Tom Hanks signs FU autograph for fan

By Alexandra Heilbron on May 21, 2009 | 133 Comments

Tom Hanks signing an autographTom Hanks was surrounded by fans outside the Geffen Playhouse in Los Angeles last Monday, after his new film, Angels & Demons, topped the weekend box office. A sharp photographer got a nice closeup of what Hanks’ signature looks like — is he writing FU in that fan’s copy of The Da Vinci Code?

Comments & Discussion

  1. Nancy β€’ May 21, 2009 @ 11:17 AM

    Depends who the fan is, I guess. There’s one strange fan of mine on this site (who is a little close for comfort at times) and I would sign her copy of ‘The Nancy Chronicles’ with a big “F U”. πŸ˜€

  2. Deadpool5 β€’ May 21, 2009 @ 3:39 PM

    Get over yourself already Nancy, you’re too much on this site.

  3. tributegirl β€’ May 21, 2009 @ 3:58 PM


  4. Nancy β€’ May 21, 2009 @ 5:03 PM

    Hey Deadpool5, who was talking to you? I’m not stuck on myself and what I do with my time is my business, right? Do I stick my nose in yours? EXACTLY! Don’t like me, just ignore me…and that goes for the rest of you too!

  5. Nancy β€’ May 21, 2009 @ 5:04 PM

    Oh, what’s “unnecessary”, Tributegirl?

  6. mandee β€’ May 21, 2009 @ 6:39 PM

    we all know tg meant deadpool was unnecessary lol. and its true, you do what you want with your time, who cares how long youre online for? im sure if deadpool thinks youre online too much, he/she is clearly here enough to see how much you post. so maybe deadpool should stop spending so much time on here?

  7. tributegirl β€’ May 21, 2009 @ 7:08 PM

    Jeez, Nancy, lighten up, what are you so angry about!
    mandee, you got it right, that’s what I meant.

  8. Nancy β€’ May 21, 2009 @ 7:13 PM

    I’m not “angry”, Tributegirl…just need to put some people in their place every once in a while…especially when they try to tell me how to spend “MY” time. πŸ˜‰

  9. Nancy β€’ May 21, 2009 @ 7:25 PM

    And yeah, I catch your joke, LMAO.

  10. tributegirl β€’ May 21, 2009 @ 8:11 PM

    haha, I knew you would! πŸ™‚

  11. drama freak β€’ May 21, 2009 @ 10:21 PM

    yeaa nancy who cares wat people think and ur famous????? yeaa ritte and im tom cruises best friend actually i amm…im joking…but anywayz i think this is weird whyy would he write fu on the autograph??

  12. Deadpool5 β€’ May 21, 2009 @ 10:39 PM

    Way to explode Nancy. By “too much” I meant we read about your opinion in nearly every single article (I never mentioned time spent online here, which goes to show a lot of your reading comprehension). Anyway, a lot of people come here just to read up on gossip, they don’t care about your opinion so stop making yourself seem important. Try to comment on the actual article in question as opposed to making it all about *you* Nancy. The way you reacted to my comment goes to show you’ve had this pointed out to you before. Grow up!

  13. mandee β€’ May 21, 2009 @ 10:41 PM

    deadpool, if no one dont wants to read nancys comments and only come here to read the “gossip” then why are they reading her opinion in the first place? as far as im concerned, if they dont like it they should mind their own business. since when did this become a hate nancy article? at what point did YOU actually comment on the article at hand? perhaps nancy IS as famous as you claim she isnt, or else you would have ignored her and commented on the article and left her alone.

  14. Bobbie Darren β€’ May 22, 2009 @ 6:53 AM

    I asked my psyche the other day if he thought I was going schizo. He just looked at the space beside me and asked the same question. I was left feeling beside myself after that…la-di-da, la-di…splat…

  15. lily β€’ May 22, 2009 @ 7:08 AM

    Well said, Mandee! Deadpool says ” Try to comment on the actual article in question as opposed to making it all about *you* Nancy” but the ENTIRE post has NOTHING AT ALL to do with this Tom Hanks article… Picking fights or just rambling on like a moron (see 6:53 post above mine) means some of you knobs need to find something else to do! This site IS about chatting and debating with other people who enjoy same. If you don’t, SHUT UP AND MOVE ON.

  16. Doug Frerichs β€’ May 22, 2009 @ 8:39 AM

    Has anyone, at all, tried asking Tom himself what’s up with his autograph instead of assuming the worst?

  17. Minerva β€’ May 22, 2009 @ 9:00 AM

    No matter how lay down or stand on my head looking at that autograph, I don’t see anything that resembles FU. It doesn’t resemble anything in fact. Leave it to the press to try and make something shabby out of something unreadable. At least he signed the autograph, which is nice. Gawd, look at all the doctors that would be sued if somebody somewhere everyday wanted to make an issue out of THEIR unreadable scratch and scribble. It’s just that movie celebs have every single thing scrutinized.

  18. Minerva β€’ May 22, 2009 @ 9:04 AM

    Bobby Darren…. If you asked your psyche, then you were talking to yourself and perhaps answered your own question. If you asked your psychologist or psychiatrist the question and that person really answered you like that, you need to get a different referral from your doctor to see someone more professional and helpful.

  19. Minerva β€’ May 22, 2009 @ 9:11 AM

    Oh……and by the way. At closer look at the picture, it actually looks like Tom is signing something on the table in front of him, and a fan is pushing a book at him to be next in line for an autograph. I doubt Tom even wrote in the book yet.

  20. Minerva β€’ May 22, 2009 @ 10:09 AM

    I still can’t see an FU in that signature, but Tom Hanks initials are FU. Read all about it:

  21. Nancy β€’ May 22, 2009 @ 10:41 AM

    Deadpool 5, goes to show YOUR reading comprehension because when I said “MY time” that means that I can come here and comment on every article as many times as I damn well please and you and anyone else who has a problem with that should take a look at your own damn schedule! I’d like to know who asked you what you thought of my opinions on these articles and how you figure I’m making myself “seem important”? I haven’t exploded at all, so…??? Sounds like you’re the one who needs the “psyche”. As for your comment “try to comment on the actual article”…I did. Read my first line. It says “Depends on who the fan is, I guess”…again, just goes to show YOUR reading comprehension. Where’s your comment on the article? “Grow up!” πŸ˜‰

  22. Cosmic Obamo β€’ May 22, 2009 @ 11:12 AM

    Β»Aah! πŸ™‚ “Angels & Demons”=POWERFUL movie. Another big Triumph/Sucess for the great team Ron Howard/Tom Hanks. Well done. πŸ™‚

  23. mae β€’ May 22, 2009 @ 12:38 PM

    Hmmm seems to me that everyone has too much time on their hands writing all these negative come backs,, everyone should keep their opinions to themselves and comment on the stories instead of the drama, including myself,,gees, I never get involved but this time it was blown way too far…who cares….and to get back to the story,, looks like its a messy T and H,,written in a hurry like they have a lot of time to write it all warm and fuzzy……

  24. JAG β€’ May 22, 2009 @ 1:06 PM

    I have to agree with Minerva. Leave it to the media to make something out of nothing when it comes to celebs. I am sure that Tom Hanks did not sign his name that way to offend anyone, it is probably just the way he signs (quick and simple) when he has to do so many autographs. I know that my signature is just a scribble like that too, because I have to sign all the time at work. It is just easier. I bet he never even looked at his signature in that way before and unfortunately he will have to now because of some stupid reoprter and photographer. How do these people live with themselves, always stirring up shit.

  25. Fraydeecat β€’ May 22, 2009 @ 2:04 PM

    Shuddup Nancy. Shuddup all. The only opinions that matter in here are mine and you all know it.

  26. Deadpool5 β€’ May 22, 2009 @ 3:43 PM

    Yeah Nancy, you’re a legend in your own mind.

  27. Nancy β€’ May 22, 2009 @ 4:03 PM

    LMAO Fraydeecat!

    Deadpool5…what the hell are you talking about? You’re a jack@$$!

  28. Jo-Anne β€’ May 22, 2009 @ 4:17 PM

    well, seeing as the number one comment was directed to me….

    some things never change, however good laugh to see how quick Nancy felt the need to “challenge” t.g. comment and how equally quick you felt the need to “assure” her nothing untoward intended…ah, some things never change

    Re Tom, possibly the markings are some foreign language deciphered along the lines of “Available for sex scene casting, please call…”

  29. Nancy β€’ May 22, 2009 @ 4:29 PM

    “I never said a word about you”, Jo-Anne. Why do you think that everything I say is directed to you? But, “if the shoe fits…” I also never “challenged” Tributegirl’s comment. I merely “asked” her what she considered “unnecessary”. It was a question less than one whole line, in no way a “challenge”. Was she referring to the article, me or Deadpool5 was all I wanted to know but, you’ll find any excuse to turn 4 words into an argument, won’t you? Yeah, you’re right, “some things never change”!! I also don’t see where Tributegirl “assured” me of anything. I do however see that she answered the question I asked. I also see you’re still a sh!t disturbing instigator…yup, some things never change for sure!

  30. Jo-Anne β€’ May 22, 2009 @ 4:35 PM

    sad when you have to lie to prove your point…”Nancy Chronicles” your first comment is WITHOUT A DOUBT directed at me, I “penned” that phrase ages ago…you take all the fun outta this when you resort to lying…

    blow a candle out, make a wish….”Help me to tell the truth”…or, at the very least, not be so obviously insincere…


  31. Nancy β€’ May 22, 2009 @ 4:42 PM

    It’s not a lie, Jo-Anne…I don’t have to lie…not now, not ever, especially not on here or to you. You do enough of that for everyone on here, and then some. Did you see the quotes I put around those words…I was quoting YOU…while giving YOU a taste of your own medicine. Does it taste good? Jeeze, you’re a few bricks short of a load today, aren’t you? Everybody and their dog (aka “mutt”) knows I was absolutely, without a doubt referring to you in my first comment…DUH!

  32. tributegirl β€’ May 22, 2009 @ 4:58 PM

    LMAO, umm, yeah, it was obvious!
    The banter between me & Nancy was just me making a comment to someone else, Nancy questionning it, mandee answering for me (lol), me ribbing Nancy, Nancy ribbing back, and a little laugh. The End.

  33. Jo-Anne β€’ May 22, 2009 @ 5:06 PM

    wow…impressive (as always)

  34. Nancy β€’ May 22, 2009 @ 5:13 PM

    So what…now you’re jealous because you have no friends?

  35. Jo-Anne β€’ May 22, 2009 @ 5:15 PM

    obvious is…”Why do you think that everything I say is directed to you?” when the first comment on here got it…obviously directed to me…

    plain. simple.

    your banter, t.g., was not at all my point, but I think that was clear.

    (little laugh)

  36. Nancy β€’ May 22, 2009 @ 5:27 PM

    Yup, you said that to me before too…”Why do you think everything I say is directed to you?” So…you never answered the question…how does it taste?

  37. Jo-Anne β€’ May 22, 2009 @ 10:04 PM

    why do I think everything you say is directed to me…dead simple…you hang on my every word…

    how does it taste? your birthday cake… kinda stale…

  38. Dawn β€’ May 22, 2009 @ 10:31 PM

    wow…. does anyone else find the comments funnier than the article? or is it just me?

  39. Missty β€’ May 22, 2009 @ 10:37 PM

    You got it Dawn! Reading this was a full half hour of entertainment in my day – immature people with nothing better to do than fight with strangers online. Thanks for the laughs, everyone!

  40. mandee β€’ May 22, 2009 @ 11:12 PM

    i dont think it makes any of us “immature” i think it makes us fun, eccentric (spelling?), funny and light hearted. until the families are dragged in that is. does anyone take this stuff seriously? clearly not, or someone would have left a long time ago over hurt feelings. im curious, is anyone else having problems getting the beatle story to load? it hasnt been loading for me AT ALL today grrr. it only loaded long enough for me to post a comment, now nothing. and i was curious, joanne was this comment about me ? : “how equally quick you felt the need to “assure” her nothing untoward intended” or was it intended for tributegirl? also, nancy, i never said i wasnt joannes friend πŸ˜› i can be everyones friend as long as they arent rude to me. anyone else notice that deadpool never commented on MY comment directed specifically at him/her?

  41. Jo-Anne β€’ May 23, 2009 @ 2:50 PM

    no, not for you, mandee…

    also, no problems today loading Beatle story, however have experienced same as you in past on many occasions when clicking on view article…

  42. Amber β€’ May 23, 2009 @ 3:27 PM

    Nancy, you’re amazing haha. The reason I even read the posts sometimes are the trail of comments under them. They always crack me up. Oh, and happy belated birthday Nancy! πŸ™‚

  43. Amber β€’ May 23, 2009 @ 3:42 PM

    These comments are all in good fun, right? The “fights” (I put this in quotes, because I don’t know what else to make of them) seem serious and although I have a fun side, I’m not one for fights that seem real. I’m too gullible and I always fall for them. I just hate fights in general. I think words hurt more than actions. I would rather tackle a girl twice my size (not hard!) than have a fight, although I love reading these comments!

    Okay, so sorry about my long rambling. I just meant to ask… this is just for fun right?Please assure me haha thank you ladies.

  44. Jo-Anne β€’ May 23, 2009 @ 5:03 PM

    speaking for me only, Amber, this has as much impact on my life as the temperature in Tel Aviv today….

    rest assured…

  45. Nancy β€’ May 23, 2009 @ 7:16 PM

    Thanks Amber…for the “happy birthday” and the “amazing” comments! I’ll try not to break my arm patting my own back, hahaha.

    “Speaking for me only, this has as much impact on my life as the temperature” up Jo-Anne’s @$$ today…which will probably be pretty high when she reads this, but I really don’t give a sh!t…BAHAHAHAHA!!! πŸ˜‰

  46. Carol β€’ May 24, 2009 @ 3:04 PM

    I think the media is putting too much on this…go to your doctor and look at his signature. When you sign that many autographs, it certainly would be nothing more than a scribble, but if you look close enough, it is not F U. Has anyone ever seen Tom Hanks in an interview. He is very funny, but yet proper, and unlike Ringo, I think he knows that we, the fans, along with his natural talent, put him where he is today, and I do think he is one of the few big stars who respects the people.

  47. tributegirl β€’ May 24, 2009 @ 6:30 PM

    Tom Hanks is truly one of the few in Hollywood who has “kept it real”. I don’t believe for one minute it is F U.

  48. Carol β€’ May 24, 2009 @ 7:06 PM

    nope, I think he tries to double the line and use it as a T and an H, but due to the fact that he was probably rushing through a huge lineup, he just missed the hooking up of the letters. The media must not have had anything important to report that day. Mandee, any intelligent thoughts on this one?

  49. demigod β€’ May 24, 2009 @ 7:33 PM

    Carol, be nice lol

  50. Carol β€’ May 24, 2009 @ 7:43 PM

    oh demigod…I just love the insight Mandee provides. She really could be an assistant to the rich and famous…she knows so much.

  51. tributegirl β€’ May 24, 2009 @ 7:46 PM

    Carol, do I detect a little sarcasm there?

  52. demigod β€’ May 24, 2009 @ 7:47 PM

    She does have her moments, and she has a high cute factor πŸ™‚

  53. demigod β€’ May 24, 2009 @ 7:49 PM

    tributegirl on May 24, 2009 7:46 PM

    A little?? That was overt lol

  54. Carol β€’ May 24, 2009 @ 7:49 PM

    you have no idea demigod…that’s funny, I might actually start enjoying your comments if you keep this up…lol

  55. tributegirl β€’ May 24, 2009 @ 7:52 PM

    LOL to both of you!

  56. Carol β€’ May 24, 2009 @ 7:58 PM

    Demi & I are BFF’s now…
    As are me and Mandee

  57. tributegirl β€’ May 24, 2009 @ 8:01 PM

    Well….I highly doubt that! You and demigod, friends, right!!! πŸ˜‰

  58. demigod β€’ May 24, 2009 @ 8:02 PM

    Carol on May 24, 2009 7:49 PM

    You took exception to my prior comments? πŸ™‚

  59. demigod β€’ May 24, 2009 @ 8:06 PM

    For the record, I take no sides, and pledge no allegiance. Especially on here πŸ™‚

  60. tributegirl β€’ May 24, 2009 @ 8:16 PM

    I know, I’m just joking around.

  61. Carol β€’ May 24, 2009 @ 9:02 PM

    I think sometimes you take sides…but who cares…Mandee might…but if you take her side, it pretty much shows your level of intelligence…lol

  62. Nancy β€’ May 24, 2009 @ 9:13 PM

    Demigod, you “take no sides”? Then do you at least agree that Jo-Anne smells just a little bit fishy then? πŸ˜›

  63. demigod β€’ May 24, 2009 @ 9:54 PM

    I’ve read your remarks..some say I’M bad!

  64. Nancy β€’ May 24, 2009 @ 10:15 PM

    I never claimed to be “good”…and you are “bad”…we all know it. πŸ˜›

  65. demigod β€’ May 24, 2009 @ 10:34 PM

    There’s ‘bad’ then there’s ‘nasty’ πŸ™‚

  66. Crystal β€’ May 25, 2009 @ 12:55 AM

    I love this!! I am working midnights and I think i would have fallen asleep over an hour ago if it hadn’t been for the endless supply of banter to keep me giggling!! I honestly couldnt care less about the article I am pretty much here just for a laugh at the comments!! keep up the good work all!

  67. Minerva β€’ May 25, 2009 @ 1:43 AM

    Tributegirl and Carol. I found out that Tom Hanks real initials are FU, so that’s why he signed it that way. If you scroll up you’ll find that my post added a link where you can find out about his initials really being FU. πŸ˜›

  68. Minerva β€’ May 25, 2009 @ 2:11 AM

    Oh I don’t know what all the blogs are about after rechecking them. I can’t find anything on Tom’s bio about his initials being FU. I think I have to agree that the F was just a peculiar way to write a ‘T’ and the U is just a really odd or sloppy ‘H’. Here’s a link to his bio if anybody wants to read up:

  69. mandee β€’ May 25, 2009 @ 4:44 AM

    i sure do love how now IM the one constantly being dragged into insecure womens lame conversations. i dont personally care how he writes his name. is that “intelligent” enough for you carol? cant help but wonder why all of a sudden you show up and seem to have such a hate on for me when i never even referred to you until you started acting so “narrow minded”. anyways, some of us do have other things to do then come online 50 times a day, thats what took me so long to answer you. and yeah, we are TOTALLY “bff” howd you know?

  70. mandee β€’ May 25, 2009 @ 4:47 AM

    wow, i realize how “dumb” that one part of that comment sounded. but its almost 5am, i havent slept yet and im pretty tired. i was merely implying that carol is an insecure woman (perhaps even an insecure man i guess) and that she needs to drag me into things that are irrelevant to make her/himself feel better about his/her life. sorry it came out as me insulting ALL women on this site.

  71. Nancy β€’ May 25, 2009 @ 8:33 AM

    Demigod…I think you must have meant “there’s ‘bad’ then there’s ‘Nancy'” LMAO.

  72. tributegirl β€’ May 25, 2009 @ 3:19 PM

    Minerva, are you serious? Still though, people know him as Tom Hanks, you’d think he’d sign Tom, or TH or something like that.
    mandee, I don’t know, I think Carol sounds very secure to be quite honest with you.

  73. Jo-Anne β€’ May 25, 2009 @ 8:21 PM

    no, you’re just…..pathetic

  74. Nancy β€’ May 25, 2009 @ 8:50 PM

    I love shopping too, mandee. Walmart…LOVE IT!!

  75. mandee β€’ May 26, 2009 @ 1:14 AM

    lol whos pathetic joanne? and yes nancy, walmart and dollarama are my downfalls !!! πŸ™‚ well, and i like to buy my niece stuff lol.

  76. mandee β€’ May 26, 2009 @ 1:28 AM

    oh, and tributegirl (sorry i didnt read your comment til like just now, i somehow missed it?) i was pretty sleepy when i wrote that last post lol. but i still think carol has some major issues considering she doesnt even know me and somehow things she can measure my intelligence by what i post online on a celebrity gossip article. everyone knows that as soon as i think things i type them and i press submit. ive admitted that quite often actually. so, if its such a big deal that i dont constantly reread what ive said, pull out a thesaurus or dictionary and make sure im using the most intelligent words, the most well thought out sentences, then maybe none of you “intelligent” people should bother reading what im saying.

  77. Carol β€’ May 26, 2009 @ 6:20 AM

    lol…Mandee to are too much, really

  78. Jo-Anne β€’ May 26, 2009 @ 7:39 AM

    ha ha mandee, it was tagged onto “your newest fan’s” remark, but it looks to be removed now…

    you really should not apologize for anything here, certainly justifying your intelligence level to Carol…it’s a celebrity website for crying out loud, not an SAT score…get a grip, Carol…

    and you come across just fine, mandee…

  79. tributegirl β€’ May 26, 2009 @ 8:35 AM

    No mandee, all I meant was that only a secure person would say what they think, an insecure person would just try to fade into the background. Carol obviously says what she thinks regardless of what others think, so I would consider her to be very secure.

  80. Jo-Anne β€’ May 26, 2009 @ 9:11 AM

    actually t.g. I beg to differ here…there are many people who “say what they think regardless…” who are in fact, in my opinion, quite insecure…prime “example” on this very site time and time again….

    it’s painfully easy to not “fade into the background” and emerge “tough” when posting on such sites…i.e. Nance…

    classic insecurity…

  81. Nancy β€’ May 26, 2009 @ 10:22 AM

    Hahahaha…like f@ck, fish lips! I’m probably the most “secure” person you would NEVER want to meet. I’d have a blast ramming my fist down your throat! Right in front of your “buddies” too! πŸ˜› LMAO…”insecure”…you’re a joke! For someone who is so “happily married” seems most of your time is spent online causing sh!t…

  82. Nancy β€’ May 26, 2009 @ 10:23 AM

    The only one I could see being “happy” about that is your “BETTER HALF”…LMFAO!

  83. tributegirl β€’ May 26, 2009 @ 11:12 AM

    I don’t know, Jo. I mean, ok, take mandee herself for example. She says exactly what she thinks, and I consider her to be very secure with herself. Well, Carol, and yes, Nancy, you, me, Gina, and several others also say exactly what we think, so those are the people I consider to be secure with themselves.

  84. Nancy β€’ May 26, 2009 @ 11:27 AM

    Well Tributegirl, at the risk of emerging “tough” when posting on a site like this, I HIGHLY doubt Jo-Anne would be so “secure” in a dark alley alone with “Nancycakes”!

  85. Jo-Anne β€’ May 26, 2009 @ 1:54 PM

    t.g. I don’t really agree with your summation, however do not wish to elaborate here.

    However, that being said, Nancy, you just keep advertising your insecurities by posts such as the above….”dark alley”????….”ramming my fist down your throat”…you’ve been wearing your Superman suit again, I see…

    and anyone has to honestly critique why I think your “mom” qualities are lacking????? you are like the worst example ever….

  86. tributegirl β€’ May 26, 2009 @ 2:00 PM

    No problem, Jo, so I guess we will just agree to disagree then, and let it drop?
    Btw, I don’t like to get anything started (but it looks like I’m too late anyway), I thought we had all kind of agreed to not bring each others families into things, and the “mom” comment does kind of bring the family in, doesn’t it?

  87. Jo-Anne β€’ May 26, 2009 @ 2:25 PM

    where were you with the constant “hubby” – etc. etc. comments (insults)?????

  88. mandee β€’ May 26, 2009 @ 2:40 PM

    i agree. complete double standard. i have nothing against the 3 of you at all, but if nancy can drag in joannes husband i dont know why she cant say anything about nancy being a mom. i think that things are getting a bit out of hand, everyone seemed to be being nice until carol had to open her big mouth. also, in that one post i realize i put “thing” instead of “think”. ooops.

  89. Jo-Anne β€’ May 26, 2009 @ 2:49 PM

    nothing has or ever will be “off limits” for your pal Nancy so I simply play by the same (her)”rules”…

    I am consistently disgusted that one who claims to be such a good mom would trash-talk in the same vein as an unrefined corner bully, nor am I in any way ashamed to openly admit my expectations of good moms does not include, (amongst other constant vulgarities)threats of ramming their fists down people’s throats…no justification for this kind of example…

    re double standard, mandee, not only has it been observed all along, my expectations there are nil…thanks anyhow, I can see you are trying and it’s appreciated…

  90. Nancy β€’ May 26, 2009 @ 3:12 PM

    Hahaha…who cares what you think, Jo-Anne? I love my kids, I know it, those around me know it. On the other hand, I despise you…and everyone on here knows it!

    “Where were you with the constant “hubby” – etc. etc. comments (insults)?????

    My my…how soon you forget about all your constant Nancy being single comments? The Nancy wearing a Superman costume and padding the chest area comments? The Nancy’s stale birthday cake comment? The “can’t decide whether to go with the “single is awesome” t-shirt or trucker cap” comment? So yeah….poor f@cking hubby! Ooops, better let my son down off my lap now…too late, he already saw what I wrote…yay! #1 MOM!! πŸ˜› LMFAO! You’re just a jealous b!tch.

  91. Jo-Anne β€’ May 26, 2009 @ 3:22 PM

    why tell me about these previous comments????

    you’re losing it…again…

    my comment was to t.g. who asked about bringing family into it and I questionned where she was when you made your “family” comments…wow, Nance, that was crystal clear….

    no need to remind me what I said and quote every comment I ever made to you (yes, I know you have them ALL memorized) – that’s not the point here, my answer (yes, I’ll state it again) was in response to t.g….

    now, when do your comments start to be better than mine, as you brag earlier???

    p.s. and you certainly don’t have to emphasize your kids witness your vulgarities regularly…that again, was my point…

  92. Nancy β€’ May 26, 2009 @ 3:44 PM

    Awe, you’re so damn worried about my kids Jo-Anne, why don’t you get your “buddies” to do something about it? Hahaha, loser! Just because you’re a bad mom doesn’t mean everyone is. You want to call me a man…I’ll bring your hubby into it! What part don’t YOU understand? Oh, and there’s no need for me to “brag” at all. The proof is in the black and white.

  93. Jo-Anne β€’ May 26, 2009 @ 4:03 PM

    it sure is…mom

  94. Nancy β€’ May 26, 2009 @ 4:29 PM

    What sure is? You being a bad mom? Hahaha.

  95. Jo-Anne β€’ May 26, 2009 @ 4:38 PM

    well, I can always take comfort in the fact when I read any of your posts how reassuring it is I actually went to school…

  96. tributegirl β€’ May 26, 2009 @ 5:58 PM

    Ok, I deserved that, I really didn’t clue in to the hubby comments, or those other ones (Superman costume? I definitely missed that one!). Actually I think the “mom” comment mostly stood out to me because it involves children, which I thought everyone agreed were off limits. I think that was decided after someone (who I dont think was a regular poster here) said something to mandee about her niece.

  97. Carol β€’ May 26, 2009 @ 6:48 PM

    Nancy and Jo-Anne, you guys should do a comedy road show….that would be awesome. I just sit here and LMAO reading about what you have to say to each other.

  98. Jo-Anne β€’ May 26, 2009 @ 7:36 PM

    when Nancy becomes “funny” I’ll consider it…

  99. Nancy β€’ May 26, 2009 @ 7:58 PM

    She’s just jealous (as usual). She knows she is sooooo far BEHIND my league. Besides….she smells like fish! LMFAO πŸ˜›

  100. tributegirl β€’ May 27, 2009 @ 1:42 PM

    Carol, ROFLMAO!!!!! What a great comment!

  101. Nancy β€’ May 27, 2009 @ 2:32 PM

    Sorry Tributegirl, but I must warn you…saying “ROFLMAO” will make you uneducated in Jo-Anne’s eyes. Hey, she might even tell you you’re in “Grade One” or maybe that “garbage” is too nice a word for your comments. What do you think, Jo-Anne? Or, do your “rules” only apply to comments that have the name ‘Nancy’ on them?

    Oh, and I am not trying to “break up” any “relationship” the two of you may have (BAHAHAHA…now THAT is funny!….Not the break up, but the fact that “someone” thinks there is actually a “relationship” there.)

  102. Jo-Anne β€’ May 27, 2009 @ 2:40 PM

    what do I think, Nancy?

    you alone continue to tread weakly in your own pool…cesspool…

  103. Nancy β€’ May 27, 2009 @ 2:56 PM

    Jeeze Jo-Anne, seeing as you are the one who “went to school”, I better get the ever “intelligent” Anon/Gina to help me decipher what you just said…

    Ooops, almost forgot….LMFAO!

    I have a video of Jo-Anne…I’ll let you guys figure out which one she is…just click my name. Who’s “funny” now?

  104. mandee β€’ May 27, 2009 @ 3:33 PM

    ewwwwwwww thats sick ha ha.

  105. Carol β€’ May 27, 2009 @ 5:57 PM

    This is such a riot…you guys are hilarious…tribute should charge for this stuff..hahahahahahahaa

  106. tributegirl β€’ May 27, 2009 @ 7:01 PM

    Don’t give them any idea’s!

  107. Jo-Anne β€’ May 27, 2009 @ 7:09 PM

    “Ooops, almost forgot”¦.LMFAO!”

    Who ya kidding Nance? You never forget this phrase.

    Here’s betting you have a well worn “LMFAO” dog tag pendant strung around your neck 24/7 as you boom box your way down the street in your cammoflauge leggings belting out your Biggie Smalls beats…

  108. tributegirl β€’ May 27, 2009 @ 7:26 PM

    hahaha, Nancy, you sound like one sexy chick!

  109. Nancy β€’ May 27, 2009 @ 7:56 PM

    “Biggie Smalls”?????????????

    Try Metallica!! DUH! And as for the dog tags…you wear those, Jo-Anne! Click my name!

    Oooops…almost forgot…”LMFAO”!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  110. Nancy β€’ May 27, 2009 @ 8:30 PM

    Actually, I do play Nickelback sometimes…and Eminem…Kelly Rowland, etc. Don’t have any Biggie Smalls downloaded though…maybe I’ll check it out. πŸ˜€

  111. Carol β€’ May 27, 2009 @ 8:59 PM

    Will you too kiss and make up…lol, I’m going to wet my pants I’m laughing so hard. It’s kind of like Seinfeld…hilarious but no point

  112. Anon β€’ May 27, 2009 @ 9:04 PM

    What more can one say other than hahaha

    Jo-Anne on May 27, 2009 7:09 PM Hilarious, thanks for the visual! Lol

  113. Nancy β€’ May 28, 2009 @ 8:48 AM

    What’s the matter Jo-Anne? No comment? Oh, maybe you’re just too busy lip synching to your old Milli Vanilli cassette.

  114. Jo-Anne β€’ May 28, 2009 @ 6:38 PM

    how gratifying to see you are STILL cashing in on my lines, and trying to run with it…and failing, miserably…

    how sad to see you STILL can’t grasp I don’t sit on Tribute 24/7 waiting for your responses…as you do mine…

  115. Nancy β€’ May 28, 2009 @ 7:13 PM

    I don’t “sit on Tribute 24/7” either but it is plain to see that unlike you, I can come up with something right away whereas you come on here and see that I’ve made a comment, then you go and try to think up a good comeback line. By the time you come back with something, the novelty has pretty much worn off. So ‘oh wise one’, what lines of yours am I “cashing in on”? And can you make up your mind on what kind of clothes you dream of me wearing? I mean, you said “cammoflauge leggings” (sic) on this article and some kind of neon, skull patterned unitard on another article….so which is it that you see me wearing in your erotic dreams? Hahaha…I need to be sick now after that vision…where’s my Texas mickey? πŸ˜›

    Anyways, just so you know, Miss “claim to have a journalism degree”…it is spelled “camouflage”…good thing you went to school and you’re better than me, huh? LMFAO!

  116. Jo-Anne β€’ May 28, 2009 @ 7:47 PM

    well, if you want to hold on…awhile…I’ll google U.S.W. (Ultimate Skank Wardrobe) yet again and come up with your entire closet…

  117. Nancy β€’ May 28, 2009 @ 9:04 PM

    You don’t have to Google that Jo….just go take inventory in your own closet, you’ll find all you need right there. If you’re missing any articles such as fishnet stockings or crotchless panties, be sure to check the closet of your better half! It works both ways you know….you wear his, he wears yours. I didn’t know the sleazy motels you frequent even had internet access…

  118. mandee β€’ May 28, 2009 @ 10:43 PM

    hahahahaha you guys are pretty funny these days. i wonder where you both come up with some of this stuff? thanks for brightening my day ladies πŸ™‚

  119. Jo-Anne β€’ May 29, 2009 @ 7:42 AM

    well Nance, you got me there (not literally, big huge shudder) my knowledge of both cross-dressing and sleazy motels is, what can I say, nil…

    Perhaps, seeing as you like to showcase your knowledge on here, you can enlighten me as to the latest list, “Nancy’s Guide to the Sleaziest Motels I’ve Visited and Forgot to Take Home my Garters/Hard Hat”….but for the sake of timeliness (as you well know and constantly whine about, I only have so much time to spend on you), try to shorten the list to say…300 pages?????

  120. Nancy β€’ May 29, 2009 @ 8:56 AM

    Your “knowledge of both cross-dressing and sleazy motels is, what can I say, nil…”

    Yeah…I guess it would be hard to see things when your always on your back!

    As for me liking to “showcase” my knowledge on here…you, Anon/Gina and demigod claim that I have no knowledge…that you are the educated, intelligent ones. πŸ˜‰

  121. Jo-Anne β€’ May 29, 2009 @ 1:37 PM

    you’re…not your…

  122. Nancy β€’ May 29, 2009 @ 4:07 PM

    Actually, if you really want to get technical about it, your comment should be:

    You’re…not “your”…

    What a joke you are. Hey, check out May 26 Mel Gibson article.

  123. Nancy β€’ May 29, 2009 @ 4:11 PM

    Oh here, I’ll change my comment to accomodate your expert editing:

    YOU’RE “knowledge of both cross-dressing and sleazy motels is, what can I say, nil…”

    Yeah, I guess it would be hard to see things when YOU’RE always on YOU’RE back! πŸ˜€

  124. mandee β€’ May 29, 2009 @ 8:40 PM

    no nancy, the FIRST your was right the first time lol. you 2 are so creative and imaginative, how come you dont write books?

  125. Nancy β€’ May 29, 2009 @ 8:50 PM

    Hahaha, I know the first and third one’s were correct, mandee…I’m just bugging her because she’s being “picky”….well, I can be picky too because she didn’t specify WHICH “your” should have been “you’re”, LOL. It’s that yummy medicine again, you know. πŸ˜›

  126. Nancy β€’ May 29, 2009 @ 8:53 PM

    Oh, and according to Jo-Anne, I have a book titled ‘The Nancy Chronicles’. Now, if she would just bring it to me, I could sign it in person for her with a BIG………”F U”.

  127. mandee β€’ May 29, 2009 @ 11:07 PM

    i didnt even check the other “you’re”s lol. i only glanced at your comment and was like huh that first one is right and then didnt bother to check it all. they had fireworks by my house tonight in the pouring rain. me and my sister and niece walked over, we were soaked lol. it was a fun time though πŸ™‚

  128. moondog β€’ May 30, 2009 @ 12:58 PM


  129. mandee β€’ May 30, 2009 @ 1:55 PM

    i wasnt telling YOU, i was telling mainly anon, nancy, joanne and tributegirl. they all tell us stuff they do, so i was sharing.

  130. Carol β€’ May 30, 2009 @ 2:55 PM

    Ok, Mandee, you think I was mean, who the f… is this moondog?
    He’s kind of funny, but not sure what his game is. I commented on another article, saying I think I love you, but the more I read the more I realize you are one harsh dude. who sh*t in your cornflakes?

  131. moondog β€’ May 30, 2009 @ 3:59 PM

    i dont care if u werent tellin ME, U r puttin ur stoopidness on a public site, dont like what i have 2 say tuff shit

  132. mandee β€’ May 30, 2009 @ 4:41 PM

    i have no idea, moondog is pretty rude though dont you think? once again moondog, i cant understand your nonsense, learn to use english spelling and maybe then we can talk.

  133. moondog β€’ May 31, 2009 @ 5:50 PM

    u cant understand? big shock

Join The Conversation:

Similar Articles

Tom Hanks delivers his best in News of the World – film review

December 30, 2020 | 7 Comments

Based on the 2016 novel of the same name, News of the World starring Tom Hanks is a classic Western film that’s got an emotional arc enough to satisfy viewers.

Tom Hanks returns to Australia after COVID-19 diagnosis

September 9, 2020 | 1 Comment

Tom Hanks has returned to Australia following his COVID-19 diagnosis earlier this year. Despite already having had the virus, he must quarantine for 14 days.

What’s new on Streaming and VOD this week through July 11

July 10, 2020 | 2 Comments

There are a number of new movies and shows releasing on streaming platforms this week, including Apple TV+ and Netflix. Check them out and watch the trailers!

ο»Ώ Change Location