tell you again nancy, before it borders on harrassment and i report you to tribute, stop talking about me and stop sending me rude messages, i stopped for quite a while and you kept bringing me up, wonder why that is? maybe because you have nothing better to do than pick on people? anyways its the internet, get over it and move on. have a great day all, back to work for me

  42. mandee • November 12, 2008 @ 4:13 PM

    ohhh the one im talkin about must be in the OTHER story that the 2 of you continue to cause s*hit with me in 🙂 take care

  43. tributegirl • November 12, 2008 @ 4:21 PM

    I don’t remember the “dig me out” comment. Maybe I didn’t see that one, since it’s gone now.
    Jo, your 10:22am comment today, you just proved what I said earlier about you being able to dish it out, but not take it.

  44. Nancy • November 12, 2008 @ 5:10 PM

    Go ahead and report me to Tribute, Mandee…You’re probably not the first…I’m sure Jo Jo has swamped them with her “Nancy reports”! You’re a f*cking nutcase! FOR SURE! I’m “in it” as you say, mandee, because I NICELY gave my opinion, without bashing you in any way, shape or form, that no one said it….MY OPINION….LUMP IT BEYOTCH! You had yours and I had mine…get over it! I never said anything about “digging you out” and signing it Tributegirl…just goes to show how nuts you really are! You stopped for quite a while, you say? When was that, in your last lifetime? Check the dates and times, whacko! So yeah, get over it and move on…your day pass is over! LMAO. 😛

  45. mandee • November 16, 2008 @ 5:41 PM

    oh shut up you retard. if you READ ANYTHING i typed properly you would be able to understand that i said JO’S COMMENT ABOUT me and tribute. not yours. so grow up, get over it and stop acting like youre queen s*hit. you may be S*HIT but youre clearly no queen and you clearly dont matter to anyone on here but yourself 🙂

  46. tributegirl • November 16, 2008 @ 7:30 PM

    If there is only one retard on here, I think we ALL know who THAT is!!! And it isn’t me, or either of you two!

  47. Jo-Anne. • November 16, 2008 @ 8:33 PM

    I beg to differ, T.g. there’s 3 of you now.

  48. tributegirl • November 16, 2008 @ 8:59 PM

    You wish Jo. You are the one siding with the “hebephile”!

  49. Nancy • November 16, 2008 @ 9:28 PM

    She’s probably a “hebe” too! LMFAO!

  50. mandee • November 16, 2008 @ 11:27 PM

    TG whos hebephile??? and no jo, we arent retards, you are. 🙂 no one likes you, you should just disappear.

  51. tributegirl • November 17, 2008 @ 4:06 PM

    mandee, check out the Miley Cyrus dating 20 year old Underwear Model, and read the comments, you won’t believe it. There is a freak on there named Steven who thinks it is ok for men and little girls to hook up, but then calls the little girls sluts and cows, and says they should kill themselves, then he said that Nancy needs to be shot. I’m not kidding. And the real knee-slapper? Since Nancy & I are arguing with that hebephile idiot, JO SIDES WITH HIM!!!

  52. tributegirl • November 17, 2008 @ 4:07 PM

    And yeah, I wish Jo would disappear too. Btw, I think the article in question is from Sept 19, or something like that. Check it out, you seriously won’t believe it!

  53. mandee • November 18, 2008 @ 2:06 AM

    ahhh, sure sounds like the HO (haha i mean JO) we all have come to know and love? 🙂 i actually commented on that post, i was unaware of the age of consent in california, here it was 14, i think it passed now that its 16 though. anyways, i commented on that site, it saids its awaiting moderation, what does that mean? ive never saw it say that before :S:S anyways, hope everyone has a good night and i hope they post my comment exactly as i said it so you can all read MY opinion 😉

  54. mandee • November 18, 2008 @ 3:47 AM

    haha i meant it said its not saids

  55. Jo-Anne. • November 18, 2008 @ 12:12 PM

    well, you three have finally suceeded in closing the comments on the above referenced Miley site, no doubt due to your highly inappropriate remarks.

    Mandee, the fact that you advertise your brain is “so much bigger” and your morals “so much better” than “ANY man” I am sure is very insulting to your father, who you mention, or any male in your life. I just hate it when women male bash, cuz of their personal issues. I happen to love my dad, husband, sons, brother, etc., and would never speak so trashy of the entire male race. Not intelligent.

    And to even attempt to drag my kids into this….just shows where your morals truly lie.

    All I ever agreed to on that storyline (and you well know that) is the depiction of the two holding hands was all that was reported, and I saw no problem with hand holding. I didn’t go any further.

    You three seem bent on turning this into a pedophile situation, not only with the hand holder, but with Stephen. You should all be ashamed of yourselves for poking fun at such a horrendous crime.

    Furthermore, I take issue with the fact you are actually inviting a male party to interact in a sexual way with what you believe is my underage daughter. At this point you have crossed the line in a very inappopriate fashion and my disgust and anger goes way beyond Tribute’s simple removal of your posts. What were you thinking? In no possible manner is this considered acceptable. I want you to know that.

  56. tributegirl • November 18, 2008 @ 12:22 PM

    I think it was probably awaiting moderation because steven made some very specific threats, which have been deleted, so I think they have closed that article to comments. Probably when you tried to post, they were watching all the comments very carefully.

  57. Jo-Anne. • November 18, 2008 @ 12:55 PM

    maybe so, t.g. but there you three were doing your best to provoke him and continued on with trying to do same to me.

    I have decided I am not responding to any of you 3 anymore as your remarks were getting really ugly and not going to play into that.

    I am sure you will all continue to poke fun at mine, but that’s cool. outta my hands. poke away and have fun.

    this is, for me, a very low priority, however interesting way to pass time here. It stopped being fun when you guys took it to that level. I don’t want to participate in that.

  58. mandee • November 18, 2008 @ 1:02 PM

    yeah my comments are still up in the other post. and first off, i made one comment JO and it wasnt directed AT YOU in that specific article. second, you think its ok for you and your friends to drag other peoples families into the fight, so it should be ok for everyone else involved. and the only reason you were agreeing with the pervert is because YOU wanted to cause trouble and YOU wanted the drama and YOU wanted people to feel sorry for you when we actually told you HOW IT WAS. and i dont believe for ONE SECOND that youre just gonna sit back and say nothing lol. its way too tempting for you. 🙂

  59. tributegirl • November 18, 2008 @ 1:03 PM

    We did our best to provoke him? Go back and read the comments over again, Jo, in the order that they were posted. I was on there one day and said that in MY OPINION, there was too much of an age difference. Then he came on & blasted me & said who the h*ll am I to say what age difference is too much, etc. I specifically asked him to have a mature conversation, which I was totally willing to do, but he was totally UNwilling, and even you have to admit he said some pretty sick stuff on there, stuff that the rest of us fought back about, because of the level of sickness he was reaching. What stuff, you ask? Well, he said that girls like Miley are sluts and cows and they should kill themselves. That’s pretty sick.
    And I’m assuming you must have missed yesterday’s comment from him, as it is now deleted, but he specifically said that he was going to kill me, Nancy, and Nancy’s children. I don’t know why you were so supportive of the other sick stuff he said, but I don’t believe for one minute that even YOU would go along with a threat like that.

  60. tributegirl • November 18, 2008 @ 1:04 PM

    And I believe it was that threat specifically that caused them to close the comments on that article.

  61. mandee • November 18, 2008 @ 4:43 PM

    well, i made comments on the miley cyrus post, if you wanna read them, they are still all there, totally pi*ssed off steven, and apparently from the sounds of it, jo haha

  62. mandee • November 18, 2008 @ 4:53 PM

    ohhh i just NOW saw your post JO. and so i understand now completely. you think its totally 100% fair for YOU to accuse nancy of being a bad parent, also to side with someone who flat out says nancy and her children should be shot, and who says that miley cyrus is a slut, a cow and should kill herself, but you disagree with ANYONE that could possibly bring in a comment about your family or your kids? and no i didnt say ALL men i said MOST men. i have no men issues, i just know they are mostly all idiots. and lol@you fish for completing an ANGER ESSAY which you so foolishly felt the need to bash me for doing the same. turns out you are a bigger hypocrite than anyone could ever imagine, and i dont even know how many kids, what their ages are or even if you HAVE any, so that remark clearly didnt mean anything, and i was only doing it to prove a point. you can bad mouth nancy and her kids but someone stop ME when i do the exact same to YOU. 🙂 wonder where YOUR morals and values came from, when youre the one that agreed with the statement but, when it came to your kids completely had a nervous breakdown because someone could suggest quite a thing. after all, if your kids are 15, steven is still only 20 🙂 same exact thing as miley and her boyfriend!

  63. Nancy • November 18, 2008 @ 6:15 PM

    Think what you want Jo… love loss here!

    Giving my opinion is NOT “provoking”….he’s a SICKO…bigtime psychiatric problems! Anyways, it’s over and done with…move along!

  64. tributegirl • November 24, 2008 @ 9:10 AM

    Possibly, but I think now she’s posting under “My own opinion”. It’s her typing style.

Join The Conversation:

Trending Articles

Current Poll

  • Which is your favorite Steven Spielberg film?

    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...

You Might Also Like

Close Menu