Oldest Jonas brother not beautiful enough

Nick, Kevin (in the middle) and Joe Jonas in their new series, JonasPeople Magazine‘s “100 Most Beautiful List” comes out in print today and has already caused public outcry. The magazine’s list predictably includes heartthrobs Nick and Joe Jonas, but the last member of the singing trio, Kevin, has unexpectedly been left out. The oldest of the three brothers gets far less media attention than the other two, and People‘s snubbing will push him even farther into the background. Fans of the forgotten brother are already speaking out about the omission, and one has even started a petition to include him on the list, which she plans to send to People‘s editors if she receives more than 50,000 signatures. Other celebrities attractive enough to make the list include Twilight stars Kristen Stewart and Robert Pattinson, Disney actors Zac Efron, Selena Gomez and Demi Lovato, Slumdog Millionaire‘s Freida Pinto and Dev Patel, Harry Potter‘s Emma Watson and American Idol‘s new judge Kara DioGuardi. ~Meryl H.

As seen in issue #396 of Movie Mail Newsletter.

Share this article:

Comments & Discussion

  1. Katrine • May 1, 2009 @ 8:00 AM

    I’m sure he realizes there’s more to life than being in a beautiful people list!

  2. Issac • May 1, 2009 @ 9:18 AM

    Dude they have Chritina Applegate on the Cover..hahah
    that list is Crap..

    they think Dev Patel is cute.. gross
    and Zac efron yes i agree but Kristen Stewart??? she looks like a dyke

    and the oldest jonas is ugly. we all know it ..why not say it

  3. Megan • May 1, 2009 @ 9:59 AM

    Wasn’t Kevin the ONLY Jonas Brother to make the list last year?

  4. Jessie • May 1, 2009 @ 10:41 AM

    Awwww….Im not even a fan of the Jonas Brothers but that was mean, leaving him out. =(

    Really, I think he’s the better looking one anyway.

  5. Monique • May 1, 2009 @ 11:36 AM

    Personally, I think all three are icky looking (so is that guy from Twilight, and Zac) but each to their own.
    If we all liked the same type of look, what a boring, lonely planet we would have.

  6. sparklingwall • May 1, 2009 @ 12:49 PM

    So, all 3 should be included just because they’re brothers? That doesn’t make sense. Even though I don’t agree with the superficial list of “Top Beautiful People” (who follows that, anyway??), it says right there that its about the “Beautiful” people.. Its based on your looks, not the fact that you’re a brotherly trio.

  7. ke • May 1, 2009 @ 5:22 PM

    the only names i agree with are the 2 jonas brothers they mention coz they are good looking, frieda pinto and emma watson. everyone else is on the list because they’re young and ‘in’ right now (except dev patel coz i like him but i wouldn’t call him beautiful – maybe on the inside but this is an appearance thing right?). and is it true applegate is on the cover? she’s pretty yes but the cover? really? yeah, the list sounds like crap this year.

  8. jackie • May 1, 2009 @ 5:32 PM

    obviously this is a popularity contest. Some of the stars are not that good looking and they made it in the 100 beautiful people :S

  9. Arezou Amin • May 1, 2009 @ 6:02 PM

    well, he was in the sexiest men alive issue when the other two weren’t

  10. paul • May 2, 2009 @ 7:21 PM

    And yet all of the trolls from Obama Inc. are included?

    Please let People magazine and its disgusting staff be the next magazine to go under.

  11. Neville A. Ross • May 3, 2009 @ 6:54 AM

    And yet all of the trolls from Obama Inc. are included?

    ‘The trolls from Obama Inc’ are more beautiful than the untalented and overhyped Jonas Bros. It’s a pity that you youngsters don’t have anything better than the idiots to listen to and swoon over (especially considering that there’s a lot of great new music out there with young people that are just as handsome/pretty as these losers that’s a lot better than what these losers play/sing; their version of Steve Winwood’s ‘Higher Love’ is enough to make one barf up their lunch!)

  12. Jo-Anne • May 3, 2009 @ 1:13 PM

    harsh…

    music is such a personal choice, like any form of art…just ’cause their particular music doesn’t make your top ten list it hardly warrants them being labelled “idiots” or “losers”….harsh

  13. lily • May 3, 2009 @ 2:44 PM

    Neville, I am TOTALLY feeling your reaction to the “Obama trolls” comment… just think you didn’t go far enough with the “idiots/losers” judgement of Paul and all who support him.

  14. demigod • May 3, 2009 @ 6:52 PM

    Define ‘beautiful’. It’s been said, it’s an ‘in’ popularity list.

Join The Conversation:

Trending Articles

Current Poll

  • Harvey Weinstein was stripped of his Academy membership. Who should be next?

    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...

You Might Also Like


Close Menu