Quantum of Solace - User Reviews

Thank you for rating this movie!

Quantum of Solace Movie Poster

2.95 / 5

User Rating User rating: 2.95

Based on 9489 votes and 252 reviews


  • User rating: 2.95 25.11%
  • User rating: 2.95 17.39%
  • User rating: 2.95 17.13%
  • User rating: 2.95 8.14%
  • User rating: 2.95 32.23%



Please rate movie 1 to 5 stars






Type the code:


 

Showing 151 to 200 of 252

User review rating: 0 November 20, 2008

Quantum of Solace is a film about revenge, and as far as revenge movies go its right there on top! No other Bond movie ever truly exploited this dynamic as this one has, its raw, edgy and immersive! 5 stars.

User review rating: 0 November 20, 2008

This is the worst Bond film ever!!! Do not even bother going to see it and don't even rent it when it comes out, you will not miss anything. Action scenes in the film make you sick as they do not show anything other then close-ups. Just terrible, I hope the director never gets work again!!!!

User review rating: 0 November 19, 2008

It's like they filmed this movie with no script and used some amateur drama director. Go back and watch Casino Royale and don't mess with something that worked, I want my money back.

User review rating: 0 November 19, 2008

I didn't think the movie had much of a continuation from Casino, the fight scenes were too close, much like the Bourne series. Overall I thought the movie was fairly decent, almost need to see it again to fully pickup all the names and info thrown at you. It wasn't the best, but it was far from the worst, still a good movie to see in the theatre.

User review rating: 0 November 19, 2008

"Not bad...but missing something that I can't quite put my finger on...female characters were beautiful but a bit weak in their script. Hopefully the next one is better"

User review rating: 0 November 19, 2008

Just like any other action movie out there. There was not much that said this was a Bond film.

User review rating: 0 November 19, 2008

well done, only thing that was wrong was that bond didnt sleep with enough girls, in previous films he was more intamte, other than that, EXCELLENT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 5 stars

User review rating: 0 November 19, 2008

where was the espionage?? Bond is a spy! not Rambo! and what is up with the bad guy? He looks like a geek who got picked on in high school and wants to get revenge. yech, what a horrible film.

User review rating: 0 November 19, 2008

The worst bond movie ever, period! This movie has no substance, and no storyline. You will leave the theatre feeling empty and disappointed. The only thing it has going for it is the superb acting that is always present in Bond movies. This movie felt more like a XXX film starring Daniel Craig instead of Vin Diesel. I feel sorry for Daniel that he has this mark on his career now. The movie moves along at such a fast pace that it feels incoherent, and confusing. It misses all the elements that make a great bond film. Where were the slick cars, the gadgets, the locales? As i said before, worst bond film ever! If you are a big bond fan, and really must see the movie, then I suggest y

User review rating: 0 November 19, 2008

awesome

User review rating: 0 November 19, 2008

whoever the James Bond would be good depends on the Director of the movie. Previous JB movies are lot better in terms of high technology and stunts. This one and the one before this seems like that the producer of these last two JB movies did not want to spend good amount of money for such. It should be showing more high tech stuffs but nothing. Invest more on High tech...what a shame!

User review rating: 0 November 18, 2008

Actually, impressive and stunning action scenes, but agonizingly difficult plot to follow. I had to come home and read on the internet about what exactly the story was about. It's confusing to the point where by mid-point of the movie, one is constantly checking the watch to find out when the movie will end.

User review rating: 0 November 18, 2008

Strike 2 for Craig, another bad bond film. Why are people's standard for bond become so low?

User review rating: 0 November 18, 2008

Casino Royale was much better since it showed the evolution of Bond. This movie is pure testosterone action.

User review rating: 0 November 18, 2008

firstt one is better....definitely more action in this one....but i didn't come away with the same feeling as the first one

User review rating: 0 November 18, 2008

Very disappointed........this movie is an insult to all precious 007 movious.. the best I would give this production is a 2 star.

User review rating: 0 November 18, 2008

Just an awful story. Confused and Muddled. I really disliked this movie.

User review rating: 0 November 18, 2008

I am the #1 Bond fan. Always have been, always will be. This movie made me feel so sad. Such dissapointment, I still cannot believe that after awaiting this film for over a year it was so horrible. The director should and the screen writers should be ashamed of this project!

User review rating: 0 November 18, 2008

i agree with all above viewers. very bad. not worth a star. craig is not bad, but director, screenplay very poor. no scenery, only action, action , motion but no brain.

User review rating: 0 November 18, 2008

I thought the movie was pretty good being that it is a 007 movie and I found the action was more exciting but short. I just prefer Casino Royale more than this movie.

User review rating: 0 November 18, 2008

The story is terrible, but Daniel Craig is very good as usual.

User review rating: 0 November 17, 2008

Amazing, preaty good

User review rating: 0 November 17, 2008

this movie is a shame.I feel ashemed, after watching this one, that i am a great J. Bond fun. This is digrase for all Bonds movies.

User review rating: 0 November 17, 2008

how someone can rate this movie 5 star. Where are beatiful places like the other J. Bond movies. Movie leaves you empty and dissatisfied. it is made in some dirthy places, lost's of dust, and sand. Not worth a penny.

User review rating: 0 November 17, 2008

not like other james movies. not even deserved 2 stars

User review rating: 0 November 17, 2008

Daniel craig you have done it again beause you kick ass. THe girls were SMOKIN HOT!

User review rating: 0 November 17, 2008

I like Bond and Craig but this was a weak movie, and not a very good continuation of the previous.. Disconnected, albeit w/some dark humour. Fights scenes are too tight, doesn’t push out to provide context, without much continuity, looks like someone fighting with the cameraman. Olga has a decent part but just revenge motivated like most other Bond girls. Gemma has really no purpose in the movie and only a few lines. 2.../m

User review rating: 0 November 17, 2008

The worst Bond film ever.

User review rating: 0 November 17, 2008

Help, where is ian Flemming when you need him? I've read every negitive comentary below and have little to add. A better script with a director who can step back and look at what we see for the first time on the screen would be helpfull. If this series is too continue it will need to move towards IAN's original Bond and soon.

User review rating: 0 November 17, 2008

Liked it but shorter than expected but as well you have to understand that its a cotinuation from casino royale

User review rating: 0 November 17, 2008

Awsome

User review rating: 0 November 17, 2008

Great Movie !! 2nd Best Bond film in the past 3 years.

User review rating: 0 November 17, 2008

Awesome movie. Daniel Craig is the best thing that ever happened to the Bond films. To the people who think that bond movie has toomuch action and no suave should actually read the Ian Flemming Books because this is the way Bond is supposed to be!!

User review rating: 0 November 17, 2008

very bad. one of the worse, james bond movies ever. Were is the excellent camera man from the "casino royal"

User review rating: 0 November 17, 2008

Not being a big James Bond fan, I found myself with passes to see this screening. It was a good action movie, but not much beyond that. There wasn't as many cool, innovative gadgets as I was hoping for, and the story line was confusing to those who haven't seen prior James Bond movies.

User review rating: 0 November 17, 2008

Let/s not forget that this is the continuation of "Bond Begins" He will not be suave yet. But this film does feel like Casino Royale part 2. The story was pretty cool but I think they could have elborated on it.

User review rating: 0 November 17, 2008

Very very gritty. Not the me most involved story but entertaining. This film is like part 2 of Casino Royale.

User review rating: 0 November 17, 2008

Very very Gritty and different then any other Bond film.

User review rating: 0 November 17, 2008

This franchise has really been reinvented for the better and I enjoyed this even more than Casino Royale. It was the perfect conclusion to this story. I hope they continue on these lines keeping the action raw, powerful and real. I'm so happy they didn't ruin it with fancy CGI like most other movies these day. I was sceptical of Daniel Graig back in 2006 but I can now see he is the best, most physical bond ever! Well done.

User review rating: 0 November 17, 2008

Great Movie, Daniel Craig delivers bond. If anyone rates this low, what the hell kind of movies you enjoy?

User review rating: 0 November 16, 2008

Casino Royalle was considered outstanding due to Craig's (and Greene's) performances and because there was a story. There was not the over emphasis on pyrotechnics and the card game battle was spectacular. In the present movie they have dropped what made Casino Royalle so good. Weak story line (just a relentless effort to get the bad guys) and non stop intense action, explosions, and crashes. Not a shred of humor or charm.

User review rating: 0 November 16, 2008

Loved it, Look forward to the next one. Only complaint is the very tight fight scenes

User review rating: 0 November 16, 2008

This has to be one of the best bond movies ever. I was on the edge of my seat the whole time what a wild ride. There was highs and the were lows.All in all what a fantastic movie.

User review rating: 0 November 16, 2008

nOT MUCH OF A STORY......TOO MUCH BROKEN GLASS AND NOISE. TWO STAR RATING AT BEST.

User review rating: 0 November 16, 2008

This Bond movie is as worst or moreso than On Her Majesty Secret Service. Bond has been presented as a muscle with no brains, sauve or charm. Someone appears to have done what CocaCola did played with the formula. Go back to the Bond formula. Someone copied from the Bourne franchise and came up with an 'F' grade. Don't go see it..rent the dvd(don't even buy it).

User review rating: 0 November 16, 2008

shorter than expected. The action sequences were entered very well. Very weak storyline.

User review rating: 0 November 16, 2008

i really liked it, i love daniel craig as 007...but its true..there wasnt much of a story but whatever, he was hot as usual!

User review rating: 0 November 16, 2008

This was without a doubt the worst Bond film I have ever seen - and that includes the original Casino Royale - at least that one had some humour. The only plot line I could make any sense of was the girls retribution for her families murder, the rest of it made no sense. The action sequenses were completely unfathomable. What a load of tripe!

User review rating: 0 November 16, 2008

its a very good movie!!! just not as good as casino royale...the only problem with this movie is that the action scenes get cut too fast and way too many times...other than that its a very fun movie to watch...definitely worth the money to see in theaters

User review rating: 0 November 16, 2008

Great action...very cool opening car chase scene. Daniel Craig is certainly my favourite Bond!

Change Location
* required!
* required!
Type the code: