Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban - User Reviews
Thank you for rating this movie!
Read your review below. Ratings will be added after 24 hours.
Please rate movie 1 to 5 stars
June 20, 2004
The best of the series so far.
June 20, 2004
I think it was amazing. Daniel, rupert and Emma really play their parts good. Emma Waston was really hot in the third film. If she is in the fourth film I will be the first to see it.
June 20, 2004
It was awesome but i would have liked more quidditch!
June 20, 2004
So good!3rd time the charm deffinatly. The kids have grown up and Daniel Radcliffe has just gotten Hotter! The ither characters however, could have been abit different.But an Awesome Summer Movie None The Less!
June 19, 2004
Highly entertaining, Rupert Grint is hilarious and should condsider a career in being a comedian. For the HP Book fans they will be surprised that so many parts were erased and moved. It`s like a new book, a second version. For people who don`t read the book they will be in a ride sure to ruffle their hair. It will be dark and it will be BLOODY BRILLIANT.
June 19, 2004
This was so far the funniest installment compared to the first two Harry Potter films. It`s amazing to me how grown up Harry, Hermione, and Ron are, particularily Draco. If you want a good laugh, be sure to watch the Prisoner of Azkaban.
June 19, 2004
Great movie worth the money I paid to watch it
June 19, 2004
I loved it! It was absolutely amazing!
June 19, 2004
My favourite part is when Harry and Hermione go back into time and how it all fits together.. I do with that they would have stuck to the book and they changed the scenery. Bring back Chris Columbus. He did a way better job. U didnt see the hatred from Harry knowing that Sirius killed his parents. And we didnt see any fighting between Ron and Hermione. In the book she was so depressed. What about the slashing of the curtains and the knife? For the 4th one KEEP IT TO THE BOOK!
June 19, 2004
I thought that this Harry Potter movie was the best one so far. I liked the part when Hermoine pushed Malfoy. Gee, I would like to do that some day in a movie! By
June 19, 2004
IT WAS THE BESSTTT!!! Omg I loved it and I forgive the new director for leaving out some parts from the book. P.S Daniel Radcliffe is HOOTTT!!!!
June 19, 2004
Harry Potter was an ok movie in my opinion. The first two movies were better. I read the book and they left out alot of important information. Other than that, it is a great movie for the younger children!
June 19, 2004
booo it sucked
June 19, 2004
its awesome but it did miss a few parts that i would`ve liked to see in the movie and it was little to quick for changing scenes.
June 19, 2004
it sucked like hell
June 19, 2004
I was very disapointed with the directing of this film. I have read all the books more times than I can remember, and the movie was just no comparison to the books whatsoever. Dumbledore`s character made him seem like he has had a dose of speed or something. All in all, I guess I will continue viewing the movies, as I am a huge Harry Potter fan. Signed, Disapointed
June 19, 2004
I LOVED IT!
June 19, 2004
Harry Potter 3 was an ok movie. Iwas really excited before i went to see it but then i was very disappointed. They missed many parts out of the book. eg. When Ron sees Sirius hovering over him with a knife in the night, who the marauder map creators are, he gets the broom for christmas and magonagall takes it away, Ron and Hermoine fight way more, No one knows why Sirius "betrayed" harry`s parents, and no one knows where crookshanks comes from. This is just to name a few mistakes. I hope that Chris Columbus can patch things up for the next movie because #3 was definitely the worst!!
June 19, 2004
OMG!! they left out soo many fun parts of the book? this movie was... horrible.. i lovveee the 1st and 2nd!! i feel so embarassed for the director!! i hope the old one comes back! they didn`t even end it properly!! since when does harry get the firebolt at the end of the movie?? and doesn`t mcgonagal check it for half the year?? where`s ron`s new owl? if i hadn`t read the book i would`ve been soooo confused! i`m so dissapointed, as i expect many others are. I don`t care if you couldn`t fit it all into one movie!! then make two if you have to! arg! okay i`m finished ranting... although i`m still very dissapointed! Yui
June 18, 2004
i love it i love it i love it
June 18, 2004
They shouldn`t have changed the book at all. Although the series of books grows constantly darker the rather sharp change from Columbus` slow transformation to darker scenes to Cuaron`s immediate jump takes away from the movie. Not the best so far. Hopefully it gets better. The idea of putting the three leads in more `muggle" clothing took away from the whole idea of wizard life which draws so many fans to this mystery world.
June 18, 2004
Harry Potter rocked!! I loved it(also because Deniel Radcliffe is so hott)!! Ypu miss a lot from the book.... the good parts... but compared to the other movies this one is the best so far!! You miss a the good parts in the book but i was great!! I love to read and see all the Harry Potter movies so keep on making them succesful!! Deniel Rad cliffe, your so cute... keep it that way!!
June 18, 2004
Harry Potter is the best ever!!!!!!!!!!! It is the ruler of all movies and all other things out there!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
June 18, 2004
Harry Potter rocked!! I loved it(also because Deniel Radcliffe is so hott)!! Ypu miss a lot from the book.... the good parts... but compared to the other movies this one is the best so far!! You miss a the good parts in the book but i was great!! I love to read and see all the Harry Potter movies so keep on making them succesful!! Deniel Rad cliffe, your so cute... keep it that way!!
June 18, 2004
i thought it was pretty good...but there are somethings that you left out...i know that you could fit everything in the movie cuz i would be 4 hours long but oh well it was still good...it was much more dark then the other two movies.
June 18, 2004
i love it
June 18, 2004
It the best harry Potter movie made so far
June 18, 2004
Harry Potter is AWSOME!!! I started out thinking that the movies couln`t get any better but The Prisoner of Azkaban changed my mind!!! You can really tell the actors have grown up (and grown HOT LOL) And because i don`t really want to write too much...i think i just have to say THANK the lord that these movies are AWSOME lol
June 18, 2004
Yikes. Quidditch really sucked, Dementors could have been better (i.e. NOT ABLE TO FLY), though the casting was good for some characters (Sirius, Remus, even Trelawney at a stretch). Though I can`t ignore that they left out Harry`s first ever Quidditch Cup! Um, the whole muggle-clothing thing was just wierd, and Malfoy was actually a bit exceedingly useless and whiney in this one. A decent movie, a terrible movie-based-on-a-book. I`ll be generous and call it a three-star movie.
June 17, 2004
This movie was good, acting was excellent, you can really tell that Emma, Daniel and Rupert are comfortable with their characters. But it was dissapionting when we went straight from Hermione storming out of the classroom to Trelawneys prediction. They missed out like 15 pages! Another thing that dissapionted me was the ending, my parents and sisters hadn`t read the book so I had to explain everything they left out on the journey home!
June 16, 2004
I think that this movie was the best of the three. There were a few parts left out that I would liked to have seen explained like the identities of the mauraders and exactly how Peter betrayed the Potters, but, lets face it... not every thing mentionned in the book could fit in a 2 and a 1/2 hour movie. Every thing else was pretty much as I`d imagined it while reading the books. I think they did a fantastic job with making this movie.
June 16, 2004
Let`s just say, the best Potter yet
June 16, 2004
....I LOVED THE MOVIE! MALFOY IS GEAR!
June 16, 2004
GET THE OLD DIRECTOR BACK!!...movie was good!! but distroyed the book!!!...keep to the text!!...many important stuff was just deleted and that wasnt good!...and many events where changed...hope you will keep to what happenes in the book next book!
June 16, 2004
It S U C KED it didn`t give you emotion like the betrayal of the potters by peter and you didn`t mention the names Moony wormtail padfoot and prongs ring any bells did the people even read the books Wat were they thinking puting them in average clothes it ruins the affect of far away most people want to stay at the movies but i wanted to leave!!!!!!*~*~*~Bring the former diretor back He was awesome and for the new one ADD QUIDITCH you left out the final part and what about the classes worry about the main and not the special effects oo and for your information DEMENTORS DON`T FLY!!!!!read the next book thousands of times acting was good thoug
June 16, 2004
I thought this Harry Potter was the best one made so far. The only disappointment is that the new director changed so much of the scenary everyone just got used to and that he left out many important things that were in the book. The book was better then the movie. The next book is even better so I can`t wait for the next movie and I just hope he doesn`t leave that much stuff out again.
June 16, 2004
Get the old director back please...this movie was not as good as the books. They cut out very key points in the movie...did the director not read the book or what.... Then again i shouldnt be surprised the movie would have been like 5 hours long if they didnt cut out stuff...but where was quidich...BTW the firebolt was given to harry around the middle of the movie NOT the end!!!!!!!!!! :( This director changed the order of events and ruined the film...im sorry but its true...in spite of all this i will go see the next one...but im still very angry at the new director. #1 harry potter fan, Alex ( i really am the number one fan you should see m
June 16, 2004
The movie was fantastic!!! They had to shave some parts out but I understand. Despite the location changes VERY well done.
June 15, 2004
The part I like the best was when the two kids went back in time and rescued Sirius Black and Buckbeak and then rescued Harry and his god father. I also liked the part that Harry banished the Dementors from the forrest as they were attacting Harry and Sirius Black. It was however one of the best Harry Potter movies that I have seen at all. The other two parts I thought were actually quite neat were when Hermione Granger hit Melfoi against the rock and when she was on BuckBeak.
June 15, 2004
I LOVED IT. thats it.
June 15, 2004
You should not of changed wardrobe and where it took place the dark forest was too bright and cheerful.Professeur Lupin if you read the book was shabby and hade long hair. Im not trying to be a critic but i am being one. Big Harry potter fan Jaqueline Grant
June 15, 2004
BEST MOVIE EVER
June 15, 2004
I thought it was a pretty good movie. They left out a lot of detail, but I understand why. It would have been at least three hours if they didn`t, which wouldn`t really bother me haha. Anywho, it really was a mad awesome movie, and I do wish they would bring out the rest of them.
June 14, 2004
umm good movie ,, just that they were older and more mature
June 14, 2004
I was a little disappointed by the way the director dropped key parts of the story such as the background info on the Marauders. The way it`s done we have no idea how Pettigrew betrayed the Potters, it`s as if he merely sold them out. We don`t realize how deep his betrayal really is. I liked that it was so dark though, it kept me on the edge of my seat but the only moment when I felt the Hogwarts atmosphere was during a scene in the dorms that wasn`t even in the books.
June 14, 2004
I thought that Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban was the best movie out of all om them!
June 14, 2004
It was good, but not as good as the other two.
June 14, 2004
This movie was ok. The book was better, and the new director didnt quite live up to the harry potter expectations of everyone. i think it was a little too overdone.
June 13, 2004
i love it! this director is way better the columbus..cant wait for the 4th!
June 13, 2004
It looked like the new director didn`t read the book!!! There were sooo many things missed.... and not just little details. I also didn`t like how Hagrid`s hut was like, in the rockies!! come on!! why did this movie have to be so different than the other two??? And the ending made no sense!!!! the whole Quidditch Cup thing wasn`t there and I was looking forward to that :( Although I have to say that Peter Pettigrew was done very well.