The Last House on the Left Feature

Masters of horror Wes Craven and Sean Cunningham revisit their landmark film that launched Craven’s directing career and influenced decades of horror films to follow: The Last House on the Left. Bringing one of the most notorious thrillers of all time to a new generation, they produce the story that explores how far two ordinary people will go to exact revenge on the sociopaths who harmed their child.

The night she arrives at the remote Collingwood lakehouse, Mari (Sara Paxton) and her friend are kidnapped by a prison escapee and his crew. Terrified and left for dead, Mari’s only hope is to make it back to parents John and Emma (Tony Goldwyn, Monica Potter).

Unfortunately, her attackers unknowingly seek shelter at the one place she could be safe. And when her family learns the horrifying story, they will make three strangers curse the day they came to The Last House on the Left.

[flashvideo file= width=480 height=390 /]

Share this article:

Comments & Discussion

  1. Jo-Anne. • March 10, 2009 @ 11:58 PM

    well, I’ll be giving this the big pass…

  2. Nancy • March 11, 2009 @ 12:57 AM

    And I’ll be sure to watch it! Saw the preview on tv a few days ago and it looks really good! I finally figured out how to tell if a movie will be good or not…I wait to see if Jo-Anne will like it…if she says no, then it’s right up my alley!!

  3. Jo-Anne. • March 11, 2009 @ 1:12 AM

    well, judging by your last remark, Paris Hilton’s “The Hottie and the Nottie” was right up that alley of yours…


  4. Nancy • March 11, 2009 @ 1:19 AM

    Nah, I wouldn’t go THAT far! 😀

  5. tributegirl • March 11, 2009 @ 10:30 AM

    I think everyone here would agree on Paris Hilton’s “movies”!

  6. Nancy • March 11, 2009 @ 10:39 AM

    Well, watching that steel pole go through her head on what was it, House of wax, was pretty funny!

  7. nat • March 11, 2009 @ 9:23 PM

    hey nancy have you seen the original ?

    if you haven’t you really should before you see this one! the music alone will make you laugh out loud. but it is a pretty good thriller, if you like blood and guts you shall like this, i as well will see this, but am glad Ive seen the original because its a very odd film. im curious to see where they go with this new one.

  8. Nancy • March 11, 2009 @ 9:28 PM

    And…why are you speaking to me like you’re not an @$$??? Refer to ALL your other most recent comments and then think about it…think about it good. Do you really think I give a sh!t what you think, nat?

  9. lily • March 11, 2009 @ 9:48 PM

    What’s the matter with you, Nancy? Someone is big enough to take the first step and say something totally civil to you and you slam them? Yeah, there’s been a lot of chitchat between you. So what? Does it have to go on forever? Good grief, what made you so hard? We’re just a bunch of strangers killing time on here. Does it have to be hateful?

  10. nat • March 11, 2009 @ 9:56 PM

    see lily this what i meant before when i said wait to see her real side. and you know what , it doesn’t give me the right to react the way i did either, this has to stop. ill be the bigger person here and say , i apologize for what i said nancy, i hope we can leave this behind us.

  11. Nancy • March 11, 2009 @ 9:56 PM

    Look in all of yesterday and today’s articles, lily. If you want to get involved, read ALL the lovely comments from nat to me/referring to me. Big enough to take the first step? Yeah, then goes back over to the above Chris Brown Booty Call article and slams me again! I understand how you can have such a soft spot for nat…he didn’t say these comments to or about you! I want nothing to do with nat…and he should NOT refer to me in his comments.

  12. nat • March 11, 2009 @ 10:00 PM

    i meant my apology. but you will see for yourself lily in the coming weeks , just how Nancy really is, she shows her true colors all the time, yes i said some dumb things, but wow, were dealing with a different kind of person here, i do wish i hadn’t said some of the things i said.

  13. Nancy • March 11, 2009 @ 10:01 PM

    Perfect example lily….go look on the above Chris Brown Booty Call article…nat is an @$$! Has NO CLUE who I am, what I look like, where I work…no clue at all. And no nat, apology not accepted…as it is NOT real!

  14. nat • March 11, 2009 @ 10:15 PM

    my apology is not for you nancy. its for everyone on this site that had to read the garbage i was saying. i guess i should have specified, but like always you made it about you, i don’t care about you, i just don’t like the way i acted, i don’t like you nancy at all. but it gave me no right in an open forum to say the things i said, so to the people reading the stuff on this site, i apologize if i offended you and /or made you uncomfortable. that apology was also for me, cause im ashamed of myself. i don’t care how you take that, but i was out of line…..

  15. Nancy • March 11, 2009 @ 10:18 PM

    Yup! “true colours” indeed!!

  16. lily • March 11, 2009 @ 10:18 PM

    Nancy, I can’t judge how real Nat’s apology is any more than you can, but I know how sorry I feel when I’ve said hurtful things and I know how wonderful it is to get forgiven and be able to move on. In fact, he forgave me right away when I said I was sorry for a cheap shot I took. And it DID make me feel good!

    He apologized to you, more than once, and that is hard to do. Why can’t you assume he DOES mean it just as easily as you assume he DOESN’T? I just think we’d all be having a lot more fun if we weren’t tearing strips off each other.

  17. Nancy • March 11, 2009 @ 10:20 PM

    Lily…read his last comment on here. Like I said…

  18. mandee • March 11, 2009 @ 10:23 PM

    man, i LOVED house of wax. and im TOTALLY gonna see this movie. im a horror junkie!!

  19. nat • March 11, 2009 @ 10:28 PM

    hey mandee have you seen the remake of Friday the 13th ? if so what did you think. im totally stoked about seeing this to, have you seen the original ?

  20. nat • March 11, 2009 @ 10:30 PM

    its ok lily thanks for saying something but don’t waste your time, im good and past that now. ill talk movies with you.

  21. lily • March 11, 2009 @ 10:32 PM

    I hear you, Nancy, but check the very last comment on the other site before you make your final decision. I’m reading genuine hurt and anger in your words, but I’m hoping there’s also room for forgiveness. I really do think this site would be more fun if we were laughing instead of raging at each other.
    Gotta leave for work. Hey Mandee, I totally agree! I can’t wait to see it either!

  22. Nancy • March 11, 2009 @ 10:39 PM

    I agree lily, it would be much more fun. I have made my final decision though, just by looking at the time on each of the two posts. The one you refer to from nat on the other article was at 10:06 pm. Then the next rude one to me was up above on this one…at 10:15 pm…decision made!

  23. nat • March 11, 2009 @ 11:08 PM

    you said nasty stuff to me to, don’t make yourself sound innocent. at least i realized my mistake, you haven’t said nothing to me that was kind at all, so i guess you are what you are and iam what iam. for me this is over. now leave lily alone, she has nothing to do with this, shes just trying to be a mediator. stop please and let it go. OMG!!! poor babies

  24. Jo-Anne • March 12, 2009 @ 12:09 AM

    as anyone who frequents this site will surely know, I am not a fan of Nancy, nor she of me, however I must say sitting on the sidelines observing this “banter” the last few days it is refreshing not to be involved…it never goes anywhere, trust me, futile…

  25. mandee • March 12, 2009 @ 1:22 AM

    nat, yes i saw the new friday the 13, i liked it but some parts were kinda lame. *running jason?* i havent saw the original, no. i may see it before i see the new one. have you saw the original? if so what did you think of it? and the new friday the 13? also, i am hoping they remake nightmare on elm street, only make it 3d. my bloody valentine wasnt that great, but the 3d effects made up for the lameness of the storyline.

  26. mandee • March 12, 2009 @ 3:14 AM

    sorry by original, i meant original last house on the left, but i actually just finished watching it. it was pretty good. especially for its time!

  27. Nancy • March 12, 2009 @ 10:13 AM

    Nice try nat..your comment above on March 11 @ 11:08 pm…what “nasty stuff” did I say to you?

    “You haven’t said nothing to me that was kind at all”….Oh, so you came on here out of nowhere, first comment bashed the hell outta me, and I’m supposed to say kind things to you? Where do you get this stuff from, nat?

    “now leave lily alone, she has nothing to do with this”…hmmm, lily asked me. And if she didn’t want to be involved, she would have stayed out of it! So stop the BS nat and then I will “let it go” but, as long as you keep up with your instigating and name calling (yes, yet again…”poor babies” & “you really are stupid”) why should I let it go?

  28. pete • March 12, 2009 @ 10:38 AM

    Why should you let it go Nancy? Because it isn’t important. Whatever anyone here thinks of you or calls you just doesn’t matter. No one knows you and it doesn’t affect real life. Life is too short, and you obviously get very wound up about what is happening here; the risk is that the frustration and anger (and even if you try to deny it, you are frustrated and angry or this wouldn’t continue) will spill into your everyday life.

  29. tributegirl • March 12, 2009 @ 12:11 PM

    Well, the Booty Call article is closed for comments, I’m thinking it’s because of all this drama.
    Nat, I was offended by a lot of the things you said, but very little was directed to me, and you said above (10:15 March 11), that your apology was directed to everybody except Nancy, so I will accept it on my behalf. But I’m wondering, if your apology wasn’t directed to Nancy, why did you suddenly get nice with her and ask her opinion on this movie?
    In the beginning of all this crap, Nancy said 3 little words, that were simply her own opinion on an article (“one word, diva”). That wasn’t a bad opinion, didn’t sound to me like she knew the people involved or was giving her own take on the situation, sounded to me like she was just giving her opinion like she and everybody else has the right to do. Difference is, because there’s often been so much controversy surrounding her name (sorry, Nancy, but I’m sure you’d agree!), people (especially nat) went all off on her. I think it has more to do with her name than her comment, and I don’t think that’s fair at all.
    So I’m issuing a challenge out there to everybody, and I’m hoping it will be kept clean and fun. How about everybody think about her three word comment (“one word, diva”), really think about it, and see if you can think of anything that is really wrong with that comment, and if all the crap that came down afterwards was warranted. Then post your thoughts on the situation, preferrably in a sensible, nice way that can be discussed.

  30. nat • March 12, 2009 @ 3:45 PM

    well i was trying to make peace in a nice sensible way, by asking something we both agreed on , that is the movie. as far as her comment is concerned,she said something that she has no proof of, calling her a “diva” is unfair because all of us except her knows what happens, and its tiring to read nancys comments are always about her making a pass judgment instead of weighing out the options, its like she doesn’t think before she comments, just goes off half cocked without knowing for sure what really happened not that any of us know. calling her a “diva” is an insult because she got upset and none of us know the reason why. sometimes you say something, but you don’t expect someone to go overboard with it, when i was being nice i was being me and had already forgotten the last issue, she takes things way to personal. then it got personal. but i agree with you 100%

  31. Nancy • March 12, 2009 @ 4:13 PM

    So, my “diva” comment is YOUR PERSONAL business how? And then you say that I act like I know these stars personally but you take that 1 little word straight to heart!!

  32. Jo-Anne. • March 12, 2009 @ 4:20 PM

    funny, the one little word that comes to my mind isn’t Diva…it’s…wait for it…”overboard”…

  33. tributegirl • March 12, 2009 @ 4:58 PM

    Ok, nat, well I respect your opinion on all this. Personally I don’t think “diva” was an unfair word, in fact I think Hayden probably IS a diva, but that’s just my personal opinion and I know it could be wrong, but being my opinion, I will say it, because that’s what this forum is for, posting our opinions. And really, what if someone else came on here and called Hayden something worse, like “b*tch” or something? That would be much worse than “diva”, but I’m thinking that since it was Nancy that said it, people were really quick to jump all over it. I really, really, really don’t think the word “diva” actually offended anybody on here, I think it is just the fact that people wanted to attack Nancy, and used that as an excuse. As I said before, I could be wrong, but that is my personal opinion on this.

    I did see where you tried to ask her about the movie, but I think a lot of your comments were really too nasty, and I have a strong feeling she’s not interested in carrying on any conversation with you, esp after you said that your apology wasn’t for her. Maybe the solution here is to just move on, maybe not post any comments towards her, because I don’t think it will be well received. And really, I don’t blame her, if you said the things to me that you said to her, I wouldn’t want any kind of conversation with you either, so yeah, maybe just leaving each other alone would be best?

  34. mandee • March 12, 2009 @ 11:29 PM

    nancy, you should off and on post things under a DIFFERENT name (like so many others on here) and see if people take your remarks the same way they do when they KNOW for a fact its you. im interested in this little experiment and im really hoping you take my advice and try it out. keep me posted with the results if ya do.

  35. mandee • March 12, 2009 @ 11:46 PM

    hey nat, still wondering, did you see friday the 13? if you did what did you think? and how about the original for last house on the left???

  36. nat • March 12, 2009 @ 11:57 PM


  37. mandee • March 13, 2009 @ 1:00 AM

    lol yeah i agree, jason x and freddy versus jason SUCKED !!!!!!! i said earlier, not sure if you read what i said, that i hope they remake nightmare on elm street and make it 3d. also, i saw the original last night, and i thought it was a pretty intense movie, and i really enjoyed it, even though it was an older movie.

  38. Jo-Anne • March 13, 2009 @ 3:24 PM

    “and I have a strong feeling shes not interested in carrying on any conversation with you”…your words T.G. – how can you possibly say this when she responds to nat’s comments JUST above yours and in fact to each and every one of his comments…

    I understand you’re promoting some sort of kiss and make up scenario here, but you consistently defend Nancy who clearly has a desire to continue this issue.

    You are always there whenever anyone posts against her, disagrees with her, etc., and faulting people for thier disdain of Nancy, yet when she lashes out, using inappopriate, ignorant names towards others (believe me I do know) you choose to not comment on, or sometimes continue in the same vein, thereby obvious acceptance for same insults you have a problem with others using. In a word, it’s okay Nancy does it, but everyone else shouldn’t.

    That’s the problem I’ve had with you all along…I guess I fail to understand your reasoning here, what’s wrong for one should be wrong for all.

    I fully understand if you are friends, neighbours, related, etc. your reluctance to preach same to Nancy, however should it be only a web relationship, why the reluctance to tell it like it is? I think I may have answered my own question actually…it’s now pretty clear why…

  39. Nancy • March 13, 2009 @ 5:15 PM

    Like to just keep things going, eh Jo-Anne? Seems to me YOU are the one “continuing this issue”. “I think I may have answered my own question actually…it’s now pretty clear why…” WOW! I only know Tributegirl on Tribute. Not everyone does what you and Vicki did, being sisters. I have no interest in knowing any of you outside of Tribute, not being rude to anyone about that but it’s true. The difference Jo-Anne…and I’m speaking for myself NOT for Tributegirl, is that yes, I have attacked, in defence. I feel (in my opinion) that it is okay to bash the hell out of the article, and that when someone gives their opinion on the article, others can either agree or disagree in a fairly respectful way, and that’s great. But I feel that when someone comments ON THE ARTICLE and another comes rushing in yelling “shut up”, “idiot”, etc. when nothing was initially said to that person, thn they deserve to be bashed back. For example (and yes, you DO know), when you said something about my kids and also when you lied about me…yeah, I did retaliate, and in this latest disagreement, I also said nothing rude (outside of the article) until the rudeness came to me. In other words, when someone crosses me, I have NO respect for them and they have no one to blame but themselves.

    Now, can we let it go?

  40. Jo-Anne. • March 13, 2009 @ 7:22 PM

    does that mean on all those articles that you and “your friends” referred to me, amongst other “endearments”… idiot” “scum” “Loser” “f*@ckin mutt”,
    “$%&hole”, “hag”, accused me for like months of posting under others names, trashed me and my employers, is that what you want to let go?

    My comment above was clearly directed to T.G., and I expressed exactly how I felt. I don’t understand her reasoning and think the same consideration on content of comments should be granted to all. You don’t punish one kid for stealing a cookie and praise the second kid for doing same, at least I don’t.

    It goes both ways about people crossing other people on here, Nancy, I am sure like myself many on here have felt lack of respect for you when your offensive comments were directed at them.

    The comments about your kids were based on how you conduct youself on line, the vulgar words, offensive, bullying, inappropriate remarks which were I found shocking given your mom status and the obvious heightened anger you express which I felt could be carried over into your home life. I mean, that wouldn’t be a far fetched assumption. Children learn by example was my point.

    This battle has been ongoing for a number of months now, and safe to say you are hellbent (yeah, I know I like that word) on blaming everyone else when you in fact are guilty of same conduct when posting your comments.

    I would be extremely happy if you didn’t comment on anything I write in the future, and I will do same for you. There are enough people on here I can chat with.

  41. Nancy • March 14, 2009 @ 4:49 PM

    Well, I can’t speak for my “friends” Jo but, the names ‘I’ have called you were in retaliation to disrespectful things you’ve thrown my way. When you refered to my posts as “childish” and “act your age”and “what are you, 10?” then I give you your disrespectful reward of “hagatha”. When you take it upon yourself (who has absolutely no clue WHO I am) to judge my comments as “angry”…just from reading typed material (like Jim said again, people don’t know), and comment to me on here that my children would be “better off” with their abusive, drug addicted biological father (which yes, I had previously admitted on here that he was but you still made that comment anyways) than with me & then also not long ago you made a comment saying that I was making “fat comments” on a certain article which is a FLAT OUT LIE and I called you on it and you still haven’t delivered the proof OR the apology, THAT is when I referred to you as the “f*@cking mutt” and told you to “go fetch” the proof. I never “trashed your employers”…I don’t have a high opinion of the majority of police officers (for good reason), you idolize them (for your good reasons)…my opinion, your opinion. I also apologized to you for accusing you of using multiple names and you said “accepted”. You accused me of MANY things as well, I could go on for days but will only mention a few: being a “bad parent”; being friends or relatives outside of Tribute with Tributegirl (proof is in your above comment); not having a job (because I don’t “showboat” my profession on Tribute), just to mention a few. I’ve also noticed that you say similar things to my “friends” (mandee and Tributegirl)…most recently your “bedside manner” comment on the Mickey Rourke article…clearly directed to Tributegirl who has mentioned working in a similar “bedside manner” in a medical facility if I remember correctly! But yeah….again, you’re soooo innocent. Even ‘I’ have the respect to apologize to ANYONE when I am wrong…even those that I despise.

  42. tributegirl • March 14, 2009 @ 9:37 PM

    Oh, Jo, you are SO tiresome. Ok, maybe I’ll give this another shot. What I said to nat, “and I have a strong feeling shes not interested in carrying on any conversation with you”, yeah, my words, no duh, and I meant them, big deal. That was part of one of my comments, what about it? I don’t praise one person for a certain action and then slam another person for the same action, that’s your game. If anyone else on here said the things Nancy said to nat, with the exception of me and mandee, you’d be all over them, kissing *ss, and you know it. Remember the pot & kettle? Well, there you go again.

    And how about your comment above, “I must say sitting on the sidelines observing this banter the last few days it is refreshing not to be involved”. Yeah, nice wat to “not be involved”. You stand back, let someone else get something going, do the dirty work, then jump in when it suits you, because you enjoy being involved in all this, you just can’t resist, you just have to get yourself in there, don’t you?

    And my personal favorite, a comment from you above, “I would be extremely happy if you didnt comment on anything I write in the future, and I will do same for you.” Hmmmmm, where have I heard that before? Oh yes! It was YOU! But you only seem to be able to control yourself for a very limited amount of time. So I will not be expecting you do “do the same” for very long.

  43. Jo-Anne. • March 14, 2009 @ 11:18 PM

    yes, that was me saying I no longer wanted banter with you once one of you guys suggested something extremely inappropriate regarding my teenage daughter (yes, you keep bringing this up, you NEVER let anything go, which is surprising in this case as it sheds a very bad light on you, and yes, I STILL feel the same way, once you start posting under my name again and saying vulgar crap I’ll be making the same comments)

    unbelievable petty comment – let someone else do the dirty work and then I jump in? So, now I must be commenting 24/7 – I can’t take a break from all this stuff and continue with my life or perhaps heaven forbid, it was uninteresting to me and I didn’t want to comment? Now, I’m being told off for not commenting continuously – how sad is that?

    If you look, I opened up the comments here, then Nancy jumps in directing comment to me – and you have the nerve to say what you’re saying. Like you DON’T have to “get yourself in there too” – you are within every comment behind Nancy for months now – don’t be such a hypocrite. You live for this.

    I’ll post when and whatever I want to post, I can’t believe your audacity criticizing me for deciding when I post!

    So, maybe if you try real hard to resist commenting on each and every post I make, we’ll get somewhere…

    what was that word…tiresome…

  44. mandee • March 15, 2009 @ 3:07 AM

    Jo-Anne. on March 14, 2009 11:18 pm

    who said something about your teenage daughter? and when?

    unless youre talking about me and that post on the miley cyrus article? im not saying anything, until you answer

    and thanks tg and nancy for seein it from my point of view 🙂

    man, im a lil drunk right now, its soo hard to type properly…i have had to go over this post like too many times to make sure its spelled right.

  45. tributegirl • March 15, 2009 @ 9:02 AM

    Hmmm, interesting, and inaccurate comment, Jo, as usual you are twisting things to suit you again.

    Ok, I never said anything about your teenage daughter, and I don’t post under your name, and you know both of those things for a fact. Yet you continuously say this. Why don’t you back your comments up with a little proof? I know why, because you CAN’T. As for your teenage daughter, don’t be sick, I have a teenage daughter myself, and would never say anything about your daughter, or any of your children, never have, never will, yet you keep saying I did, but can’t back up your words.

    Yes, you opened up the comments here, then Nancy LIGHTHEARTEDLY commented to you, anyone with half a brain (oops, did I just say that?) could see that she was just joking around. Then of course I commented, why wouldn’t I? My comment was very clean and appropriate, wasn’t offensive in any way. I didn’t comment BECAUSE Nancy did, I commented because I wanted to, yet you always seem to say that my comments follow behind Nancy. Even if they did, what’s it to you? How is it your business?

    Yes, you do often let someone else do the dirty work, then you jump in. I never said you are on here 24/7, I mean, how can you? You work 1 full time and 1 part time job, are a loving wife, a doting involved mother of three, go to practically every concert and movie out there, watch practically every show on tv (except reality tv of course), subscribe to 15 magazines, volunteer in your community, jeez, I wonder how you find even one minute to comment on here. Your days must have about 30 hours in them for you to do all you say you do. So my comment wasn’t petty, it was true.

    And where did I tell you off for not commenting continuously? That doesn’t even make any sense.

    Oh, and my favorite comment in your last post, this is just too good to pass up, “Ill post when and whatever I want to post, I cant believe your audacity criticizing me for deciding when I post!” HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, are you serious??? I guess you don’t quite get the pot and kettle thing, do you! Because that comment there I could so easily say right back to you, it fits!

    Btw, I’m wondering, why are you always so ready to attempt to discredit me, yet you STILL have not commented at all about the compliments I gave you? At least lily thanked you for your nice comments, if only you could be as big a person as her.

  46. mandee • March 15, 2009 @ 2:28 PM


  47. Nancy • March 15, 2009 @ 2:52 PM

    Don’t hold your breath Tributegirl because even if she did say “Thank you, Tributegirl”, it wouldn’t be true. How can I say that? How do I know? Because remember when I apologized to her for accusing her of using multiple names, and she said “accepted and thanks”? Well, see how she threw it back up in my face in her March 13 @ 7:22 pm comment? She constantly accuses us of knowing each other outside of Tribute…meanwhile, she is the one who did that, admittingly saying she and Vicki are sisters. Tributegirl and I have disagreed (not very often mind you) on certain articles, we just don’t argue and name call. We seem to be alot alike and that is probably why we get along well. I can’t say FOR SURE because outside of Tribute, I have absolutely no clue but from what has been said ON Tribute, we seem to have alot in common. She and I have both stuck up for other commenters on here as do some others. She has been accused of kissing my @$$, so to speak, and of being my follower and me a follower of her. Like I said, we and others have stuck up for several people on here who were unnecessarily called “idiots” and such for their opinions. Because we frequently comment and “usually” agree on topics at hand, we separately get attacked more frequently than others….then get accused of riding each others coattails and of knowing each other outside Tribute. No one said you cannot comment when you want, Jo-Anne but….the same goes for the rest of us! And it IS true what Tributegirl said, that you wait until the posters on here that ‘YOU’ don’t like, get attacked (being of course, Tributegirl, mandee and myself) and when the comments are quite heated, then you jump in. You don’t jump in when someone else gets called an “idiot” or whatever….ONLY when the names Tributegirl, mandee or Nancy are involved! Anyways, people have said to me on here this past week, that I take others comments too seriously and that I shouldn’t care what people say about me or my kids, that they don’t know me outside of the computer…..where are they to tell you the same? Just let it go, Jo-Anne.

  48. Jo-Anne. • March 15, 2009 @ 4:22 PM

    you’re telling me to “let it go”????

    seems to me you and t.g. are the ones in need of your advice…judging by your above fixation of a celebrity website…???

  49. Jo-Anne. • March 15, 2009 @ 4:35 PM

    oh, and correction, t.g….

    “You work 1 full time and 1 part time job, are a loving wife, a doting involved mother of three, go to practically every concert and movie out there, watch practically every show on tv (except reality tv of course), subscribe to 15 magazines, volunteer in your community”

    It’s actually 16 magazines now…
    No slouching on accuracy for my biography you’re compiling…details details!!!!

  50. Nancy • March 15, 2009 @ 5:17 PM


    All I said was that these people said it to me, so where are they to say it to you? Because you don’t seem any better at “letting it go” than me. So, what’s up with that? Seems a little one sided, doesn’t it?…then again, they are like you….only “out for blood”” when the name ‘Nancy’ is involved, doesn’t matter the content of the comment…it’s the name on top of the comment.

  51. Nancy • March 15, 2009 @ 5:20 PM

    It’s kind of similar to “punishing one child for stealing a cookie and praising another for doing the same”. Good thing YOU don’t do that! 😉

  52. mandee • March 15, 2009 @ 5:34 PM

    well, that all seems a little over the top if you ask me. i dont believe for one second you do HALF the amount you claim. and this comment : Jo-Anne. on March 15, 2009 4:22 pm was pretty hypocritical coming from someone that cant seem to let go of the fact someone ONCE said something about your kids, in the PAST accused you of using multiple names *and again, APOLOGIZED FOR IT* you are just as bad as anyone else on here. so before you start throwing stones, perhaps you should check to make sure YOU dont live in a glass house yourself.

  53. tributegirl • March 15, 2009 @ 6:22 PM

    So Jo-Anne says that Nancy is “fixated” on a celebrity website. Yet Jo-Anne is on here as often as anybody else. But we wouldn’t DARE say Jo-Anne is fixated on this site, because I’m sure that would be just wrong!
    Sixteen magazines, wow, that’s wonderful, your lucky, lucky husband. There’s another couple hours each month he doesn’t have to listen to you.

    Don’t worry, Nancy, I would NEVER hold my breath waiting for her to act like a decent human being where any of our names (mine, yours & mandee’s) are involved. No matter the compliments we give her (and we have), she will never say thank you. Only a decent human being would do that. And I would suggest that you also do not hold your breath waiting for her to let it go. She can’t.

  54. tributegirl • March 15, 2009 @ 6:24 PM

    Oops, my bad, I guess the “fixation” comment was directed to me as well as Nancy. Sorry Nancy, at first I thought it was just directed to you.

  55. mandee • March 16, 2009 @ 9:09 PM

    hmm is this one closed for comments now?

  56. Nancy • March 16, 2009 @ 10:19 PM

    Nah, she’s just taking so long to think up more excuses! 😀

    (She knows she’s no better than the rest of us!)

  57. Nancy • March 16, 2009 @ 10:21 PM

    Tributegirl: don’t sweat it, they usually are directed to me…LOL….good thing I’m a “freak” with wide shoulders!!

Join The Conversation:

Trending Articles

Current Poll

  • Which is your favorite Steven Spielberg film?

    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...

You Might Also Like

Close Menu