Teen star Panettiere snaps at photogs

Hayden PanettiereHayden Panettiere, 19, may have spent the last 13 years of her life in front of the cameras as an actress, but apparently she’s had enough of the paparazzi. According to Us Weekly, while attending a fundraiser for the Rehabilitation Hospital of the Pacific Foundation, the Heroes star snapped at photographers on the red carpet, saying, “Back up.” And when a female reporter tapped her on the shoulder to ask a for an interview, she reportedly turned and screamed, “Don’t you ever touch me!” She then told a group of reporters, “Oh, am I supposed to do interviews? You all make my life miserable.” Wonder what’s up with the dolphin-loving, cigarette-smoking teen. Maybe she’s still bummed that her Heroes co-star Milo Ventimiglia dumped her for being too immature.

Share this article:

Comments & Discussion

  1. Nancy • March 10, 2009 @ 11:11 AM

    One word,

    D I V A !!!!

  2. Mike • March 10, 2009 @ 11:49 AM


    I have never posted any comments before, but I have read several of yours over the last few months.

    I think you need to step back and think about the real issue. These paparrazzi practically stalk these stars, living like leeches, and are constantly invading their personal spaces.

    Everyone needs their space – put yourselves in her shoes. Add her break-up on top, where she is probably depressed and doesnt need people bugging her like crazy, and you have someone who is going to snap at these losers. Just because she is famous doesnt mean she doesnt get mad or doesnt have the right to scream at these a-holes!

    Before you go off ripping my post apart – NO – it should NOT be something they put up with. They face enough scrutiny from the industry itself – they dont need to see themselves on the covers of every gossip magazine with every piece of their private life on display. Watch them on the screen – then leave them alone!

  3. Nancy • March 10, 2009 @ 12:55 PM

    Well, I do agree with you Mike that stars deserve to have “personal lives” just as much as the rest of us and that they have bad days too BUT, a reporter nicely tapped her on the shoulder to ask for an interview and she totally flipped…sounds a little over-the-top, wouldn’t you say? I mean, would you like it if I ‘screamed’ at you right now because I’m having a bad day and then read your comment “I have never posted any comments before, but I have read several of yours over the last few months” and “Before you go off ripping my post apart”? I think you would change your tune then if it were your face which was screamed in! It is a well known fact that these ‘stars’ are in the tabloids constantly because they want to be. They know ALL the hot spots where the paparazzi will be and lots of times they or their friends call the pap. to let them know exactly where they will be….hence the term, ‘Media Whore’!!

  4. Adam • March 10, 2009 @ 1:01 PM


    I totally agree with you. As an actor you are expected to do interviews and photo shoots to promote your project and that is where it is supposed to end.
    As a young actor who is just now trying to make the change from theater to film and tv acting, this is a situation i feel almost made me not want to continue the move.
    Over the past few years the media has changed the way they are showcasing people in the entertainment industry, and it is starting to get out of hand and invasive.
    I am not that old and even i can remember when US Weekly was actually a bi-weekly magazine that had features and actual interviews. Instead of what it is now, a picture filled what’s hot what’s not peice of garbage.
    Shame on the paparrazzi, they all should be charged with stalking.

  5. ash • March 10, 2009 @ 1:22 PM

    Nancy should shut up. her comments always make her sound like she knows all the celebs and exactly what they go through. how do you know for sure for sure that the report “nicely tapped her on the should”…you must have been there?

  6. Mike • March 10, 2009 @ 1:36 PM


    The reason I pointed out that I have read several of your comments is because you seem to jump to conclusions fairly quickly, or have in the past at least. Thats usually why tribute girl is either quick to agree or completely dismiss your comments.

    I just have to say, yes media whores like Paris Hilton will continue with their ways, but you should be hesitant before suggesting that all those in the entertainment industry are alike and will always do anything for attention. Sometimes they dont want apart of it at all, but they are forced into it. As the article pointed out, she’s been in the industry for 13 years – and shes only 19! Think of all the scrutiny she has faced over the years – and look..she still has a full head of hair! 🙂

    One more thing – it is never right to put your hands on another person. You do realize that spitting on another person is assault, and you dont even touch them! The paparazzi doesnt know her, and if this one photographer wants an interview he can ask her, he doesnt have to lay a finger on her. Thats exactly the issue – they will do ANYTHING! Even when they dont get their interview, they’ll still get a story!! sad really…..

  7. Nancy • March 10, 2009 @ 1:37 PM

    Well ash, first of all, you completely make a fool of yourself by telling someone to “shut up”….and then you ask that same person a question!! I NEVER said that I was there and I NEVER said that I know any or “all” the celbs and “exactly what they go through”….did I, ash? Now, yes, I added the word “nicely” but the article above states that “when a reported tapped her on the shoulder to ask for an interview”….and that is how I “know for sure for sure”, LMAO ash!!

  8. Nancy • March 10, 2009 @ 1:49 PM

    Mike, it’s kind of hard to ask her for an interview in such a crowd…which is most likely why the reporter “tapped” her on the shoulder. What is this world coming to, where people don’t think that it is EVER ok to touch another person? I have agreed with you that the pap. has crossed the line on many occasions and that stars need their personal space too. I don’t agree with the pap. camping outside stars homes, going through their trash and chasing them around, especially in motorized vehicles but, EVERY star,especially after 13 years…..knows WHERE the paparazzi “hang out”!!

  9. nat • March 10, 2009 @ 1:55 PM

    guys!!! forget about trying to make nancy understand anything.This is a woman who spends way to much time on this site and in the lives of celebrities ! while the rest of us leave the house every day and not give a rats ass about this whole celeb /pap thing. I totally agree with you guys, we all have bad days and Hayden is no different , the pap need to back off and give these people some space , its disgusting really!!. yeah and nancy is the dumbest person Ive never met. who ever has read anything on this site knows that , just imagine what her husband must go through. OK nancy go for it attack me now !!!! DIFFERENCE IS, I don’t give a rats ass what you say . do us a favor , try not to make a comment , ill bet millions you cant stay quiet.

  10. Nancy • March 10, 2009 @ 2:06 PM

    HAHAHAHA! Yeah, I’m a shut in…I have cabin fever! LMAO! You have never “met” me nat…and believe me when I say, you don’t want to…because your big mouth and my attitude just wouldn’t work…AT ALL! I’m FAR from “dumb”. Look at the first comment I made on here, I gave my opinion on the topic, never said anything about you, Mike, ash…Adam is the only other person on here with some respect, even though his and my opinions differ. It is possible you know, to have differing RESPECTFUL opinions! AND if you would happen to read my comments instead of just seeing the name ‘Nancy’ and jumping all over it like white on rice, you just might actually see that I said I AGREE THAT STARS DESERVE THEIR PRIVACY AND PERSONAL SPACE JUST AS MUCH AS ANYONE ELSE!!!!!!!!

  11. Mike • March 10, 2009 @ 2:07 PM

    Nancy, are you one of them??!!? 😛

    You seem to be coming to the defense of the paparazzi now, as if they deserve it! haha…job description: stalk whoever will pay your bills…by whatever means…and bend every law in the process. If you break the law – deny it, take the money and run!

    In a world where teachers cannot even lay a finger on their students because they will scream “assault” or “sexual harassment”, where does some creepy stranger get the right to touch you or me? Isnt that what this situation boils down to?

    Also, did I miss something? You must know something I dont because I dont recall any information be posted about where this is. For all you know, it was after she was going for lunch in public(god forbid), or walking out of her house, or even on a set. WHO KNOWS?!? Cant just admit you were wrong and learn to count to 10 before posting your opinions? I have tried to be nice up to this point but no one really wants to read your ignorant posts – thats the only reason we care to say anything in the first place!

  12. Nancy • March 10, 2009 @ 2:12 PM

    Then don’t read them Mike!! So, in my opinion she is acting like a “DIVA”…why would I say I am wrong, Mike? And to call my posts “ignorant”…like I care what you OR ash OR nat OR anyone else thinks. You all should look in the mirror…and think about YOUR “ignorant posts”!! 😛

  13. Mike • March 10, 2009 @ 2:25 PM

    Sorry – just trying to lighten your day. Im guessing years of ignorance has finally taken its toll – when you have become such a narcissist that you cant accept that you could possibly have been in the wrong, or stop responding to all the people who are telling you why you opinion is invalid.

    Geeze…its almost as if everyone has agreed with my points or made the exact same point about your original ignorant post. You completely jumped to conclusions and you still dont seem to get that! Yes, its your post and its your opinion. All I did was point out every reason why you would be wrong to have such an opinion! GOD FORBID I HAVE MY OPINION – NEXT TIME, DONT READ MY POSTS!!!

    The whole world must be against you! Oh no – your world is coming to an end!!!! oh wait..you dont care what we think – you just keep responding to them.

    Yea..explain that one to me again there champ.

  14. Nancy • March 10, 2009 @ 2:37 PM

    Ok, I’ll explain….this is not a test, there are no “right or wrong” answers….your such a brainiac there, Mike!! I’m laughing at you and your friends here because you guys came jumping onto my back, not the other way around…so who exactly are you trying to convince that this is MY fault and that MY posts are wrong? Notice Adam and Jim didn’t jump on the bandwagon..either bandwagon…because everyone is entitled, yes…no right or wrong…remember that now Mike! 😛

  15. Mike • March 10, 2009 @ 2:48 PM

    haha..were you one of those kids who would ask a question and then your teacher would say “theres no such thing as a stupid question?”

    yea..they lied…and there is also such thing as an opinion that is flawed.

    Me and my friends? I dont even know these people! Laughing at us? – time for the meds there champ!

    haha..your posts dont even make any sense anymore. Yea – not everyone jumped on the bandwagon – thats why I said “its almost as if everyone has agreed with my points or made the exact same point about your original ignorant post” (i.e. – they also attacked you for your ignorance or made the exact same posts that I have about why the paps. were in the wrong and why you should not call her a DIVA)

    Sorry to say – dont have time for you anymore.

    Its been a blast! 🙂

    Till next time sugar cakes!

  16. tributegirl • March 10, 2009 @ 3:07 PM

    Wow, I was going to say something about Nancy’s first post having only three words, and the attacks coming left, right, and centre, but I decided no, I’ll keep out of it. But thanks Mike, for bringing my name in anyway! Always nice to know who the instigators are!
    Anyway, from what I have read (not on this site), yes it was in a public place, and she overreacted. Don’t shoot the messenger, just telling you what I’ve read. If that is true, then yes, she is a little diva, and very immature. If it happened at her home or some other private place, then the paparrazzi should be charged with trespassing and harrassment.
    As far as the paparrazzi, I don’t like them at all, I think they are dangerous (just ask princes William and Harry). But there are many stars out there who lead very private lives. If they can do it, so can Hayden and others like her. I’m not saying it’s easy, but obviously it can be done.
    Man, this article is just like election time. Maybe people could post what they think on the article without being attacked, that would be a nice change.

  17. Spanky • March 10, 2009 @ 3:16 PM

    Ash you were foolish about the shutup part, not because you said for Nancy to shutup but that you told Nancy to shutup! The girl can’t shutup she is on every post here with opinions on every subject (most are just plain dumb). Let me leave you with a piece of advice \Why is argueing with Nancy and competeing in the Special Olympics similar? Even if you win, you are still a TARD!\

  18. tributegirl • March 10, 2009 @ 3:19 PM

    That’s mature.

  19. Mike • March 10, 2009 @ 3:29 PM

    Well I have no more time for Nancy, but I will apologize to you, tribute girl. I was merely using you as an example because she thinks she is always right.

    I do thank you for the update because I was kind of wondering where it took place – but just because it WAS in public doesnt mean its o.k.! They are still creeps and invade the private space of any star while practically stalking them. Did she over-react? Usually questionable – but considering the paparazzi felt the need to touch her – I really dont think so. (just my opinion) How would you feel if you were in her shoes? haha..if you let strangers touch you all the time…then I guess you wouldnt understand…not saying you are! just saying there are people who dont mind! 🙂

    Those stars who do manage to live private lives usually move out to a vineyard in France because they have tens of millions of dollars in the bank and hire security and what-not to keep it that way (which doesnt even do it all of the time because they still end up in the tabloids – often NOT by choice)Its as if it THEIR fault for going into public! thats just not right…..

    My point is stupidity should not be ignored and Nancy received what she deserves. She needs to realize that opinions can be flawed! Just the same way as I realized that bringing you into the post to prove my point wasnt right. (again, sorry) If she wants to pass judgment on others, who is to say they cant do the same to her? If she doesnt like it, wouldnt you think that is a little hypocritical? She keeps defending her ‘right to her opinion’ while dismissing everyone else’s opinion. We didnt gang up on her, we just ALL think she is wrong!

  20. Jessie • March 10, 2009 @ 3:31 PM

    Most of these comments I just skimmed through, but it looks like everyone’s pretty anti-Nancy right now. She only called Hayden a diva why is everyone freaking out?
    I think anyone who’s taking so much time to bitch at her for this needs a life.

    Sorry, not trying to cause anymore arguing, I just think all this was pretty uncalled for.

  21. tributegirl • March 10, 2009 @ 4:33 PM

    Ok, Mike, apology accepted. But what I don’t understand is, she did post the first comment on here, it contained three words, words that were her own opinion, and look at the responses, esp from ash, nat & spanky. In my opinion, their responses were very immature and uncalled for, and if you really read them, their comments have absolutely zero to do with the article, or their opinion on the subject matter, their comments had the sole purpose of attacking someone who they don’t even know.
    Your first comment to her was a little sharp, I can see how she would take offense, but when I re-read it, that’s all it was, just a little sharp, no big deal, it didn’t start getting dirty between you & her until your 2:07 comment, it started getting a little more needlessly sarcastic at that point, and went downhill from there.
    She called Hayden a diva, which is probably right on the mark, but got attacked for it. I’m not trying to defend her here, she’s a big girl and can handle herself, I’m just wondering why there are always people on here who are constantly ready to attack. What I mean is, her opinion is Hayden is a diva, that’s not a bad word, really. But then she GETS called a “tard”, is told to shut up, is called “the dumbest person Ive never met.” (nat has met her?), etc. In MY opinion, these things are way worse than calling someone a diva!
    And no, I am not someone who likes to be touched by strangers, but if someone taps me on the shoulder, I will turn around and find out what they want. If that sets Hayden off, I wonder how she would handle a crowded elevator? We are all humans, touching (within reason) is natural, but some people these days (no one in particular) seem to have such a sense of entitlement.

  22. Nancy • March 10, 2009 @ 5:50 PM

    OMG! Mike, you really need a reality check! You said “My point is that stupidity should not be ignored and Nancy received what she deserves. She needs to realize that opinions can be flawed!” ????????!! Just because someone gave an opinion that YOU (and ash and nat) don’t agree with does not mean that opinion is “flawed”!!!

    “She keeps defending her ‘right to her opinion’ while dismissing everyone else’s opinion”…..where did I “dismiss everyone else’s opinion, Mike??????????? Seems to me, you’re the one who is dismissing my opinion. Actually, I half-a$$ed agreed with you!

    “We didn’t gang up on her, we just ALL think she is wrong!” So what, so what if people think I am wrong? I am totally okay with that! That’s what difference of opinion is, Mike. It’s good. It’s healthy. It’s life. Get used to it! BUT sorry to have to tell you, I definately don’t put up with people telling me to “shut up” and calling me “dumb”, “time for the meds there, champ”, etc. And then you centre out my posts, calling them “ignorant posts”..when they were not even ignorant, but yet, as long as the others agree with you, you have nothing to say about their “ignorant posts”, which truly ARE ignorant…??? Maybe you should just stick to reading the comments instead of writing them, Mike…..”champ”!! “Sugar cakes”!! LMFAO!

  23. Coop • March 10, 2009 @ 7:36 PM

    Can you imagine some irritating idiot with a camera following you 24/7 spewing constant(often offensive) crap at you just to get a reaction?No matter who you are it’s bound to grate on you eventually.I say cut her some slack.As for Mike and Nancy you BOTH gotta let it go!In your constant need to one up each other you distract from the issue at hand.

  24. Mike • March 10, 2009 @ 10:03 PM

    Nancy, you are right. I am so busy working at a job with university educated people, I begin to forget at times how only a certain percentage of people have actually obtained a post-secondary education – and for good reason (yea – Devry doesnt count)! Maybe I should go get a job flipping burgers so I can get a different perspective, or continue reading your posts for time to come….. (“LMFAO!” as you would say) …i begin to wonder if you are just some 18 year old drop out or something – stay at home mom who is a trophy wife?…the list goes on – yes, im an ass – just for you!

    Look, I think after the 3rd post of trying to prove how stubborn and ridiculous you had become – going back and forth between agreeing with some of my points (which were only made to prove how ignorant you were in the first place) and refuting others – I realized that it was probably a lost cause.

    I’ll just leave you with this.

    You keep saying how your post wasnt ignorant and how all of mine are. Let me explain: to be ignorant, you have to either have a lack of knowledge or a lack of understanding. It is defined by being uneducated or uniformed! This entire time you fail to understand that by posting she is a diva without any knowledge of the situation itself and without consideration of any other factors, you are being IGNORANT. Who cares if I call you out on it? Was I alone – no. But lets face it – you live on this site, posting under every topic to pop up just so you can put in your two cents. You respond to every person who makes a single comment about you or your opinions because they dont agree with you and you think you are right! The difference is the entire time I have tried to convey my point and have been only frustrated to do so, whereas you are doing this solely for the attention.

    Dont agree? I dare you not to post your opinion for an entire day (yes one whole day). If you cant do that, the complete lack of restraint can only lead to so many conclusions, many of which will include those that I have wasted far too much time pointing out.

    For now on, you win and I wont argue with you. I’ll just sit here and continue reading your ignorant comments so that it reminds me that I can sit back and admit when I am right and when I am wrong, can show restraint and self control, and most of all – have informed and relevant opinions. For that Nancy, thank you.

  25. nat • March 10, 2009 @ 11:02 PM

    i told you about nancy , just ignore her, she really has nothing else, think about it if she did,would she be here so often ? no matter what she says i know what im talking about! can you say couples counseling in her future, poor bugger of a husband

  26. Nancy • March 10, 2009 @ 11:44 PM

    Hahaha, like I said nat, you don’t know ANYTHING about me!

    To Coop…defending oneself is NOT trying to “one up” someone.

    To Mike, you said it…you’re an @$$! So what, so I called Hayden a “DIVA”…man, I must be really “uneducated”, right Mike? By reading the article, I am just as informed about the subject as you are only one difference…you seem to have hot panties for her! Awwe, can’t stand for miss diva to get called a “DIVA”. No wonder her boyfriend dumped her….you think you have a chance now? LMFAO! I’m very well educated, thanks “champ”! Every comment you make just makes you sound more and more like an @$$, Mike. I’ve told nat before and now I’ll say it again to both of you….what I do with MY time is MY business. Why do you seem to care so much about my comments? Are you paying me? Am I on your “educated” time, Mike? Seems to me that you’ve been on here commenting at least as much as me today Mike…and your comments are more like books!

  27. Jo-Anne. • March 10, 2009 @ 11:55 PM

    One word

    W O W!!!!!!

    (couldn’t resist that)

    anyhow, back to the topic, to appease the Stick To The Topic crowd..totally see Hayden’s getting frazzled by the media and preferring them to back off a wee bit, just don’t think it’s such a big deal, it’s not like she pulled a “Kelly Osborne” on the reporter or anything…

  28. Mike • March 11, 2009 @ 12:20 AM

    haha..I should have put money down on the second last paragraph of my “book”!

    And yes – you should be paying me! I actually studied psychology and could teach you a thing or two! God knows you need it!

    And YES – you caught me – I want in her pants! In fact, that photographer that asked for the interview – IT WAS ME! I put my hands all over her! YOU CAUGHT ME! 🙂 (Gee you are right – this whole immature thing is fun – I should stoop to your level more often!)

    BTW – I admitted to being an ass because you dont seem to see how much of a b*tch you are! just reciprocating the love! (obviously you arent a fan of sarcasm) You still didnt actually read my “book” because you completely missed that forming an opinion with a “lack of knowledge or a lack of understanding” is ignorant. Or is it because you know thats 100% true and you are still trying to do anything to keep your head afloat??? (and yes – not being able to use a definition in context really shows off your level of intelligence)

    Why do i care? Its because stupid idiots should not be aloud to post their ideas or else they will never know they are stupid idiots! Just doing my part, Nancy.

    And you are right – I ALMOST gathered as much attention as you….on one blog…for one article…for one day….

    They are all yours! We all know you’ll be back for every single one of them.


  29. Nancy • March 11, 2009 @ 12:44 AM

    Oh, so now I’m a “b*tch” for being “IGNORANT” by calling Ms. Panettiere a “DIVA”. is that what you’re saying Mr. Psychologist? You’re f-ing nuts! I read your “book”, Mr Psychologist…your “forming an opinion with a ‘lack of knowledge or a lack of understanding’ is ignorant” comment…that is why I said “By reading the article, I am just as informed about the subject as you”…so if I am forming an opinion on it and am (in your opinion) “IGNORANT” and if you are forming an opinion on it, even though your opinion differs from mine, does that make you “IGNORANT” too, Mr. Psychologist or are you just “IGNORANT” for forming all the “lack of knowledge or a lack of understanding” comments you made about me (being someone you absolutely know nothing about)? By the way, this “stupid idiot” would have spelled the word as “allowed”….Jeeze, sure wish I was as educated as you, Mr. Psychologist!! 😉

  30. Mr. Psychologist • March 11, 2009 @ 1:02 AM

    haha..appears I may have made the crazy one a little bit angry! Everyone run for cover!

    and if “By reading the article, I am just as informed about the subject as you” you meant “I know just as much as you but i still let crap spew out of my mind and into this keyboard”…then yes.

    I know all I need to know from your last post- and Im sure im not alone when I say – crazzzzyyyy b*tch! Holy Moly! DUCK AND COVER!

    And its o.k – you can be just as educated as me! A lot of people are – you right now- not so much. Its funny how one letter of a word I typed was forgotten, yet you dont even form complete sentences, but you still struggle to fight for your right to spread stupidity by using it as proof of MY stupidity! Go on…Im half asleep and this is just plain amusing.

  31. Mr. Psychologist • March 11, 2009 @ 1:16 AM

    sorry – meant the “three letters of a word I typed”. All this thinking at 1AM makes my head hurt!

    Nancy – can you take over? Please???? Pretty Please?!?! Come on – you can do it!

  32. demigod • March 11, 2009 @ 3:48 AM

    Doesn’t matter what Nancy says,her reputation precedes her.

  33. tributegirl • March 11, 2009 @ 7:39 AM

    Wow, all this sh*t over the word “diva”. Guys, either you think Hayden is a diva, or you don’t, it’s all a matter of personal opinion, why not leave it at that?

    Mike, just wondering, are you a psychologist?

  34. Mike • March 11, 2009 @ 9:44 AM

    haha..no..never said I was. I sarcastically said that I have taken courses in psychology – which is true, not just making it up (just hinting that she was acting crazy). But – honestly, I think when I hit 3:00 in the afternoon it was ALL sarcasm after that. I dont know if she got it or not. lol
    I guess she doesnt have much of a sense of humour after I start telling her that she was being ignorant and an attention seeker. I really dont think that will ever sink in….

    But you know what – if anyone is a DIVA…..

  35. tributegirl • March 11, 2009 @ 10:07 AM

    No, I saw where you said that you had taken psychology courses, so I didn’t know if that was the direction your career went in or not, so I was just asking.
    I don’t know, I still think the whole thing on here has been blown way out of proportion, I wanted to stay out of it (thanks again buddy for pulling me in! 🙂 ) but I think I would have had to say something anyway (hey, it’s my nature!). Some of the comments and name calling have gone way overboard.

  36. Mike • March 11, 2009 @ 10:45 AM

    yea, considering where we are now 24 hours later..agreed. I’ll stop. lol Hey I already apologized to you! 🙂

  37. tributegirl • March 11, 2009 @ 11:02 AM

    Yeah, I know, and thanks for that, I was just kidding around this morning about you pulling me in.
    Ok, so all this is done? Finished? Good!

  38. Nancy • March 11, 2009 @ 12:59 PM

    How am I being “ignorant and an attention seeker”, Mike? I gave my opinion that I think Hayden is a diva..still do and after her outburst, I probably always will think that. Why couldn’t you, ash, and nat just give YOUR opinions on the topic instead of bashing me for the one word I said? I have no problem with your or anyone else’s opinions on the topic and stand firm that there are no “right or wrong” answers but all your name calling and BS is where I draw the line. So now, I think you can shove your opinion because you truly ARE an @SS!! You are more IGNORANT than anyone else on here! So, Mr. Psychology…let me use some psychology on you…I’m not the only one on this topic who said that Hayden is being a “diva”…so what is truly bugging you, Mike? Because it’s certainly NOT the fact that I read the article and made a comment that Hayden is a diva! 😉

    As for you Spanky….at least I give an opinion on the topic…the whole point of coming on this website, isn’t it?

  39. mandee • March 11, 2009 @ 5:25 PM

    “According to Us Weekly, while attending a fundraiser for the Rehabilitation Hospital of the Pacific Foundation, the Heroes star snapped”

    clearly, she would have been WELL AWARE of the pap being at this function. also, everyone is soo quick to say “oh these poor celebs, having to deal with the pap their whole life” if they didnt want the attention, they wouldnt be in this industry. also, how come i see no one, but nancy, defending the people that ARE PAID to take pictures of these stars at such an event? that are PAID to do interviews? they have to make a living too dont they? and as far as im concerned, everyone defending these *poor RICH celebs* are nothing but hypocrites because i am certain most of these paps arent as rich as the people they take pictures of.

    by the way, i stopped reading here : tributegirl on March 10, 2009 3:19 pm

    because as far as im concerned, you are all being idiots lol. fighting with nancy for thinking the girls a DIVA, which, clearly she is, and then going on and on and on for posts and posts and posts. dont you think its about time some of you grew up and acted your age? its funny how the paparazzi are all such MONSTERS and TERRIBLE PEOPLE etc, but none of you are for attacking others about their views on things like this? im waiting for you all to start on me, since im certain no ones gonna see it from my point of view. keep in mind, im just as feisty, if not more, than nancy 😉

  40. lily • March 11, 2009 @ 6:08 PM

    Paparazzi are paid huge amounts for invasive pictures (the more humilating, the better) by tabloids with no scruples whatsoever, so that they in turn can be paid huge amounts by people with an insatiable appetite for celebrities losing control/losing too much weight/losing their panties, etc.
    Does being PAID really make everything alright?
    I don’t think anyone has the right to touch anyone else without their permission, ever. Before you criticize Hayden too harshly, just think about it. Are YOU willing to give up your own right to be free from a total stranger’s physical contact?
    In my opinion, many of the paparrazzi are simply annoying but many more are vicious scum, willing to do anything to get that one picture that will make them rich. ANYTHING. And they are empowered by all of you who argue that touching someone against her wishes is just fine… if she happens to be famous.

  41. tributegirl • March 11, 2009 @ 6:48 PM

    I would think the main reason they would want someone famous at any sort of charity fundraiser is to have as much press there as possible, because that would mean more coverage, thus more money for their charity. So the charity, and Hayden, would have been very aware that the pap’s would be there, I would think she would have been prepared for that (as much as one can prepare for it). Also, I would expect that someone would try to be on their very best behaviour at a function such as this, as bad behaviour would be noticed and shown to the public very quickly.
    I’m not sure if it happened exactly as tribute is reporting it, but if so, then her comments do sound very snotty.

  42. lily • March 11, 2009 @ 7:44 PM

    Respectfully, tributegirl, you are sidestepping the main point. Was it okay for the pap to touch her — yes or no?

  43. Jim • March 11, 2009 @ 8:04 PM

    Hey – where did my post go?
    Interesting…..I posted earlier yesterday and Nancy even referred to it at 2:37.
    I touched on what you were saying Mandee. I understand they have a job, as do you (I assume) and I but there is a time and place to “work.” Celebrities need their privacy too. I understand what you are saying though about knowing they would be at that particular function however you hear about them all over in places that are a little intrusive. Perhaps Hayden was sick of seeing them or perhaps that particular papparazzi pissed her off before. We don’t know the whole story so it is hard to refer to her as a DIVA.
    Just from reading this website alone I can see that some people fly off the handle, some people cannot take criticism and some people are quick to defend themselves. I am sure Hayden is no different than us in that perspective, we just have the luxury of never seeing anyone that we talk to on here. Understand what I am saying?

  44. lily • March 11, 2009 @ 8:17 PM

    You say it well, Jim.

  45. mandee • March 11, 2009 @ 8:53 PM

    yes, and i do in a way agree with you. and i wasnt sure that you had posted about it, because like i said, i stopped reading after i hit that one specific tributegirl post because it all seems like such a childish thing to fight about. im not saying im for the paparazzi, or for hayden, im just saying i can, AT THE VERY LEAST, actually see this topic from both sides of the situation. she very well could have been tired of them, and been in a bad mood, whatever her excuse, BUT they were, after all, just doing THEIR job by also being there. and the fact that she should have been well aware of that, she also should have known how persistent they more than likely would be and she should have acted accordingly. im sure she could have said NICELY “do you think you could just please give me some space?” and she could have said to the interviewer touching her “im sorry but could you please keep your hands to yourself?” she was in a very very public place, i very highly doubt that the person wanting to interview her could have done her any physical harm, if thats what she was worried about. these celebs are fully capable of deciding to stay home if they decide they do not want to be targeted by the paparazzi, or they could go somewhere instead that they KNOW is not a public function. but sure, they SHOULD back off, but EVERYONE knows they are not GOING to, they need a pay check just as badly as the rest of us! (oh, and no one is defending anyone on this site, but who started calling US names? it sure wasnt nancy who started picking on everyone first 🙂 )

  46. lily • March 11, 2009 @ 8:58 PM

    Hey, I like the way you write, Mandee. I still feel more sympathy for Hayden than anything else but now I see the other side too. You make some very reasonable suggestions.

  47. mandee • March 11, 2009 @ 9:41 PM

    thanks so much 🙂

  48. Anon • March 11, 2009 @ 11:46 PM

    Oh my god Mike, I think I’ve just fallen in love with you! To think I was going to skip this article. Once I saw 40 comments, I knew it was going to be a very interesting read. This has been the highlight of my day!!! lol

    Nancy, you are fighting a loosing battle with the intellect. Though your initial comment didn’t warrant getting ripped apart, I do believe you are generally getting on Mikes nerves.

  49. Jo-Anne • March 12, 2009 @ 12:41 AM

    I understand what you’re saying Jim…

  50. Nancy • March 12, 2009 @ 10:24 AM

    Gina/Anon…”a ‘loosing’ battle with the intellect”..??….DOUBTFUL! 😉 As for getting on Mike’s nerves……who cares? Hayden is still a DIVA!! 😛

  51. Jim • March 12, 2009 @ 11:11 AM

    I am not trying to be rude here so please don’t jump all over me for this but I feel the need to express something here Nancy.
    Hayden is still a DIVA…in YOUR opinion. And 90% of the populations opinion of you is…??? which you have continuously pointed out over and over again that you just don’t care about. This is an opinion website and as much as the whole argument with Nat started with Nat being rude to you, it has continued after he or she apologized to you. Now with Gina/Anon they are winning. Don’t get me wrong – I enjoy reading the bickering and arguments, however only one person is looking “stupid” (for lack of better word – I don’t mean stupid in the less than intelligent sense) here for continuing to argue back and unfortunately that is you. Why can you not let anything go? It is a computer and a website. It is fun to disagree but this is a whole new level. Gina has openly admitted that she does it to piss you off and you still bite – every time and Nat apologized and stopped with the ridiculous back and forth. I think it is time for you to stop now.

  52. Nancy • March 12, 2009 @ 11:18 AM

    Jim…I’m not trying to be rude to you either but when you want to get involved, you should read ALL the comments involved…including the other articles where you must have saw this “apology” from nat that you speak of. Nat has NOT stopped with “the ridiculous back and forth” and did NOT apologize TO ME, he gave a fake apology to everyone else. Yes, I said “fake”…because after this “apology”, nat continued with the comments in which he apologized for…which makes it a fake apology…and you fell for it!! 😀

  53. Jim • March 12, 2009 @ 11:30 AM

    Perhaps I may have fell for it or perhaps I did read the comments and saw where he apologized and you decided not to read it and continued to go on and on.
    And no comment on the Gina thing I see?? Do you understand where you look a little like a fool (again for lack of a better word) when she totally calls you out and purposely says things to get a rise out of you and you bite? I have read over all of the articles and I have seen numerous admissions out of Gina/Anon that it is a game to them and they enjoy it. It has become my humour for the day. I can’t wait for the comments to multiply because the pattern says that is when Gina will jump in and “stir” things up with you. Not only does the pattern say that but Gina does too.

  54. tributegirl • March 12, 2009 @ 12:23 PM

    True, Jim, Gina/Anon has said that she does it just to “get a rise”. However, nat did say specifically that his/her apology was for everyone on here that he/she offended, except Nancy. I thought that was pretty rude, actually. I still don’t see what is wrong with calling Hayden a diva though, it’s not that bad a word.

  55. Nancy • March 12, 2009 @ 12:43 PM

    You’re not getting me here, Jim….why would I care about nat’s fake apology?…it wasn’t directed to me and it’s fake anyways. Ok, I’ll acknowledge what you said about Gina/Anon…yes, she’s been saying it for a couple years, I know, I know. She’s not getting a “rise” out of me. Please! Tell me something new and interesting…

  56. Jim • March 12, 2009 @ 12:52 PM

    You are right tributegirl. Diva is not a bad word at all, however I think it is a little premature to call anyone a DIVA in this case but whatever. I don’t agree with her opinion and she doesn’t agree with mine. I can deal with that. I was just pointing out the whole riduculousness (Is that even a word? I don’t think so) of the back and forth. It is non stop and as much as the apology was sincere to us and perhaps not to Nancy, she just won’t let things go. She too was rude and degrading and I would never condone the stuff nat said. Nancy’s is not as blunt and outright as nat’s was but Nancy is sarcastic to a fault. Her arrogance is what ticks people off and offends, therefore fueling the fire to retaliate. It is when the retaliator (or perhaps the instigator) ceases and she keeps going that it gets out of hand.
    But you know I realize that it is like getting water from a stone. Obviously she enjoys arguing adn bickering and you know what – to each their own. If that is what she enjoys, so be it but she portrays herself to be something that I don’t think many others strive to be.

  57. pete • March 12, 2009 @ 12:59 PM

    After wasting so much time reading all this back and forth stuff, I reread the first 2 posts and I disagree that the original posting of “diva” is what caused all this. If you reread Mike’s first comment, all he is saying is that there is the larger context to look at — i.e. how the papparazzi interact with celebs. In that first post, there is no personal attack against Nancy or her opinion.

    Although he says he has read her prior posts and says “before you rip my post apart”, one might assume he has an expectation of how she will react, it is a far cry from any name calling that occurred later.

  58. Nancy • March 12, 2009 @ 1:01 PM

    Oh, so now I’m “arrogant”? And Jim, nat or “the retaliator” as you call him, did not “cease” his side of the argument….he was back on here last night slamming away. The only reason he’s not here doing it at this moment is probably because he is “out with the humans”!! LMAO!

    So, enlighten me, Jim….why does everyone take all my comments so seriously but yet, I’m expected to “let go” and brush everyone else’s off as “they are just baiting you, Nancy”..? Who’s to say I’m not the ‘baiter’..??

  59. Anon • March 12, 2009 @ 1:10 PM

    Jim on March 12, 2009 11:30 am

    My comments about stirring things up do not apply to just Nancy. I think maybe you misinterpreted the game. What I said was that I like to get a rise as well and when I see an opening or an opportunity to discredit a narrow-minded opinion, I cant help but jump in. I believe Nancy likes the challenge as well. lol The rise is generally from people defending a foolish and narrow minded opinion that had absolutely no thought put into it.

    I think I speak for everyone here when I say that this is an area for people to share not only their opinions on the topic at hand, but also to enjoy a good, healthy debate on their different opinions while maintaining an appropriate level of respect for each other. It is only my opinion, but I cant imagine spending any time here reading and responding if all were to agree with each other, exchanging niceties without any thought provoking views.

    As for nat, the poor guy was somewhere along the road insulted by nancys remarks and poorly lashed out at her. His rage clouded the thought process, no big deal, weve all been there and all should be forgiven. After all Jim, you do agree that you find it quite entertaining and you are continuing your bickering with nancy by commenting to others about herare you stirring the pot?

  60. Anon • March 12, 2009 @ 1:16 PM

    Nancy on March 12, 2009 12:43 pm

    Ok, Ill acknowledge what you said about Gina/Anonyes, shes been saying it for a couple years, I know, I know. Shes not getting a rise out of me. Please! Tell me something new and interesting

    Come on Nancy. I do deserve a little credit. I’ve had you go through your living room roof…..Rosanne comments many moons ago. I believe one of my first posts. J And, I don’t target you specifically. As I said, just when there is an opening to discredit a narrow minded opinion such as the one made about blacks being the ones that commit the most crimes as it is part of their culture.

  61. Nancy • March 12, 2009 @ 1:21 PM

    Roseanne comments? Jeeze, I must have went through my roof pretty hard…because I cannot remember a “Roseanne comment” from you, sorry, I just don’t…and I have a pretty good memory. 😛 Seriously though, tell me more…

  62. mandee • March 12, 2009 @ 1:23 PM

    anyone ever stop to think its because we are WOMEN? women love to argue and will continue to fight until they win. thats the way life goes lol.

  63. Jim • March 12, 2009 @ 1:24 PM

    I very well could be Anon. Honestly I wasn’t intending to stir the pot initially, but once the “bait” was taken I figured why not. I do stand behind my points regarding the topic at hand as well as what I said about all of the back and forth. I do enjoy reading the bickering and the differing opinions but it tends to get old quick when it continues for hundreds of posts saying the same thing over and over with different insults.
    And yes Nancy I do find you completely arrogant.

  64. Anon • March 12, 2009 @ 1:30 PM

    Nancy on March 12, 2009 1:21 pm


    Crap, I can’t remember what name I was posting under! But I do remember the outburst my comments created, not just from you my friend, but from every woman reading the posts. I do believe that you and Jo-anne actually joined forces on that one. lol

    Shoot, I just called a co-worker nancy. haha Must stay away from Tribute while working. Must behave in order to keep job. Must hid screen from co-worker (Gina, whose name I stole). Must get life with real humans.

  65. mandee • March 12, 2009 @ 1:30 PM

    anon “narrow minded opinion that had absolutely no thought put into it.” that is pretty rude of you dont you think? youre saying anyone that has a different opinion than you is “narrow minded” and “doesnt put any thought into it”?? if you ask me, JIM, anon sounds pretty damn arrogant herself, no? everyone finds poor nancy to be the devil for calling hayden a diva, but where is everyone to support or back up nancy when people are calling her much worse things? like “arrogant” perhaps? or “narrow minded”? i think that you(jim) and anon are both hypocrites and before you go name calling and pointing fingers, how about you stop and look at yourselves for a moment? picking fights with someone who simply stated their opinion, then calling them (and ANYONE that COULD disagree with you) names? thats pretty immature. but i guess im just as bad considering im telling you what i think of you right now. but im just wondering, at what point do the 2 of you grow up and learn that bullying is not a good trait to have?

  66. Nancy • March 12, 2009 @ 1:46 PM

    (“arrogant” Nancy is laughing cause you just got in trouble) Hahahahaha…no recess for you JIM…to the principal’s office!

  67. Anon • March 12, 2009 @ 1:47 PM

    mandee on March 12, 2009 1:30 pm

    “youre saying anyone that has a different opinion than you is narrow minded and doesnt put any thought into it?? if you ask me, JIM, anon sounds pretty damn arrogant herself, no? ”

    Please spare me the bull and stop trying to stir the pot yourself. I never, anywhere stated that a different opinion from my own was narrow minded or a thoughtless opinion. I did however give you an example of what I considered to be narrow minded; you just chose to disregard that and used only what you could to start some $hlt. Besides, I do believe that your comment somewhere in the last few pages to nat was that it was ok to call people names if you didnt agree with what they were saying. Not quite arrogant, but very immature to say the least. See below:

    well, im not gonna lie, sometimes nancy does act like an idiot, but then again, sometimes you do too, sometimes i act like an idiot. just from reading the last few articles, it can be said that at least 95% of the population acts like an idiot at some point in their lives. so i dont really see why its such a big deal if we call eachother names sometimes. everyone on here does it to someone, which is why most people get defensive. and youre right, if nancy wasnt faulted for her own opinion soo often, perhaps she would never resort to name calling, or being soo defensive? we live in an imperfect world

    You need to read your previous posts so you can keeps your posts consistent.

  68. Jim • March 12, 2009 @ 1:57 PM

    Hypocrite what mandee?? At least you kind of called yourself out on it by saying you are just as bad considering you are telling us what you think, but seriously, go back and read the whole thing over please. As for calling Nancy arrogant, yes I did and I believe it to be true. Arrogance is not necessarily a bad thing. Confidence is construed as arrogance a lot of times and posting on a blog is the main cause of misinterpretation. And yes Anon comes off as arrogant a lot as well and so do both you and I. It is a misconception often found on websites with no tone of voice and no way to actually tell how someone intends their words to come out. I fully realize that Nancy stirs the pot just as much as others on here I just think she reads into things way too much and gets completely defensive and exudes arrogance in her rebuttles. Whether she is arrogant in “real life” I don’t know and realisically it is irrelevant on an online discussion group.
    And Anon I find you hilarious and very intellectual. I could never pull off the different names. How do you keep track?

  69. Jim • March 12, 2009 @ 2:02 PM

    That took me a long time to type that because I didn’t get nancy laughing at my getting in trouble until after I posted this.
    Your comment did make me laugh Nancy. I give credit where credit is due. Good One. I will stay in at recess and write lines. I am very impressed at how many people will stick up for you.

  70. Nancy • March 12, 2009 @ 2:19 PM

    That’s because I’m so luvable!! 😛

  71. tributegirl • March 12, 2009 @ 2:52 PM

    Jim, I agree with most of what you said, esp how people can’t exactly hear our tone of voice when they are reading our posts, so things can be taken the wrong way. Maybe that is what happened here, because when I read Nancy’s first post, the diva post, I “hear” it in a very lighthearted way, just havin’ fun, then the comments that came after (I was online that night and saw them as they were posted), I “heard” as very unnecessarily viscious and vindictive. Maybe I “heard” the whole thing wrong? I don’t know, but when I go back over it, I “hear” it the same way each time.
    So, bottom line here, Nancy’s opinion (whether right or wrong, it doesn’t matter, it is her own personal opinion) is Hayden is a diva, others disagree. nat’s apology was not intended for Nancy, and Nancy wishes no further communication (if I’m wrong on that, Nancy, sorry, this is how I’m seeing it) with nat. So, can we leave it at that?

  72. tributegirl • March 12, 2009 @ 2:54 PM

    I wonder if the techie’s at tribute are totally p*ssed at us all for all this, or if they are sitting there reading it all and laughing their heads off?

  73. Anon • March 12, 2009 @ 2:58 PM

    Jim on March 12, 2009 1:57 pm

    I only post under anon or anon (blue) – if I remember to put a website in. I used to post under Gina and annon then went strictly gina until my ip address was banned. 🙁

    I agree, arrogance can at times be an asset, especially while posting on line. What would one do really if there were only passive people on this site that had no attitude? Absolute boredom! And I agree that Nancy does deserve credit when due, though thats not too often. hahahaha just kidding. I am also impressed that she has quite the following which keeps her up on her pedestal… until one of us comes by and knocks it over LOL LOL

  74. Nancy • March 12, 2009 @ 3:07 PM

    And then I trip you!! LMAO!

    Told you I’m luvable! ☺

  75. Anon • March 12, 2009 @ 3:36 PM

    tributegirl on March 12, 2009 2:54 pm

    I think they should be grateful that we’re on their site! Our comments entice others to post their comments. I mean really, the article is boring and I don’t think anyone really cares what this chick did or who she lashed out at. On the other hand our little “articles” are quite interesting!

  76. Jo-Anne. • March 12, 2009 @ 3:59 PM

    and people on here actually condemed “my own opinion” at one time for going on and on and on…and on

    my, how times have changed

    what a refreshing change it would be for them, or others like him/her to return and debate once again on the article content before you succeed in closing every storyline down with the Nancy Chronicles…

    for God’s sake, people, get a….book…

  77. Nancy • March 12, 2009 @ 4:19 PM

    Oooooh….sounds like “someone” is a little envious of ‘the Nancy Chronicles…’ 😉

    I agree with Anon, March 12 @ 3:36 pm. Well said!

  78. Anon • March 12, 2009 @ 4:22 PM

    Jo-Anne. on March 12, 2009 3:59 pm

    I would have never condemned someone that could offer a debate; this is a skill that has to be appreciated. Whether it’s about the article at hand or about a well thought out opinion/view or rebuttal on any other matter. Many resort to insulting when they feel they’re backed into a corner or a truth hits a nerve. No disrespect intended as we have all gone down that road. But to suppress or ridicule someone here whenever they post a comment shows a lack of self-confidence and maturity. I have noticed that while speaking to one person, people will throw in a jab at another. Refrain yourselves people and attack only if it applies to you and your opinion. We dont need to be sinking down to the point that every comment we make has a remark about someone else. Direct your comments to the person you have conflicting views with, and refrain from throwing in snide remarks about someone else.

  79. Jo-Anne. • March 12, 2009 @ 4:26 PM

    well, anon, likewise no disrespect to you, but for you to ask others to “refrain themselves” seems a bit…….

    well, I’ll let you fill that last word in for yourself

  80. lily • March 12, 2009 @ 4:41 PM

    In a funny way, Jo-Anne, these “Nancy Chronicles” as you call them (very amusingly, may I say) kind of ARE debating on the article content. The question is the same in both discussions: when do strangers cross the line while involving themselves in the lives of other people? i.e. Did the paparazzi who bothered Hayden Panetierre act inappropriately, or did she over-react? Similarly, did people on this site act inappropriately in criticizing Nancy, or did she over-react?
    I think the answer to both questions is the same.
    YES there was inappropriate behaviour to start the problem and YES the targets of this behaviour (Hayden and Nancy) over-reacted. As someone put it earlier (Mandee), Hayden could just have said something like, “Excuse me but you’re really bothering me” instead of going off the deep end. And Nancy could have just accepted Nat’s overture of friendship as suggested by his friendly posting about the horror movies, and never gotten into the whole “real or not apology”. When someone extends an olive branch, the classy thing to do is take it!

  81. Anon • March 12, 2009 @ 4:44 PM

    Jo-Anne. on March 12, 2009 4:26 pm

    Hmmm, correct me if I’m wrong, but I don’t think I’ve bashed any one person to another. I tend to direct my comments and opinions to the person I am speaking to. As I said earlier, if I read a comment that I find to be very narrow minded and what I perceive to be ignorant, I cant help myself and have to post a comment to that person. My point was to refrain ourselves from jabbing one person while conversing with another. And if you want me to be specific, your and Nancys comments always include jab at each other which as Jim said become old very quickly.

  82. Anon • March 12, 2009 @ 4:48 PM

    lily on March 12, 2009 4:41 pm

    “When someone extends an olive branch, the classy thing to do is take it!”

    Completely agree!

  83. Jo-Anne. • March 12, 2009 @ 4:57 PM

    hmmm..interesting comment, Anon…seeing as I haven’t been on here much throughout these last weeks directing anything at said individual as you contribute yet another chapter…

    oh, as someone once said – hey, wait a sec – it was you! And I quote….”Please spare me the bull”…

  84. Nancy • March 12, 2009 @ 4:58 PM

    Sorry lily and Anon, but I didn’t take the “olive branch” because right after the “friendly posting” about the horror movies came a snide remark on another article from the person extending that olive branch. Why would I reach out and take the branch when I can see with my own eyes that the branch is broken? It wouldn’t make sense..

  85. Anon • March 12, 2009 @ 5:12 PM

    Jo-Anne. on March 12, 2009 4:57 pm

    .Please spare me the bull

    Well, It really is not worth my time, but if I have an hour to spare tonight, I just might join the ranks of yourself and go through your posts and quote them all for you. I am not the one that brought up the staleness of your bickering with Nancy, but have to tell you it really is getting old. As for not commenting much, these have been the types of comments that have been made for the last….oh how many years? Jazz it up a little, or pick someone else. They may surprise you and offer a different perspective and type of response to the nitpicking you both desperately need.

  86. Anon • March 12, 2009 @ 5:13 PM

    Nancy on March 12, 2009 4:58 pm

    Because then we could all have virtual martinis.

  87. lily • March 12, 2009 @ 5:17 PM

    Understand your point, Nancy, and LOVE that creative metaphor (you sound like my night school teacher, who I love!).
    I’m just worried that there is often some funny timing where our postings are concerned. Some messages appear right away and some seem to be held back for several minutes. Nat could very well have posted that “snide remark” BEFORE he got tired of all the nastiness and tried to make things right. I know this was said before (very nicely by Jim), but it’s so easy to assume the worst about someone, especially when we read “tone” into the words. Would it kill us all to try assuming the best instead?

  88. Anon • March 12, 2009 @ 5:23 PM

    Jo-Anne. on March 12, 2009 4:57 pm

    As for contibuting yet another chapter, it’s to YOUR BOOK I’ve made my contribution.

  89. Jo-Anne. • March 12, 2009 @ 5:38 PM

    well, Anon, you can take over now, I’ll sign all rights over to you, you have so so so(did I say so?) much more to say….

  90. lily • March 12, 2009 @ 5:38 PM

    Hey, get this! I just read on MSN that Hayden’s trying to get Milo V. kicked off of Heroes now that they broke up. In the article’s title they call it a “diva move”. I still feel kind of sorry for Hayden where the pushy paparrazzi are concerned but I LOVE Milo so I’m going along with the “diva” label on this one!

  91. Anon • March 12, 2009 @ 5:41 PM

    Jo-Anne. on March 12, 2009 5:38 pm

    I figured as much. There really isn’t a whole lot more you can say.

  92. Jo-Anne. • March 12, 2009 @ 5:41 PM

    lily, I really like Milo as well and… btw I really liked your comments at 4:41 above, very well thought out and expressed…

  93. Jo-Anne. • March 12, 2009 @ 5:45 PM

    ha ha Anon, “if you have an hour to spare tonight”?????

    looks to me like you’ve got weeks, buddy….

  94. Nancy • March 12, 2009 @ 5:50 PM

    The time on the comment is the time the person submitting the comment pressed ‘submit comment’..I’ve had my comments held back enough too. LOL. Sorry, I just cannot assume the best of someone who has commented insult after insult and that my children will hate me and then turn and blame me for why those words were spoken. Can’t do it, lily. That type of person is not in my life. I want to move on…I won’t forgive though, nor forget. Thank you for the compliment though, lily. 😀

  95. Anon • March 12, 2009 @ 5:59 PM

    Jo-Anne. on March 12, 2009 5:45 pm

    Oh I do have a few weeks, even months…..but it seems to me that you’ve had years of back tracking comments, opinions and dishing out indirect insults.

  96. Anon • March 12, 2009 @ 6:16 PM

    Nancy on March 12, 2009 5:50 pm

    Why are you suddenly being so nice to everyone???????

    Anyway, I’d like to thank you for keeping a low profile and not raining on my parade lol

  97. Nancy • March 12, 2009 @ 6:29 PM

    No, not to everyone, Anon. When I’m treated with respect, I give it back and I treat others respectfully until they cross me. Lily and Jim just want peace and I completely understand that. Have to admit though, it’s not very often we get almost 100 comments on an article (and 50 of them mine, LOL).

    No prob. let’s save the “rain” for another day. 😛

  98. mandee • March 12, 2009 @ 11:45 PM

    “My comments about stirring things up do not apply to just Nancy. I think maybe you misinterpreted the game. What I said was that I like to get a rise as well and when I see an opening or an opportunity to discredit a narrow-minded opinion, I cant help but jump in. I believe Nancy likes the challenge as well. lol The rise is generally from people defending a foolish and narrow minded opinion that had absolutely no thought put into it.”

    that IS you basically suggesting/implying that any opinion other than yours would be considered “narrow minded” AND “had absolutely no thought put into it.” so, you can see where i would get that idea from? and sorry then jim, perhaps i shouldnt have been referring to you as much as to anon, who clearly has rage/anger issues or else her original ip wouldnt have been banned?

    Anon on March 12, 2009 4:22 pm i agree with you here.

    lily on March 12, 2009 4:41 pm i also agree with you here.

    Jo-Anne. on March 12, 2009 4:57 pm im glad you posted this comment.

    i read all the comments and im beginning to see now why anons ip was originally banned. now that shes no longer picking at nancy, or me because i was at work “with HUMANS” (lol, love that) she is now picking on joanne? seriously, jo hasnt even really been around lately, i havent saw her actually say ANYTHING that mean to anyone in a WHILE and now someones gotta start their fingers flappin? hmmm, wondering how long until anon is once again banned from this site? will be a glorious day for all in tribute land then 😉

  99. mandee • March 12, 2009 @ 11:48 PM

    oh and fyi, the post i made in browns booty call article, i definitely know what i said, im certain you dont need to remind me, thanks though 🙂

  100. nat • March 13, 2009 @ 12:09 AM

    i wonder if hayden knows how much trouble shes caused on this site. wow i for one am spent. this should make 100 comments. i guess she is a “diva” hahahahahah! LMAO!

  101. Anon • March 13, 2009 @ 9:32 AM

    mandee on March 12, 2009 11:45 pm

    “so i dont really see why its such a big deal if we call eachother names sometimes”

    I don’t have rage problems, I’ve never called someone a name or really loose control and start ranting and raving over someone’s comments. I point out their inconsistencies or disagree with their comments, but name call or lash out in a rage. As for being banned, someone complained, not about the “rage” but because of different names being used….I think

    nat on March 13, 2009 12:09 am

    Your right, she definitely is one now! lol

  102. mandee • March 13, 2009 @ 12:42 PM

    anon, its ok when everyone is calling everyone names. its not ok when 5 different people (ok so im exaggerating a BIT here)all feel the need to attack ONE SPECIFIC PERSON because they disagree that someone is a “diva”. like, last time i checked, you were all adults. perhaps acting like adults is the proper thing to do? and oh, now everyone is changing their tune and thinking that miss panettiere is a “diva” well isnt that just a little “narrow minded”. so, now that everyone agrees, where are nancys apologies??

  103. mandee • March 13, 2009 @ 12:43 PM

    oops, sorry ? after “narrow minded” not .

  104. tributegirl • March 13, 2009 @ 1:59 PM

    So now everyone is agreeing that Hayden IS a diva??? Are you serious??? After all the nasty comments that were made over that one little word, you are now all agreeing with it? I can’t believe this!

  105. Jim • March 13, 2009 @ 3:14 PM

    After the first article I didn’t agree with it at all. I said it was premature to call her a DIVA after the one incident involving the papparazzi. Of course now the whole story is out, whether true or not, and it changes things a little. The original article did not say where she was. That was a huge element and if I remember correctly I touched on that in my post. For all we knew at that time she was walking out her front door. I stand by my “opinion” that it was premature to call her a DIVA. Do I think she is one after hearing the whole story and after reading the new story about her regarding Heroes? Yes I do, but I would prefer to call her a completely immature child who is attempting to pull off being a DIVA.

  106. Anon • March 13, 2009 @ 3:15 PM

    mandee on March 13, 2009 12:42 pm

    Im not one of Nancys protégés so there really is no need for me to apologize. I also don’t believe I even made a comment on this topic except to say that I wasn’t interested in Hayden and didnt really care what she did.

  107. Jo-Anne • March 13, 2009 @ 3:37 PM

    Thanks mandee, for what you said.

    However I thought I refrained from calling people names, have no problem in voicing my opinion or getting involved in a debate.

    On the other hand, the long list used to describe myself on here has ranged from idiot, scum, b*%tch, F**cking mutt….a few have come to my defence, but generally I go it alone and file those comments where they belong, in a very large garbage.

    I can only imagine should some of these words been aimed at your friend, you guys would be very busy, perhaps leaving your job to advise the site of your outrage! ha ha

    anyhow, I’m not recruiting web pals, I just think it would be novel to let others voice their opinions in disagreement of other’s posts and not get so ruffled over such petty remarks.

    now, should someone call here a F*#cking Mutt, well then you have something to talk about…oh, wait a minute that was her addressing me….

  108. Nancy • March 13, 2009 @ 5:39 PM

    Well, first of all, I just looked at the photo (above) and I knew she was in a public place. Secondly, the same day I read this article, I heard then about her trying to get her ex fired! Hence my “opinion”….”DIVA!!!”

    Thanks mandee, that’s what I’ve been trying get people on here to understand for months now and I just commented it to Jo-Anne on another article (because she asked), that it’s one thing to come on here and bash the hell out of the articles contents and it is a totally different thing to attack each other in such a rude manner for our opinions ON THE ARTICLE. Yes, I have called other posters on here names….AFTER they attacked me first, with their “shut up” and “idiot”, lies, and saying bad things about my kids.

  109. Anon • March 13, 2009 @ 7:04 PM

    Nancy on March 13, 2009 5:39 pm

    I agree, very immature, but I know you love it; other than the kids that is. And do you really care what they say about them? They dont even know even know them. And besides, if you didn’t come on here with that “arrogant” attitude, you wouldn’t have a novel thicker than the bible. Lol

  110. mandee • March 13, 2009 @ 7:07 PM

    Jim on March 13, 2009 3:14 pm actually, i posted when you said you didnt know where she was, exactly WHERE this SPECIFIC article claimed hayden was when all of this went down. ill show you again…”According to Us Weekly, while attending a fundraiser for the Rehabilitation Hospital of the Pacific Foundation, the Heroes star snapped at photographers on the red carpet”

    and no problem nancy, again i tell it like it is. (go ahead, try to prove me wrong, i dare yas, considering everyone is asking tg why she never calls anyone on anything and i full out told everyone on the booty call article that yes i do agree sometimes nancy, and ALL OF US act like idiots.) and i completely agree with you nancy. when i post and someone comes across as rude or insulting, i get completely defensive, rude and arrogant too. then, they deserve it. 🙂

  111. Jim • March 13, 2009 @ 7:34 PM

    I know you did Mandee and I appreciated the clarification. What I meant in my first sentence didn’t come out correctly at all. I meant to say “was after the first comment”; not the first article. I have mentioned several times about the prematurity of the comment INITIALLY. I also said at 8:04 that I didn’t know where my original post went…the one where I said we don’t know where she was. I have never once defended her after hearing from you where she was. I have, however commented that I think until details are posted it is wrong to assume the worst in people. I didn’t realize (because it was never mentioned) that Nancy was already aware of the background info on this scenario until she commented at 5:39. I was working on the assumption that all of the other stuff didn’t happen yet as I had no idea about the Heroes deal nor did I know exactly where she was at the time that this incident happened. Personally I would hate to have papparrazi around me 24/7 whether it be walking to my truck from work or walking my kids to the bus stop. I would understand them being at a public function though, which in this case she obviously didn’t do.

  112. Nancy • March 13, 2009 @ 7:34 PM

    Actually Anon, contrary to the beliefs of some people, I don’t love it. Sure, a little sarcasm here and there is fun and humorous but I’m not into all this “hate” stuff. I’m actually more of a funny person…love to laugh, which is why I always use LOL, LMAO, LMFAO, 😀 , 😛 . My coming off as arrogant to some on here is a little true, I guess. I don’t much like being judged by people…good or bad and I don’t like to hear others be judged badly either. Judging the articles here and their contents doesn’t bother me though because I don’t believe that the stars come on here and read these comments although, I could be wrong about that. I don’t however like to read stuff that is a flat out lie. And I’m definately NOT the type of person who thinks she is better than others, that’s for sure. I am fairly ‘high maintenance’ but I really don’t give myself alot of credit.

  113. Anon • March 13, 2009 @ 8:00 PM

    Nancy on March 13, 2009 7:34 pm

    I know, I was just quoting the arrogant attitude I do believe you are a good hearted person that tries to make people here laugh. Unfortunately, because you post frequently, have strong opinions and are quick to defend yourself, you are also an easy target. I dont think youre judgemental in the least; when I was ricky, you were very polite even though I was a completely illiterate looser lol. Like your self, Im really not a bad person with anger issues. I just like to point out contradictions / inconsistencies and cant help myself when I read a very closed minded comment either about someone here or on some stupid article.

    I actually feel bad for my comments to jo-anne. I think the comment I made was, no disrespect but. which was not directed to her. I was merely saying that it is unfortunate if people have left this site because they were beaten down and insulted if they presented a good debate. After that, my whole conversation with her went to hell.

  114. Jim • March 13, 2009 @ 8:16 PM

    Just question Anon – was that an olive branch that you intended on me grabbing? I am just curious?

  115. Anon • March 13, 2009 @ 8:26 PM

    By all means….and the branch isn’t broken. 🙂

  116. Nancy • March 13, 2009 @ 8:32 PM

    Awwe, no virtual martini’s? LOL. I liked that one, as you can tell. 😛

  117. Jim • March 13, 2009 @ 9:15 PM

    Nice work….but I am a beer drinker. No martini’s here. This is where I would inset a happy face but I don’t know how!!

  118. Anon • March 13, 2009 @ 9:23 PM

    shift colon then shift zero 🙂

  119. Jim • March 13, 2009 @ 11:36 PM

    : Thanks

  120. Jim • March 13, 2009 @ 11:40 PM

    HMMM Let me try again because I obviously did something wrong….hey give me credit…It is 1AM you know I have kids and you know I am a beer drinker. What am I doing online???
    HMMM 🙂

  121. Jim • March 13, 2009 @ 11:43 PM

    PS Where are all of you from that it is only 11:40 there? Is Tribute based in TO?

  122. Anon • March 14, 2009 @ 8:02 AM

    Jim on March 13, 2009 11:43 pm

    I’m from the disgusting, defunct steel town Hamilton, ON. I have no idea where Tribute is based but I wish their contest section would offer movie passes for some of the Silvercity’s in my area…anyone from tribute listening?

    Where you from Jim?

    Jim’s Lesson for the day:
    shift colon then shift 9 = frown
    shift colon then shift P = tongue out
    no shift semi colon then shift D = wink with open mouth smile
    semi colon gives a wink
    Give us a test with them all, but before you have the beers or all we’ll see is a bunch of colons and letters lol


  123. tributegirl • March 14, 2009 @ 9:12 AM

    I was under the impression tribute is in Toronto. Jim, just judging from the times, are you from the rock?
    Also Jim, I know you thought diva was a premature suggestion, I didn’t think it was premature, that’s all fine, you weren’t rude and nasty about it. My comment yesterday at 1:59pm was mainly directed at the people who went beserk and were calling Nancy all those names (ex. tard).
    mandee, just fyi, originally (before you were on this article) tribute didn’t have as much info in this article, like where Hayden was or anything, so that’s why people were talking about it maybe being in a private place. Also, I’m confused as to what you meant when you said “everyone is asking tg why she never calls anyone on anything”.

  124. mandee • March 14, 2009 @ 3:47 PM

    i dont know, it wasnt everyone lol. i think it was only jo??? and only on the last article. (last house) (sorry i tend to over exaggerate sometimes…ok well, all the time lol) and i didnt say i agreed, but i do think that eventually someone will say that to me to try to cause a fight, but i dont care because ive told people when i think they are idiots. and oh i was not aware that it was not posted where hayden was before i came on this article.

  125. Jim • March 14, 2009 @ 5:12 PM


    Not so sure how the semi colon one is going to work…it is supposed to be a wink but I didn’t press shift so who knows what will happen.
    I am from New Haven, PEI but I originally lived in Windsor, ON. I still have family in southern Ontario so I try to visit once a year. It is nice there and I love my family, but nothing beats the scenery of the east coast.
    As for being rude and nasty tributegirl I don’t really like to stoop that low. There are was one or two articles where another poster was posting with the same name as me. It hasn’t come up at all in recent conversations but he was not me and was a tad bit rude. I was concerned someone would question it but they haven’t and I think I have been on here enough that people will realize which ones are me and which aren’t if it happens again.

  126. Jim • March 14, 2009 @ 5:14 PM

    See – the last 2 didn’t work. I think I will stick to the first two that I have “mastered.”

    Thanks Anon for the instructions on how to do them. I always wanted to know and I am totally one for figuring it out on my own but I have never found the right time. It was great to finally have the opportunity because some times they are just needed!!

  127. Nancy • March 14, 2009 @ 6:27 PM

    I totally agree about them being needed, Jim. If not for anything but to add some colour in between all the black and white! I’ll warn you though, that even when you use them some people will still take your comments the wrong way. I’m often referred to as “angry” when most of my comments contain an “LOL, LMAO, LMFAO, 😛 , :D, 😉 , etc.”

  128. Nancy • March 14, 2009 @ 6:29 PM

    Well, see that? I didn’t leave a space between the “D” and the “,”. I’ll try again:


  129. tributegirl • March 14, 2009 @ 9:21 PM

    Jim, I didn’t realize that happened to you, someone had been “doubling” a lot of us a while back, but I haven’t noticed it in quite some time, so I didn’t realize that some of your comments were not yours. So was that really you I was arguing with a while ago, or the double? Either way, I’m glad that’s all over with.

  130. Jim • March 15, 2009 @ 12:47 PM

    My comments have never stirred up an argument that was more than a debate. Never have I stooped so low as to name call. I did call Nancy arrogant but I also called myself that at times so it was not a “negative” comment if you will. I think the doubling happened all throughout the Chris Brown/Rihanna articles. I steered clear of those when I realized someone else was posting under my name as well as to not cause confusion and conflict. I actually kind of stayed away from posting for a little bit after that as well hoping that no one would come back at me for what some other Jim said. I have disagreed with you tributegirl but I have never had an argument with you. From what I can tell our correspondences have been quite respectful. We have disagreed but have no resorted to name calling and sarcastic digs. Actually I think none of my debates and differences of opinions have resorted to that and in return I don’t think anyone has purposely come after me which is the reason I continue to post. Of course I have had differing opinions but I expect people to disagree with me sometimes. It is a gossip website and everyone has their own opinions and sometimes mine is not always right. I realize this.
    As for the “doubling” I have seen it on here many times but I don’t really know if they intended to double me or not. Jim is not an uncommon name.

  131. tributegirl • March 15, 2009 @ 7:08 PM

    True, it’s not uncommon, but I don’t think most people would use a name someone else is using on here unless they intended on doubling them. So then, it wasn’t you that was talking about me & Nancy adding to our cat collection? I hope not, because that really didn’t make any sense at all!
    Either way, I have no problem when someone has a different opinion than mine, and if they want to debate it in a mature manner, I’m absolutely fine with that. I’ve found that I can have really great debates with you, Nancy, mandee, Vicki who used to be on here, and some others, and it’s really enjoyable when it’s kept mature. There are some who take it to that other level, thankfully they are in the minority. So actually, I would like to take this opportunity to thank you (and the others) for all the great conversations we’ve had on here and I hope there will be many more to come!

Join The Conversation:

Trending Articles

Current Poll

  • Which Star Wars character, besides Han Solo, should get a prequel movie?

    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...

You Might Also Like

Close Menu