Chris Brown releases statement, seeks treatment

Chris BrownChris Brown, who’s being investigated for an assault on his girlfriend, singer Rihanna, has hired a public relations company that specializes in crisis management to issue the following statement: “Words cannot begin to express how sorry and saddened I am over what transpired. I am seeking the counseling of my pastor, my mother and other loved ones and I am committed, with God’s help, to emerging a better person. Much of what has been speculated or reported on blogs and/or reported in the media is wrong. While I would like to be able to talk about this more, until the legal issues are resolved, this is all I can say except that I have not written any messages or made any posts to Facebook, on blogs or any place else. Those posts or writings under my name are frauds.” Brown is currently free on $50,000 bail.

Share this article:

Comments & Discussion

  1. Khristopher • February 17, 2009 @ 6:38 PM

    Hahaha. God’s help? Hahaha! You need help that “god” is not going to be able to give you. Professional treatment is what you need. What a loser.

  2. Rekha • February 17, 2009 @ 6:42 PM

    It’s interesting at times when jerks like these are caught out they seek god’s help as well as loved ones….my husband packed boxes of my personal stuff, left a note on the table, emptied the bank account, removed things from the home and told me he did it all on the same advice….jerks should be locked up for life….no forgiveness at all.

  3. demigod • February 18, 2009 @ 5:01 AM

    This punk is religious and has a pastor? Yea, I’m sure he has him on his quick dial. I wonder when was the last time he stepped inside a church.
    The day after the beating, he stated he’ll show everyone her true colors, and changed his status to ‘single’ on facebook. Real remorseful.
    Just let the PR people speak for you to smooth over your big pile.

  4. demigod • February 18, 2009 @ 5:30 AM

    oops, my bad if those fake blogs were true.

  5. Pinprick • February 18, 2009 @ 11:08 AM

    I saw this posted on a news site:

    “It has also been revealed Rihanna had been working on a song about killing a cheating partner when she was allegedly attacked by Chris.

    The 20-year-old pop beauty had teamed up with rapper Akon on the track ‘Emergency Room’, in which she fantasizes about exacting revenge on an unfaithful boyfriend by hospitalizing him and then removing his drip.

    Rihanna sings: “I’m going to leave your heart broken on the floor/ You’re gonna be in the emergency room/ I’m standing by your bed/ And so tempted to pull out your IV.

    “Tryin’ to call a nurse but nobody can help you now/ Let me see you try to live without me/ Now where’s your heartbeat?/ Flatline on the ECG.” ”

    So, what kind of person would write a song like that??

    And, whoever at Tribute is putting together the polls, the “All of the Above” option makes NO SENSE.

  6. Nancy • February 18, 2009 @ 11:33 AM

    People have written songs about worse. And OMG! What about movies…who comes up with the ideas for some of those? Jeeze, take Friday The 13th for instance…”what kind of a person” would write something like that? What kind of a person would write a script for a movie called ‘SAW’?

    I feel that you brought up this song as an excuse to why Chris attacked Rihanna..??

  7. Nancy • February 18, 2009 @ 11:42 AM

    Oh, and as for the Tribute Poll…ALL OF THE ABOVE means 7 years in prison + community service + pay a fine + apologize…not that hard to understand at all!! 😉

  8. Jo-Anne • February 18, 2009 @ 2:31 PM

    Actually Nancy, re the Tribute Poll, the “all of the above” is really NOT making sense…

    they say community service “ONLY” or “JUST” pay a fine or an apology “SHOULD DO” those words seemingly implying (clearly, to me anyhow) that ONE single option…not all of the above…

    anyhow, the referal by Brown to “pastor” and “God” assisting him, obviously trying very hard to show his religious links, I find hard to stomach. Get your anger in check and learn to walk away before expecting Divine Intervention to come down from above and save your image…Amen to that

  9. mandee • February 18, 2009 @ 3:07 PM

    well, im thinking given this part of the article : chris brown “has hired a public relations company that specializes in crisis management to issue the following statement” that he didnt even WRITE it himself. i dont believe anyone that has let god into their life can be abusive. i believe in god, but where was he the night this happened? if god is going to help him change, why didnt he help him change the second he had the thoughts about hurting rhianna? i do not believe that he is a religious person, i think thats just the public relations company trying to make people think it cant be as bad as it really is. (this situation i mean). im very surprised that in this post demigod seemed to be AGAINST what chris did to rhianna, every other post i saw seemed to prove otherwise. i can see where some people could be confused by the all of the above in the poll, but i dont understand why. sure i see what youre saying jo, but also i see where nancy is coming from. they just worded it strange thats all.

  10. Pinprick • February 18, 2009 @ 3:29 PM

    Thank you Jo-Anne for agreeing with me on the way the poll is worded. I know that it is fairly easy to understand what the intention of “all of the above” is, but that isn’t the point. The fact is it is incorrect, and for any legitimate source to be taken seriously, anything written must be logical and have correct spelling and grammar. (I know its only a gossip site, but that doesn’t matter).

  11. tributegirl • February 18, 2009 @ 4:52 PM

    I see what is being said about the poll, yes it is worded incorrectly, but anyone with half a brain can figure it out easily, so I don’t see what all the fuss is about. mandee, I believe in God as well, but I also believe God has given us free will, so I don’t think he would change Chris’s mind about what he was going to do. But I do believe that he will dole out whatever punishment he feels Chris deserves.
    btw, I haven’t seen you on here much lately, girl, where ya been?

  12. Jo-Anne • February 18, 2009 @ 5:13 PM

    well, actually, I didn’t see any fuss at all t.g., pinprick disagreed with the wording, nancy agreed with it, and I didn’t. no fuss.

    and errors, one should feel free to move on or point them out…choices. Lately, many on here have been pointing out, (rather rudely at times) spelling errors, which obviously happens time to time. To each his own.

  13. Nancy • February 18, 2009 @ 5:20 PM

    Yeah Jo, I can read the wording in the poll! This ‘Pinprick’ person said “the ‘all of the above’ option makes NO SENSE”…..but, it does make sense, just worded a little differently than some of us would have done. Man, some people sure are picky little nuts!

  14. tributegirl • February 18, 2009 @ 5:49 PM

    There were 6 comments before mine about the poll being worded incorrectly, so yes, I would consider that making a fuss. And I am aware that people can move on or point out all the little errors, “choices”, MY choice was to post my comment above exactly as I did. Is there a problem with that?
    You got that right, Nancy!

  15. mandee • February 18, 2009 @ 6:02 PM

    yeah i went away to peterborough to stay with a friend for 5 days…needed a little vacation from all the stress of my family lol. 🙂 and also, some of these articles i dont really have much to say to, now that i am back i mean, and what i DO want to say, has already been said. so lol thats partly why 🙂 hope all is well with everyone !!

  16. tributegirl • February 18, 2009 @ 6:25 PM

    Oh, cool, I hope you had a good time, and are all relaxed! I know what you are saying about the articles, sometimes there’s just nothing I want to say.

  17. mandee • February 18, 2009 @ 7:14 PM

    i did but im thinking me and the girl i went to see arent going to be friends for too much longer because i picked on this girl ive know 11 years and shes known for a while, and the girl i was picking on called the cops lol so me and amanda *the girl i went to see* had a fight about it and things are a little off right now. we only just became friends in january lol. but it was great to get away from having to drive everyone everywhere and work and all that. but its also good to be home 🙂

  18. Jo-Anne. • February 18, 2009 @ 7:20 PM

    yeah, the problem was your petty “anyone with half a brain” – unnecessary, for sure. You know it could be worded so much nicer than this….but it never ends with you, who are you kidding, there’s ALWAYS something you want to say after I’ve posted…

    by the way, you are most welcome, pinprick,

  19. tributegirl • February 18, 2009 @ 9:29 PM

    Aaaaaannnnddddd…..SHE’S BACK! I knew the peace wouldn’t last long.
    “Anyone with half a brain” is no worse than you telling someone that time to “take a chill pill”.
    As YOU pointed out above, it’s all about choices, and I choose to make the comment I made, so why don’t you leave it at that? I didn’t say anyone had half a brain (although your comments sure do make it sound like you’d be lucky to have half of one), I just said something that is very common to say.

    ” theres ALWAYS something you want to say after Ive posted”, yeah, right, I wasn’t even talking to you before, and you started with me, so I guess it’s you always needing to say something to me. Why don’t you, just for once, give it a rest?

  20. Jim • February 18, 2009 @ 10:04 PM

    I would never come to anyone’s aid on anything on here but tributegirl needs to go back and read her post. You did say “I see what is being said about the poll, yes it is worded incorrectly, but anyone with half a brain can figure it out easily, so I dont see what all the fuss is about.” That was copied and pasted from your post. I don’t know who that was to or about, and I don’t really care but you seem to be defensive all of the time about a certain someone. Who says she was talking about you?

  21. tributegirl • February 18, 2009 @ 10:16 PM

    Umm, because she WAS talking to me, Jim.
    And what I had said (that you copied and pasted) wasn’t directed to her or to anyone, it was just a very simple, plain comment, and she instantly goes after me for it. There was nothing wrong with what I said. I didn’t see what all the fuss was about, yes, anyone with half a brain would be able to figure it out, what’s wrong with that comment? It was my opinion, and I choose to post it.
    Things had been nice and peaceful for a very short time, and now out of the blue she starts in on me again, (been happening for a very loooong time now) so yes, naturally I would be defensive.

  22. Jim • February 18, 2009 @ 10:29 PM

    You just don’t get it do you tributegirl? Good luck in your wasted arguments. Thankfully for you, friends will come to your aid on here to prove why your views are better and “right.” You will all rally around each other no matter what is being said to prove your opinions matter and are the correct ones. While doing this you will constantly pick one person and turn it around to make it look like they always start stuff. I have been reading this for awhile and find it very amusing.
    As for the poll, I do agree with Nancy and tributegirl. I, personally didn’t see any wording discrepency.

  23. Nancy • February 19, 2009 @ 12:59 AM

    Hahaha Jim! “You will all rally around each other no matter what is being said to prove your opinions matter and are the correct ones. While doing this you will constantly pick one person and turn it around to make it look like they always start stuff.”….where the hell have you been Jim? You said you have been reading this for awhile…obviously you don’t read too well because ‘most’ times it is Jo-Anne who starts stuff and blames it on me and ‘most times’ I point it out to everyone! Oh, and there is no “correct” opinion…to each their own, I could really care less who agrees or disagrees with me. I know one thing though, I have used the phrase “anyone with half a brain” before and when I read Tributegirls post it did not seem aimed at anyone.

  24. mandee • February 19, 2009 @ 1:00 AM

    ok, well since im gonna DEFEND her anyways, might as well start now…i can see why SOME of you would find offense to what tribute was saying (im not directly pointing this at anyone really) but, she was not specifically talking about any single person. i dont see why everyone needs to make it such a big deal. its almost like the whole miley slanting her eyes situation. everyone blows everything all out of proportion and i dont see any reason for it. if jo had said the same exact sentence, do you think anyone would have taken offense? (im not starting a fight with you jo, im just pointing out) anyways, i dont see whats wrong with saying anyone with half a brain would understand what they meant, especially since everyone on this article has made it perfectly clear they understand what it meant, but that it was worded wrong.

  25. Jo-Anne. • February 19, 2009 @ 8:21 AM

    thanks Jim, you get it…

  26. Nancy • February 19, 2009 @ 10:08 AM

    Actually no, he doesn’t “get it”…and you know the truth Jo-Anne. Just because I apologized to you for accusing you of being the one using multiple names on here when it was actually ‘Gina’ doesn’t mean that all is forgotten. I don’t kiss @$$…remember that.

  27. tributegirl • February 19, 2009 @ 3:15 PM

    So Jim, where was I trying to prove that my views are better and right? Hmmmm, I don’t see that anywhere, all I see is that like everyone else on here, I posted my own views, and Jo-Anne, who WAS talking directly to me, tried to tear a strip off me, and you suddenly show up and come to her aid. If I didn’t know better, I’d say you must be Mr. Jo-Anne.

  28. Nancy • February 19, 2009 @ 3:20 PM

    Hahahahaha! That’s funny!! LMAO!

  29. Jo-Anne. • February 19, 2009 @ 3:38 PM

    stick around, Jim, it’s sadly always the same story…Nancy posts, Tribute girl agrees to everything she says, someone disagrees with Nancy, Tribute girl starts challenging that person…on and on.

    They can’t tolerate anyone in agreement with myself, hence the rude, but sadly again, expected remarks. I find it amusing how much they try and try and try to point a finger at me, like no one on here can read? ha ha black and white…

    yes, t.g. I was OBVIOUSLY adressing you, as I openly stated for your rude “half a brain” remark. You call it tearing a strip off you, I am now aware of your sensitivity issue here, I simply called it a rude remark. And it is….

  30. tributegirl • February 19, 2009 @ 4:05 PM

    Ug, yes, it is always the same story. On this very article, where did your version of events happen? You know, where you said “Nancy posts, Tribute girl agrees to everything she says, someone disagrees with Nancy, Tribute girl starts challenging that personon and on.”
    My original post had nothing to do with Nancy, or with you, it was just my own personal comment on here. Then you started your usual, annoying picking. And then you started your usual, annoying twisting of words. And then you started your usual, annoying pointing fingers.
    Yes, no kidding that you were addressing me, you said t.g. right in your comment, but your dear little buddy Jim didn’t seem to get that.
    And you are aware of my “sensitivity issue” here? wtf? If you mean I find nasty, lying b*tches such as yourself annoying, then yes, I guess you’d be right.

  31. Jo-Anne. • February 19, 2009 @ 4:33 PM

    are you single handedly trying to insult and attack everyone so they leave this site, save yourself and Nancy? why not just exchange personal info and converse at your pleasure? There is no need to constantly be such a rude confrontational person with everyone that disagrees with you.

    no wonder you have so many issues. Try being nicer.

  32. Nancy • February 19, 2009 @ 4:47 PM

    Open your eyes, Jo. Stop the BS and people won’t have to get “confrontational”. It’s right up above for everyone to read…you were rude to Tributegirl for HER OPINION. You attacked her saying her comment was “petty” and “unnecessary” and “could have been worded nicer”. You don’t have to respond and belittle others comments just because you don’t agree with how they word it. Oh, and then point the finger at Tributegirl for getting “defensive” and “confrontational”.


  33. tributegirl • February 19, 2009 @ 7:12 PM

    No, Jo, I believe Vicki left because of you, My own opinion left because he could dish it out but expected to not have to take it. Much like yourself, but unfortunately YOU won’t leave. Instead, you keep sitting there, continuously stirring the cauldron.
    You expect I won’t get defensive and confrontational with you? Are you really that crazy? What the h*ll is wrong with you? You sound to me like one miserable, lonely, bitter old lady, one who isn’t happy unless she’s being nasty to others, and you’ve picked a few to be particularly nasty with, so if anyone says anything even slightly against us, you can’t help but stick your big nose into it.

    And I want you to explain, right now, what you mean by “no wonder you have so many issues.”. What issues? YOU are the only issue I have on here. What you said was, and I quote the great Jo-Anne, “Extremely offensive and insensitive. And just plain wrong”


  34. Jim • February 19, 2009 @ 7:50 PM

    It is very fitting that tributegirl would use the same insults as Nancy. Tough girls sitting behind a computer.
    Where is Max to ask about the cats? I think tributgirl is running out to get some so she can be more like her idol.

  35. tributegirl • February 19, 2009 @ 9:14 PM

    Ummm, yeah, whatever, Mr. Jo-Anne. That didn’t even make any sense. But I think we just figured out who Max is.
    Btw, what “same insults” did I use, there, Jim? Talk about a toughie sitting behind a computer, you don’t even make any sense, plus you jump on Jo’s bandwagon without having a single clue what you are talking about. I bet she’s standing behind you right now, telling you what to type. Big man.

  36. Jim • February 19, 2009 @ 9:28 PM

    I have no idea who Jo-Anne is nor do I care actually.
    I am beginning to wonder if you and Nancy are not the same person or friends or lovers or something though.
    What was it….woof?? Yup that was it.

  37. Nancy • February 19, 2009 @ 10:10 PM

    Yeah well, “woof” is funny and Jo-Anne knows what it means, LOL and actually, I have absolutely no clue who Tributegirl is outside of Tribute but if you were to take the time (cause I’m not going to do it for you) and archive, then you would see that there have been times that Tributegirl and I have posted at the exact same time. I don’t play that multiple name game, Jimbo…I don’t have to because I say pretty much what I want and unlike some, I don’t care what others think of it! 😉

    Oh, and I have no cats and “tough girls sitting behind a computer”…I’ve said nothing on here that I wouldn’t say to their face, plain and simple..straight up!

  38. Jo-Anne. • February 19, 2009 @ 11:33 PM

    when you’re wrong, you’re REALLY wrong, t.g.

    funny thing, I don’t have to talk to Vicki on here…I see her all the time – she’s my older sister. Yes, I know you have a problem with older people, it is the brunt of your many immature retorts…

    my own opinion was a very intelligent interesting person to chat with, it’s too bad you had to be offensive to him as well

    and who are you kidding – if anyone is bitter and lonely, it is definitely yourself, that comes through every remark you make. I picture you sitting waiting by the computer relishing the next time I respond so you can jump all over it with witty remarks like “woof” and “Mr. Jo-Anne”, so lame.

    And why do you care who jumps on my bandwagon, if indeed they do, you have been riding, chauffering and clinging to Nancy’s bandwagon forever….

    it amazes me how you constantly profess such “what did I do, poor me?” comments, when looking over almost every comment on here, you have tried pathetically to throw childish insults my way. If you can’t grow up, at least provide originality instead of echoing everything Nancy says. Your original post, contrary to your defensive words, had everything to do with Nancy, once again in total echo and also a thinly veiled insult to myself for disagreeing with her. Who are you kidding?

    “woof” – not even remotely funny, actually old hat, however Jim’s “idol” remark…not only true, but hillarious.

    wow, check back over the sites, every time someone agrees with me or has anything rempotely nice to say to me….guess who is there with the claws out? yeah, you two. I may be older than you both, but you two need to find a hobby that requires more maturity than what you display on here.

  39. Kaiya • February 19, 2009 @ 11:44 PM

    My own opinion was confrontational and combative and put everyone down, both posters and Tribute included. The story on here about Terrence Howard, everytime Nancy said something, he/she jumped all over her. Then she would reiterate politely what she was saying and again, he/she was unbelievably rude and confrontational, trying to get Nancy to be rude back. Good for you Nancy, for not taking the bait. And good riddance, My own opinion. I hope you are true to your word and stay away, it seems Tribute was much too lowly for you of such high intelligence. Typos? Oh my god, how freaking awful that you had to endure that. But it’s utter nonsense that there are only typos on the internet. I see them in books and especially in magazines, ALL THE TIME.

  40. Jo-Anne. • February 19, 2009 @ 11:58 PM

    Kaiya, I think you should re-read that. He did absolutely nothing except state his own opinion and tried to get clarification from Nancy. You are way way off the mark here. I can’t believe you are drawing that from his remarks. I do not interpret anything even close to what you are complaining of.

    How was he rude? by asking her to clarify her remarks? By saying his opinion on the article?

    and typos? many many people, including Nancy have commented on those…people get carried away and type fast on here, I do as well and am guilty many times of typos, etc. So, some people find that the articles put on here or in mags, etc. should be proofed better, again so what?

    I found no rudeness at all in his posts, au contraire, I have found Nancy to be confrontational, bullying and offensive for months. To feel proud of yourself because you caused someone to drop off this post is really sad. This is a very small interest for many people, I imagine the ones who pat themselves on the back ’cause he/she is gone now have nothing much else in their lives, which in itself is very unfortunate.

    isn’t everyone entitled to their opinion as much as you or Nancy? and how wonderful it would be that that person wouldn’t be met with insults and name calling when their opinion differed from the two of you…

  41. Alex • February 20, 2009 @ 12:04 AM

    No, Jo-Anne, you reread it. He wasn’t allowing Nancy to have her opinion, he kept trying to goad her. I know Nancy can be confrontational, especially towards you, but in this instance, she came out lily white and he was the bully and confrontational.

    You said “So, some people find that the articles put on here or in mags, etc. should be proofed better, again so what?”

    So it’s nitpicky and annoying. It makes the people who do the nitpicking look small. People who do things like that put others down n order to build themselves up. It shows a lack of self esteem. Pathetic, really. If someone goes through life nitpicking every little detail, they cannot be very happy in their lives.

  42. mandee • February 20, 2009 @ 4:27 AM

    this shouldnt have even been brought up, or fought about in the first place. lol lets stay on topic people, maybe things wont get so out of hand 😛

  43. Jo-Anne. • February 20, 2009 @ 10:26 AM

    Well, Alex I guess we just disagree on this and that is fine…

    everyone has things that they nitpick about in life, I mean just look at these posts – ha ha!! a huge amount of people on here have pointed out typos for months now, and to “nitpick” and single out My Own Opinion is…well, like you say, small.

    it hardly represents “unhappiness in life” ’cause you dislike typos – that is a huge stretch…

  44. Anonymous • February 20, 2009 @ 1:58 PM


  45. Jo-Anne. • February 20, 2009 @ 2:17 PM

    and you….well, you’re anonymous…

  46. mandee • February 20, 2009 @ 2:22 PM

    hmmm…it is you’re lmfao…im just messin with ya 😛 i dont really care lol

  47. Nancy • February 20, 2009 @ 7:46 PM

    Wow Jo…you really like my name don’t ya? I mean 4 times in one post! Hahaha…I knew all along that you knew Vicki, I just didn’t know she was your sister and I really didn’t think there was anyone older than you except for those in ancient tombs! I like being “lily white”. Jo-Anne, you know better…I apologized to you when I was wrong but we all know that I don’t like you anymore than you like me but, for the past couple of weeks things were going pretty good…until you started again…so now you will feel my wrath again and it is a shame that other people who come here to read the comments and post their opinions will have to feel the backlash!

  48. tributegirl • February 20, 2009 @ 8:20 PM

    AAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!! I KNEW there was something between Jo & Vicki! I just never in a million years would have guessed they were SISTERS!!! I thought maybe co-workers at best! Jeez, well, I really liked Vicki and really enjoyed talking to her, it’s too bad she’s the sister that left. At least now we all know that what ever “affliction” Jo has isn’t in her entire family, Vicki was smart and pleasant!
    Oh, btw, Jo, you’d be hard pressed to find any negative comments about age from me anywhere on here, because age doesn’t bother me. My parents are older, so are most of the patients I work with, and I think the world of them.
    I wasn’t offensive with My own opinion, I was DEfensive.
    “woof” and “Mr Jo-Anne” are lame, but weird comments about cats, and “idol” aren’t? You’re off your rocker.
    When did I say anything remotely similar to what did I do, poor me? You don’t make any sense at all.
    wow, check back over the sites, every time someone agrees with me or has anything rempotely (sic) nice to say to me.guess who is there with the claws out? yeah, you. you need to find a hobby that requires more maturity than what you display on here.
    I can’t imagine being foul enough to turn your own sister off this site! Priceless!

  49. Jo-Anne. • February 20, 2009 @ 11:14 PM

    yuor parents are older than you? wow.

  50. Jo-Anne. • February 20, 2009 @ 11:15 PM

    your parents are older than you? wow. impressive.

  51. Jo-Anne. • February 20, 2009 @ 11:46 PM

    and you talk about me being off my rocker, you’re now pointing out other people’s insults, not mine, directed at Nancy and asking me to take offence with those comments?

    for the record, the “idol” comment couldn’t be closer to the truth, it’s not like I haven’t commented time and time again how you are the follower. You repeatedly echo not only agreement, but almost fall over yourself laughing and cheering Nancy on when she spews extremely offensive remarks, yet trash a whole slew of others on here for making what you deem to be insulting remarks to Nancy. Talk about insincere.

    Your attempts to throw a bad light on my relationship with Vicki are, once again, totally expected from yourself and further demonstrate your immaturity and nastiness. Maybe you should throw your energy into your own relationships, hopefully you address them in a better and kinder manner than you exhibit on here.

  52. mandee • February 21, 2009 @ 12:14 AM

    i know this is gonna make me sound stupid, but what exactly does (sic) mean? ive always wondered, but everyone ive ever asked, really has no idea…

  53. Kaiya • February 21, 2009 @ 12:17 AM

    sic = Spelling incorrect.

  54. mandee • February 21, 2009 @ 12:36 AM

    oh !!! thanks so much lol 🙂 i feel better now :)it was REALLY bothering me

  55. Nancy • February 21, 2009 @ 2:22 PM

    Jo-Anne just doesn’t get it…that my “extremely offensive remarks” ARE TO AND ABOUT HER! Tributegirl and I both don’t like her and she knows it…she attacks both us and our comments and then wonders WHY we gang up on her..?? She even tried to blame Kaiya(along with Tributegirl and myself) on the other article in the archives (the one where mandee mentioned getting a new suv) for why ‘My own opinion’ left. Jeeze, lay off! Kaiya hadn’t even commented since the Gina/Stan/Ricky BS until AFTER ‘My own opinion’ said he/she was leaving.

  56. Jo-Anne. • February 21, 2009 @ 9:22 PM

    actualy Nancy, you are dead wrong, there has never been even a shadow of doubt in my mind that your offensive remarks are aimed at me. Rest assured I get it only too well.

    You and t.g. don’t like me you say, yes, you are correct, I know it, the feeling is mutual…isn’t this old news?

    I guess you feel some kind of need to keep reiterating it. Oh well, so be it…

  57. tributegirl • February 21, 2009 @ 9:53 PM

    “I guess you feel some kind of need to keep reiterating it.”
    “its not like I havent commented time and time again”

    “Your attempts to throw a bad light on my relationship with Vicki”
    No bad light thrown on your relationship with your sister, I just said that she is the nice one.

    “your parents are older than you? wow. impressive.”
    uh, yeah…of course they are. I said they are “older”, I didn’t realize I had to add “than me”.

  58. Nancy • February 22, 2009 @ 2:30 PM

    Well Jo-Anne, I feel that I have to keep saying that my “offensive remarks” are AIMED AT YOU because you keep mentioning my “offensive remarks” as though I comment daily offending others…but really it is YOU who draws out the best in me, thus receiving the “offensive remarks”. You also keep speaking of all the comments of mine that Tribute has deleted…really though, they haven’t deleted any more from me than you…

    So, what is your excuse going to be now for blaming Kaiya, along with others, for “bullying yet another” (meaning ‘My own opinion’), when Kaiya hadn’t even been posting comments until AFTER that person said they were leaving? Look in the mirror Jo….look long and hard because believe it or not, you have just as many faults as everyone else!

  59. Jo-Anne. • February 22, 2009 @ 3:33 PM

    I have never had one comment “deleted” Nancy, only “awaiting moderation” which always get posted eventually. And those ones don’t even have anything in them that would warrant any deletion, as is clearly shown when they are posted.

    I have actually seen a number of people on here arguing with you back and forth, and some pretty heated remarks between you and them, I am surprised you would comment as you do in that regard, that it is only me. There are lots to choose from in that area, however I know you have a “special place” for me amongst the crowd…I am honoured. ha ha

    You seem “stuck” on this Kaiya thing…Kayia thought m.o.p. was bullying you and I disagreed with her, yes, I didn’t feel he was, and asked her to clarify, point out where he was doing such. I still feel sorry he went away, I enjoyed his/her comments, felt they were a very respectful person.

    You always seem hellbent on starting something..that’s what I meant by the anger comment before…I can’t even disagree with other people’s comments on here, if they pertain to you in any way, shape or form, or the anger, lashing out starts all over again…

    aren’t you ever satisfied to let something go? Why do you look for things to fight about?

  60. Nancy • February 22, 2009 @ 5:11 PM

    I didn’t look for anything to fight about Jo, you started it as you most always do and you seem to not be “satisfied to let something go” yourself. Weren’t you the one who was preaching on the Terrence Howard article about people not “adding fuel to the fire”? Why don’t you just stop commenting to me and I will to you? That seemed to work for a couple of weeks, didn’t it? Oh, and you would also have to stop putting your snide little remarks in your comments that refer to me without using my name, of course. Hmmm…I also know for a fact, and have witnessed with my own eyes, comments of yours which were deleted…so, don’t even go there!! And I NEVER commented that it is “only” you that I have had “heated arguments” with as you say, but at least you admit that these “heated arguments” went “back and forth” between me AND them…I’ve also had the pleasure of witnessing some “arguing” with you as well…hahaha! Like I said, look in the mirror…at least I don’t claim to be a saint. I have apologized for things I was wrong about and I have admitted to the arguing with you. At least ‘I’ have the guts!

  61. Nancy • February 22, 2009 @ 5:21 PM

    Oh here, I’ll copy and paste your comment for you, Jo-Anne…

    “well, like I said earlier, Kaiya, pat yourselves on the back, you’ve succeeded to bully yet another on here”

    Yeah, it doesn’t make sense to me so…I guess I am “stuck” on it…???

  62. Jo-Anne. • February 22, 2009 @ 5:39 PM

    okay, you’re right, Nancy, that’s what you want to hear no matter what I really think – all you are looking for is confirmation you are right.

    I don’t have time to pour through the many comments posted on here by you over the months and paste them to illustrate my point so…

    you’re right…

    that should satisfy you, I hope.

  63. Nancy • February 22, 2009 @ 6:04 PM

    “Aren’t you ever satisfied to let something go? Why do you look for things to fight about?”


  64. tributegirl • February 22, 2009 @ 7:14 PM

    Actually several of Jo’s comments have been deleted, so saying “I have never had one comment deleted Nancy” is a flat out lie.

  65. Anon • March 3, 2009 @ 9:24 AM


  66. Nancy • March 3, 2009 @ 9:28 AM

    Ok, Anon is me, Nancy. I was testing to see if the *new* mandatory name and mandatory email address would stop people from using multiple names to comment….it was a big FAIL! 😉

Join The Conversation:

Trending Articles

Current Poll

  • What's your favorite Netflix original series?

    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...

You Might Also Like

Close Menu